um no, you have to prove it, this site is filled with plenty of evidence of White speedsters that don't get a shot or are switched to other distances.
I don't believe that. It may happen in cases, but if some white is able to win at that distance, he'll get a shot. Just playing with blacks, there are two things where they are generally superior to whites.
I would say number one, even more than speed, a considerably higher percentage of blacks is able to jump high. That's just my observation, playing basketball with them.
Second, they are generally a little quicker. I do think this difference is exaggerated, but I also believe it's real.
Whites are superior at pretty much everything else, as I know from reading and from paying attention in the real world. These two areas of deficit they can mostly make up for in other ways, but in straightforward, nothing-else sprinting over a short distance, you will find a lot more blacks making the fastest times. That's what we see. I don't think racial discrimination is enough to account for reality.
Your proof is that 40 blacks in the entire world have run sub 10 in the past couple of decades?
My point was a quick search of the fastest 2013 100m sprint times seemed to show almost all blacks making those times, though I didn't look at all the names. All the ones I checked were blacks.
Not to mention Bolt is juiced to the gills, all of the previous guys who had ridiculous times turned out to be cheaters, but Bolt is somehow clean? Christophe LeMaitre (White) broke the 10 second barrier, but look at his frame compared to all of the blacks that have broken it. I won't deny that many Whites probably juice for other sports like football, I just don't see it with the White sprinters I have seen.
Maybe...but I don't see any proof. It's not like whites have any problem with cheating - see all white bicylists, starting with Armstrong. I'd agree they're a little less likely to cheat, see steroids in baseball, but plenty of them juiced there when it was the going thing.
All I'm asserting is (west african) blacks do have some genetic advantage in sprinting. What I've read tracks with what I've seen myself playing sports.
check out 40 yard dash times, which are often changed anyway to make Whites look slower like Hillis going from 4.58 to 4.64. I see the raw speed, when I see guys like Jordy Nelson and Riley Cooper beat black dbs with ease, and then I see Calvin Johnson, supposedly the fastest wr get caught from behind by a White safety , Heath, who is said to be lacking speed.
I agree with this - functional speed, whites are underrated. I was discussing pure speed on the track. There's a reason blacks win all the 100m races, it's not racial discrimination. Until someone proves otherwise. Pointing to a couple examples where guys are shifted to other races, or saying "they're all using steroids" - I doubt it very much.
I guess just like Matt Giordano who was able to catch up with Devin Hester whose 100 meter dash was 10.6, same as Jordy Nelson. Only one starter has a faster 100 meter dash, Jamaal Charles, 10.3 or 10.4, the only guys who have come close to going sub 10 are midgets like Trindon Holliday who is 5'5 and Jeff Demps who is pretty thin and just a special teams player as well. Both continued track in college. Imagine if Jordy Nelson had continued track like Demps, Hollliday or Charles (yes Nelson's time was in high school). Or a rb like Jake Sharp who you've probably never even heard of because he got screwed over, who also ran a 10.6 and a 4.3 at his pro day, 1200 yards from scrimmage his junior year at KU, one day at the Bears camp and let go.
There's 6x as many whites as blacks in the US, so you shouldn't have to rely on a few anecdotes. The whites you mention like Nelson are succeeding just fine. That suggests that others that aren't fail for non-racial reasons.
Way I see it, NFL is trending toward higher IQs, which result in stabler behavior on and off field, and that alone will favor whites. Even the blacks that succeed - they usual have whiter names (Richard Sherman) and more behavioral control (I don't consider Sherman's response to Andrews' question thuglike or inappropriate).
This is what I can't stand about racists like you, you automatically assume that since Whites are better on IQ tests, smarter, able think faster etc on average etc. that they must be lacking somewhere else, that there must be some advantage the black man must have with his low IQ. This is the same line of thinking most liberals have, the media etc. They just don't come out right and say it. Same with a lot of coaches as well. Id say 99 percent of them.
I know exactly what you mean - but I don't think that way. I would LOVE to believe whites are as fast as blacks. Or could jump as high. But I don't. Because of what I've seen first-hand with my own eyes, with no jew in between me and what was going on, offering a queered interpretation.
It's roughly 100x easier to discriminate against whites in football than in track. If you can run the 100m faster than anyone, who can stop you? You're not part of a team. Any track coach will take you.
You're letting what you want to believe drive your opinion, rather than the facts.
Notice how they WANT ALL OF their black qb prospects to be RUNNERS and they talk about athleticism, because deep down they know they can't get it done as pocket passers. Out of all of the ones pushed into the league, only Warren Moon has had success. The same reason they don't give White running qbs a chance, they only want to be a black thing, or believe Whites can't do it. Tebow ran the same 40 yard dash as LeGarrete Blount, but was always knocked for his speed, when it was around what most powerbacks run, yet he was a qb, with faster shuttle and 3 cone drill times, agility. And that is much easier to prove, that Whites have better quickness and coordination than blacks.
