whiteathlete33
Hall of Famer
Swain did make the team as a fifth receiver. He probably won't see the field much unless a few affletes get injured. Still it certainly is great news.
Lynch is not a resoundingly better option â€" he too lacks awareness, and there are major character issues. Still, he is a better option nonetheless. And, there is at least one prominent Packer who thinks trading for him is a good idea.
Bring him on," Aaron Rodgers said, without hesitation, according to CBS Rapid Reporter Greg Bedard in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Asked about the character concerns with his former Cal teammate, Rodgers replied, "(Lynch is) a great player. And any character issues the team might see, I think in a situation like that, and I think you've seen that with other players across the league, when you give a guy a change of scenery and a guy like that who feels he might have something to prove, and surround him with two guys, (Desmond) Bishop and myself who played with him...I think that can only help him feel comfortable and see a lot of production."
ToughJ.Riggins said:I have to give Michael Silver credit for writing that article on Gerhart being underranked and stereotyped. However, he was the guy who started this push for the Packers to sign Marshawn Lynch- who hasn't even performed at the level of an average RB. He could have mentioned Danny Woodhead, but I guess touting the talents of a second white RB would send shockwaves throughout Yahooligan/White Rivals. It would hurt the very site he works for's credibility. Yep, to Silver there is only one white RB in the entire universe worth talking about- Toby Gerhart "the anomolous freak". Mentioning Woodhead as another white who is VERY underrated- would be seen as "pro white". Way to coward out and tote the line Silver. "Journalism" is dead, company prostitution is alive and well.
whiteathlete33 said:ToughJ.Riggins said:I have to give Michael Silver credit for writing that article on Gerhart being underranked and stereotyped. However, he was the guy who started this push for the Packers to sign Marshawn Lynch- who hasn't even performed at the level of an average RB. He could have mentioned Danny Woodhead, but I guess touting the talents of a second white RB would send shockwaves throughout Yahooligan/White Rivals. It would hurt the very site he works for's credibility. Yep, to Silver there is only one white RB in the entire universe worth talking about- Toby Gerhart "the anomolous freak". Mentioning Woodhead as another white who is VERY underrated- would be seen as "pro white". Way to coward out and tote the line Silver. "Journalism" is dead, company prostitution is alive and well.
Remember when Larry Johnson came out of college in 2003? I'm using him as an example because Gerhart has similar size. Johnson was a first round draft pick and is slower than Toby. SI shows that he ran a 4.62 40.http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/2003/draft/players/323.html
Yet no one doubted his athletic ability.
Don Wassall said:<div></div>whiteathlete33 said:ToughJ.Riggins said:I have to give Michael Silver credit for writing that article on Gerhart being underranked and stereotyped. However, he was the guy who started this push for the Packers to sign Marshawn Lynch- who hasn't even performed at the level of an average RB. He could have mentioned Danny Woodhead, but I guess touting the talents of a second white RB would send shockwaves throughout Yahooligan/White Rivals. It would hurt the very site he works for's credibility. Yep, to Silver there is only one white RB in the entire universe worth talking about- Toby Gerhart "the anomolous freak". Mentioning Woodhead as another white who is VERY underrated- would be seen as "pro white". Way to coward out and tote the line Silver. "Journalism" is dead, company prostitution is alive and well.
Remember when Larry Johnson came out of college in 2003? I'm using him as an example because Gerhart has similar size. Johnson was a first round draft pick and is slower than Toby. SI shows that he ran a 4.62 40.http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/2003/draft/players/323.html
Yet no one doubted his athletic ability.
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>I had to doublecheck Johnson's Combine time, because the year he went into the NFL draft all the hype was that he ran a 4.4 at his size. I just did a search and this comment is typical:</div>
<div></div>
<div>well for RB's Larry Johnson ran a very fast 40 around 4.35-4.40. that's why he was compared to Bo Jackson who ran close to the same. probably faster. another RB who was fast at the 40 was Ronnie Brown. another 4.40 40. And don't forget about DE Julius Peppers. He is 6'6" and ran a really fast 40. http://www.sports1234.com/football-american/2016-1-football-american.html</div>
<div></div>
<div>Yet in reality Larry Johnson was slower than Toby Gerhart coming out of college. If Gerhart had run a 4.62 at the Combine like Johnson did he would have had a much more difficult time avoiding being switched to fullback in the NFL. Great example of how the Caste System media propaganda machine works.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
Don Wassall said:There were teams in the '90s that started three and fewer Whites. The Cardinals, Cowboys and Steelers come to mind. In fact the success of the latter two seemed to spur on the move to make the o-line a black position as both teams had all-black lines at various times. The Steelers were the first team ever to have an all-black line, right after Bill Cowher was hired.
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>Brian Billick was hired by the Ravens for the '99 season and Jim Haslett began coaching the Saints in '00. Both were fanatical Caste disciples that went to almost all-black teams at the beginning of the '00s. </div>
<div></div>
<div>There certainly has been noticeably more teams starting 3 or fewer Whites since 2000, three just to begin the '10 season and another half dozen with just 4. </div>
whiteathlete33 said:I know what you were trying to say Don. Sorry if my post was a little misleading. During a majority of the 90's the Cowboys had at least four white starters but as you stated a few seasons did have three white starters. After Novacek the Cowboys started Dave Lafleuer(spelling) and Eric Bjornson at tight end. Novacek was basically a wide receiver who had many productive seasons.
Don Wassall said:<div></div>whiteathlete33 said:I know what you were trying to say Don. Sorry if my post was a little misleading. During a majority of the 90's the Cowboys had at least four white starters but as you stated a few seasons did have three white starters. After Novacek the Cowboys started Dave Lafleuer(spelling) and Eric Bjornson at tight end. Novacek was basically a wide receiver who had many productive seasons.
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>You wrote that no team in the '90s started less than 4 Whites. That wasn't "a little misleading," it was inaccurate. Naming various white players on the Cowboys is irrelevant to that point.</div>
Don Wassall said:So, knowing that starting lineups fluctuate from week to week, you researched every game for every team in the 1990s and didn't find a single time in which a team started less than 4 Whites, is that what you're telling me?
Don Wassall said:And your "research" found that Buddy Ryan's Cardinals teams never started less than 4 Whites?
whiteathlete33 said:Don Wassall said:And your "research" found that Buddy Ryan's Cardinals teams never started less than 4 Whites?
I never said anything about the Cardinals or Steelers but I'm going to check them out as well.
whiteathlete33 said:Don Wassall said:So, knowing that starting lineups fluctuate from week to week, you researched every game for every team in the 1990s and didn't find a single time in which a team started less than 4 Whites, is that what you're telling me?
I researched every single season. No I didn't research every single game. That would be ridiculous. Regardless there were four white starters a season unless white players were injured for several games.