New Year’s Disgrace

Rebajlo

Mentor
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1,521
Location
N.S.W. - Australia
We aren’t going to see eye-to-eye no matter what. And, however much I indirectly and unintentionally insulted you with some of my posts I think you’ve more than made up for that with your direct attack and insults on me.

In my mind, you fall into the blue-pill category (no offense at all, and I’m sure, none taken) where I’m more of a red-pill person, and they simply don’t see things the same way. So, I can’t see you changing my mind nor me yours. So there’s simply nothing to “debate”. You can mock those terms all you want, it doesn't matter to me.

But, of course, you continue to misconstrue my position on prostitution by comparing me to BoxingSpecialist, so I will have to mention that again. My position remains that it’s probably the most “honest” interaction between the male and female species, considering their default nature. That was simply an observation that I made at a point in time based upon some anecdotal observations in that I’ve gathered from the media as well from human behavior and their primary motivations. It may rub people the wrong way or people may disagree with that and that's fine...it's just my opinion and I'm entitled to it.

So, feel free to state whatever your opinions are on these or any other matters, as always. I’ll may read them, but if you direct them at me expecting me to respond, I won’t.

Heretic said:
You can speculate and hysterically rant like an unhinged madman all you want and pat yourself on the back for it, but that's all it is. You are probably used to bullying people into submission if they don't agree with you but those tactics don't work on me, but feel free to continue to try...and that doesn't make me a "tough guy". You still don't know me, no matter how much you try to convince yourself or others, but you certainly seem obsessed. I've had women obsessed with me before but never a man.

I’m actually pretty happy and content, for the most part…nothing's perfect, but I'm healthy, financially stable, in decent physical shape. etc. I have very few worries and am enjoying life. You’re the one ranting and raving over very inconsequential stuff. I hope everything is OK with the wife.

I know insulting people or speaking with an air of condescension, not only to me, but to others here at CF, is a staple of yours, but it doesn't really matter to me as you're the one that comes off looking poorly for doing it. I owe you no explanations and I offer no apologies for any perceived slight. I have my opinions and I will state them as long as I'm welcome here, in good health, and they fall within the guidelines of this site. Nothing of what you say that you think will get to me does. If you understood red-pilled people, you’d understand that. On cue, feel free to mock.

One more thing...I'm not the only one that posts here almost daily, many people do. There are some great posters here and I've learned a lot of new things from them. I appreciate the time they take to do it. It replaces much of the time I previously spent reading or watching some television. Impugning me with that statement impugns them as well. But, again, you can’t see that because you are simply too obtuse to notice.

Heretic -

Firstly, if you haven’t already done so, please read my response to Don above. (EDIT: i.e. at the bottom of the previous page)

I’m not misconstruing anything and understand the essence of the specific “observation” you are presenting. But you and BoxingSpecialist both like to reduce the entire male-female relationship to the primitive models of a provider and a recipient, a host and a parasite, and - ultimately - a de facto client and a de facto whore. In your own words, “everything else is pretty much ‘window dressing’ that we call ‘civilisation’”. Damn that pesky civilisation, eh?

The next thing you know, you’ll be claiming that you don’t harbour extremely negative opinions about women…

F#@k, I made a couple of posts critical of you and your oh-so-precious, oh-so-original “opinions” and that makes me obsessed? With you? Yeah, you’re a really important fellow - the undisputed intellectual leaven of the men’s rights movement, a towering figure of global significance, & etc…

Women have been obsessed with you before, have they? Oooh, aren’t you the “popular” boy who’s the envy of all others. I’ll bet you’ve had heaps and heaps of girlfriends, haven’t you. But who needs women anyway, eh? It’s far better to “choose” to be alone, isn’t it…

Sure, I know naff all about the minutiae of your personal life. Nor do I give a sh!t about you or whatever supposedly “enjoyable” life you lead. But for the purpose of the current discussion, am I perchance incorrect in my assumption that you’re “single”? Am I? Really?

Don’t despair, for an answer is neither requested or required. But put it this way: if you happened to be in a stable, loving relationship, then you wouldn’t be - how can I couch it? Oh, I know - bitterly obsessed with feminism, morality, and the apparent complete lack of women suitable for marriage throughout the entire Western world. You certainly wouldn’t be bemoaning the dearth (or alleged absence) of attractive females on the streets you walk and in the places you visit.

By the way, everything is fine with my lady. Thanks for asking. Awfully thoughtful of you. Less than a month until Valentine’s Day. Commercialised tawdriness at its worst but nevertheless a good bit of fun. I’ve already arranged to take the day off work, even purchased a gift or two. How’s everything with your woman..? Do you have anything planned? Oops, sorry, how beastly insensitive of me…

The “tough guy” phrase is merely something I’ve always habitually dropped in as a light, humorous pejorative. I was already using it as a teenager here in Australia during the mid-1980s but it was later made famous by “The Jerky Boys”:


The geezer who uploaded the above video irritatingly superimposed that stupid face over Johnny Brennan’s appearances in the scenes. Anyway, you weren’t to know all of that so I don’t blame you for taking it literally.

So, insulting people and speaking with an air of condescension is a staple of mine, is it. Is the advancement of opinions which aren’t always congruent with mainstream “alt-right” thought insulting and condescending? Maybe asking people to provide evidence (oh, my!) to back up their assertions is an insult? How about making lengthy posts which methodically outline specific, interconnected facts to substantiate my own arguments? Pure arrogance, I guess…

Perhaps you thought I was being patronising when I asked if you cared to name a few White players who were “serving a racial apprenticeship” in the Championship or whether you have ever followed the English lower divisions?

http://castefootball.us/index.php?threads/off-season-transfers-2017.36149/#post-704011

I must have been so f#@king condescending that you opted not to answer both of those questions. Yes, that must have been it, mustn’t it. Please forgive me as I inexplicably slip into my customary “condescension” yet again…

Was I being unforgivably rude when I disparaged that prize-winning idiot CrazyFinn following his cordially generous proclamation that non-Germanic and non-Nordic Whites have made next to no contributions to science? Yeah, I was obviously the ignorant and discourteous party there as well.

