2012 NFL Week 11

[davidholly]

I think God did that

Pff...

 

[Kaptain]

How explosive could NE be if they started Edelman, Woodhead, Welker, and Gronk all at the same time? and next year they can add Jake Ballard (PUP list) who I believe is much better than hernandez as an all around TE.

 

[Wes Woodhead]

How explosive could NE be if they started Edelman, Woodhead, Welker, and Gronk all at the same time?

If winning was the ultimate goal they would certainly start, and feature them all. They would be unstoppable for sure.

 

[The Hock]

Weren't there rumors that Edelman was on the bubble in training camp? That would have been ridiculous. I mean, his talent is so obvious.

 

[Tom Iron]

All the jerks were so happy Cam Newton had a good rookie season and now he's come back to earth with a resounding thud. I take great pleasure in seeing that guy lose, even to another black guy.

Tom Iron...

 

[backrow]

Stokley has a long TD catch as well. no sign of Decker so far!

 

[TBProdigy]

I've only seen Woodhead in one play all day, what gives?

 

[northwinds]

I've only seen Woodhead in one play all day, what gives?

I don't get it either.....Danny had a great game last week....so is Bellichick punishing him? He was in on that last third down.....

 

[backrow]

loving Pats tonight... another nice Gronk TD after a strip sack and recovery by Ninkovich!

i've seen Danny in on 3 or 4 plays, not enough! Ridley is playing like ****, why is he even given that many carries... i don't get Pats backfield management...

and now Eric Decker TD!!! 20 yard catch and run!

 

[The Hock]

Here's a theory on Danny's role. You use the bigger guys for the first part of the game to pound on the defense. Later in the game, when they are getting tired and slowing down, bring in a guy like Danny nice and fresh, and they're sitting ducks for his quicks and speed.

That's the only explanation I can come up with.

 

[backrow]

Julian Edelman almost scored on an end around! 47 yards before he got stopped just short. over 100 yards on offense.

RE: Pats backs: no clue how they do it. Vereen was having a good day, running well and after 3 carries he didn't touch the ball again. they went to Ridley who's only averaging over 2 yards because of one run of 11, otherwise he would be on about 1 ypc...

 

[Gibbon]

Watched the game with a buddy tonight.

"What's with all these awesome white receivers on the Patriots?!"
"What's with not having awesome white receivers on every team? Don't get it. Don't get it at all."

 

[Don Wassall]

Damn, NBC is reporting that Rob Gronkowski has a broken forearm.

 

[bigunreal]

What a dismal day, even for the corrupt NFL. Gronk with a serious injury. Woodhead with no touches. Jordy ignored yet again by Rodgers. Decker all but ignored again by Manning. The Jets rewarded, with some of that great "karma," for bad mouthing Tebow by somehow upsetting the Rams.

Btw, I was watching the Rams-Jets game early on, and there was a textbook example of how the referees can turn the outcome of the game around with one call. Givens returned a kickoff for a TD for the Rams, but at the last second, literally after he coasted into the end zone, the refs flew a flag. The announcers helpfully pointed out the "obvious" transgression on the play, which was one of the most innocuous looking blocks you'll ever see. That kind of block happens on EVERY football play. And, of course, it occurred very early in the return, so why did the refs wait all that time to throw the flag?

At any rate, the Rams would have been in complete control with that TD. Instead, they were left with a first down on their own 10 yard line. A 90 yard penalty is a bit much, don't you think? Bradford was awful after that, and the obnoxious Jets, behind the remarkable Sanchez and with no help at all from the despised Tebow, come up with a fantastic victory.

Then we have the miraculous RGIII's 14 of 15 passing performance, for 4 TDs, against an Eagles defense that I'm sure was trying really, really hard. With Luck making several bad mistakes against the Patriots (one of them a pick 6 by the odious Aquib Talib- welcome to Belicheck's world and more of that nice "karma"), the focus will be back in full on Subway's sexy spokesman. Josh Freeman also continues to pull out wins for the surprising Bucs, under fiery coach Mike "Psycho" Schiano.

And we will all get to hear RGIII's unbelievable performance compared to his fellow rookie, Nick Foles, and how it's now really obvious to those "haters" out there that the problem wasn't Mike/ Michael Vick. Who knows- maybe the ****y RGIII was right, when he proclaimed last week that the Redskins will make the playoffs. Wouldn't that make John Madden happy? That would sure justify his seemingly insane statement that RGIII was the best player in the NFL after he'd played only 3 games.

