Your posts are the greatest amalgamations of logical fallacies I have ever read in my life.I just told you that I am a self loathing black man ala Michael Jackson and you continue accusing me for being a biased white man.................Sir are you the racist after all?
How dare you to deny me the chance to be a self loathing black man? Is it maybe because you are used to all the militant, openly racist against other races, with the criminal "swagger", violent, "proud pro black" men from the ghetto and you can't picture "us" as self loathing little Michael Jacksons?
Shame on you racist white man, I feel opressed now.........DO YOU REALIZE THAT AS A BLACK MAN I WANT TO HAVE EXACTLY THE SAME CHANCES AND OPPURTUNITIES WITH YOU?
DO YOU REALIZE THAT WE BLACK MEN HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE CULTURAL MARXISTS AND SELF LOATHING SCUMS JUST LIKE YOU MR. WHITE LIBERAL ?
Why do you think that being an obese, insecure, self hating, self loathing, emasculated male is only your personal privilege, oopppss I mean today's white man's privillege? I, as a black man, want to be as self loathing and self hating just like you, can't I? :madgrin:
Obama for the change, OH YES WE CAN :dance:
Right, but any genetic differences we can deduce from these experiments are at best minimal and at worst totally inconclusive.Have you seen the nurture experiments? There are still gaps regardless of the environment, the gap isn't as big when in the same environment raised in the same house etc, but it is still there.
The only thing they can throw out there is excuses, race related anxiety during testing, saying they feel too much pressure to do well because they are black affecting performance. Then there is the theory that they don't want to do well because it means they are "acting White" so they give up on academics. There are Whites with a lower than average iq, just a smaller ratio. When they don't understand something and have problems understanding, they act out and give up. They don't get to use excuses.
I love this one:
Jeff Howard and Ray Hammond added another important strand to this argument when they suggested that academic competence developed partly through competition, and that "rumors of inferiority" made blacks reluctant to compete academically. More recently, Claude Steele has argued that people of all races avoid situations in which they expect others to have negative stereotypes about them, even when they know that the stereotype does not apply.
Seems to be totally different in athletics.
Partially responsible, but not wholly responsible. They're also partially responsible for environments in the US.So whites are responsible for the atrocious environments of blacks in Africa?
No, blacks who live around nonracist whites enjoy the highest standards of living.
"I disagree with you"="You're automatically wrong+ad hom" lolGet back to marching with Al Sharpton and the NAACP you self-loathing white pig!
I'm self-loathing because I don't think everyone who's different from me is inherently worse than me?
I am very aware of this, and try to account for all biases.are you aware who conducts these experiments and studies? These guys get money to make stuff up sometimes. I had a Sociology professor who got a huge sum of money to publish studies in his book that show that the reason for more black violent crime is not related to genetics and was because of environment, nurture etc. They didn't care what he put in the book as long as it sounded legit and it supported what the conclusion they wanted. 300 pages of pure garbage.
Too much time, effort and money has been put into these studies to show that we are the same. We should just accept the fact that we are different. It doesn't make someone inferior to be different.
It doesn't make someone inferior to be different, but there is an obvious implication on this site that blacks are inferior. And we can't just accept the fact that we're different and be done with it; assuming one race has substantially lower intelligence, for example, has serious policy and social implications.
I'm not basing my views on an antiquated, unequivocally false source. It's a bit harder than that.How funny, you are constantly asking "source?" yet here is your reply: "wrong." It isn't wrong, and that isn't theory because it isn't supported by hard evidence. It is politically based. According to 1930s German intellectual thought you are completely wrong. See how easy that is?
Here is a sources though:
http://wilderdom.com/personality/L4-1IntelligenceNatureVsNurture.html (summarizes multiple sources, talks a bit about race and inherited intelligence)
This is probably my last post here. Nearly every single person who replied was extremely hostile (dwiw the exception). My views change every day. I would wager yours haven't in thirty years. That's what happens when you get all of your information from people who already agree with you.
I'll leave you with a question, though: Why do Asians and Jews have considerably higher IQs than Christian Caucasians? If you're going to cite IQ levels as evidence against blacks, and then say whites are the smartest race, how can you have it both ways?