Alexander Povetkin

Charles Martel

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 14, 2007
Messages
8,484
Povetkin: "I would like to fight Wladimir"

http://www.fightnews.com/Boxing/povetkin-i-would-like-to-fight-wladimir-139498

After easily taking out WBA mandatory challenger Hasim Rahman in two rounds, WBA “regular” heavyweight titleholder Alexander Povetkin and his team say they’re ready to settle any debate in the heavyweight picture and take on WBA “super” heavyweight champion Wladimir Klitschko, who also holds the IBF, WBO and IBO belts.

“Wladimir Klitschko takes on Mariusz Wach from Poland next. The winner has until the end of February to face Alexander inside the ring,” said Povetkin’s promoter Kalle Sauerland.

Povetkin himself is hoping for a Klitschko victory.

“I would like to fight Wladimir. A fight between him and myself would be very exciting and interesting to watch.”

Meanwhile, Povetkin’s manager Vladimir Hrunov told R-Sport that negotiations between the Povetkin and Klitschko camps will begin after Wlad’s next fight on November 10. He also stated that Povetkin will continue to work with trainer Kostya Tszyu.

Povetkin, Sauerland Eye Wladimir Klitschko in 2013

http://www.boxingscene.com/povetkin-sauerland-eye-wladimir-klitschko-2013--57686
 

Gibbon

Guru
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
339
Location
New England
Povetkin is a dangerous fighter but Vladimir would stay out of range and take care of him handedly, IMO.

If only David Haye (we call him Gaye here?...haha) would take on Povetkin. That's a fight I would watch and not because I necessarily think it would be all that competitive. I mean I guess Gaye could get on his bicycle for a few rounds.

BTW I think a good way to counter the erroneous "boxing is in decline because the Klitschkos have no worthy opponents" meme is to point to the Michael Jordan era of basketball. Unlike the Bird/Magic era, this era was characterized by dominance and NOT competitive rivalry. Yet it is nevertheless considered one of the golden eras of the sport, while its primary icon the best player to ever play. So stick that in your pipe and smoke it, DWF.
 
Last edited:

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,995
Povetkin looked very strong - and another Great Black Hope/Dope bites the dust.
 
Last edited:

The Hock

Master
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
3,902
Location
Northern California
It's easy to look good when you're fighting a bum. What matters is how good you look when fighting quality boxers.

Rahman is not technically a bum, he has an very good resume. Knocked out Lennox Lewis, beat David Tua when Tua was supposed to be a monster. No, Rahman is old and shot, absolutely finished as a fighter. Now with some Klitchko money looming I can understand Povetkin's management wanting a safe fight, but this match-up was sickening. A world class heavyweight like Povetkin deserves better than to be a part of such a farce.

A lot of the brutality in boxing happens outside the ring.
 

Gibbon

Guru
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
339
Location
New England
On the subject of poor-beat-to-**** Rahman: has anyone ever noticed how blacks tend to decline more rapidly in boxing? There are certainly exceptions. For instance, whatever one might say about his relative ability overall, George Foreman has to be consider one such exception. And my feeling is that this decline tends to be more pronounced, in general, in the lower weight classes.

My personal feeling is that many of these blacks never really learned how to be fundamentally strong boxers because of an early reliance on speed i.e. hand-speed, elusiveness and "athleticism" (at least as the term is very specifically defined nowadays). And, in fact, often this reliance leads them to bad habits, thereby making an advantage, a liability. A cultural love of "flashiness" certainly doesn't help in this regard either. Once this "athleticism" fades, they are sitting ducks.

Contrast, for example, Roy Jones and Joe Calzaghe. What a shadow Roy became of his former self and what a genius Joe proved himself throughout his career. Intelligence and discipline are also factors. And, of course, strength is the last thing to go....

And certainly WE also "be havin' some brothers with some dope hand-speed" —but, in the final analysis, the greatest warriors are a balance and melody of all the requisite traits, knowing how to use each in proportion to its true value, frugally, without vanity and with only victory as the goal. Anything else is maladaptive.