And I am nearly as insane as Madden to keep paying attention to this nonsense. There is nothing to like about this criminally corrupt, decidedly unfair league.

 

[Don Wassall]

What a dismal day, even for the corrupt NFL. Gronk with a serious injury. Woodhead with no touches. Jordy ignored yet again by Rodgers. Decker all but ignored again by Manning. The Jets rewarded, with some of that great "karma," for bad mouthing Tebow by somehow upsetting the Rams.

Btw, I was watching the Rams-Jets game early on, and there was a textbook example of how the referees can turn the outcome of the game around with one call. Givens returned a kickoff for a TD for the Rams, but at the last second, literally after he coasted into the end zone, the refs flew a flag. The announcers helpfully pointed out the "obvious" transgression on the play, which was one of the most innocuous looking blocks you'll ever see. That kind of block happens on EVERY football play. And, of course, it occurred very early in the return, so why did the refs wait all that time to throw the flag?

At any rate, the Rams would have been in complete control with that TD. Instead, they were left with a first down on their own 10 yard line. A 90 yard penalty is a bit much, don't you think? Bradford was awful after that, and the obnoxious Jets, behind the remarkable Sanchez and with no help at all from the despised Tebow, come up with a fantastic victory.

Then we have the miraculous RGIII's 14 of 15 passing performance, for 4 TDs, against an Eagles defense that I'm sure was trying really, really hard. With Luck making several bad mistakes against the Patriots (one of them a pick 6 by the odious Aquib Talib- welcome to Belicheck's world and more of that nice "karma"), the focus will be back in full on Subway's sexy spokesman. Josh Freeman also continues to pull out wins for the surprising Bucs, under fiery coach Mike "Psycho" Schiano.

And we will all get to hear RGIII's unbelievable performance compared to his fellow rookie, Nick Foles, and how it's now really obvious to those "haters" out there that the problem wasn't Mike/ Michael Vick. Who knows- maybe the ****y RGIII was right, when he proclaimed last week that the Redskins will make the playoffs. Wouldn't that make John Madden happy? That would sure justify his seemingly insane statement that RGIII was the best player in the NFL after he'd played only 3 games.

And I am nearly as insane as Madden to keep paying attention to this nonsense. There is nothing to like about this criminally corrupt, decidedly unfair league.

Well done, you managed to attack some of the least pro-Caste players and the least pro-Caste coach.

If Jordy doesn't dominate every single game, then he's deliberately being ignored by the same QB that helped make him a star last year. And if Decker doesn't dominate every game he's being deliberately ignored by Peyton Manning, because we all know that Manning just hates to throw to White receivers and tight ends.

Let's see, what else, the refs were ordered to have the Jets defeat the Rams because a few Jets criticized Tim Tebow.

Josh Freeman continues to "pull out wins" -- but wasn't today's win at the expense of Cam Newton? I mean, one of the two black quarterbacks had to win didn't they?

And Bill Belichick, the most White friendly NFL coach of the past 40 years, has bad karma because he hired a thug to help out his horrible defensive backfield, the Patriots of course being the only team that employs black players with criminal records. And Belichick is also bad for not playing Woodhead, even though his nearly all-White offense won a game where the Patriots scored 59 points, led by Gronkowski, Edelman and Welker.

What a ridiculous post, you just lowered the quality of this thread immeasurably.

 

[referendum]

Manning was targeting white receivers for most of the game, just not neccessarily Decker. I'm really irritated about Gronk's injury. It was on the extra point for the last touchdown. Why is he even involved in special teams when there is a huge lead?

 

[bigunreal]

I am sorry to lower the level of this thread. Obviously, my references to "karma" were sarcastic. My point was that the notion of "karma" as some cosmic force of good, which eventually strikes those who do bad things, is absurd. A thug like Talib should be serving life in prison, if only for the slew of crimes we actually know about, not being paid a huge salary to play football for the league's least corrupt team.

It is inexcusable for Woodhead not to get a single touch, a week after he dominated on his usual spartan total of touches. And if you saw the play I mentioned in the Rams-Jets game, you'd know what I mean about that one call basically influencing the outcome of the game. No players need to be involved there. One belated drop of the flag, and all the momentum is turned in the desirable direction. There was no legitimate penalty on that play, just as virtually every "illegal" block called on kick returns happens on EVERY kick return. Like holding and pass interference, these penalties are called whenever the referees feel like calling them.