Heretic said:
One more thing...I'm not the only one that posts here almost daily, many people do. There are some great posters here and I've learned a lot of new things from them. I appreciate the time they take to do it. It replaces much of the time I previously spent reading or watching some television. Impugning me with that statement impugns them as well. But, again, you can’t see that because you are simply too obtuse to notice.

Nice try. I visit the forum a couple of times a week. You seem to post several times a day. Both are facts, are they not? I was only emphasising that you aren’t - how did you put it? - “living in my head” and certainly wasn’t “impugning” any other member, regardless of post count or frequency.

Heretic said:
This is not an apology, but simply a personal disclaimer if I should make, or in the past have ever made, a general observation about females or women. It is sincere.

Personal Disclaimer:
My statement does not in any way apply to any female poster on this site, sympathetic female lurker, or any female that is an immediate or extended family member or relative of a poster on this site, dead or alive. Nor does it in any way pertain to any girlfriend of any. In addition, this statement applies to any male poster that is currently going through a transitioning process to become female, tranny or anything in-between that may be construed to be female or if you have any immediate or extended family member or relative that is transitioning to become female. Nor does it in any way pertain to any girlfriend of any such circumstance.

I wanted to be explicitly inclusive on that because I don't know what folk's personal situation is or that of their extended relatives or family members.


I encourage others to come up with their own personal disclaimers on any subject matter they feel others may take personal offense to, even if it’s a general observation, which implies that there are always exceptions and not meant to apply to any particular individual. We should do all we can to make sure this a “safe space” for all participants no matter how near or far they are, dead or alive.

I’ll also include a PSA (Public Service Announcement), for good measure, to balance things out:
“Censorship is a slippery slope”

"Uproarious" stuff. As I said, don’t forget to add “great sense of humour” to your online dating profiles.

Who mentioned censorship? Simply keep in mind that not everyone will always agree with your precious opinions.

In this case, if you hadn’t made that idiotic remark about the “crotch-grab test” (which I’m sure you thought was awfully witty…) in addition to the “Western sluts” and “almost mandatorily when they turn 12 years old” clauses I would have merely read your post, chuckled silently, shaken my head, thought “here he goes again”, then moved on to the next newest thread.

All in all, I reckon you’re the one who requires a “safe space” - free of females, of course. Strictly red-pilled “single” men only. Hang on, if you’re not reading this at work or in a public place you’re already sitting in a female-free “safe space” right now, aren’t you…
 
Last edited:

Extra Point

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
6,289
Well, one thing's for sure. The anti-whites have done everything they can to turn white men and white women against each other. Divide and conquer, divide and rule. They've been working at this for decades and, unfortunately, have had some success.

We need to reverse this division between white men and white women. It will take time, just as it took time to create this situation.
 

Heretic

Master
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
3,261
Heretic -

Firstly, if you haven’t already done so, please read my response to Don above. (EDIT: i.e. at the bottom of the previous page)

I’m not misconstruing anything and understand the essence of the specific “observation” you are presenting. But you and BoxingSpecialist both like to reduce the entire male-female relationship to the primitive models of a provider and a recipient, a host and a parasite, and - ultimately - a de facto client and a de facto whore. In your own words, “everything else is pretty much ‘window dressing’ that we call ‘civilisation’”. Damn that pesky civilisation, eh?

The next thing you know, you’ll be claiming that you don’t harbour extremely negative opinions about women…

F#@k, I made a couple of posts critical of you and your oh-so-precious, oh-so-original “opinions” and that makes me obsessed? With you? Yeah, you’re a really important fellow - the undisputed intellectual leaven of the men’s rights movement, a towering figure of global significance, & etc…

Women have been obsessed with you before, have they? Oooh, aren’t you the “popular” boy who’s the envy of all others. I’ll bet you’ve had heaps and heaps of girlfriends, haven’t you. But who needs women anyway, eh? It’s far better to “choose” to be alone, isn’t it…

Sure, I know naff all about the minutiae of your personal life. Nor do I give a sh!t about you or whatever supposedly “enjoyable” life you lead. But for the purpose of the current discussion, am I perchance incorrect in my assumption that you’re “single”? Am I? Really?

Don’t despair, for an answer is neither requested or required. But put it this way: if you happened to be in a stable, loving relationship, then you wouldn’t be - how can I couch it? Oh, I know - bitterly obsessed with feminism, morality, and the apparent complete lack of women suitable for marriage throughout the entire Western world. You certainly wouldn’t be bemoaning the dearth (or alleged absence) of attractive females on the streets you walk and in the places you visit.

By the way, everything is fine with my lady. Thanks for asking. Awfully thoughtful of you. Less than a month until Valentine’s Day. Commercialised tawdriness at its worst but nevertheless a good bit of fun. I’ve already arranged to take the day off work, even purchased a gift or two. How’s everything with your woman..? Do you have anything planned? Oops, sorry, how beastly insensitive of me…

The “tough guy” phrase is merely something I’ve always habitually dropped in as a light, humorous pejorative. I was already using it as a teenager here in Australia during the mid-1980s but it was later made famous by “The Jerky Boys”:


The geezer who uploaded the above video irritatingly superimposed that stupid face over Johnny Brennan’s appearances in the scenes. Anyway, you weren’t to know all of that so I don’t blame you for taking it literally.

