Stevenson was just walking around an apartment complex wasted and didn't know where he was? I wonder if when he sobered up, he was like, "What, why is Abraham Lincoln tattooed on my neck?!?"
alln2 said:Mavs' blacks are blacks, not Ns.Deadlift said:.. as for DeShawn Stevenson, there are black people and there are Ns. I wonder which it is that he looks like? Do I need to post pictures?
The "mainstream perspective" is BS!!!ToughJ.Riggins said:Oh j41181, sorry I missed the "mainstream" perspective part. I will say that I think most fans realize that Dirk is better than Lebron "this year". Heck, Charles Barkley called Dirk "the best player in the NBA this year" "BEFORE THE FINALS STARTED". According to some posters Barkley is too hard on certain white players- so that says a lot of Dirk's recognition by media and fans this year.
Bill Russell had more than that. He had Heinsohn, KC Jones, Sam Jones, Bill Sharman and other good role players. He had the deepest team ever. That's why he won so many titles. He might be the biggest "overrated" legend. Really he was Tyson Chandler with much more offensive polish. Chandler has none and that's why he isn't a perennial all star.white lightning said:Great posts by most of you guys. I really am enjoying reading this thread. One very important thing to remeamber is the talent surrounding the all stars on this list that helped to lead to the multiple titles. To name a few:
<div> </div>
<div>Magic had Worthy and Jabar</div>
<div> </div>
<div>MJ had Pippen and Rodman</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Bird had McHale, Parrish and Ainge</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Bill Russell had Cousy and Havlicek</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Tim Duncan had Robinson, Parker and Ginobli</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Ok I will stop for now. The point I'm making is so blatantly obvious. Look at the talent surrounding almost everyone of these guys and then look at the two teams that Dirk led to the NBA Finals. He had some good players but he didn't have the All Star Supporting Cast that most NBA Champions have. Look what happended to Chicago. D.Rose didn't have much help so is he really the MVP of the league? My vote would have went to Dirk. Year after year he has done amazing with little help. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kidd, Terry, and Chandler are good basketball players but none of them are even remotely close to being all stars anymore. Only Jason Kidd is worthy of being in the same sentence as Dirk and that would only be back when he was in his prime. He is on the downside of a great career. Dirk Nowitzki deserves all of the praise he is getting. Maybe even more. The guy is a legend. Put him on the teams that Bird had and he would have had at least 3 rings too in my honest opinion. I could say the same thing if he played on many of these other all stars teams too.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Let's salute this legend. Dirk is simply amazing!</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
GiovaniMarcon said:Kevin McHale should be on that list if Lebron James is going to be on it. Pete Maravich should be on it, too.
Lebron has no business being on that list if Clyde Drexler isn't on it. Who came up with that list?
Some fat, 12 year old loser White kid who plays video games all day and with a pu$$y for a father?
Don Wassall said:I've really been enjoying sports lately. The Stanley Cup playoffs are always great, the tennis has been superb this year, and golf is so much more enjoyable without the media talking about the injured and now almost forgotten Tiger Woods 80 percent of the time. Whites are more than holding their own in baseball again this season, and Lemaitre is going sub-10 again. And Nowitzki's play has been sensational whether Dallas ends up winning the championship or not. If not no one will be blaming Dirk, unlike past seasons. It's all good right now.ÂÂÂ
white is right said:Bill Russell had more than that. He had Heinsohn, KC Jones, Sam Jones, Bill Sharman and other good role players. He had the deepest team ever. That's why he won so many titles. He might be the biggest "overrated" legend. Really he was Tyson Chandler with much more offensive polish. Chandler has none and that's why he isn't a perennial all star.white lightning said:Great posts by most of you guys. I really am enjoying reading this thread. One very important thing to remeamber is the talent surrounding the all stars on this list that helped to lead to the multiple titles. To name a few:
<div> </div>
<div>Magic had Worthy and Jabar</div>
<div> </div>
<div>MJ had Pippen and Rodman</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Bird had McHale, Parrish and Ainge</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Bill Russell had Cousy and Havlicek</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Tim Duncan had Robinson, Parker and Ginobli</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Ok I will stop for now. The point I'm making is so blatantly obvious. Look at the talent surrounding almost everyone of these guys and then look at the two teams that Dirk led to the NBA Finals. He had some good players but he didn't have the All Star Supporting Cast that most NBA Champions have. Look what happended to Chicago. D.Rose didn't have much help so is he really the MVP of the league? My vote would have went to Dirk. Year after year he has done amazing with little help. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kidd, Terry, and Chandler are good basketball players but none of them are even remotely close to being all stars anymore. Only Jason Kidd is worthy of being in the same sentence as Dirk and that would only be back when he was in his prime. He is on the downside of a great career. Dirk Nowitzki deserves all of the praise he is getting. Maybe even more. The guy is a legend. Put him on the teams that Bird had and he would have had at least 3 rings too in my honest opinion. I could say the same thing if he played on many of these other all stars teams too.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Let's salute this legend. Dirk is simply amazing!</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
The 50's and 60's basketball was BIGGER and the hoop SMALLER in those days, dribbling and handling them was quite a challenge itself. Taking FT's and long range shots was much more difficult then, and the defenses and battling for boards was much tougher.pistol pete said:I also read that the ball then was weird and harder to shoot which is why shooting percentages were low.