2010-11 NFL Playoffs

Charlie

Guru
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
354
This may seem odd, but I contend that thing Brady was wearing over his head contributed to his poor play. I realize it was cold, and too much discomfort can be a bad thing, but too much comfort can be bad as well.

Brady seemed to have little sense of where the 'rush' was. Hearing is a big part of sensing where other players are. But when your ears are completely covered that has to affect hearing. Do other QBs wear something like that? It looks nifty, like a knight with a chainmail cowl, but still.

He may have had the flu yet didn't talk about it because he wasn't excuse seeking.
 

Deadlift

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
5,240
Location
North Carolina
The playoffs are essentially "Detroit1 -vs- Detroit2" and
"Detroit3 -vs- Detroit4" and so on..

Sometimes a Kansas City (MO) or Columbus (OH) will be in the playoffs, but they'll face the prospect of being CONSUMED by one of the Detroits.. an uphill battle. It's just the way it is, and the Caste Masters' would have it no other way.
 

whiteathlete33

Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 18, 2007
Messages
12,669
Location
New Jersey
Some of the posts in this thread are just crazy. QB Dog Killer, the guy who was supposed to have the fairy tale season is out. That's good enough for me.

The Jets were just a better team, at least this Sunday. I don't think the Jets are the better team overall but they happened to have a better game plan. It's not like the Patriots can win it every year.
 

johnnyboy

Guru
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
357
Location
California
alln2 said:
snow said:
a white friendly offense losing one game doesn't mean blacks are better athletes. Besides, most of the mistakes were by non whites, a drop by Crumpler, a drop by Chung, a drop by Branch. White players have down days, get over it. I fail to see how that makes blacks better athletes. Stop feeling sorry for yourself. There are still the Packers to root for.
What about the OL who played like sh1t?  You think the MSM missed that? They surely mentioned the 5 sacks in their game report. Drop by Crumpler yeah, but why the **** was he in the first place in the position to drop the ball when Gronk was very good all season in the endzone?   Just another coincidence in a game full of "coincidences". Drop by Chung, when that play had no chance of succeeding, and there was absolutely no need for it.   Without that dumb "trick" play, they would have lead at HT, regrouped at HT and come out swinging. Instead, that "trick" play placed NE under pressure for the rest of the game.  Just another coincidence in a game full of "coincidences". Drop by Branch, yeah, thats what you get when you go to the afrolet on a big play, and thats what you deserve.  Packers?  They are still very much a caste team, lone White reciever in Nelson who is allowed maybe 1 big play a game, then he makes ways for the superior athletes, 2 Whites on defence, Kuhn mostly in his caste position at FB, blocking for the superior athlete.  Yeah, the Packers are very much a Caste team. Maybe you fail to see, but be sure that the MSM will not fail to plaster the Jets afroletes all over their magazines, sites and newspapers.  Check out nfl.com to see MSM congratulating the afroletes for their big win.


Don,

please delete this idiots' posts before we see them again on the Mr Rachel Maddow show. Edited by: johnnyboy
 

Mighty Joe

Newbie
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
78
i knew this would be a very tough game for New England despite being on a different planet from the Jets in terms of talent.The Pats have been thrashing everyone in sight and i always believe it comes down to the law of averages that a defeat will eventually come their way.It always seems to pan out that way,particularly the last few seasons.The 16-0 Pats team eventually getting beat post season,the brilliant Colts last season going 14-0 before losing the final.The Pats basically peaked when they should have been playing their best football now.Its very hard to keep winning,for players to maintain the same level of focus and intensity.Players take their eye off the ball and start believing that all they have to do is turn up and the wins theirs.And i think this happened to the Pats.The good thing is that the Packers are peaking and playing their best football now particularly Rogers who looks phenominal.If the Packers win the Super Bowl,then the Colts and Pats defeats wont matter.
 

foreverfree

Mentor
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
902
Toby Hillis said:
Alln2, this would of been the PERFECT year to finally have that one black QB who lead his team through the majority of his teams regular season games, through the playoffs to the Super Bowl and won a championship.  I'm talking about Mike Vick of course and the season he had was well beyond anybody's expectations.  He played at a high level for most of the year, yet his season ended by throwing a pick in the endzone.  I think the fact that there has still NEVER been a black QB to do what I just said should just end the notion of a fixed NFL(along with countless other clues that would point this out).  It's not like the fixed-NFL-powers that be would think, "we really want to let a black QB win a Super Bowl, but if we let a black QB win just one, that will blow our cover and everyone will know we're a fixed league."  Also, remember that the Pats team that won 3 Super Bowls(including the one where Brady beat a puking Mcnabb. Why wasnt that one fixed?) featured a RELATIVELY good amount of White players.  Sorry Don, just had to get that out...