So, insulting people and speaking with an air of condescension is a staple of mine, is it. Is the advancement of opinions which aren’t always congruent with mainstream “alt-right” thought insulting and condescending? Maybe asking people to provide evidence (oh, my!) to back up their assertions is an insult? How about making lengthy posts which methodically outline specific, interconnected facts to substantiate my own arguments? Pure arrogance, I guess…

Perhaps you thought I was being patronising when I asked if you cared to name a few White players who were “serving a racial apprenticeship” in the Championship or whether you have ever followed the English lower divisions?

http://castefootball.us/index.php?threads/off-season-transfers-2017.36149/#post-704011

I must have been so f#@king condescending that you opted not to answer both of those questions. Yes, that must have been it, mustn’t it. Please forgive me as I inexplicably slip into my customary “condescension” yet again…

Was I being unforgivably rude when I disparaged that prize-winning idiot CrazyFinn following his cordially generous proclamation that non-Germanic and non-Nordic Whites have made next to no contributions to science? Yeah, I was obviously the ignorant and discourteous party there as well.


Nice try. I visit the forum a couple of times a week. You seem to post several times a day. Both are facts, are they not? I was only emphasising that you aren’t - how did you put it? - “living in my head” and certainly wasn’t “impugning” any other member, regardless of post count or frequency.

"Uproarious" stuff. As I said, don’t forget to add “great sense of humour” to your online dating profiles.

Who mentioned censorship? Simply keep in mind that not everyone will always agree with your precious opinions.

In this case, if you hadn’t made that idiotic remark about the “crotch-grab test” (which I’m sure you thought was awfully witty…) in addition to the “Western sluts” and “almost mandatorily when they turn 12 years old” clauses I would have merely read your post, chuckled silently, shaken my head, thought “here he goes again”, then moved on to the next newest thread.

All in all, I reckon you’re the one who requires a “safe space” - free of females, of course. Strictly red-pilled “single” men only. Hang on, if you’re not reading this at work or in a public place you’re already sitting in a female-free “safe space” right now, aren’t you…
Heretic -

Firstly, if you haven’t already done so, please read my response to Don above. (EDIT: i.e. at the bottom of the previous page)

I’m not misconstruing anything and understand the essence of the specific “observation” you are presenting. But you and BoxingSpecialist both like to reduce the entire male-female relationship to the primitive models of a provider and a recipient, a host and a parasite, and - ultimately - a de facto client and a de facto whore. In your own words, “everything else is pretty much ‘window dressing’ that we call ‘civilisation’”. Damn that pesky civilisation, eh?

The next thing you know, you’ll be claiming that you don’t harbour extremely negative opinions about women…

F#@k, I made a couple of posts critical of you and your oh-so-precious, oh-so-original “opinions” and that makes me obsessed? With you? Yeah, you’re a really important fellow - the undisputed intellectual leaven of the men’s rights movement, a towering figure of global significance, & etc…

Women have been obsessed with you before, have they? Oooh, aren’t you the “popular” boy who’s the envy of all others. I’ll bet you’ve had heaps and heaps of girlfriends, haven’t you. But who needs women anyway, eh? It’s far better to “choose” to be alone, isn’t it…

Sure, I know naff all about the minutiae of your personal life. Nor do I give a sh!t about you or whatever supposedly “enjoyable” life you lead. But for the purpose of the current discussion, am I perchance incorrect in my assumption that you’re “single”? Am I? Really?

Don’t despair, for an answer is neither requested or required. But put it this way: if you happened to be in a stable, loving relationship, then you wouldn’t be - how can I couch it? Oh, I know - bitterly obsessed with feminism, morality, and the apparent complete lack of women suitable for marriage throughout the entire Western world. You certainly wouldn’t be bemoaning the dearth (or alleged absence) of attractive females on the streets you walk and in the places you visit.

By the way, everything is fine with my lady. Thanks for asking. Awfully thoughtful of you. Less than a month until Valentine’s Day. Commercialised tawdriness at its worst but nevertheless a good bit of fun. I’ve already arranged to take the day off work, even purchased a gift or two. How’s everything with your woman..? Do you have anything planned? Oops, sorry, how beastly insensitive of me…

The “tough guy” phrase is merely something I’ve always habitually dropped in as a light, humorous pejorative. I was already using it as a teenager here in Australia during the mid-1980s but it was later made famous by “The Jerky Boys”:


The geezer who uploaded the above video irritatingly superimposed that stupid face over Johnny Brennan’s appearances in the scenes. Anyway, you weren’t to know all of that so I don’t blame you for taking it literally.

So, insulting people and speaking with an air of condescension is a staple of mine, is it. Is the advancement of opinions which aren’t always congruent with mainstream “alt-right” thought insulting and condescending? Maybe asking people to provide evidence (oh, my!) to back up their assertions is an insult? How about making lengthy posts which methodically outline specific, interconnected facts to substantiate my own arguments? Pure arrogance, I guess…

Perhaps you thought I was being patronising when I asked if you cared to name a few White players who were “serving a racial apprenticeship” in the Championship or whether you have ever followed the English lower divisions?

http://castefootball.us/index.php?threads/off-season-transfers-2017.36149/#post-704011

I must have been so f#@king condescending that you opted not to answer both of those questions. Yes, that must have been it, mustn’t it. Please forgive me as I inexplicably slip into my customary “condescension” yet again…

Was I being unforgivably rude when I disparaged that prize-winning idiot CrazyFinn following his cordially generous proclamation that non-Germanic and non-Nordic Whites have made next to no contributions to science? Yeah, I was obviously the ignorant and discourteous party there as well.



Nice try. I visit the forum a couple of times a week. You seem to post several times a day. Both are facts, are they not? I was only emphasising that you aren’t - how did you put it? - “living in my head” and certainly wasn’t “impugning” any other member, regardless of post count or frequency.



