Is Aaron Rogers a homosexual?

[bearclaw500]

Rumors are circulating on the internet that Aaron Rogers has sugar in his gas tank. I am not sure what to think. I find it strange for a man who makes millions that he would have a room mate. He also brought this guy to the ESPY's. That seems a bit strange to me.... but on the other hand I know how the homo's are pulling out all stops to get acceptance, especially with the use of professional athletes.

 

[wile]

Pics all over the net of his girlfriend, a decent looking gal if I may say so. Cubs player Mark Grace lived with his chicky but became good friends with a local reporter and for some reason that dude moved in, no rumors there. If I would say its more like a personal assistant type thing. Its not like the GBP have never had "gay" players they most certainly have, and both were and are as tough as nails football players.

 

[GiovaniMarcon]

Black males seem to be way, WAY more into being on the downlow than any other people. As in, they'll be really homophobic in some contexts, but in a different time and place they are total fruits. This, among other things, might be one reason why so many Black people spread AIDS around.

Anyway if Rogers is a *** I don't want to know or hear about it. I don't believe in faggotry nor do I think it's right, but if he's gay he's gay and there's nothing any of us can do about it. His sex life is his business and as long as doesn't make it a focal point of everything he says in public (like most **** do), I will continue to see him as a good example of an elite White athlete.

Having said all that, I don't think he's even actually gay. It's just rumors.

Which brings me to another thing. All these media outlets gossiping about him being a *** as if it's some kind of juicy tidbit of trash talk.

Wait a minute... I thought that "being gay didn't matter" anymore?

People are trying to "out" him because, like it or not, people simply know instinctively that there's something wrong with being gay.

When it is FASHIONABLE to accept it, such as "supporting" some effeminate White actor or singer, the media goes full on Richard Simmons with their ball-licking.

But when it comes to supporting a strong, powerful, dominant and masculine White male, people go "ooh I caught you, neener neener neener" as if there are different standards for different people.

And there ARE different standards for different people.

It's OKAY for the media to gaybash Aaron Rogers, because he's a White dude.

Had he been BLACK, maybe there would still be interest in him being a puffer, but none of it would be nearly as negative as the sh*t being talked about Rogers, and if it did get to that point, the race card would be pulled again and again.

If Rogers is a ***, great, good luck with that, I don't want to know. Just play football and STFU.

 

[goyim]

Pics all over the net of his girlfriend, a decent looking gal if I may say so. Cubs player Mark Grace lived with his chicky but became good friends with a local reporter and for some reason that dude moved in, no rumors there. If I would say its more like a personal assistant type thing. Its not like the GBP have never had "gay" players they most certainly have, and both were and are as tough as nails football players.

http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/24340876/packers-qb-aaron-rodgers-tackles-internet-rumors-im-not-gay

That settles that.

The Marxist media wants to make all friendships between men seem questionable so that men avoid them completely. There is nothing that can't be accomplished by men forming friendships and alliances, white men especially. This is why the white man makes for the best soldier. There is no war we cannot win with our collective cooperation. Us Americans fought on the wrong side of World War II, but we won it nonetheless because of it.

Marxists are terrified by the idea of male cooperation and comradery because if we exercised it to its fullest, their heads would be on stakes planted on our front lawns.

I have no idea how the Rodgers gay rumors got started. Packers GM Ted Thompson is a far more suspect case in that regard.

 

[Fortitud3]

Its a weird fetish.

Recently there was rumors Sean Avery a hockey player is gay because he is friends with a gay, but people had this weird fetish of wishing an active player would come out and because it would be somehow cool.

I have no idea how its cool, but they usually respond with "less competition." Really? Less than 1% of the population is gay, but the American public thinks its much much higher, with a lot of Americans thinking its close to 30%.

 

[jaxvid]

Us Americans fought on the wrong side of World War II, but we won it nonetheless because of it.

We should have fought alongside the Japanese? ;-)

I have no idea how the Rodgers gay rumors got started. Packers GM Ted Thompson is a far more suspect case in that regard.

Professional athletes are perpetual teenagers. With the millions they make and the tremendous amount of off time they have you can expect them to live a life of arrested development unless some adult thing happens early on--like marriage.