Didn't a brutha named Doug Williams already do that in the 1987 (SB 22) season for Gibbskins I (as I like to call Gibbs' first go round in DC)? IIRC Williams got his break when Jay Schroeder went down in the season opener and Williams took it from there, to the point that he was SB MVP.

John
Edited by: foreverfree
 

Kaptain

Master
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
3,383
Location
Minnesota
This was a lose for us, but certainly nothing to mull over for more than one day. Though one of the whitest teams in the NFL the Patriots are still a majority black team. Even if they were an all white team named the New England Nordics and undefeated in the regular season it doesn't ensure them victory in a game of football. A football game is rather short. A single bad pass, a dropped ball, a dropped snap on a fake punt could effect the outcome of any game.

We have tended to give a little too much credit to Bill Belichek and therefore take the lose too personally. Belichek is not on some secret caste football mission to build the leagues only all white team. He is just a little bit less unfriendly to white offensive skill players than most. I'll give him credit for picking up Wes Welker years ago and drafting Edelman, but Danny Woodhead fell into his lap with stars aligning Hillis/Shanahan style. Woodhead was probably just picked up to play head games with the Jets and a day later Kevin Faulk has a season ending injury. While Woodhead was used all season, law firm got the majority of carries all season long. After a year featuring his explosiveness, excelling in Welker's role, and a great playoff performance Julian Edelman wasted most of the year on the bench.

Ultimately the Patriots lost because a couple a physical errors and they were out-coached - white chess player vs. white chess player. Simply running the ball more in the first half and not going to the hurry-up in the second is a coaching mistake - not rocket science. All in all the Patriots weren't on their toes and didn't put their best foot forward.
 

Kaptain

Master
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
3,383
Location
Minnesota
A reminder that the Packers (not the Patriots) are the whitest team in the NFL. Like the Pats they have an all-white OL, a white WR, a white TE, and a white RB. They also feature a white defensive MVP.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Its quite simple I want to see more white football players, especially at the caste protected positions of corner and runningback. Why wouldn't the media sniffers and the black athletes not want to see more diversity at those two positions. I would ask them point blank, I would especially like to ask Deon Sanders this question.
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Man, getting over the depression of last night. I saw the game at two bars in Venice Beach Ca. Most of the DWFs wanted the Jets. I have no answer for this.

Like Highlander mentioned. I agree that the teams who get a bye maybe lose some of the rhythm and timing. I think that interception by Brady kind of set the tone for the game. Whatever, the PATS just were not clicking. They had a chance to send it into O/T, but that last TD run by some Jet affelet RB and poor pursuit angle by another affeletic linebacker sealed their fate.

Next weeks games I hope for the obvious choice of the Packers against Hatie Smiff and Ryan of all people against AA choice who is still in the league looking like a pimp Tomlin.

Weeks ago I said 'sometimes life is fair. Where Danny seized the moment on Monday Night Football and had a great game.' We all know, however, life is not fair, but just have to slog through it. The retarded talk of fixed games really puts a dark cloud over this site. I hope those who support this rationale put it in the 'Happy Hour' forum from this point forward.
 

LabMan

Mentor
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
644
Location
Pennsylvania
I was pulling for N.E. all year because of so many White players involved,an observation while watching the game was that Tom Brady went down easier than usual from some hits that were not that violent,anyone else agree?
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
LabMan, what I know is that Aron Rodgers is the better overall QB. This includes Brady. When Rodgers feels or senses the heat, he has the ability to evade the rush or sack and make a play. Brady, although an elite pocket passer, and deserved MVP for 2010, does not possess Rodger's ability in this area.
 

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,975
Location
Arkansas
i hated to see the Pats lose, but even so there is an awful lot of overreaction in this thread. i think Freethinker and Electric Slide said it better than i could, so i'm going to quote them in order for anyone who missed their perspective to have a second chance to take note. cheers, gentlemen.
smiley20.gif


Freethinker said:
I wanted to Pats to win but I am certainly no team fan. Until a team is over 50% White, then we never lose any of these games. It's all black beating black. In terms of White players today, we did great.

