Will the White Race Survive?

chris371

Mentor
Joined
Dec 1, 2006
Messages
715
We are supposed to care about tortoises, whales, etc, dying out. But when it comes to ourselves, were supposed to not care in the least. What a joke.
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
Powerful video!
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
The Awakenig = Tea Parties!
 

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,975
Location
Arkansas
jaxvid said:
Powerful video!


i second this. truly, a powerful video!
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
A simply exceptional video, as usual. Duke' statements are quite accurate; I meet more and more "eyes open"Â￾ whites every single day. So much has changed, especially in the past 2-3 years.
 

Mezza

Newbie
Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
14
<div id="watch-stats-main-column-insight">





<div id="watch-full-stats">
<div id="watch-honors" ="watch-stats-section">

<div ="watch-stats-title-text">
Honors for this video (13)</span>
</div>
<div id="watch-honors-">


<div ="statItem">#8 - Most Discussed (Today)) - News &amp; Politics</div>


<div ="statItem">#41 - Most Viewed (Today)) - News &amp; Politics - Australia</div>


<div ="statItem">#44 - Most Viewed (Today)) - News &amp; Politics - Canada</div>


<div ="statItem">#59 - Most Viewed (Today)) - News &amp; Politics - United Kingdom</div>


<div ="statItem">#55 - Most Viewed (Today)) - News &amp; Politics - Ireland</div>


<div ="statItem">#54 - Most Viewed (Today)) - News &amp; Politics - New Zealand</div>


<div ="statItem">#70 - Most Viewed (Today)) - News &amp; Politics</div>


<div ="statItem">#34 - Most Viewed (Today)) - News &amp; Politics - South Africa</div>


<div ="statItem">#62 - Most Viewed (Today)) - News &amp; Politics - Czech Republic</div>


<div ="statItem">#23 - Most Viewed (Today)) - News &amp; Politics - Sweden</div>


<div ="statItem">#8 - Top Favorited (Today)) - News &amp; Politics</div>


<div ="statItem">#20 - Top Rated (Today)) - News &amp; Politics</div>


<div ="statItem">#68 - Top Rated (This Week)) - News &amp; Politics

KEEP IT VIRAL!
</div>


</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
I was reading Teddy Roosevelt's letters and he explicitly mentions the danger of race suicide. What President would say something like that now. I'll see if I can get a quote.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,444
Location
Pennsylvania
Europe said:
I was reading Teddy Roosevelt's letters and he explicitly mentions the danger of race suicide. What President would say something like that now. I'll see if I can get a quote.








There's a book on the topic, "Theodore Roosevelt on Race, Riots, Immigration and Crime":
http://www.northernvoicebookstore.com/viewproduct.asp?ID={17778473-3D07-4E24-807A-FA35845C724B}

Here's a Teddy quote on immigration from 1907: "In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin.

"But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American. . . There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag. . . We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language. And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

Here's a pic of Roosevelt giving a speech. For some reason Presidents didn't need to be surrounded by an army of Secret Service agents walling them off from the American people back then:
teddy-roosevelt_speech.jpg
 

j41181

Master
Joined
Nov 23, 2008
Messages
2,344
"...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag. . . We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language. And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

This is what the USA of today is missing.
smiley7.gif
 

jcolec02

Mentor
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
886
Location
Tennessee
Look at that picture, surrounded by the American people while giving a speech, just the look of that makes it seem like he was a man of the people. (not to mention he helped to create Yellowstone National Park)
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
"Here's a pic of Roosevelt giving a speech. For some reason Presidents didn't need to be surrounded by an army of Secret Service agents walling them off from the American people back then"

But, TR got to be Pres by an assasination of Mckinley and TR also was shot and his eye glass case saved life. It wasn't that safe then.

It terms of being an American first; I still don't want the hordes of Mexicans in this country even if they wave the American flag. I am tired of all immigration. I am surrounded by foreigners in my area and I don't consider them Americans, even if they do.You know an American when you meet one,North,South,East or West accent. The immigrants now have only one foot in the country. Many of them have duel citizenship , which shouldn't be allowed.

For example, there is an English guy on Fox Soccer Channel who had a son in America. This guy has been in the US for 20-30 years, but he wants his son to play for the English National Team. Few in the 30's or 40's would think like that. First, his son shouldn't be allowed to play for England and 2nd his son should consider himself an American. I don't know how the guy even got in the country.
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
TR said,"I very much wish that Australia would encourage Europrean immigration or would see a higher birth rate among its own citizens."

"Both the US and Canada are increasing so much in population that it is hard to imagine a ethnic conquest by a yellow race here on the mainland."

I wonder how he would feel about all the 3rd world immigration into the US now?

"Our business is with our own nation, with our own people. If we can bring up the US we are doing well."
 

Charlie

Guru
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
354
"...TR also was shot and his eye glass case saved life..."

Shot by an immigrant. Still gave a 90 minute speech. The bullet remained in his chest for the rest of his life.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,444
Location
Pennsylvania
Europe said:
"Here's a pic of Roosevelt giving a speech. For some reason Presidents didn't need to be surrounded by an army of Secret Service agents walling them off from the American people back then"

But, TR got to be Pres by an assasination of Mckinley and TR also was shot and his eye glass case saved life. It wasn't that safe then.