"Uproarious" stuff. As I said, don’t forget to add “great sense of humour” to your online dating profiles.

Who mentioned censorship? Simply keep in mind that not everyone will always agree with your precious opinions.

In this case, if you hadn’t made that idiotic remark about the “crotch-grab test” (which I’m sure you thought was awfully witty…) in addition to the “Western sluts” and “almost mandatorily when they turn 12 years old” clauses I would have merely read your post, chuckled silently, shaken my head, thought “here he goes again”, then moved on to the next newest thread.

All in all, I reckon you’re the one who requires a “safe space” - free of females, of course. Strictly red-pilled “single” men only. Hang on, if you’re not reading this at work or in a public place you’re already sitting in a female-free “safe space” right now, aren’t you…
Yeah, from your long, mad ramblings, it’s obvious I’m in your head. Come Valentine’s Day, try to focus strictly on your wife and leave me out, otherwise she may become suspicious.

The “crotch-crab test” reference was facetious, obviously. I understand humor can be subjective and sometimes falls flat, but one would have to be pretty obtuse to think I was serious and then get all bent out-of-shape and belabor the issue. I’m sure there are some “honey do’s” you could be checking off your list instead of going on about that.

Like I mentioned in an earlier post, red pill and blue pill just don’t mix, it’s like trying to mix oil and vinegar, using an analogy an obtuse person might understand. It also doesn't mean you don't have relationships with women, it's just that you don't do it with blinders on. Modern Western society is littered with broken men because of that. So, you can try to mock and personally insult (your trademark) all you want, it falls flat and is just irrelevant.

I’m sure once you get some more of those “honey do’s” checked off your list, you’ll grace us once again with your constructive dialogue, knowledge and wisdom in a week or two - because it really exudes charm and attracts many new posters to the site as well as continuing to encourage existing posters to keep posting on various subjects whenever they like.
 
Last edited:

Rebajlo

Mentor
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1,521
Location
N.S.W. - Australia
Yeah, from your long, mad ramblings, it’s obvious I’m in your head. Come Valentine’s Day, try to focus strictly on your wife and leave me out, otherwise she may become suspicious.

The “crotch-crab test” reference was facetious, obviously. I understand humor can be subjective and sometimes falls flat, but one would have to be pretty obtuse to think I was serious and then get all bent out-of-shape and belabor the issue. I’m sure there are some “honey do’s” you could be checking off your list instead of going on about that.

Like I mentioned in an earlier post, red pill and blue pill just don’t mix, it’s like trying to mix oil and vinegar, using an analogy an obtuse person might understand. It also doesn't mean you don't have relationships with women, it's just that you don't do it with blinders on. Modern Western society is littered with broken men because of that. So, you can try to mock and personally insult (your trademark) all you want, it falls flat and is just irrelevant.

I’m sure once you get some more of those “honey do’s” checked off your list, you’ll grace us once again with your constructive dialogue, knowledge and wisdom in a week or two - because it really exudes charm and attracts many new posters to the site as well as continuing to encourage existing posters to keep posting on various subjects whenever they like.

Guffaw! Guffaw! Aren’t you the witty one. Those lamentably feeble attempts at “humour" fall flatter than a constipated female Samoan figure skater, so do yourself - and everyone else - a favour and stick to the repetitive moaning because you aren’t even remotely funny.

Yes, the “crotch-grab test” was obviously a poor attempt at laddish facetiousness. Yet the sentiment behind it was unambiguous. How about “Western sluts” taking the pill “almost mandatorily when they turn 12 years old”? Why don’t you just be honest and drop the flimsy pretence of being a fellow who hasn’t got an axe to grind against the female half of the species and who’s merely been driven to distraction by the hostile modern social environment.

Long, mad ramblings? Let’s see…

My second last post was a response to Don. You know, the administrator who runs and funds this site. Don had tactfully articulated his disapproval of my abrasive tone towards you so I had both the natural courtesy and dialectic requirement to provide a comprehensive response. I delineated the innate origins of my own disdain for the very concept of feminism and also expressed my base contempt for whining wimps who do nothing but complain about the lack of “decent” women “on the market”. I also explained part of the reason for my incivility vis-a-vis you in this thread, namely - the fact that I had twice tried to raise similar issues with you in the past but had been ignored on both occasions. That sort of thing…

’Twas only natural that I used one of your past posts as an example…isn’t it? Contrary to what you proudly maintain, you are not “in my head”. I couldn’t care less about the likes of you, who are a dime a dozen out there in Internet Land. We just happen to be currently engaged in a conversation of sorts. Strikingly stupid statements tend to stick in the memory. And that specific quotation - particularly the bit about Prince Harry - was both phenomenally moronic and conveniently germane to the discussion.

Let me guess - you’re one of those “broken men” who litter Western society. What happened? Did some “bitch” clean you out in a divorce? Or did she - like every other “slut” - eventually jettison you due to certain recurring shortcomings? Is that when you became - to use the annoying little buzzword you delight in employing - “red pilled”?

Just when one might believe that you couldn’t possibly look more wretched…you’re now trying to ridicule me for actually being in a relationship by way of your juvenile little “honey do” comments. Haw! Haw! That really is a good wheeze. Read on…

The modern world can certainly be a droll place. Society’s lowest strata of "permanently single" born losers, habitual failures, nutless milksops, borderline psych-ward cases, and miscellaneous rejects who would have had to hide their ugly, envious faces in tomato-hued shame during the “good old days” they ironically yearn for now form online “subcultures” to try to validate their own miserable existences and inflate their limp egos by collective therapeutic derision of those who lead the lives they would love to lead themselves - if only they didn’t lack the tools to do so. The contemptible non-entities who were always ridiculed for not having wives and girlfriends now attempt to invert the paradigm and mock the majority of men who are in “normal” relationships.

