Colonel_Reb
Hall of Famer
White Starters in Major College Football in 2009</span> by Colonel Reb
http://www.castefootball.us/viewarticle.asp?sportID=3&teamID=0&ID=23486
(9/26/09)
This picture illustrates the plight of the white college football
player in 2009. Marginalized years ago, by white coaches who embraced
black players for their supposed athletic superiority, whites have been
forced to the back of the bus at many positions.
Using even
the most conservative estimate, whites make up over two-thirds
of the U.S. population in 2009. It seems highly unlikely that a game
that whites have enjoyed and excelled at for so many years could be so
dominated by non-whites simply by chance, especially when you consider
that the vast majority of U.S. high school football players are white.
Even
with many half white rosters in FBS football in 2009, the number of
white starters is much lower, partly due to the influence of pro-Caste
college football recruiting services that consistently rank non-white
players higher than white players with equal or better skills and/or
stats. When whites are recruited at positions like cornerback,
tailback, or wide receiver, they are often buried on the depth chart by
coaches who could care less about their talents, or they are told to
switch to a more racially correct (but often unnatural) position like
safety, linebacker, tight end, or fullback.
Many times,
superior white players will sit the bench in favor of inferior black
athletes who start even after performing badly for several games. Such
discrimination goes un-reported by mainstream sports journalists;
however, we at Caste Football are here to report all the facts so white
football recruits can choose teams that are more likely to give them a
fair chance to play their natural position, whatever it may be. Most of
the blame for such widespread anti-white discrimination should rightly
be placed on the university athletic administrators and coaches of the
FBS, who buy into the Caste hype and recruit nearly all-black classes
each year, while telling the record breaking white stars to walk on or
go to a smaller school.
Here are the breakdowns of white
starters by team and conference, using the 22 full-time offensive and
defensive positions as a baseline for comparisons. As you scroll down,
you will notice some interesting geographical factors to these numbers.
Southeastern Conference
Vanderbilt-11/22
Alabama-8/22
Arkansas-7/22
Tennessee-6/22
Georgia-5/22
LSU-5/22
Mississippi State-5/22
Ole Miss-5/22
South Carolina-5/22
Auburn-3/22
Florida-3/22
Kentucky-3/22
Total of 66/264 (25%) in the SEC
Mountain West Conference
BYU-16/22
Colorado State-16/22
Air Force-15/22
Wyoming-15/22
Texas Christian-10/22
New Mexico-8/22
San Diego State-8/22
UNLV-8/22
Utah-8/22
Total of 104/198 (52.52%) in the MWC
Big 12
Nebraska-13/22
Colorado-12/22
Kansas State-12/22
Kansas-11/22
Texas A&M-10/22
Baylor-9/22
Missouri-9/22
Texas-9/22
Texas Tech-8/22
Iowa State-7/22
Oklahoma-7/22
Oklahoma State-5/22
Total of 112/264 (42.4%) in the Big 12
Big 10
Northwestern-15/22
Iowa-13/22
Wisconsin-13/22
</span>Penn State-12/22</span>
Michigan State-11/22
Minnesota-11/22
Ohio State-11/22
Purdue-11/22
Indiana-9/22
Michigan-8/22
Illinois-4/22
Total of 118/242 (48.76%) in the Big 10
FBS Independents
Army-13/22
Navy-13/22
Notre Dame-10/22
Total of 36/66 (54.5%) for the Independents
Atlantic Coast Conference
Wake Forest-11/22
Boston College-10/22
North Carolina-9/22
Virginia-9/22
Duke-7/22
Georgia Tech-7/22
North Carolina State-7/22
Florida State-6/22
Virginia Tech-6/22
Clemson-5/22
Maryland-4/22
Miami-4/22
Total of 85/264 (32.2%) in the ACC
Sun Belt Conference
Western Kentucky-13/22
Troy-10/22
Florida International-9/22
Louisiana Monroe-8/22
Florida Atlantic-7/22
Arkansas State-6/22
Louisiana Lafayette-6/22
North Texas-5/22
Middle Tennessee State-4/22
Total of 68/198 (34.3%) in the Sun Belt
Conference-USA
Central Florida-12/22
Southern Methodist-11/22
Rice-10/22
Tulsa-10/22
Tulane-8/22
Southern Miss-6/22
UAB-6/22
Houston-5/22
Marshall-5/22
UTEP-5/22
Memphis-4/22
East Carolina-3/22
Total of 85/264 (32.2%) in C-USA
Mid-America Conference
Central Michigan-13/22
Eastern Michigan-12/22
Northern Illinois-12/22
Western Michigan-12/22
Ball State-11/22
Bowling Green-11/22
Buffalo-10/22
Kent State-10/22
Ohio-10/22
Miami-9/22
Toledo-8/22
Akron-7/22
Temple-6/22
Total of 131/286 (45.8%) in the MAC
Big East
Cincinnati-12/22
Rutgers-10/22
Connecticut-9/22
Pittsburgh-9/22
Syracuse-9/22
West Virginia-9/22
Louisville-6/22
South Florida-5/22
Total of 69/176 (39.2%) in the Big East
Western Athletic Conference
Boise State-10/22
Fresno State-10/22
Idaho-9/22
Louisiana Tech-8/22
New Mexico State-7/22
Hawaii-5/22
San Jose State-5/22
Utah State-5/22
Nevada-4/22
Total of 63/198 (31.82%) in the WAC
Pac-10
Stanford-15/22
Oregon State-12/22
Washington State-11/22
Oregon-10/22
California-8/22
UCLA-8/22
Washington-8/22
Arizona-7/22
Arizona State-7/22
USC-5/22
Total of 91/220 (41.36%) in the Pac-10
Total number of white starters in the FBS in 2009=1,028/2,640 = 38.94%
We
can compare the number of white starters by conference as either
members or non-members of the Bowl Championship System. There is a
slight difference between these two groups, with BCS member conferences
starting over 2% fewer whites than non-BCS member conferences.