I concentrate on criticizing Belicheck and the Pats, and now Manning and the Broncos, because they are really the only two offenses worth watching. Should I waste my time arguing about whether Julio Jones or Roddy White should be getting more looks for the Falcons? Obviously, the Patriots and Broncos are my two favorite teams now. I don't bother paying attention to any other offenses, other than to note when individual white players are getting especially screwed over.

If you watched the Packers game, you saw Rodgers again not giving his clear #1 WR the looks he should be getting. I think he had 5 targets, against a laughable Lions defense. I criticize Rodgers for that now, because McCarthy is finally at least keeping Jordy on the field. I would expect Rodgers has earned the right to at least audible whenever he wants, if not call the plays. The same goes for Manning, who obviously does call the plays. Last week he never looked Decker's way. Today, he rarely did, although Decker scored a TD on one of his few looks.

Again, my criticism of the Patriots is not directed at their white players. Obviously, McWigger calls the shots there now. You've raked McWigger over the coals many times in the past. Why is it okay for you to blast whoever you want, but when I do it, somehow I'm ruining the thread?

And you never answered my observations about Sport Historian. Why do you nitpick about things I say, when I clearly am a fierce opponent of the Caste System, but you permit him to blast white players all the time, and make indefensible claims like saying Charlie Sanders belongs in the Hall of Fame? Why is he held to such a different standard?

 

[Don Wassall]

I am sorry to lower the level of this thread. Obviously, my references to "karma" were sarcastic. My point was that the notion of "karma" as some cosmic force of good, which eventually strikes those who do bad things, is absurd. A thug like Talib should be serving life in prison, if only for the slew of crimes we actually know about, not being paid a huge salary to play football for the league's least corrupt team.

It is inexcusable for Woodhead not to get a single touch, a week after he dominated on his usual spartan total of touches. And if you saw the play I mentioned in the Rams-Jets game, you'd know what I mean about that one call basically influencing the outcome of the game. No players need to be involved there. One belated drop of the flag, and all the momentum is turned in the desirable direction. There was no legitimate penalty on that play, just as virtually every "illegal" block called on kick returns happens on EVERY kick return. Like holding and pass interference, these penalties are called whenever the referees feel like calling them.

I concentrate on criticizing Belicheck and the Pats, and now Manning and the Broncos, because they are really the only two offenses worth watching. Should I waste my time arguing about whether Julio Jones or Roddy White should be getting more looks for the Falcons? Obviously, the Patriots and Broncos are my two favorite teams now. I don't bother paying attention to any other offenses, other than to note when individual white players are getting especially screwed over.

If you watched the Packers game, you saw Rodgers again not giving his clear #1 WR the looks he should be getting. I think he had 5 targets, against a laughable Lions defense. I criticize Rodgers for that now, because McCarthy is finally at least keeping Jordy on the field. I would expect Rodgers has earned the right to at least audible whenever he wants, if not call the plays. The same goes for Manning, who obviously does call the plays. Last week he never looked Decker's way. Today, he rarely did, although Decker scored a TD on one of his few looks.

Again, my criticism of the Patriots is not directed at their white players. Obviously, McWigger calls the shots there now. You've raked McWigger over the coals many times in the past. Why is it okay for you to blast whoever you want, but when I do it, somehow I'm ruining the thread?

And you never answered my observations about Sport Historian. Why do you nitpick about things I say, when I clearly am a fierce opponent of the Caste System, but you permit him to blast white players all the time, and make indefensible claims like saying Charlie Sanders belongs in the Hall of Fame? Why is he held to such a different standard?

If McWigger is calling the shots and not Belichick, my hat is off to him for: 1. somehow passing Belichick in the organizational hierarchy; and 2. directing the most White friendly offense in the last 40 years in the NFL.

The Broncos and Packers both won. That's the bottom line. This isn't fantasy football where every star has to get certain stats every game and when they don't it can only be because their quarterback deliberately ignored them just to tick you off. All of the greats have good and not so good games statistically during the course of a season (and Decker scored a nice TD today). I greatly enjoyed both the Broncos and Patriots wins, didn't watch much of the Packers game. It makes no sense to continually criticize the most White friendly offenses for the same reason we aren't continually lambasting the Minnesota Timberwolves.