Take you, for instance, Mr. Men’s Rights Activist. You smugly believe yourself to be some sort of ultra-perspicacious and enlightened being whose masterful comprehension of the deepest arcana of the male-female emotional nexus is infinitely superior to that of the ignorant “blue-pilled” masses you delight in sneering at. You pitifully endeavour to invert the natural paradigm of derision by convincing yourself that you aren’t a lonely loser. Instead, the loser is someone like me, who is in a relationship and must therefore - in your spiteful eyes - be on a leash and forever ticking off a list of “honey do’s” (honestly, from where do you source such idiotic terms…). If you cannot have something yourself, then it mustn’t be worth having. For some strange reason, Aesop springs to mind...

The concept of entering and maintaining relationships “without blinders on” is not a recent, earth-shattering discovery made by “scholars” such as you and the bloggers from whom you derive most of your “original” thoughts. ’Tis nothing more than a combination of common sense and instinct, yet you and your ilk theatrically elevate and over-intellectualise basic astuteness to the point of psychosis. Probably because you’ve been screwed over due to a lack of the very discernment you tiresomely brag about possessing…

I reside in the same world as you do. I’m in a happy, loving, long-term relationship with a lady who is not a feminist and who - despite leftist indoctrination at university - was never a feminist. I’ve never been divorced. I’ve never had to pay “alimony”. I’ve never had to pay “child support”. That must make me a f#@king supra-genius-level superhero in the MGTOW Universe of red pill munchers - the equivalent of Batman, Superman, Shazam, and Black Adam all rolled into one. And all without the help of physically, emotionally, and intellectually impotent bloggers posting from their female-free but porn-packed flats strewn with male authored self-help books, men’s health magazines, medicine jars rattling with pecker-stiffening pills, and crumpled brochures advertising the miraculous benefits of hair-replacement drugs.

By all means, keep posting about various subjects whenever you like. I don’t believe my very sporadic posts have somehow curtailed the exchange of ideas nor have they discouraged potential new members from signing up and having their say. As I stated previously, not everyone is obliged to agree with your opinions, particularly if you choose to express them in a boorish manner.

Sure, I sometimes pose “problematic” questions that people mightn’t been overly keen to answer. For instance, if a ******** artist tries to run his mouth about the lower divisions in England when it is painfully apparent that he doesn’t know what he is talking about, I’ll ask him for details to substantiate his claims. What a heinous crime. Disrupting paeans to Hitler, the Wehrmacht, and Nazi Germany with “tricky” questions about, let’s say, Generalplan Ost? Guilty as arraigned. Pointing out that Eurasians aren’t White? Yes, ‘twould appear I’m an ill-natured and divisive figure, to be sure…

Who knows, maybe today will be a red letter day and you might catch a rare glimpse of an attractive and feminine woman.

Now, if only there was a red pill you could swallow that would expand your vocabulary by at least one synonym for “obtuse”…
 

Heretic

Master
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
3,261
Guffaw! Guffaw! Aren’t you the witty one. Those lamentably feeble attempts at “humour" fall flatter than a constipated female Samoan figure skater, so do yourself - and everyone else - a favour and stick to the repetitive moaning because you aren’t even remotely funny.

Yes, the “crotch-grab test” was obviously a poor attempt at laddish facetiousness. Yet the sentiment behind it was unambiguous. How about “Western sluts” taking the pill “almost mandatorily when they turn 12 years old”? Why don’t you just be honest and drop the flimsy pretence of being a fellow who hasn’t got an axe to grind against the female half of the species and who’s merely been driven to distraction by the hostile modern social environment.

Long, mad ramblings? Let’s see…

My second last post was a response to Don. You know, the administrator who runs and funds this site. Don had tactfully articulated his disapproval of my abrasive tone towards you so I had both the natural courtesy and dialectic requirement to provide a comprehensive response. I delineated the innate origins of my own disdain for the very concept of feminism and also expressed my base contempt for whining wimps who do nothing but complain about the lack of “decent” women “on the market”. I also explained part of the reason for my incivility vis-a-vis you in this thread, namely - the fact that I had twice tried to raise similar issues with you in the past but had been ignored on both occasions. That sort of thing…

’Twas only natural that I used one of your past posts as an example…isn’t it? Contrary to what you proudly maintain, you are not “in my head”. I couldn’t care less about the likes of you, who are a dime a dozen out there in Internet Land. We just happen to be currently engaged in a conversation of sorts. Strikingly stupid statements tend to stick in the memory. And that specific quotation - particularly the bit about Prince Harry - was both phenomenally moronic and conveniently germane to the discussion.

Let me guess - you’re one of those “broken men” who litter Western society. What happened? Did some “bitch” clean you out in a divorce? Or did she - like every other “slut” - eventually jettison you due to certain recurring shortcomings? Is that when you became - to use the annoying little buzzword you delight in employing - “red pilled”?

Just when one might believe that you couldn’t possibly look more wretched…you’re now trying to ridicule me for actually being in a relationship by way of your juvenile little “honey do” comments. Haw! Haw! That really is a good wheeze. Read on…

The modern world can certainly be a droll place. Society’s lowest strata of "permanently single" born losers, habitual failures, nutless milksops, borderline psych-ward cases, and miscellaneous rejects who would have had to hide their ugly, envious faces in tomato-hued shame during the “good old days” they ironically yearn for now form online “subcultures” to try to validate their own miserable existences and inflate their limp egos by collective therapeutic derision of those who lead the lives they would love to lead themselves - if only they didn’t lack the tools to do so. The contemptible non-entities who were always ridiculed for not having wives and girlfriends now attempt to invert the paradigm and mock the majority of men who are in “normal” relationships.