Greg Oslen leading receiver.
Brandon Stokley leading receiver.
Hasslebeck and Cutler great games with 5 TD to 0 Intos.
Brian Urlacher leading tackler.
Danny Woodhead leading rusher.
Rob Gronkowski leading receiver.
Eric Smith and Mike DeVito leading the Jets D in a win.

Our few guys more than held their own today and that's what I will take away from this.

Electric Slide said:
Wow I can't believe how many posts there have been in this thread in the past 3 hours, probably some sort of record!

Anyway, I think it's time to redirect this thread. Can we all agree to 86 this fix talk? This is an issue that really divides us here. We all know the purpose of this site is not to look into these type of things. Let's stick to the issue at hand, supporting white athletes and raising awareness about the caste system. Please can we all agree to this, because that's the only way forward. Yes, arguing about a fix may provide some exciting fodder at first, but this is the type of thing where people's feelings really get hurt, one way or the other, and people start jumping ship from both sides. Let's just realign ourselves together for a common purpose now

About the game, yes I'm bummed but it's football and anything can happen on any given day. Sometimes there are triumphs, like when Hillis gashed the patriots for 184 yards. Were we upset the Patriots lost to the blacker Browns that day?

There are days when Lemeitre runs under 10 seconds, Jeremy Wariner wins the gold medal, Hillis rushes over 1000 yards, BYU beats Oklahoma, and John Kuhn, who most of us didn't even know existed 4 months ago (myself included) scores 3 touchdowns.

There are also days when the Patriots lose on a freak 4th down catch in the super bowl, Welker blows his knee out in a meaningless game, Austin Collie gets injured for the season after 2 TDs and 8 catches in a half, Toby Gerhart barely misses out on the Heisman, and the Patriots with a whiter offense than we've seen in decades lose in the first playoff game.

There are ups and downs in life. We saw a lot of ups this weekend, and some downs.

This may be a blessing in disguise. As most of us here I wanted Packers and Patriots in the SB, but maybe now the Packers and crush the Jets or Steelers, then maybe we'll be even happier.

If that doesn't happen, then life goes on. Teams are already getting ready for next season. There are other triumphs and tragedies we will get to experience. This is life. It's unpredictable.

"Every adversity, every failure, every heartache carries with it the seed on an equal or greater benefit." -Napoleon Hill

As a side note lets keep building up and supporting this site. If you haven't contributed to the drive to rebuild the site please consider sending in some money, even if it's only 3, 4, or 5 bucks. It's important that we have a high percentage of people contributing.

Let's be like the great white QBs we admire and keep our cool even when things don't go our way.
Great weekend of football, I'm looking forward to the Packers, and John Kuhn, Aaron Rogers, Jordy Nelson and Tom Crabtree next week!

Take care CF and goodnight!

also, for anyone who missed the National Anthem performed by Jim Cornelison before the Chicago-Seattle game , i've posted it below. enjoy!

[tube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-BCPymjGI4[/tube]Edited by: Jimmy Chitwood
 

icsept

Master
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
3,773
Location
Oklahoma
Very disapponting to see the Pats lose. Belichik got too cute and got out coached. Then, when the Pats got down, they had no sense of urgency. Then it was over. The Pats coal black defense did not make a single big play.
 

alln2

Guru
Joined
Jul 3, 2010
Messages
242
Don Wassall said:
<div>I notice your IP address is located in Bucharest, Romania. What network did you watch the game on there? </div>
<div></div>

Yes, Im from Romania. The site where I watch is http://www.atdhe.net , they usually have all NFL games. And there are other sites with links to streams, like http://www.fromsport.com, http://www.livescorehunter.com, or http://www.myp2p.eu/index.php?part=sports.