I don't criticize Sport Historian just as I don't criticize 99%+ of the posters here except on occasions when they violate the posting guidelines or when I suspect they may be trolls or otherwise determine that they don't get what we're about here -- I may not agree with all of Sport Historian's opinions, but his posts are logical, rational and well thought out, unlike many of yours. He also has a fantastic memory and adds a lot of interesting facts and tidbits about athletes and events that many posters here were unaware of, including me on more than a few occasions. By contrast, you frequently engage in paranoia and buffoonery, which is not in the best interests of Caste Football.

Go read your post again. In between the usual nonsense, e.g. the insinuation that games are being scripted to favor Josh Freeman with no explanation as to why games are no longer being scripted to favor Cam Newton, you accused Manning and Rodgers of deliberately ignoring Decker and Nelson, you accused the refs of throwing a game just to spite Tim Tebow, and you engaged in your usual vitriol toward the Whitest offense of the past 40 years. How is that supporting White athletes? How is that helping Caste Football? Answer: it isn't.

 

[Westside]

After the Pats demolition of the Colts and how they dropped 60 points on them and the disappearance of Danny Woodhead, the only logical explation would be; BB wants to insure Woody is fresh and ready to go in the playoffs. Remember how critical he was in the playoffs and especially the SB last year. BB is therefore only rationing him out and "saving" him for the critical games. I know this may be absurd, but I am at loss for his "nonplay" last night.

Next week I hope his rationing increases.

 

[foobar75]

Bigunreal, I have a simple question for you. Do you watch any of these games in their entirety, or just refer to the box score, and then form an opinion on what happened?

I am in a position to comment on 2 games I watched today, start to finish. The early game was GB-DET, and the late game was SD-DEN.

In the first game, the GB offense was out of sync the entire time. They never had a good rhythm, Rodgers did not have his A-game, and it was an ugly affair all around. But they managed to pull out a crucial win on the road. The fact that Cobb was targeted 12 times (and caught 9) vs Nelson's 5 targets (and 3 receptions) does not mean that Rodgers was ignoring Nelson. That happened to be the favorable match-up of the day, and it worked for them. What purpose would Rodgers have of deliberately ignoring his best receiver? We cannot expect Nelson to have double-digit catches, TDs, and 100+ yards every game.

As for the Denver game, here are the receiver stats:

Stokley - 4/55/1
Tamme - 4/53
Thomas - 3/42/1
Dreessen - 4/28
Decker - 2/23/1

4/5 top pass catchers were White. Manning was spreading the ball around and wasn't ignoring anyone on purpose. In fact, the announcers commented that Decker is clearly Manning's #1 target when the Broncos are in the redzone. Here are the season stats:

(second number there is targets)

Thomas - 57-85/933/5
Decker - 50-79/621/8
Stokley - 32-40/387/5
Tamme - 34-55/312/1
Dreessen - 27-38/250/4

Again, 4/5 are White, with Decker right up there with Thomas in targets and receptions, while leading the team in TDs. Thomas, who's a good receiver, has a few big plays that gives him that advantage in total yards.

As for Nelson, despite missing 2 games, he still leads the team in total yards, and has 5 TDs.

I believe your criticism of Manning, Rodgers, (and the Patriots) is simply without merit and completely irrational, and not supported by facts/stats.

And finally, did anyone watch how atrocious PIT's offense looked without Big Ben tonight? Fat Albert is a horrible downgrade at the position, and looked like a trainwreck all night, including a self tackle in the endzone after his opening TD run in which he hurt his shoulder. As we've been saying all along without Ben (and Heath Miller), the Steelers are nothing, a garbage, 5-11 team at best. I hope Ben is out a few more games so they are out of the playoff picture all together.

 

[bigunreal]

Foobar75,

I do watch the games in question. I have Sunday Ticket, and thus can concentrate on the few games involving the Patriots, Broncos, Texans and the white stars of teams like the Packers. I certainly couldn't stand to watch a minute of the Redskins, Falcons, Panthers, Steelers, etc.

You ask why Rodgers would intentionally ignore his best receiver. Isn't that the gist of the entire Caste System? Why would coaches not play the best players? Why would they cut so many white players who are far more skilled than the majority of their coal black rosters? I can't believe we even still ask these kinds of questions. Let "reporters" from ESPN and the like ask them.

We have to understand that some white players are more important to the cause of breaking up the Caste System than others. Edelman had a great game yesterday, but if the past is any indication, he could all but disappear from the offense for the rest of the season. Woodhead is crucial there, because he is just about the only white RB in the league now getting meaningful touches. So yes, no matter how else that game played out, it is certainly fair to question why he received ZERO touches the entire game, especially after he performed so well last week.