Overall,
the whitest conference is the Mountain West, with over 52% white
starters. This is not a surprise, since many MWC teams are in areas
with almost entirely white populations, and they tend to have coaches
who are willing to give whites a fair chance for playing time at the
Caste positions of CB, RB, and WR.
The blackest conference is
no surprise either, that being the Southeastern Conference. The Caste
System has a strong hold on coaches in the Southeast, and they usually
aren't interested in fairness enough to consider recruiting a white
player for one of the ultra-Caste positions, let alone playing him.
BCS Members
Big 10-118/242 (48.76%)
Big 12-112/264 (42.4%)
Pac 10-91/220 (41.36%)
Big East-69/176 (39.2%)
ACC-85/264 (32.2%)
SEC-66/264 (25%)
Total of 541/1,430 (37.83%)
Non-BCS Members
Independents-36/66 (54.5%)
MWC-104/198 (52.52%)
MAC-131/286 (45.8%)
Sun Belt-68/198 (34.3%)
C-USA-85/264 (32.2%)
WAC-63/198 (31.82%)
Total of 487/1,210 (40.25%)
You
might be asking yourself where the good news is in all of this. The
good news is that since 2005, the number of half white or better FBS
teams has increased, which means that the situation can be improved by
using knowledge of anti-white discrimination to work in our favor.
The
best thing you can do with this article is to email it or print it off
and show it to your friends, relatives, and any white high school
players you know, so they can make wise decisions when it comes time
for them to choose a place to play one of the many sports that whites
have always excelled at, college football.</span>
Edited by: Colonel_Reb
(9/26/09)
This picture illustrates the plight of the white college football
player in 2009. Marginalized years ago, by white coaches who embraced
black players for their supposed athletic superiority, whites have been
forced to the back of the bus at many positions.
Using even
the most conservative estimate, whites make up over two-thirds
of the U.S. population in 2009. It seems highly unlikely that a game
that whites have enjoyed and excelled at for so many years could be so
dominated by non-whites simply by chance, especially when you consider
that the vast majority of U.S. high school football players are white.
Even
with many half white rosters in FBS football in 2009, the number of
white starters is much lower, partly due to the influence of pro-Caste
college football recruiting services that consistently rank non-white
players higher than white players with equal or better skills and/or
stats. When whites are recruited at positions like cornerback,
tailback, or wide receiver, they are often buried on the depth chart by
coaches who could care less about their talents, or they are told to
switch to a more racially correct (but often unnatural) position like
safety, linebacker, tight end, or fullback.
Many times,
superior white players will sit the bench in favor of inferior black
athletes who start even after performing badly for several games. Such
discrimination goes un-reported by mainstream sports journalists;
however, we at Caste Football are here to report all the facts so white
football recruits can choose teams that are more likely to give them a
fair chance to play their natural position, whatever it may be. Most of
the blame for such widespread anti-white discrimination should rightly
be placed on the university athletic administrators and coaches of the
FBS, who buy into the Caste hype and recruit nearly all-black classes
each year, while telling the record breaking white stars to walk on or
go to a smaller school.
Here are the breakdowns of white
starters by team and conference, using the 22 full-time offensive and
defensive positions as a baseline for comparisons. As you scroll down,
you will notice some interesting geographical factors to these numbers.