Now remember what life was like when you were a teenager? Probably had one real good friend you hung out with, played video games with, went to bars with, b.s. about girls with. A lot of the time him or you slept over on the couch in the basement or on the floor. Get up the next day and do the same thing. If it wasn't for school and nagging parents you and your best bud would probably be fooling around on Madden or shooting baskets in the driveway, drinking beer, hitting on chicks, all the time.

Now take one of the buddies, give him millions of dollars and 6 months of nothing to do. What would happen? Joint research on a cure for cancer? Attempt to find a unified field theory? Uh-no. Unlimited fooling around like an endless summer. That's all it sounds like is what happened with Rodgers and his friend. He's dated girls at different times but hangs out with his BFF. This is a complete non-story started by that wretch of a human being Perez Hilton.

 

[goyim]

We should have fought alongside the Japanese? ;-)

Old Japan was terrifyingly amoral and brutal. Hitler knew the eventual fate of Europe, however.

Professional athletes are perpetual teenagers. With the millions they make and the tremendous amount of off time they have you can expect them to live a life of arrested development unless some adult thing happens early on--like marriage.

Now remember what life was like when you were a teenager? Probably had one real good friend you hung out with, played video games with, went to bars with, b.s. about girls with. A lot of the time him or you slept over on the couch in the basement or on the floor. Get up the next day and do the same thing. If it wasn't for school and nagging parents you and your best bud would probably be fooling around on Madden or shooting baskets in the driveway, drinking beer, hitting on chicks, all the time.

Now take one of the buddies, give him millions of dollars and 6 months of nothing to do. What would happen? Joint research on a cure for cancer? Attempt to find a unified field theory? Uh-no. Unlimited fooling around like an endless summer. That's all it sounds like is what happened with Rodgers and his friend. He's dated girls at different times but hangs out with his BFF. This is a complete non-story started by that wretch of a human being Perez Hilton.

Excellent points all around. Can't say that I wouldn't do the same thing in the same situation.

Perez Hilton projects his filthy sodomite pathologies onto everyone he possibly can, as sodomites typically do.

 

[Ieroner]

I'm gay and this pisses me off. The media wants so badly for there to be a big-name mainstream athlete who is openly gay that they will clutch at any little straw that suggests even the outside possibility that a guy might be gay. It's not unlike how the media wants so badly for a black quarterback to become one of the NFL's record-breaking, elite, wins-more-than-one-superbowl QBs that they over-hype black college QBs.

None of this does any good in the long-run though. Grasping at straws for a gay athlete only serves to annoy the "accused" athletes and probably make them feel uncomfortable about their male friendships, which is a real shame. I feel bad for Aaron Rodgers' roommate. Before all this, he was getting to hang out with his friend and even attend important events. Now Rodgers is probably going to subconsciously distance himself from his friend, which sucks for both guys.

Overhyping black quarterbacks just makes them look extra foolish if they ultimately fail and doesn't do anything at all to advance the agenda of liberals who want a consistently winning, elite black QB. Seeing all of these black guys turn out to be busts or merely game manager quality is bound to eventually have an effect on how NFL coaches draft their QBs, which means that someday in the future, if there is a genuinely deserving black QB who has the potential to be "the next Peyton Manning", coaches might shy away from him because of all the prior black busts who got more praise than they deserved. They're hurting their own agenda.

Furthermore, if a football player was gay, shouldn't coming out of the closet as a gay athlete be his choice? Maybe there is a gay athlete out there who doesn't want to take on the mantle of all the liberals and LGBT movement's hopes, dreams, and expectations? Maybe he just wants to play good football and not be a distraction to his team? Maybe he doesn't want to be anybody's poster boy? Is it really fair to try to anoint someone as some kind of gay football savior (even if he is gay) if he personally has no interest in the job?

I'm sure someday there will be a major NFL player who is gay and out of the closet, and I'm sure someday there will be a black QB who deserves to be mentioned in the same sentence as the elite whites of the present and past. I just wish the media had enough patience to wait for the right guy to come along rather than lusting after him every year and trying to find him where he's nowhere to be found.

 

[jaxvid]

Furthermore, if a football player was gay, shouldn't coming out of the closet as a gay athlete be his choice? Maybe there is a gay athlete out there who doesn't want to take on the mantle of all the liberals and LGBT movement's hopes, dreams, and expectations? Maybe he just wants to play good football and not be a distraction to his team? Maybe he doesn't want to be anybody's poster boy? Is it really fair to try to anoint someone as some kind of gay football savior (even if he is gay) if he personally has no interest in the job?