As for the Broncos, Decker is the key guy there. He is a young outside WR, battling with Thomas to become the undisputed #1. Tamme and Dreesen will never shatter the Caste System, and while it's great to see Stokley resurrect his career, at his age he isn't going to, either.

 

[Kaptain]

I'm going to go against the grain here and say that I enjoy bigunreal's weekly cynical rants. The most frustrating and at the same time enjoyable teams to watch are the teams that are most white friendly. There is nothing frustrating about watching the Ravens, Steelers etc. because there is absolutely no chance of whites popping on the playing field. Yes, it is frustrating watching Woodhead take a back seat to three rookies who have lesser career yards per carry. Edelman's day was great, but didn't we see this year's ago and then watch him sit behind lesser black receivers? And where's the genius in the attempt to lessen Welker's role at the start of the season a year after his best season ever? Yah the Patriots are fun to watch, but by default only. Jordy Nelson hasn't had to compete with Greg Jennings this year for touches and yet he's not in the top twenty of wrs. The Packers only look good when they target Nelson consistently. Even DWFs next to me at the sports bar were calling for him to get the ball. A pultry 5 targets is inexcusable for a #1 reciever of Jordy's obvious elite talent. What's more is that his tiny targets hasn't been the exception this year as much as its been the rule. As the main target and explosive talent on one of league's most potent passing offenses, he should be one of the league leaders and he's not. That's frustrating.

On the other hand, the most satisfying team to watch are the Peyton Manning's Broncos. It's Manning's Broncos, not that idiot coaches. The team's success and white players will disappear when Manning retires. Manning demanded some familar white recievers from his past and then consistently targeting them. I can't ever complain about him.

I guess to sum up, I take bigunreal's ranting as just venting. I don't have to agree with every point he makes and if he goes a little over the top it doesn't really bother me. I think he would get less flack if he didn't insinuate in the slightest way an organized conspiracy - such as the refs conspiring to give the Jets the game. Also big, you always end with a statement on what a waste of time this all is which can be conscrewed to be somewhat insulting to this website if you think about it. And it's a bit hypocritical when you yourself have the NFL package. :icon_grin:

 

[Thrashen]

In the absence of Coby Fleener and Austin Collie, I felt little sympathy for the Colts in their embarrassing defeat. This squad has eagerly shed promising receivers like Blair White and Samuel Giguere, and tight ends Brody Eldridge, Dallas Clark, and Jacob Tamme, in favor of all-cocoa offensive weaponry. I wish the best for Andrew Luck, Pat Angerer and Tom Zbikowski, of course, but the result of Patriots-Colts was for the best.

Firstly, it was nice to see the NFL’s best tight end amass 7 catches for 137 yards and 2 TD’s, bringing his season total to 53 catches for 748 yards and 10 TD’s. With his unfortunate injury, this may be his last touchdown for a few weeks...

CAPTION: Gronk's 1st TD

CAPTION: Gronkian Thunderspike After 2nd TD

The break-neck speed of the multi-talented Julian Edelman was on display early and often, as the former Kent State quarterback turned NFL receiver, former cornerback, and punt returner broke his 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] career punt return for a TD. His 68-yard return was a thing of beauty, which showed #11 blistering past his black opponents...

[video=youtube;4MmvOI7QrmE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MmvOI7QrmE[/video]
CAPTION: 68-Yard Punt Return TD From Fan's POV

Edelman added 5 catches for 58 hard-fought yards and a touchdown catch...

CAPTION: Edelman Spike After Diving TD Catch

Edelman also had a dazzling 47-yard run which fell inches short of securing him his 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] touchdown of the contest...

CAPTION: Edelman During 47-Yard Reverse

With 222 all-purpose yards, Edelman made all racially-conscious fans proud today!

Wes Welker, who despite being permanently wide open, has been disappointing of late, but only by his own lofty standards. Against the Colts, he had 7 catches for 80 yards, bumping his season total to 73 catches for 890 yards. Another 100+ catch, 1,000+ yard season is hopefully forthcoming for “The Patriot Missile.” I found it humorous to watch the Casteon Conjurer, Phillis Simms, squirm and babble while calling Welker a “potential future hall of famer,” admitting that Welker could be the first receiver in NFL history to produce 5 different 100-catch seasons…

CAPTION: Welker VS. Colts

The contributions of New England’s white constituents weren’t entirely offensive, as New England played Steve Gregory, Rob Ninkovich, and Trevor Scott (for an injured Chandler Jones) on defense. Scott applied nice pressure and had a great TFL, and Ninkovich had 8 tackles, ANOTHER sack (his 7[SUP]th[/SUP]), ANOTHER forced fumble (his 5[SUP]th[/SUP]) and ANOTHER fumble recovery...