I didn't say it was safe then, my point was the remarkable difference in the way politicians are insulated and "protected" from those who, in theory at least, are their employers.

And it's not like society is safer today, at least for non-politicians. It's far more dangerous for the average tax-paying serf.Take a look at these stories gathered just today at ANU News. And that's just the tip of the iceberg on any given day. Would you rather have a little less "safety" or a full-blown police state? http://www.anunews.net/
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
Don Wassall said:
Europe said:
"Here's a pic of Roosevelt giving a speech. For some reason Presidents didn't need to be surrounded by an army of Secret Service agents walling them off from the American people back then" But, TR got to be Pres by an assasination of Mckinley and TR also was shot and his eye glass case saved life. It wasn't that safe then.
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div> </div>
<div>I didn't say it was safe then, my point was the remarkable difference in the way politicians are insulated and "protected" from those who, in theory at least, are their employers.  </div>
<div> </div>
<div>And it's not like society is safer today, at least for non-politicians.  It's far more dangerous for the average tax-paying serf. Take a look at these stories gathered just today at ANU News.  And that's just the tip of the iceberg on any given day.  Would you rather have a little less "safety" or a full-blown police state? http://www.anunews.net/</div>

Yes, The politicians think of us as their subjects and not as their employers. They are doing everything they can to screw the average American over.

The politicians work for the corporations. John Dewey said, " Politics is the the shadow cast by big business over society." The businesses want immigration, outsourcing and NAFTA and they get it.
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
US childlessness is up, but racial gaps narrowing

By Hope Yen

Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) â€" Nearly 1 in 5 American women beyond childbearing years never gave birth as fewer couples, particularly higher-educated whites, view having children as necessary to a good marriage.

An analysis of census data by the Pew Research Center, being released Friday, documents the changes in fertility rates that are driving government projections that U.S. minorities will become the majority by midcentury.

The figures show that among all women ages 40-44, about 18 percent, or 1.9 million, were childless in 2008. That's up from 10 percent, or nearly 580,000 in 1976.

Broken down by race, roughly 20 percent of white women are childless, compared with 17 percent of blacks and of Hispanics and 16 percent of Asians. Still that gap has been narrowing: Since 1994, childlessness for blacks and Hispanics has grown by 30 percent, about three times the rate for whites.

The numbers coincide with broader U.S. trends of delayed marriage and increased opportunities for women, who now outnumber men in the work force and have drawn even with them in advanced degrees. After reaching a high of 3.7 children per woman during the baby boom, the U.S. fertility rate dropped to a historic low of 1.7 during the mid-1970s and stands at about 2.

The findings also come amid a historic demographic shift in which blacks, Hispanics, Asians and multiracial people are growing rapidly in the U.S. population and wielding more influence in politics and society. Minority babies now make up nearly half of all U.S. births.

"Social pressure to bear children appears to have diminished for women and that today, the decision to have a child is seen as an individual choice," according to the report by Pew researchers Gretchen Livingston and D'Vera Cohn. "Improved opportunities and contraceptive methods help create alternatives for women."

While higher-educated women overall are more likely to be childless, that may be slowly changing. In 2008, about 24 percent of women ages 40-44 with a master's, doctoral or professional degree did not have children, a decline from 31 percent in 1994.

In the meantime, childlessness has risen sharply for women with less than a high school diploma â€" from 9 percent in 1994 to 15 percent in 2008.

Other findings:

â€"Less than half, or 41 percent, of surveyed Americans said that children were very important for a successful marriage. Still, a rising share of people â€" about 38 percent in 2009 â€" say the trend of increased childlessness is bad for society.

â€"More births are from women who never married. Among never-married women ages 40-44, about 56 percent were childless in 2008 compared with 71 percent in 1994.

â€"U.S. childless rates were somewhat similar, if not higher, compared with other industrialized nations. About 17 percent of U.S. women were childless at age 40, compared to 22 percent in England, and 17 percent in Italy and Ireland. The rates were between 12 percent and 14 percent for Spain, Norway, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden.

Pew, an independent research group, based its findings on 2008 data from the Census Bureau. The report analyzes the population of women who do not have biological children, as opposed to adoptive or stepchildren. Figures for "white" refer to those whites who are not of Hispanic ethnicity.

http://www.ajc.com/news/us-childlessness-is-up-557314.html

Edited by: DixieDestroyer
 

Guest

Newbie
Joined
Dec 17, 2005
Messages
82
Hate to say it but this will be very difficult to solve.

One reason is that Whites in their 20's and even 30's want to continue to live like their teenagers. They would rather spend their free time club hopping, getting drunk/wasted at parties, sleeping around w/ multiple partners, etc. as opposed to getting married and starting families. Asians and Hispanics start having getting married and having families much earlier, while Blacks are just less likely to use condoms and have illegit. children. Either way colored women have more kids at a younger age than white women.

From the Middle Ages-1900's it the opposite. It was White Europeans who were populating the earth due to early marriages and several children. Sadly I don't see any way of changing this trend. Rich white kids just want to get party all night and have fun till their 40's. They don't care about the future of their race.

What's worse is my cousin who is a doctor tells me that the later women have children, the higher at risk they are for birth defects and mental illnesses. It's no coincidence these have become a lot more common in white children in the past 50 years.
 
Top