The network is that in which one of scumbag announcers claimed that "its hard to spot" Woodhead. When Brady was under pressure he threw it at his legs, and one announcer first claimed grounding, then the other announcer pointed out that Woodhead was in the area, and the first announcer derisively claimed that Woodhead "its hard to spot", thats why he made the mistake of calling it grounding. I wonder how many times did he made that comment towards the midget negroes who play in the NFL. Yeah, thats the network.
Edited by: alln2
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
On a positive note I tallied that of the 232 points scored by teams in the four games this weekend 108 of them were by white players. Other then the Pats-Jets game ironically (only 9 of 49 points by white players) the other games were much more well balanced with white players scoring over 50% of the points in two of them and nearly 50% in the other. This is a whole magnitude better then in past seasons and is definitely a sign that things are moving in the right direction.
 

white lightning

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
21,492
The day after. I agree that the game was tough but it was legit. The play calling still makes me sick to my stomach but between that and the many mistakes, the Pats lost. It's just hard to see a arrogant bunch of a**holes talk the talk and then walk the walk. I can't stand the Jets. I wish there was a rematch but the Pats will be back. I just feel bad for Brady and the Patriots. They lost the Super Bowl after going 16-0 and now fall short after a 14-2 season. Brady could have had 5 rings now and been the best of all time. Oh well. I hope they remember this lose all off season.
 

Borussia

Guru
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
231
Location
Florida
Lots of proper perspective here. The Jets outperformed the Patriots. Teams split the season series and both of those games weren't really close. Yes, I do 'blame' Pats coaching and game plan...inept and no sense of urgency most of the game.
Benching Welker the 1st series shows a lack of loyalty to your team. Belichik makes his point, but subconsciously it illustrates that he doesn't have the players' back sometimes.
It did not cost them the game and there exists no conspiracy. The Jets out played, out coached and out performed the Patriots in the playoff game.

Jets have gone to Indy to Foxborough and now on the road to Pittsburgh. If they win next week, we have to be fair and give them credit.
That would be impressive to win all 3 in the playoffs.

After digesting this loss yesterday, I have become more impressed with the Jets (reluctantly) then angry or mad at the Patriots for blowing this game.
Part of being Caste aware is to have a firm grip on reality and to be objective.
The results are on the field. Jets beat the Pats 2 games to 1 and deserved to win yesterday.

Now my subjectivity: this game along with a few other playoff and SB losses, will help to displace this Bellichik as God Coach.
He surely is not whatsoever.

Packers are our hope now.
 

chris371

Mentor
Joined
Dec 1, 2006
Messages
716
They lost in the playoffs, but screw it, this white offense beat some affletic defenses all year. Cant win em all. Soon there will be more teams similar to the pats.
Anyway I wont let this get me down, sports is still just a brief escape from life to relax a little. The pats losing isnt going to affect my life, i hope you guys dont feel down too much.
 

Wolfman82

Newbie
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
55
Location
Ft. Worth
The wayhe coached its clear to me that Belichikwas not trying to win the game. Brady threw more balls in the dirt than he ever has too. The Packers are the team now for sure, and Im inGBs corner, but after what I sawlast night I wouldnt bet on them.
Id like to point out the HUGE difference between NE, and GB. Welker, and Woodhead. That made them NFL enemy number one. Its not cool to be that good with 2 white men under 5ft10, and less than 200 lbs.
 

Matra1

Mentor
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
527
Location
Outside North America
I agree with the following from Fox Sports:

Belichick was being outcoached on Sunday before the game even started. He decided to bench Wes Welker for the game's first series...

But did I miss something? Did Welker get a DUI last week that we didn't hear about? Earlier this season, Ryan benched Braylon Edwards for one quarter of a regular-season game after his DUI arrest. By sitting Welker on the team's first possession, delaying his entry into the game until there was 5:44 left in the first quarter, Belichick almost matched the punishment given Edwards.

For what? For trying to be funny?

Do you think there was any way Ryan would have sat a player for so much as a snap this week if he believed it might hurt his chances of winning by even 1/10 of 1 percent? No freakin' way.

But that's the arrogance of Bill Belichick. He believes he can play the first possession of a playoff game with one weapon tethered to the sideline to emphasize adherence to The Belichick Way.

So what happened on that first possession?

On first-and-10 at the Jets' 28, the Patriots called an ill-advised screen pass to BenJarvus Green-Ellis, which Tom Brady airmailed, leading to a pick and a 58-yard return by David Harris.

Green-Ellis had been targeted a total of 16 times all season, catching 12 passes. Welker was targeted 122 times, hauling in 86 receptions, including countless quick screens. Had Welker been on the field on that first possession, it's not unreasonable to assume the Patriots would not have gone to the BenJarvus Green-Ellis-as-primary-receiver well.