Take you, for instance, Mr. Men’s Rights Activist. You smugly believe yourself to be some sort of ultra-perspicacious and enlightened being whose masterful comprehension of the deepest arcana of the male-female emotional nexus is infinitely superior to that of the ignorant “blue-pilled” masses you delight in sneering at. You pitifully endeavour to invert the natural paradigm of derision by convincing yourself that you aren’t a lonely loser. Instead, the loser is someone like me, who is in a relationship and must therefore - in your spiteful eyes - be on a leash and forever ticking off a list of “honey do’s” (honestly, from where do you source such idiotic terms…). If you cannot have something yourself, then it mustn’t be worth having. For some strange reason, Aesop springs to mind...

The concept of entering and maintaining relationships “without blinders on” is not a recent, earth-shattering discovery made by “scholars” such as you and the bloggers from whom you derive most of your “original” thoughts. ’Tis nothing more than a combination of common sense and instinct, yet you and your ilk theatrically elevate and over-intellectualise basic astuteness to the point of psychosis. Probably because you’ve been screwed over due to a lack of the very discernment you tiresomely brag about possessing…

I reside in the same world as you do. I’m in a happy, loving, long-term relationship with a lady who is not a feminist and who - despite leftist indoctrination at university - was never a feminist. I’ve never been divorced. I’ve never had to pay “alimony”. I’ve never had to pay “child support”. That must make me a f#@king supra-genius-level superhero in the MGTOW Universe of red pill munchers - the equivalent of Batman, Superman, Shazam, and Black Adam all rolled into one. And all without the help of physically, emotionally, and intellectually impotent bloggers posting from their female-free but porn-packed flats strewn with male authored self-help books, men’s health magazines, medicine jars rattling with pecker-stiffening pills, and crumpled brochures advertising the miraculous benefits of hair-replacement drugs.

By all means, keep posting about various subjects whenever you like. I don’t believe my very sporadic posts have somehow curtailed the exchange of ideas nor have they discouraged potential new members from signing up and having their say. As I stated previously, not everyone is obliged to agree with your opinions, particularly if you choose to express them in a boorish manner.

Sure, I sometimes pose “problematic” questions that people mightn’t been overly keen to answer. For instance, if a ******** artist tries to run his mouth about the lower divisions in England when it is painfully apparent that he doesn’t know what he is talking about, I’ll ask him for details to substantiate his claims. What a heinous crime. Disrupting paeans to Hitler, the Wehrmacht, and Nazi Germany with “tricky” questions about, let’s say, Generalplan Ost? Guilty as arraigned. Pointing out that Eurasians aren’t White? Yes, ‘twould appear I’m an ill-natured and divisive figure, to be sure…

Who knows, maybe today will be a red letter day and you might catch a rare glimpse of an attractive and feminine woman.

Now, if only there was a red pill you could swallow that would expand your vocabulary by at least one synonym for “obtuse”…
One would think that with marriage rates at all-time lows, divorce rates at all-time highs and birth rates at all time lows in the West the problem just may be systemic.

But statistics matter not to those with obtuse natures…instead, just make it personal to some random poster on a red-pill site like Caste Football that he disagrees with and to hell with everything else. That will certainly help solve the systemic problems in the West now, won’t it.

“Lonely”, “Bitter”, “Loser”, “Alone”, "Can't get laid"…sounds like what a typical poster on Jezebel.com would write as those are typically used by the man-hating feminists as “shaming tactics” against men that won’t give them the attention they feel they “deserve”...or won't buy into their prescribed bulls*t.

I never said you were a “loser” because you were married. Only one-dimensional immature personalities like yourself insult people and use middle-school jargon like that and then pretend like it’s some great feat of prose. You’re the one slinging the personal insults, not me. I'm glad you are happily married and that it's working out for you.

I must be honest though that over the past few months, I have seen a slightly higher percent of attractive females lately that aren’t hideously obese, covered with tattoos or both with awful attitudes. It’s been an pleasant unexpected surprise. Hopefully it continues to move in that direction. Having pleasant feminine attractive women in a society or culture is a big plus, and actually necessary for its survival. Enabling or excusing them when they are not is not helpful. They should be the ones called out and shamed, not those people that take notice of it.

“Blonde in the Belly of the Beast” stated it as well as it could be stated recently, as reality exists today in the West. It’s good to hear a red-pill (truthful) take by an attractive (alt-right), intelligent, articulate and aware blonde that actually understands what's going on and has put down the rose-colored glasses:


Glad to see you were able to fit in a post of consequence though outside of your rambling, irrelevant, personal vendetta.
 
Last edited:

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
I'm glad you are happily married and that it's working out for you.

From what I can recall, in nearly 10 year that Rebajlo has been posting here, he's never stated that he was "married," only that he was in a "long-term relationship" with his "lady." The term "wife" was never employed. I could be wrong.

Despite his expansive, sometimes-presumptuous, and comically-abusive "tirades" (mostly against trolls, but sometimes against fantastic posters such as yourself), he brings an atypical and diverse perspective to CF in that he is half-Polish, half-English, speaks multiple European languages, appears to have traveled to numerous countries in Europe, and lives in Australia. As such, he is able to observe anti-white happenings in his portion(s) of the "Anglosphere" and also read of our observations here in the U.S.
 

Booth

Master
Joined
Jul 23, 2015
Messages
2,073
I will admit to two things, I like reading Rebajlo posts and I don't know a third of what he is talking about. Yes I am an uneducated redneck and have trouble understanding a lot of the posts on here, but the ones I do, I enjoy. So Rebajlo just relax, you don't have to be right all the time, besides when you dead and gone nobody will remember you in a year.
 
