Considering this was a World Cup Qualifying match, what (or more accurately, (((whom)))) could possibly make Eric think that way? I mean, an African country has never won a World Cup and the last time a South American team won was Brazil in 2002. Since then, it's been either completely White or White-dominated teams that have won, namely, Italy, Spain, and Germany, in that order.
By "Magic", I'm guessing he meant some form of voodoo?...otherwise, why not just forget "Magic" and use logic to bring in a bunch of Italians, Spanish or Germans instead? After all, it was those ethnicities that won the last three World Cups, not "Africans" or "South Americans". Of course, the (((DailyTelegraph))) out of probably hundreds of viewpoints to publish, chose his. "Funny", that.
Heretic -
Ah, but what shapes the perceptions
of the average malleable idiot? Let’s forget the direct influence of the anti-White media for a moment. How else do you believe that this Eric Palm dope arrived at his conclusion? Mind you, Palm’s vocabulary and syntax indicate that he is probably a teenager - at least, I hope he is, as such puerile “analysis” and “expression” would be downright embarrassing in an adult.
People are far more influenced by what they repeatedly see every day than they are by occasional events - however technically significant - which diverge from that habitual norm.
Why do you think I am always fuming about the high numbers of Negroes and other non-Whites spread across
all clubs in the “big four” leagues, not just the various national champions, European Cup winners and perennial domestic and European contenders?
International football is, by its very nature, fleeting - a handful of serious matches per year and a one-month tournament every two years - whereas each season of club football lasts approximately ten months and consequently forms the bulk of any fan’s “interaction” with the sport. It is therefore bizarrely “logical” that morons like Palm base their half-baked “theories” on the football they see on a daily basis, year in, year out.
The Premier League is the most watched domestic competition on the planet and is without doubt the most watched domestic competition among viewers in the “Anglosphere”. So if that fuckstick Palm sees a pack of Negroes and South Americans (both non-White and White) in the starting lineups of the biggest Premier League clubs every week are you at all surprised that he makes such proclamations? His convictions are doubtlessly further reinforced when he watches Champions League giants Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern Munich, and Juventus.
Remember when I “controversially” persisted in drawing attention to the fact that not a single all-White team reached the knockout stage of the last World Cup instead of smugly announcing that such an uncomfortable truth was inconsequential because the trophy was won by a German team which was predominantly White and “only” featured a Negro, a Turk, an Arab, and an Albanian? Well, the lack of all-White teams in the latter stages of the last World Cup was glaringly apparent to the casual observer, who would quickly have drawn some inevitable conclusions. Sure, mostly White Germany beat Argentina in the final. The latter started three mestizos. The beaten semifinalists were the Netherlands (who started something like three Negroes in every game) and heavily non-White Brazil. Pricks like Palm tend to notice such things.
How about Euro 2016? The final was contested between Portugal and France, so only ten of the twenty two starters were White. That’s even more ammunition for the Palm and his limp-dicked ilk.
Jack Lambert said:
Rebajlo, in regards to your post on the Socceroos - ouch!! It kind of reminds of the pitiful United States performances in their last two matches against Honduras and Costa Rica. But at least Costa Rica are competent at football, and Honduras, to a point. But the United States should still kill anybody in our pathetic region aside from Mexico and Costa Rica.
Jack -
Both Australia and the United States have squandered the progress they made in the 1990s and early 2000s by subsequently using their domestic leagues as vehicles for “multicultural” (i.e. multiracial) social engineering.
Since its inception in 2005, the A-League has been more concerned with signing tenth-rate South American and European “imports” in addition to filling its teams with Negroes, Arabs, and other non-White trash than producing White Australian talent. The proof (and c0ck) is in the national team pudding.
The Socceroos peddle embarrassingly primitive football devoid of any semblance of skill or creativity. We don’t have anyone who can even
pretend to badly masquerade as a playmaker. When they aren’t passing the ball backwards, the Socceroos’ woefully telegraphed “attacking play” consists of guileless attempts to bolt down the wings and swing in a basic cross in the hope that a “striker” somehow gets his empty head to it. The 37-year old half-Samoan Tim Cahill is still playing for Australia - and is the Socceroos’ most “reliable” goalscorer. That says it all. “Surprisingly” enough, both of Cahill’s soft goals in the second leg against Syria came from headers.
The Socceroos’ defence is about as slow, flat-footed, and amateurish as it gets. The only thing worse is Andy Harper’s painfully try-hard, pseudo “intellectual” ******** artistry in the commentary box. That and the half-time and post-match “analyses” provided by various studio panels of childishly biased Australian “experts” who somehow remain completely impervious to the hammer blows and nut shots of reality…
to the oft-repeated theory that the Hispanicization of America would lead to a World Cup winning soccer team.