It's beyond question that our race produces the best boxers. And one day we will consider it shocking that we even considered another possibility.
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
On the subject of poor-beat-to-**** Rahman: has anyone ever noticed how blacks tend to decline more rapidly in boxing? There are certainly exceptions. For instance, whatever one might say about his relative ability overall, George Foreman has to be consider one such exception. And my feeling is that this decline tends to be more pronounced, in general, in the lower weight classes.

My personal feeling is that many of these blacks never really learned how to be fundamentally strong boxers because of an early reliance on speed i.e. hand-speed, elusiveness and "athleticism" (at least as the term is very specifically defined nowadays). And, in fact, often this reliance leads them to bad habits, thereby making an advantage, a liability. A cultural love of "flashiness" certainly doesn't help in this regard either. Once this "athleticism" fades, they are sitting ducks.

Contrast, for example, Roy Jones and Joe Calzaghe. What a shadow Roy became of his former self and what a genius Joe proved himself throughout his career. Intelligence and discipline are also factors. And, of course, strength is the last thing to go....

And certainly WE also "be havin' some brothers with some dope hand-speed" —but, in the final analysis, the greatest warriors are a balance and melody of all the requisite traits, knowing how to use each in proportion to its true value, frugally, without vanity and with only victory as the goal. Anything else is maladaptive.

It's beyond question that our race produces the best boxers. And one day we will consider it shocking that we even considered another possibility.

Good points Gibbon! Welcome to Castefootball by the way. We need some more knowledgable posters in the boxing forum.

I've said this before but if Calzaghe simply had more power I'd probably rate him the best P4P fighter ever. He was very crafty, very fast, and intelligent. He embarrased Bernard Popkins and if he had more power he would have knocked the clown out that night.
 

Gibbon

Guru
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
339
Location
New England
Good points Gibbon! Welcome to Castefootball by the way. We need some more knowledgable posters in the boxing forum.

I've said this before but if Calzaghe simply had more power I'd probably rate him the best P4P fighter ever. He was very crafty, very fast, and intelligent. He embarrased Bernard Popkins and if he had more power he would have knocked the clown out that night.

Thanks Whiteathlete. Hopkins is another good example of a black boxer who couldn't age well relative to his elite, white contemporaries. Calzaghe ended up being one of my favorites. Though I admit rooting for Kessler when they fought. Back to Povetkin...
 

Charles Martel

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 14, 2007
Messages
8,484
Alexander Povetkin is now scheduled to fight Manuel Charr on May 30.


20140502-133546.jpg
 
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
1,434
Location
Calgary, Canada
Charr VS Povetkin will be a great fight. I'm a big supporter of both boxers, so I just hope the best man wins. Conventional logic would make Povetkin a favourite because of his superior technical skills but Charr hits good and is definitely a live underdog (especially with Pov coming off the Wlad loss where he was dropped numerous times). I'm excited for this one!
 

Charles Martel

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 14, 2007
Messages
8,484
[video=youtube;gXzRqchN0Lo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=gXzRqchN0Lo[/video]
 

white is right

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
10,178
Povetkin was in another class than Charr. Beyond some jabs and forearms to the throat Charr was just a punching bag in the ring. It shows you the gulf between Klitschko and the rest of the division. He made Povetkin look like Charr.
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Great win and KO by Povetkin! He also appears to be in excellent condition. If I was him I would demand a fight with the winner of Stervene vs Wilder match. Then after that attempt a rematch with Wlad. The outcome however, would be the same.
 
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
1,434
Location
Calgary, Canada
Great win by Pov. Watched the fight and I was really imprrssed with Alex. Manuel Charr is a very decent boxer, and Id say on the strength of this win Pov reafforms himself as the #2 heavyweight in the world.

I was expecting a Povetkin decision win, but Charr was a live underdog. Povetkin closed the show like great boxers do. Congrats to Alex.
 

werewolf

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
5,995
Povetkin looked great. I was especially impressed with the uppercut in his repertoire. I think it's the best in the business.

Anybody know why he uses the nickname Vityaz, and it's also written on his trunks in the back? Vityaz is one of the Russian military special forces. Was he in it at one time?

Charr did his best, and he was extremely sportsmanlike and gracious in losing. Good on him too!
 
Top