I think I read somewhere the "gay" media was arguing this point (with itself I guess) about stop forcing and outing people if being gay was not supposed to be a big deal. However the amount of publicity that can be generated by real or phony outings is too much for guys like Perez Hilton to resist. Hell I clicked on a link to his site for this issue, how can they ignore the chance to generate so much traffic? It's pandering to the worst instincts of human nature. This type of thing probably drives the superfluous self announcements of being gay, why give someone else the publicity?

 

[PamelaOC]

Sorry, but there never will be a black quarterback as good as Peyton Manning. The biological differences in intelligence are just too great. With the average black IQ being one full standard deviation below the average white IQ, that means that geniuses by black standards are the equivalent of whites who are merely smart, smart blacks are the equivalent of average whites, average blacks are the equivalent of dim-witted whites, etc. Since intelligence is such an important factor in what makes a great QB, the best black quarterbacks will be at the same level as decent white quarterbacks, decent quarterbacks by black standards will be the equivalent of marginally passable white quarterbacks, etc. There are plenty of "glamorous" positions where blacks are capable of doing well, such as running back or wide receiver. But the Marxist desire to push blacks into the most glamorous position of all - QB, combined with black eagerness to snap up any glory, will ensure a steady stream of unqualified blacks flowing into the QB position.

Whites can produce Manning, Brady, Brees, Luck. Blacks come back with...Cam Newton? Whites produce Kepler, Einstein, Curie, Darwin. Blacks come back with...Neil deGrasse Tyson? (BTW, that Tyson guy is overrated and overexposed to a level that even the Cam Newtons don't match. OK, some black dude is good, or good enough, at science. We get it. We don't need it waved in our face every 15 seconds).

 

[jaxvid]

Sorry, but there never will be a black quarterback as good as Peyton Manning. The biological differences in intelligence are just too great. With the average black IQ being one full standard deviation below the average white IQ, that means that geniuses by black standards are the equivalent of whites who are merely smart, smart blacks are the equivalent of average whites, average blacks are the equivalent of dim-witted whites, etc. Since intelligence is such an important factor in what makes a great QB, the best black quarterbacks will be at the same level as decent white quarterbacks, decent quarterbacks by black standards will be the equivalent of marginally passable white quarterbacks, etc. There are plenty of "glamorous" positions where blacks are capable of doing well, such as running back or wide receiver. But the Marxist desire to push blacks into the most glamorous position of all - QB, combined with black eagerness to snap up any glory, will ensure a steady stream of unqualified blacks flowing into the QB position.

I guess it's not impossible, but the percentages, as you aptly stated make it extremely unlikely. The main problem is that the real smart black guys are not the best athletes. Blacks are selected for athleticism, then they (sometimes) pick out one with a decent IQ and put him at the QB spot. Any black that is Peyton Manning smart will have looked at the odds of having a pro QB career and instead opt for one of the many Harvard-Yale scholarships given exclusively to black people in a field where they can make good money.

I have mentioned before, in my experiences playing HS football in Detroit at the end of the White people era, at that point the schools were mostly black so most of the teams were. But none had a black QB. They would find some White kid that could throw and make him do it. The coaches just felt that it would be too hard to teach a full offense to a black kid. And in those days there was a whole lot of rote learning of plays. From what I have seen of football plays today it seems a lot simpler. Let me also say that no black kid wanted to play QB because they knew there was no future in it. Not until there were only black kids in HS's and then the colleges started to use them as QB's (and now the pros') did that all change. But they are always going to put the best black athlete at the QB position, the White kid doesn't have to be a great athlete, but he's always a smart kid.

 

[Carolina Speed]

Sorry, but there never will be a black quarterback as good as Peyton Manning. The biological differences in intelligence are just too great. With the average black IQ being one full standard deviation below the average white IQ, that means that geniuses by black standards are the equivalent of whites who are merely smart, smart blacks are the equivalent of average whites, average blacks are the equivalent of dim-witted whites, etc. Since intelligence is such an important factor in what makes a great QB, the best black quarterbacks will be at the same level as decent white quarterbacks, decent quarterbacks by black standards will be the equivalent of marginally passable white quarterbacks, etc. There are plenty of "glamorous" positions where blacks are capable of doing well, such as running back or wide receiver. But the Marxist desire to push blacks into the most glamorous position of all - QB, combined with black eagerness to snap up any glory, will ensure a steady stream of unqualified blacks flowing into the QB position.