Fox Sports

For weeks all I've heard is that Belichick outsmarts everybody and runs a classy outfit that doesn't tolerate trash talk. It's as if he had been reading too much of his own press and thought he could do no wrong.
 

Bart

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
4,329
Matra1 said:
I agree with the following from Fox Sports:

But did I miss something? Did Welker get a DUI last week that we didn't hear about? Earlier this season, Ryan benched Braylon Edwards for one quarter of a regular-season game after his DUI arrest. By sitting Welker on the team's first possession, delaying his entry into the game until there was 5:44 left in the first quarter, Belichick almost matched the punishment given Edwards.

For what? For trying to be funny?

Do you think there was any way Ryan would have sat a player for so much as a snap this week if he believed it might hurt his chances of winning by even 1/10 of 1 percent? No freakin' way.

But that's the arrogance of Bill Belichick. He believes he can play the first possession of a playoff game with one weapon tethered to the sideline to emphasize adherence to The Belichick Way.

So what happened on that first possession?

On first-and-10 at the Jets' 28, the Patriots called an ill-advised screen pass to BenJarvus Green-Ellis, which Tom Brady airmailed, leading to a pick and a 58-yard return by David Harris.

Green-Ellis had been targeted a total of 16 times all season, catching 12 passes. Welker was targeted 122 times, hauling in 86 receptions, including countless quick screens. Had Welker been on the field on that first possession, it's not unreasonable to assume the Patriots would not have gone to the BenJarvus Green-Ellis-as-primary-receiver well.[/i]

I cooled down a bit from yesterday but reading about Welker being benched kindled a few embers. Brady hadn't thrown a pick in 10/11 games and only 4 on the year. That pick in the first quarter was his lamest toss of the year! The beginning of the game often sets the tone in playoff games.

Oh, but Welker was admonished, humiliated and benched and made an example of...for what?

Compare what he said to the garbage the affroletes were spewing.

Talk about stabbing your guy in the back, Belichick. Way to inspire your team.

Oh, but today is MLK day, so perhaps BB was doing his duty.

Yahoo Sports has a photo of Lovie Smith and Tomlin on the page. An article about the wonderful Rooney rule follows. Brother!
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
That Fox Sports writer is echoing some of what I wrote yesterday.
 

Jack Lambert

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
4,743
Bart said:
Matra1 said:
I agree with the following from Fox Sports:

But did I miss something? Did Welker get a DUI last week that we didn't hear about? Earlier this season, Ryan benched Braylon Edwards for one quarter of a regular-season game after his DUI arrest. By sitting Welker on the team's first possession, delaying his entry into the game until there was 5:44 left in the first quarter, Belichick almost matched the punishment given Edwards.

For what? For trying to be funny?

Do you think there was any way Ryan would have sat a player for so much as a snap this week if he believed it might hurt his chances of winning by even 1/10 of 1 percent? No freakin' way.

But that's the arrogance of Bill Belichick. He believes he can play the first possession of a playoff game with one weapon tethered to the sideline to emphasize adherence to The Belichick Way.

So what happened on that first possession?

On first-and-10 at the Jets' 28, the Patriots called an ill-advised screen pass to BenJarvus Green-Ellis, which Tom Brady airmailed, leading to a pick and a 58-yard return by David Harris.

Green-Ellis had been targeted a total of 16 times all season, catching 12 passes. Welker was targeted 122 times, hauling in 86 receptions, including countless quick screens. Had Welker been on the field on that first possession, it's not unreasonable to assume the Patriots would not have gone to the BenJarvus Green-Ellis-as-primary-receiver well.[/i]

I cooled down a bit from yesterday but reading about Welker being benched kindled a few embers. Brady hadn't thrown a pick in 10/11 games and only 4 on the year. That pick in the first quarter was his lamest toss of the year! The beginning of the game often sets the tone in playoff games.

Oh, but Welker was admonished, humiliated and benched and made an example of...for what?

Compare what he said to the garbage the affroletes were spewing.

Talk about stabbing your guy in the back, Belichick. Way to inspire your team.

Oh, but today is MLK day, so perhaps BB was doing his duty.

Yahoo Sports has a photo of Lovie Smith and Tomlin on the page. An article about the wonderful Rooney rule follows. Brother!

Even Jason Whitlock thinks the Rooney Rule needs to be changed. I read one of his articles where he says it needs to be taken off, since it's served it's purpose already.
 
Top