knightedsoldier5000
Mentor
Thanks Carolina! I haven't been keeping up on baseball like I used to. I usually just check the box scores on Trout and Harper nowadays.
That's great! Thanks for sharing Claimjumper.The Cubs are presenting Steve Bartman, whose life was ruined because of Moises Alou and rabid DWFs, a World Series ring today
Some performances of note so far tonight:
Goldschmidt, AZ. 3 HR's,(25th) and 6 RBI's
Blackmon, COL. 25th HR
...and Mike Trout despite missing about a third or 50 games this season hit his 20th HR last night and if he had enough AB's to qualify would be leading the league in OB%, SLG. and OPS. and second in BA.
On another injury note, 15 game winner and leading the league, Clayton Kershaw injured. No time table on his return.
Given his loss of time to injury, just how many Plate Appearances does Trout need to "lead" in various categories like OBP?
Here's the rule:
A ** by the stat's value indicates the player had fewer than the required number of at bats or plate appearances for the BA, OBP, SLG or OPS title that year. In order to rank the player, the necessary number of hitless at bats were added to the player's season total. The value printed here is their actual value and not the value used to rank them, therefore some numbers may appear out of order.
For batting rate stats, generally a minimum of 3.1 Plate Appearances/G, 1.0 IP/G, 0.67 Gm and Chances/Team Game (fielding), 0.2 SB att/Team Game (catchers), and 0.1 SB att/Team Game (baserunners only since 1951), and 0.1 decision/G for single-season leaderboards generally needed for rate statistics.
So, 3.1 PA's per team game = 3.1 X 162 = 502.2 PA's required.
Now, what happens if he falls short at say only 500 PA's? My understanding is they substitute a zero for ever PA needed to get to the magic number, so they would give him 0 hits in 2.2 ABs to get his final "average" for consideration for batting title, OBP title, etc. So he doesn't really HAVE to have 502.2 PA's, but how ever many he falls short will be considered outs in his calculations.
Let's look at where Trout is:
He currently has 288 PA's, so he needs 214.2 to get to the minimum 502.2.
The Angels currently have 52 games left to play.
So, Trout needs 214.2 / 52 games = 4.112 average Plate Appearances per game for the rest of the year to reach the magic number.
He got 5 last night, but averaging more than 4 seems like a real stretch. It's going to be close for sure. But if he maintains a massive lead in these categories, he would easily be the official league "leader" in OBP, SLG, OPS, etc. even if he falls just short in PA's. Batting title will be a tough one, and it all depends on Altuve cooling off IMO. Trout will need a 10-20 point lead in BA to end up winning the title if he falls just short of the required PAs.
I don't think Trout has a shot at the MVP this year. The media is lining up behind the NY halfrican Judge, and with the Yankees playing well he deserves the attention.
Altuve 0-4 last night. Now he's at .361 BA. Trout has cooled a bit and has a .340 BA. Trout still over 200 OPS+. Trout is now the official league leader in OBP at .466 despite hitless at bats being added to his totals to get to the required number to qualify.
Trout with his 25th and 26th HR tonight.Also, Trout with his 24th HR last night, is now leading the league in SLG%. .684, OPS. 1.149 and OBP and as you mentioned now at .465. I believe he's also moved up into a tie for fourth in WAR, 5.2. Don't know that he'll catch Altuve, 6.7, but what a story that would be if he could despite missing 50+ games. If he could get close in WAR and the Angels make the playoffs, I think he has a strong case for MVP again!
Trout with his 25th and 26th HR tonight.
Ahh, yes...sweet memories:A lot of speculation on this thread about whether Trout can win the MVP with so many games missed. The only comparable of which I'm aware is 1980 George Brett. He only played 117 games, but hit .390 with 24 HR and 118 RBI. The Royals also won the AL Pennant that year.