An important difference is that Shipley can be a three down back in the NFL, a bellcow. Woodhead was never seen as anything more than a third down scatback because of his size, which is why the comparisons are limiting to Shipley and his proven ability and the role he played at Clemson. He may not be as good as Christian McCaffrey (but has the talent to be very, very good) but for those who are only capable of comparing White players to other White players, McCaffrey is the obvious comp. So when his head coach makes the Woodhead comparison others pick up on it and it quickly becomes the hive mind norm.
An example is Jon Ritchie, the former NFL blocking fullback, raving about Shipley -- until you go a little further down the article and find this quote: "I love the Shipley to Danny Woodhead comparison."
https://www.audacy.com/94wip/sports...eagles-rookie-rb-will-shipley-reps-play-snaps Well, I don't.
It may be well intentioned, but it's no different than the Carson Steele can be a fullback hive mind take. If Steele was black, no one would be advocating for him being a fullback. If Shipley was black, there would be no comparisons made to Danny Woodhead, none. They're nothing alike other than skin color and the easy, lazy comparisons based on that alone that we've been hearing and reading about forever when it comes to White RBs and WRs result from that, not an objective analysis of their respective strengths and talents.