Southeastern Conference
Vanderbilt-11/22
Alabama-8/22
Arkansas-7/22
Tennessee-6/22
Georgia-5/22
LSU-5/22
Mississippi State-5/22
Ole Miss-5/22
South Carolina-5/22
Auburn-3/22
Florida-3/22
Kentucky-3/22
Total of 66/264 (25%) in the SEC
Mountain West Conference
BYU-16/22
Colorado State-16/22
Air Force-15/22
Wyoming-15/22
Texas Christian-10/22
New Mexico-8/22
San Diego State-8/22
UNLV-8/22
Utah-8/22
Total of 104/198 (52.52%) in the MWC
Big 12
Nebraska-13/22
Colorado-12/22
Kansas State-12/22
Kansas-11/22
Texas A&M-10/22
Baylor-9/22
Missouri-9/22
Texas-9/22
Texas Tech-8/22
Iowa State-7/22
Oklahoma-7/22
Oklahoma State-5/22
Total of 112/264 (42.4%) in the Big 12
Big 10
Northwestern-15/22
Iowa-13/22
Wisconsin-13/22
</span>Penn State-12/22</span>
Michigan State-11/22
Minnesota-11/22
Ohio State-11/22
Purdue-11/22
Indiana-9/22
Michigan-8/22
Illinois-4/22
Total of 118/242 (48.76%) in the Big 10
FBS Independents
Army-13/22
Navy-13/22
Notre Dame-10/22
Total of 36/66 (54.5%) for the Independents
Atlantic Coast Conference
Wake Forest-11/22
Boston College-10/22
North Carolina-9/22
Virginia-9/22
Duke-7/22
Georgia Tech-7/22
North Carolina State-7/22
Florida State-6/22
Virginia Tech-6/22
Clemson-5/22
Maryland-4/22
Miami-4/22
Total of 85/264 (32.2%) in the ACC
Sun Belt Conference
Western Kentucky-13/22
Troy-10/22
Florida International-9/22
Louisiana Monroe-8/22
Florida Atlantic-7/22
Arkansas State-6/22
Louisiana Lafayette-6/22
North Texas-5/22
Middle Tennessee State-4/22
Total of 68/198 (34.3%) in the Sun Belt
Conference-USA
Central Florida-12/22
Southern Methodist-11/22
Rice-10/22
Tulsa-10/22
Tulane-8/22
Southern Miss-6/22
UAB-6/22
Houston-5/22
Marshall-5/22
UTEP-5/22
Memphis-4/22
East Carolina-3/22
Total of 85/264 (32.2%) in C-USA
Mid-America Conference
Central Michigan-13/22
Eastern Michigan-12/22
Northern Illinois-12/22
Western Michigan-12/22
Ball State-11/22
Bowling Green-11/22
Buffalo-10/22
Kent State-10/22
Ohio-10/22
Miami-9/22
Toledo-8/22
Akron-7/22
Temple-6/22
Total of 131/286 (45.8%) in the MAC
Big East
Cincinnati-12/22
Rutgers-10/22
Connecticut-9/22
Pittsburgh-9/22
Syracuse-9/22
West Virginia-9/22
Louisville-6/22
South Florida-5/22
Total of 69/176 (39.2%) in the Big East
Western Athletic Conference
Boise State-10/22
Fresno State-10/22
Idaho-9/22
Louisiana Tech-8/22
New Mexico State-7/22
Hawaii-5/22
San Jose State-5/22
Utah State-5/22
Nevada-4/22
Total of 63/198 (31.82%) in the WAC
Pac-10
Stanford-15/22
Oregon State-12/22
Washington State-11/22
Oregon-10/22
California-8/22
UCLA-8/22
Washington-8/22
Arizona-7/22
Arizona State-7/22
USC-5/22
Total of 91/220 (41.36%) in the Pac-10
Total number of white starters in the FBS in 2009=1,028/2,640 = 38.94%
We
can compare the number of white starters by conference as either
members or non-members of the Bowl Championship System. There is a
slight difference between these two groups, with BCS member conferences
starting over 2% fewer whites than non-BCS member conferences.
Overall,
the whitest conference is the Mountain West, with over 52% white
starters. This is not a surprise, since many MWC teams are in areas
with almost entirely white populations, and they tend to have coaches
who are willing to give whites a fair chance for playing time at the
Caste positions of CB, RB, and WR.
The blackest conference is
no surprise either, that being the Southeastern Conference. The Caste
System has a strong hold on coaches in the Southeast, and they usually
aren't interested in fairness enough to consider recruiting a white
player for one of the ultra-Caste positions, let alone playing him.
BCS Members
Big 10-118/242 (48.76%)
Big 12-112/264 (42.4%)
Pac 10-91/220 (41.36%)
Big East-69/176 (39.2%)
ACC-85/264 (32.2%)
SEC-66/264 (25%)
Total of 541/1,430 (37.83%)
Non-BCS Members
Independents-36/66 (54.5%)
MWC-104/198 (52.52%)
MAC-131/286 (45.8%)
Sun Belt-68/198 (34.3%)
C-USA-85/264 (32.2%)
WAC-63/198 (31.82%)
Total of 487/1,210 (40.25%)
You
might be asking yourself where the good news is in all of this. The
good news is that since 2005, the number of half white or better FBS
teams has increased, which means that the situation can be improved by
using knowledge of anti-white discrimination to work in our favor.
The
best thing you can do with this article is to email it or print it off
and show it to your friends, relatives, and any white high school
players you know, so they can make wise decisions when it comes time
for them to choose a place to play one of the many sports that whites
have always excelled at, college football.</span>
Edited by: Colonel_Reb