Whites can produce Manning, Brady, Brees, Luck. Blacks come back with...Cam Newton? Whites produce Kepler, Einstein, Curie, Darwin. Blacks come back with...Neil deGrasse Tyson? (BTW, that Tyson guy is overrated and overexposed to a level that even the Cam Newtons don't match. OK, some black dude is good, or good enough, at science. We get it. We don't need it waved in our face every 15 seconds).

Good post PamelaOC. I was just about to make similar statements. Not much more to add.

 

[Lew]

I honestly wouldn't care if he were gay. I'm 100% certain that it's genetic. There were homosexuals before the cultural revolution of the 1960s and they tried their best to live normal lives. They weren't getting married, trying to adopt kids, holding parades, acting flamboyant, or campaigning for special rights. They knew they were dealt a bad hand in life and they just tried their best to deal with it like men.

 

[Carolina Speed]

I honestly wouldn't care if he were gay. I'm 100% certain that it's genetic. There were homosexuals before the cultural revolution of the 1960s and they tried their best to live normal lives. They weren't getting married, trying to adopt kids, holding parades, acting flamboyant, or campaigning for special rights. They knew they were dealt a bad hand in life and they just tried their best to deal with it like men.

If being homosexual is genetic, then why do most homosexuals go back and forth between being with the same sex some of the time and then being with the opposite sex some of the time? It seems to me that they are making their own choice on what they want to do.

 

[Ieroner]

If being homosexual is genetic, then why do most homosexuals go back and forth between being with the same sex some of the time and then being with the opposite sex some of the time? It seems to me that they are making their own choice on what they want to do.

I can't speak for every homosexual out there, but I certainly didn't choose to be gay. I'm attracted to women, always have been ever since I had any attraction to anybody. Even years and years of prayer didn't change that. It's not a choice, and the majority of gay folks never flip flop back to being straight once they've come out...not sure where you heard that from. I know dozens of gay people, both male and female, and not one of them ever went back to the opposite sex. I'm sure it happens from time to time but it's certainly not common.

Sorry, but there never will be a black quarterback as good as Peyton Manning. The biological differences in intelligence are just too great. With the average black IQ being one full standard deviation below the average white IQ, that means that geniuses by black standards are the equivalent of whites who are merely smart, smart blacks are the equivalent of average whites, average blacks are the equivalent of dim-witted whites, etc. Since intelligence is such an important factor in what makes a great QB, the best black quarterbacks will be at the same level as decent white quarterbacks, decent quarterbacks by black standards will be the equivalent of marginally passable white quarterbacks, etc. There are plenty of "glamorous" positions where blacks are capable of doing well, such as running back or wide receiver. But the Marxist desire to push blacks into the most glamorous position of all - QB, combined with black eagerness to snap up any glory, will ensure a steady stream of unqualified blacks flowing into the QB position.

Oh, I agree about the intelligence thing. I guess I was just giving it the benefit of the doubt and thinking that at some point one of them would get lucky and happen to win the black genetic lottery and have what it takes. Maybe I'm wrong--but either way, the main thing I'm concerned with is the media trying to force it to happen when the talent is just not there.

 

[jaxvid]

I can't speak for every homosexual out there, but I certainly didn't choose to be gay. I'm attracted to women, always have been ever since I had any attraction to anybody. Even years and years of prayer didn't change that. It's not a choice, and the majority of gay folks never flip flop back to being straight once they've come out...not sure where you heard that from. I know dozens of gay people, both male and female, and not one of them ever went back to the opposite sex. I'm sure it happens from time to time but it's certainly not common.

I don't think it's common to "switch". Certainly in the olden days people faked it because there was no other option. Now why bother? But it's not unheard of. Probably pretty rare for men but it's very common for women. I'm surprised you aren't aware of the strange phenomenon of late life lesbianism. There have been quite a few Hollywood actresses that have gone from a life of normal relations to men to suddenly taking up with women. There's the one from sex and the city, and one recently who pissed off gay advocates by saying she had always liked men but now was in love with the women she was with (can't think of her name). Anne Heche is the gold standard of lesbo switcheroo going from Ellen Degeneres back to men. Lindsay Lohan is another one time lesbo that switched teams. I guess you could call them bi-sexual but what is that but the option/choice to switch?