Last edited:

Rebajlo

Mentor
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1,521
Location
N.S.W. - Australia
One would think that with marriage rates at all-time lows, divorce rates at all-time highs and birth rates at all time lows in the West the problem just may be systemic.

But statistics matter not to those with obtuse natures…instead, just make it personal to some random poster on a red-pill site like Caste Football that he disagrees with and to hell with everything else. That will certainly help solve the systemic problems in the West now, won’t it.

“Lonely”, “Bitter”, “Loser”, “Alone”, "Can't get laid"…sounds like what a typical poster on Jezebel.com would write as those are typically used by the man-hating feminists as “shaming tactics” against men that won’t give them the attention they feel they “deserve”...or won't buy into their prescribed bulls*t.

I never said you were a “loser” because you were married. Only one-dimensional immature personalities like yourself insult people and use middle-school jargon like that and then pretend like it’s some great feat of prose. You’re the one slinging the personal insults, not me. I'm glad you are happily married and that it's working out for you.

I must be honest though that over the past few months, I have seen a slightly higher percent of attractive females lately that aren’t hideously obese, covered with tattoos or both with awful attitudes. It’s been an pleasant unexpected surprise. Hopefully it continues to move in that direction. Having pleasant feminine attractive women in a society or culture is a big plus, and actually necessary for its survival. Enabling or excusing them when they are not is not helpful. They should be the ones called out and shamed, not those people that take notice of it.

“Blonde in the Belly of the Beast” stated it as well as it could be stated recently, as reality exists today in the West. It’s good to hear a red-pill (truthful) take by an attractive (alt-right), intelligent, articulate and aware blonde that actually understands what's going on and has put down the rose-colored glasses:


Glad to see you were able to fit in a post of consequence though outside of your rambling, irrelevant, personal vendetta.

Heretic -

Please accept my apologies for the four month delay in replying to your post. I’m sure you and everyone else here shall understand that the exigencies of life can ofttimes curtail one’s participation in online fora.

You are surely aware that tabloid newspapers in the UK purposely sensationalise the most disgusting behaviour of the most dysfunctional elements of the White “lower classes”. It will come as no surprise that the Daily Star “newspaper” from which the images in the titular post were sourced is owned by a Jew, Richard Desmond. It’s quite astonishing that “racially aware” Whites who can apparently detect even the most subtle anti-White bias in the sports sections still credulously believe that the blatantly transparent, cherry-picked propaganda of anti-White cultural and racial demoralisation delivered by tabloid “publications” somehow reflects the behaviour of the majority of young Whites, particularly White women. But I guess people are in the habit of drawing conclusions which conveniently affirm their accepted worldviews…

As I readily conceded in my initial post, the UK has a far higher than average proportion of females who regularly make pigs of themselves. That’s as undeniable as it is embarrassing. But consider the following…

How would you react if the Daily Star or any other worthless tabloid decided to publish photos of drunken Russian teens and twenty-somethings sprawled out across sidewalks? How about photos of young Russian females reeling about in a state of inebriated semi-undress? Would you consequently assume that this is the societal norm in Russia? Or would you indignantly denounce the material as vicious anti-Russian propaganda whose aim is to distort perceptions of Russian youth and is therefore obviously not an accurate reflection of “the responsible majority”? I believe we both know the answers to the above questions, don’t we now…

Like I said in my opening post, socially and economically debilitating alcoholism is far - and I mean far - more rampant in eastern Europe and Russia than it is in the UK, western Europe, North America, and Australia.

Firstly, people are much more likely to turn up to work under the influence of alcohol, which logically results in reduced productivity, impaired efficiency, and an increased risk of mishaps and accidents. For example, in January a Warsaw tram driver ran a man over while drunk on the job. The man died instantly. Back in 2014, another tanked-up Polish tram driver went through a red light and killed three women in Lodz.

In March of this year, an inebriated female paramedic arrived to treat an elderly heart attack victim in a place called Drzewica (which, I discovered, lies about halfway between Lodz and Radom - not that this would mean anything to you). The patient died. The said paramedic was 45 years old, so we’re not talking about a youthful “party animal” in her early twenties but a supposedly experienced, middle-aged woman working in an occupation which demands maximum professionalism, maturity and social responsibility. Can you see what I’m getting at?

Secondly, widespread chronic alcoholism prevents people from either entering into or remaining within the workforce. Russia and eastern Europe are full of idle lifelong drunks who dwell in frighteningly subhuman conditions and are content to exist on comparatively meagre social security benefits because they desire nothing more than to swill cheap booze. The alt-right bloggers and Putin encomiasts tend to omit such details from those glowing accounts of their ingenuously idealised visions of a Russia that is the “last hope” of the White race (God help us…). ’Tis hardly a surprise as next to none of them have ever actually set foot in Russia, Ukraine, Poland, or any other west or east Slavic nation. You know, those countries from which the “natives” have eagerly been emigrating to the “rotten” Anglosphere for generations, with no sign of the trend abating…

You are whippet quick to collectively condemn young British women as feckless drunks, yet - like the alt-right bloggers and MGTOW fraternity - you choose to overlook Russia’s ingrained culture of widespread alcohol dependence. That’s part of what I meant about ignoring those little inconvenient truths which don’t quite correspond with your preferred ideological paradigm.

Permit me to pause at this juncture to acknowledge that yes, the forces of “feminism”, “Cultural Marxism”, “tolerance”, and just about everything else are indeed arrayed in full battle panoply against heterosexual (that is, normal…) White men. I’ve always been unambiguously clear on that point, so I’d be grateful if you don’t attempt to claim otherwise.