CAPTION: Ninkovich The Strip-Sack Master

As Bigunreal mentioned, it was a down week for the Broncos' white receivers, as no one player came close to a 100-yard game. As Foobar posted, Peyton Manning threw for 270 yards, 159 of which (60%) were to either Stokley, Tamme, Decker, or Dreessen…

CAPTION: Stokley Scorches Afro For Long TD

CAPTION: Decker Scores

Aside for their sumo tackles, Denver’s offense is every bit as exciting as New England’s, if not more so.

Despite getting chipped and doubled, the “Nordic Beast,” JJ Watt, managed 8 tackles, 1 sack, and another PD. At 23 years old, he’s already the biggest, strongest, fastest, most explosive, most athletic DE in the NFL…

CAPTION: Watt’s Sack

The Texans barely survived the lowly Jaguars, with up-and-coming TE, Garrett Graham, having the best outing (82 yards, 2 TD’s) of the group (Graham, Daniels, Walter, and Casey)...

CAPTION: Garrett Graham Scores

With these athletes, the Texans’ offense is also on par with the Broncos and Patriots. Naturally, any combination of these three squads (although I’m partial to New England due to their offensive line and more productive individual white receivers) for the AFC Championship Game would be a highly agreeable scenario. With squads such as these three (and to a lesser extent, the Packers and Rams), it’s difficult to fathom the intense, torturous sting of boredom I would endure while watching any other of the league’s tar-tinted corporations.

Of course, I didn’t watch a single moment of the “DWF Valhalla” (Steeler-Ravens) last night for the same reason I wouldn’t watch Grambling State versus Howard University. I’m sure Christine Collinsworthless was heartbroken, as his plodding, rotund, tackle-whiffing little Poly idol was still injured. Can a non-white player still be voted to the Pro-Bowl if he only plays 2 quarters in an entire season? The little human-dumpling with matted, kinky black locks of fur shall finally answer this question. Of course, I’m pleased by the news that Pittsburg’s obese, wigger-flavored “Plantation Manager” will be sidelined for a few more games. With any luck, Roethlisburger’s injury will cost Pittsburg a playoff spot in favor of the ever-so-slightly “whiter” Ravens or Bengals. And yes, I hope one of those squads loses immediately as well...

CAPTION: Tubby Terrell Chases Blubbery Byron

 

[bigunreal]

Thanks for the support. Kaptain.

I forgot to note the curious fact that Gronk appears to have somehow broken his forearm on the last extra point for New England.

Exactly how do you break your arm on an extra point? More pointedly, what was a star of Gronk's magnitude still doing in the game at such a late stage, blocking for a meaningless extra point, when the Pats had a 30+ point lead?

But then again, Wes Welker-who isn't even the regular kickoff returner, was back returning the Colts' last kickoff, late in the game. Brings back memories of when BB inexplicably had Woodhead covering punts in the fourth quarter of a preseason game last season.

 

[Leonardfan]

I read Peter King's weekly article summing up the day that was in football. He goes on to heap praise on Robert Gremlin's day while bashing Foles. He also praises Andre Johnson - I do not recall him ever mentioning Brian Hartline's huge receiving day a few weeks back.

This moron is also going to have an impact on the DWFs when draft time comes around and he begins to hype up black quarterbacks and compare them to Griffin (who is more a product of the system - one one long pass was just thrown up and luckily Moss came down with it and the other the guy was wide open - an indictment of that eagles secondary). I do my best on other forums to expose Geno Smith and EJ Manuel but it looks like they are gaining more and more traction. One can only hope that the Cam Newton meltdown of year two will help detract teams from drafting black quarterbacks early.

Their are good weeks and bad weeks. This week was probably mediocre - things could of been better but they could of been worse. Hopefully this week the Cowboys pummel the blackskins, freeman loses, newton continues his downward spiral and russell wilson stops getting lucky. Also I hope Foles gets another shot at starting.

Alex Smith has been ruled out for tonight's game so AA draft pick Colin Crapernick will get the start giving the SF DWFs their very own exciting black quarterback. The funny thing is that this guy gets to be a 2nd round draft pick yet Collin Klein is being treated as nothing more than an afterthought when he has an equal skillset physically and is obviously smarter.