there is a big difference between 10.60 and 10.20
similarly 9.80 and 9.58
and the difference is sarms .
do you no see what i am spelling out that these times are not
possible without them , steroids would never be able to do this .
and would never be giving steroids to a younger athlete especially
if under 18 , do more bad than good .
it is not an issue of steroids ,this steroids that ,
it is an issue of how peds use has evolved in the sprints ,
the fact that using them now at such younger age to avail of benefit
such a 10.60 athlete might never get close to low 10,s but with sarms
if done correctly and young enough ,it is a reality , that is the difference between them and plain old
steroids slash hormones ,these sprinters are nearly you could say heavily manufactured for better want of words .
do you no see what i am spelling out.
big difference . still expected to swallow that it is as clean as ever
but could say that less morality than ever , with younger athletes and ped use
et cetera ,so on so forth
might laugh if i say that senior bolt was on the smelling salts from as young as 16
but when see it happening with other sprinters then not so ,