 

[Carolina Speed]

I can't speak for every homosexual out there, but I certainly didn't choose to be gay. I'm attracted to women, always have been ever since I had any attraction to anybody. Even years and years of prayer didn't change that. It's not a choice, and the majority of gay folks never flip flop back to being straight once they've come out...not sure where you heard that from. I know dozens of gay people, both male and female, and not one of them ever went back to the opposite sex. I'm sure it happens from time to time but it's certainly not common.


I obviously don't know you, but I don't believe you. I here it from homosexuals all the time, from the flaming guy who wants to get with another guy and another woman at the same time, to a guy that's married and says he likes to have anal sex. Unfortunately, I have to deal with some homosexuals in my occupation and I here it in the gym as well. I'm sorry, you can call me what you want, but there is something sick about a man dipping his wick in another man's @$$! Does Jerry Sandusky ring a bell to you? There would not have been any children raped at Penn St. if Sandusky wasn't homosexual or chose to act on his weakness for boys!

I'm a happily married man and am attracted to women (only) also. I see lots of good-looking women all the time and deal with many women in my profession, but I make a choice to not cheat on my wife. There's always temptation, but you do have a choice to do what's right and what's wrong.

I may agree somewhat that it's becoming less common for homosexual's to go back to the opposite sex, but that's because our sick society is becoming more accepting of it.

Society is becoming accepting of lots of things, but it sure doesn't make it right!

You said you prayed for years without results, I'm Christian and I will say a prayer for you. I hope you don't mind.

goyim, put some stats in the Robin Roberts thread that you might find interesting about homosexuals.

 

[jaxvid]

I can't speak for every homosexual out there, but I certainly didn't choose to be gay. I'm attracted to women, always have been ever since I had any attraction to anybody. Even years and years of prayer didn't change that. It's not a choice, and the majority of gay folks never flip flop back to being straight once they've come out...not sure where you heard that from. I know dozens of gay people, both male and female, and not one of them ever went back to the opposite sex. I'm sure it happens from time to time but it's certainly not common.


I obviously don't know you, but I don't believe you. I here it from homosexuals all the time, from the flaming guy who wants to get with another guy and another woman at the same time, to a guy that's married and says he likes to have anal sex. Unfortunately, I have to deal with some homosexuals in my occupation and I here it in the gym as well. I'm sorry, you can call me what you want, but there is something sick about a man dipping his wick in another man's @$$! Does Jerry Sandusky ring a bell to you? There would not have been any children raped at Penn St. if Sandusky wasn't homosexual or chose to act on his weakness for boys!

I'm a happily married man and am attracted to women (only) also. I see lots of good-looking women all the time and deal with many women in my profession, but I make a choice to not cheat on my wife. There's always temptation, but you do have a choice to do what's right and what's wrong.

I may agree somewhat that it's becoming less common for homosexual's to go back to the opposite sex, but that's because our sick society is becoming more accepting of it.

Society is becoming accepting of lots of things, but it sure doesn't make it right!

You said you prayed for years without results, I'm Christian and I will say a prayer for you. I hope you don't mind.

goyim, put some stats in the Robin Roberts thread that you might find interesting about homosexuals.

I think Ieroner is female so there is a different thing going on then with male homosexuals. Not saying what you wrote is wrong but the butt sex, Sandusky, and being promiscuous is not part of the lesbian thing.

 

[Kaptain]

The handful of queer males that I have known throughout my life have all had some sort of sexual molestation background as a child. All of whom have slept with women at least one point in their life. Many have gone on to sexually molest younger boys just as they were molested. I've heard and seen it enough to know for a fact that Gay men are many many more times likely to be child predators. Funny how stats on things like that are never researched or at least publicized.

I don't believe for a second that normal chromosome people are born gay. Scientifically impossible. The same genes that demand a man grows and penis and has male hormones in his blood wouldn't accidentally mutate the part of the brain that desires the opposite sex. Point mutations are rare and would result in something physical linked to it. A traumatic childhood experience or upbringing on the other hand could change how you think or decide to think.