I know all that and have written about it many times. But the media are owned and operated by jews, and they hate christians. Even a jew writer suggested Tebow was blackballed. I personally have never in 47 years seen anyone who did what he did with Denver be unable to find a starting job. That goes to background whispers among the jew owners, in my opinion. But I know caste football is not so open to the jew explanation, or maybe I'm wrong. I don't like christianity at all, I think it's the worst thing that ever happened to our race. But Tebow was fantastically exciting to watch. And I guarantee you if he had been black, the jews at ESPN would have howled nonstop until he had a new starting job. But didn't I already say all this in the article? The very title shows you what I think.
Yes, absolutely: the jews controlling the US have promoted the idea of the QB of the future - who is always black and what they call mobile. They can't ever make this a reality because blacks can't think well enough to read defenses, and they end up getting smashed. They might pull off some success for a few years a la Michael Vick, but they certainly aren't changing the position. It will always be dominated by people like Brady and Manning who aren't fast but can think. But QBs with an ability to run in spots can certainly do well, white or mulatto (Kaep and Wilson) or black. The position will always put a premium on quick thinking and good judgment, and those are qualities whites more often possess than non-whites.
What good is straight line speed if you can't cut without losing a significant amount of speed? Most speedy black receivers round out their routes which makes it easier for a db to make an interception, which gets blamed on the WHITE quarterback. So when it comes to football, it doesn't really matter, there is only one route that involves going straight down the field, and rarely is a rb going to get a hole straight up the middle without having to make a cut.
Perhaps that's why the smarter coaches like Belichick seem to be realizing that it's the guys like Welker and Edelman who are the where the gold lies. I'd bet anythign Belichick would admit this in private...if you gave him truth serum.
Not too long ago, it was absurd to think of even a legit White heavyweight contender in boxing, now Whites own the division.
Yeah, now boxing is "dead" - the second a white PhD takes the heavyweight division. Can only laugh at these jews at ESPN.
So because Whites aren't on the top 100 meter list right now means nothing.
No, it means something. Your standard of proof ought to be higher than your real opinion. Have you observed whites generally being faster than blacks in real life? I haven't. I've observed blacks are generally faster. Just as they're generally dumber, more obnoxious, more violent. I don't doubt the last three, why would I doubt the first?
Produce some white who can run 100m faster than any black. Or who claism he's been discriminated against?
Sprinting would be about the hardest single sport to sustain racial discrimination in because all you're doing is...running in a straight line. Habeas runnerus, so to speak: produce these runners who are being discriminated against who can run these sub-10 100s? They aren't there. They don't exist.
Maybe if more were interested in it weren't changed to different distances we would see the same thing. For most high school Whites I have encountered, sprinting is merely a 2nd or 3rd sport to them, not something to move up in the world in. I am not a track expert, I coach football, so perhaps read more by those who are into track, like I said, lots of info on here
.Frankly, I find sprinting to be boring.why is the 100 meter the end all is what I have questioned, why not 250 to 300 meters, which is the farthest the human body can go all out before lactic acid completley builds up in the body?
Because anything longer is an endurance test, rather than a speed test. In real-life situations where you have to employ running to get away, the issue is settled within 100 yards. Anything longer than that, it might as well be a competition to scale Everest or something. When you say who is fastest, that's what it means: over a 100 yards or 200 yards, not miles and miles. Longer than one lap around a track is some other competition, endurance like I say.
so why is the 100 meter dash proof that blacks are faster? because less than 100 blacks have broken the 10 second barrier as opposed to 1 White?
Because blacks are the large majority at the top of every 100m list I've ever seen, has nothing to do with 10s or time. Show me these whites you say exist who can beat the top blacks. I don't see them. I say they don't exist.
think about the event, what else in life does it apply to? anything? where else will they be sitting on the blocks, in a track stance with track shoes for exactly 100 meters in a straight line? Lemme guess, blacks are taller, have bigger dicks and can jump higher as well? right? even though the average black in the hood is probably like 5'6 and can't outrun overweight White policemen. Save that nonsense garbage for stormfront.
Blacks aren't taller than whites. Nor do they have bigger dicks - that is a media-propagated myth. But they are faster than whites at springs. I don't know stuff longer than a mile.
Sorry I called into question the great honor of your opinion and implied that actual evidence is more compelling.
See...I don't care what you think. Name names. Show me these whites who can beat these top blacks. Or, show me these whites who are discriminated against. Get me their quotes.
You can't. Because they exist in your head and nowhere else.