Read my previous posts in this thread. I have never stated that feminism isn’t a civilisational blight on every level. But I simply cannot stand the sub-culture of constant whining victimhood to which many White men - particularly “racially aware” White men - subscribe. The MGTOW and Men’s Rights keyboard pounders claim to possess a profoundly comprehensive understanding of the female psyche which - paradoxically - leaves them forever mired in bitter misery and crushing loneliness. They ceaselessly extol all of that ridiculous “alpha male” ********…yet live the lives of cowardly wimps, the leitmotif of their “erudition” being frustrated powerlessness in the face of apparently insurmountable external misandristic forces. That’s nothing more than pathetic excuse making by people who expect to fail and who convince themselves that it’s therefore pointless to expend any effort in the pursuit of what they conveniently believe is a doomed cause.

“Strangely” enough, I’d never heard of jezebel.com - probably because I don’t waste time trawling through useless crap which clogs the arse pipes of the internet. Several seconds after clicking on that link you embedded, I closed the tab with a bemused shake of my head. Don’t tell me you actually visit such sites for “investigative” purposes…

“Middle-school jargon”, eh? How about we replace “losers” with “appalling non-achievers in the arena of male-female amatory relations”…

I, of course, can never even dream of emulating the transcendent virtuosity with which you wield the English language. My limited “middle school” vocabulary doesn’t include such sophisticated terms as “honey do”, which is obviously part of the very “grown up” MGTOW argot to which - due to circumstances very much within my own control - I am thankfully not privy. Your use of “honey do’s” might reasonably be construed as an attempt to mock me for being in a relationship, might it not? But as you have stated that this was not your intention, I’m quite happy to take your word for it.

It’s heartening to hear that you are lately seeing a slightly higher percentage of attractive females. I guess I struck a jackpot by being born in Australia, for I see beautiful women all over the place…

Tattoos have been discussed on a number of occasions and there’s even a thread dedicated to the cursed things somewhere in the Happy Hour vaults. Tattoos utterly repulse me, particularly those of the high volume “sleeve” variety. The latter make their bearers look like inhuman (or subhuman…) creatures straight out of nightmare. Why anyone - let alone a female - would wish to disfigure themselves in such a manner is beyond me.

I haven’t mentioned this before on Caste Football, but I am a lifelong aficionado of rockabilly music, fashion, and culture. My hatred of prominent tattoos is therefore compounded by the fact that “ink” has somehow become an integral component of modern neo-rockabilly subculture. The said subculture is replete with devastatingly beautiful, alluringly attired women whose magnificent, rectitude-shattering bodies are straight out of a f###ing pin-up by Bill Ward, George Petty, or Coop - but whose eye-popping physical charms are unfortunately marred by a practical ubiquity of unsightly tattoos.

Rambling, irrelevant personal vendetta?

Hmmm. Er, right. Mayhap, in your scoffing indignation, you “overlooked” a thing or two. Would you perchance care to offer an observation about the comparative rates of chronic alcoholism in Russia - the utopian home of the brave, the beautiful, and the good - and the dastardly, deplorable, and degenerate UK? Don’t be shy, now. By all means, please share your views upon the drinking habits of the saintly, temperate Russians and “eastern Europeans”, which must surely be infinitely more sensible than those of the backward “West”.

The topic of this thread was, after all, public drunkenness. I’ve certainly addressed the subject in my posts. You, on the other hand, appear to be avoiding the undeniable fact that the incidence of hazardous and harmful alcoholism is far greater in Russia and eastern Europe than it is in the UK…

Ah, yes - there’s nothing quite as inconvenient as the truth, is there…

Thrashen said:
From what I can recall, in nearly 10 year that Rebajlo has been posting here, he's never stated that he was "married," only that he was in a "long-term relationship" with his "lady." The term "wife" was never employed. I could be wrong.

Despite his expansive, sometimes-presumptuous, and comically-abusive "tirades" (mostly against trolls, but sometimes against fantastic posters such as yourself), he brings an atypical and diverse perspective to CF in that he is half-Polish, half-English, speaks multiple European languages, appears to have traveled to numerous countries in Europe, and lives in Australia. As such, he is able to observe anti-white happenings in his portion(s) of the "Anglosphere" and also read of our observations here in the U.S.

Thrashen -

I’m glad that someone has actually been paying attention to what I write. You’re not wrong, as I’ve never married but have now been in a monogamous relationship for eleven years. Who knows? Perhaps my lady and l shall marry sooner than later…

My ancestry isn’t quite as simple as half-Polish and half-English, for the latter “half” includes a very substantial Celtic strain which encompasses Wales, Scotland, Ireland and Cornwall. Let’s just say I’m 100% Australian. ;)
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
Secondly, widespread chronic alcoholism prevents people from either entering into or remaining within the workforce. Russia and eastern Europe are full of idle lifelong drunks who dwell in frighteningly subhuman conditions and are content to exist on comparatively meagre social security benefits because they desire nothing more than to swill cheap booze. The alt-right bloggers and Putin encomiasts tend to omit such details from those glowing accounts of their ingenuously idealised visions of a Russia that is the “last hope” of the White race (God help us…). ’Tis hardly a surprise as next to none of them have ever actually set foot in Russia, Ukraine, Poland, or any other west or east Slavic nation. You know, those countries from which the “natives” have eagerly been emigrating to the “rotten” Anglosphere for generations, with no sign of the trend abating…

Very nice overall post, but this paragraph really stood out. I follow a far-right cartoonist from Norway who uses the handle "Boatsinker" and he's constantly bemoaning that "Eastern Europe is our version of Mexico." Whenever one checks the demographics of various Scandinavia nations, Eastern Europeans (particularly Poles) seem to always constitute the highest non-native population of people in any given nation. It seems like these people are perceived by native Scandinavians with only a slightly higher esteems than African/Muslim rapefugees. Perhaps the rampant alcoholism among the lower class of Eastern Europeans is one reason for their intense resentment?
 
Top