As far as lesbians go, I know a couple who went lesbian for a short time in their life and then returned to dating men. They said it was a phase. One was dumped by her boyfriend and fell pray to Softball team-mate (big surprise). She has since dated men. The other was a couple who just grew out of it and both became Christians again. Both have married and moved on. At least lesbians don't stick their privates in feces.

 

[goyim]

The handful of queer males that I have known throughout my life have all had some sort of sexual molestation background as a child.

I don't agree that homosexuality is genetic, nor do I agree that it's environmental. Rather, I think it's developmental. The blog Dusk in Autumn makes a few fair points which highlight the difference in physical development and facial morphology in homosexuals compared to the rest of the population. He explains it far better than I can.

http://akinokure.blogspot.com/2012/06/gay-peter-pan-ism-part-34586-more.html

http://akinokure.blogspot.com/2012/09/decoding-homosexual-face-1.html

 

[GiovaniMarcon]

I think one thing that is generally true for most homosexuals is that they just act like freaks. I'm talking about their whole persona and demeanor.

There's a reason they're called degenerate deviants, because that's precisely what most of them are. I'm sure there are many nice, conservative (in a relative sense), quiet homos who keep their sexual preferences to themselves and their partners, but that's not most ****.

Most **** are these weird-assed, bitchy queens who basically embody every unpleasant, annoying gay stereotype imaginable.

The trouble is, rather than rightfully looking at these people as disgusting perverts, society today is being manipulated into thinking such behavior is endearing, or cute, or interesting.

If they want to be proud of sucking cack, then whatever man. But their parades are not about just running around saying, "hey yo, we're gay and we're not sorry to be gay." And they're all sensibly dressed according to weather conditions and personal fashion taste.

No. Their parades are nasty, AIDS-ridden quasi porn that is totally inappropriate for children, and for the most part, ****** fashion sense is wearing GIRL'S clothes, or makeup, or running around like disgusting idiots in their underwear.

These people do not want acceptance. They want you to CELEBRATE them and validate their disgusting, perverted lifestyle. They want and crave this validation because it is obvious to all who still have some common sense that their lifestyle is WRONG. For most *******, being a *** and being a disgusting sexual pervert, probable child-molester/rapist, AIDS spreading ecstasy junky are one and the same.

They're going to exist and I accept that, but what I do not have to accept is some f*cking *** telling me he is "normal".

No, you're not.

 

[icsept]

As I recall, there was a rumor that Troy Aikman was gay during the prime of his career. Was never substantiated.

 

[PamelaOC]

I'm probably more centrist than most people here on the gay issue, but even for me, gay male flight attendants who feel the need to act flamboyant, outrageous, and OMFG look how gay I am!!!!111one drive me crazy. I dread it every time I have to go out to dinner with one of them, or worse, two of them.

 

[PHillisFan]

I dont believe it comes down to some "gay gene" as the funded gay science would like us to believe. Like most things, this is behavioral and it comes down to choice. Yeah there might be some males born or develop less testerone but it is still a choice at the end of the day.

 

[Carolina Speed]

I think Ieroner is female so there is a different thing going on then with male homosexuals. Not saying what you wrote is wrong but the butt sex, Sandusky, and being promiscuous is not part of the lesbian thing.

I'm not quite clear on what you're saying, a different thing going on? If Ieroner is female, then it's OK for her to be a lesbian, but not for a male to be queer?

Without being too graphic, what is it that a woman can do for a woman that a man can't, and vice versa for you queers out there? That's right! There's nothing. It's a choice abnormal people make to be with members of the same sex. It's just as Giovani Marcon says, it's disgusting and perverted, it's not normal, period!

I was just coming from a normal straight male perspective. It's disgusting to me, as I would think it would be as disgusting for a normal straight female. My wife will barely discuss, lesbian/homosexual topic, with me, because just the thought of it makes her sick!

This is just part of the bigger problem that's been going here over the last 40 almost 50 years. There's no more sense of what's right and wrong. Just do what makes you "feel" better as long as it doesn't hurt anyone, I was born that way. Well, I was born to do many wrong things, but that doesn't mean I'm going to always act on them. There's a lot of wrong things I can do that won't hurt anyone, but that doesn't make it right.