Ok guys. I just have a couple of questions. First off, I'm glad at least a couple of fans still exist. How many sprinters do you know who have peaked at only 22 years of age? Also, how many would have peaked and broken their personal best time if they were running injured most of the year? For some one to still give their best effort is to be adimired in my opinion. The times still were descent late summer as they showed being right close to the year 2007 before even hurt.
So now let me ask you guys this. Who other than Shirvington has run more times in the last 5 years or so in the sub 10.20 range? What white sprinter can compare with the consistancy and still get very litte support? I get so tired of using white sprinter because I would rather have it be young sprinter. I just want you guys to realize that most of the guys we talk about are lucky to have 1 good race a year. Maybe 2 in the range that Craig can run on a normal basis.
So why would anyone think that he has peaked. When Fabio Cerutti, Jared Connaugton, Christian Blum, Tobias Unger, or any other guy can run multiple sub 10.20's, then maybe they will be close. They cannot say that yet. This does not keep me from rooting for them. It's just that usually to go sub 10, you have to show consistant form down around the 10.10 range at the least. The only one close is you know who!
Again, not to root against the other guys. The more the merrier. It is a stupid number that is talked about like if it is a trip to Mars. Ten seconds will be broken and it will go down in the near future. Could I be wrong? It's possible but unlikely despite all of the odds stacked against it happening.
As I've said a few times:
You have to believe it to acheive it.
If you don't believe, then you won't succeed!
For most sprinters, it all started with a dream as a kid.
One last thing. In England, it seems to be like alot of the guys who do it the right way are getting screwed. Two guys to lose funding will Andy Turner and the guy with bad form in the 100! Yeah that would be Pickering. Andy got the worse of it and yet he is Europes leading 110 high hurdler. The guys that are funding are getting killed by Turner. All because Great Britain/UK Athletics are trimming their budget. You talk about unfair. Then on top of that the fans tend to root for the cheats. It's enough to drive a guy insane. It's also a reason why some guys eventually give up and start using.
Tell me the world is fair. So in the end, can we just support our athletes please? I don't think that is too much to ask.Edited by: white lightning