Woods had a couple of bad lies yesterday, one in particular that was stuck on the grass right above a sandtrap just off the green that caused him to have to take a very awkward stance and he subsequently ended up with a bogey.
White golfers, Phil Mickelson in particular but others as well, have owned Tiger in recent years. At Pebble Beach in February of 2012, Mickelson and Woods were paired in the final round. Phil crushed Woods, outshooting him by 11 strokes that day to win the tournament going away. Here's what our friends at ESPN said afterward: "Woods used to own Mickelson, but that changed at the 2007 Deutsche Bank Championship. This was the fifth straight time Mickelson posted the better score when playing in the same group as Woods in the final round."
Woods' aura of intimidation is gone, or at least is a shadow of what it used to be. However, he is 36 years old, an age when most golfers are at their peak. Woods has undeniably been a great golfer; if he continues to play very well and wins on a very tough course, then it shows he's still capable of winning a major, nothing more. If Serena Williams still wins a tournament now and then, does it mean she won only because all the other players in the field were intimidated? Is it possible that she won because she played better than the rest?
What I can't stand is the media worship Woods gets, but if he wins I'm not going to say it was only because all the White golfers wilted in his presence. That sounds like sour grapes based on how things were years ago (including implying that a GPS satellite or some other technological fix is causing Woods' balls to end up with better lies than the other golfers). If it happens that he wins it just might have something to do with him being the best golfer in the field for this particular U.S. Open, along with knowing how to handle the pressure of a major.