What Would It Take?

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,456
Location
Pennsylvania
If you can read this and not be infuriated you're a braindead DWF:

What Would It Take?

by Edmund Connelly

I believe Whites are willfully denying the clear and present danger we face. Whether it is through late or broken marriages, lackluster efforts at having replacement-level families, or feeble efforts at keeping the governing elite from importing a new (non-White) people, demographically, White Americans are in free fall. About this, the numbers speak clearly; there is no ambiguity.<?: prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:eek:ffice" /><O:p><A name=EC></A></O:p>

The National Policy Institute, for one, has an excellent set of free publications one can (and should) order. Here's one of their presentations showing how Whites are faring demographically in the Great Darwinian Race for Survival:<O:p>
NPI.png





A short video of this is available at YouTube<O:p>.</O:p>
The message of this decline is everywhere. For instance, <I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">The Atlantic Monthly[/I], that most American of magazines, founded in Boston in 1857 and featuring such luminaries as Harriet Beecher Stowe, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr., John Greenleaf Whittier and James Russell Lowell, was once as White as they come. Now they revel in the dispossession of White men.<O:p></O:p>
Readers no doubt saw the collectors' cover photo of President-Elect Barack Obama in the Jan-Feb, 2009 issue of the magazine last year:<O:p></O:p>
<o:wrapblock><?: prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" /><?: PREFIX = W /><W:WRAP ="topAndBottom" anchorx="page" anchory="page" ns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:word"></W:WRAP></v:shape></o:wrapblock>
Hua.bmp
<BR style="mso-ignore: vglayout" clear=all><O:p></O:p>
The cover story read: "The End of White America?" I suppose we exiting Whites should be grateful for the softening question mark attached to the title, though of course the essay itself reads as a elegy for White America. <O:p></O:p>
<O:p>
Hua-Hsu.jpg
</O:p>
<O:p>Hua Hsu</O:p>
<O:p></O:p>Written by one Hua Hsu, an instructor at Vassar, it aptly points to the 1993 Michael Douglas film Falling Down. There Douglas "plays Bill Foster, a downsized defense worker with a buzz cut and a pocket protector who rampages through a Los Angeles overrun by greedy Korean shop-owners and Hispanic gangsters, railing against he eclipse of the America the used to know."Â<O:p></O:p>
<o:wrapblock><W:WRAP ="topAndBottom" anchorx="page" anchory="page" ns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:word"></W:WRAP></v:shape></o:wrapblock><BR style="mso-ignore: vglayout" clear=all><O:p>
Falling_down.jpg
</O:p>
In the dénouement, this White character faces a policeman, gun drawn, on the Santa Monica Pier. To his great astonishment, just before he is gunned down and falls into the sea, he learns that this is a new America. Shocked, he stammers, "I'm the bad guy?" And then he's gone.<O:p></O:p>
Fittingly, the story that follows Hsu's account of America is one on First Lady Michelle Obama by Ta-Nehisi Coates (I'll let readers ponder the race and gender of writer Coates). Accompanying it is a two-page photo of Mrs. Obama dancing with her husband.<O:p></O:p>
Further, it's hard to escape the impression that editors at The Atlantic aren't begging advertisers to create ads that minimize the exposure of White men. Microsoft, for instance, ran a series in the magazine that imagined a future in which non-Whites and women would replace the White men who built America and sent rockets out into space. Here's a sample:<O:p></O:p><O:p></O:p>
<o:wrapblock></v:><W:WRAP ="topAndBottom" anchorx="page" anchory="page" ns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:word"></W:WRAP></v:shape></o:wrapblock>
MicrosoftRocket.jpg

Or my favorite, Lockheed Martin's vision of America's future:<O:p></O:p>
<W:WRAP ="none" ns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:word"></W:WRAP><W:ANCHORLOCK ns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:word"></W:ANCHORLOCK><O:p>
LockheedMartin.jpg
</O:p><O:p></O:p>
Recently, after teaching an American culture class where I yet again illustrated the scripted decline of White men because â€" according to the Hollywood films in question â€" they were evil, I began to wonder if I had laid it on a bit too thick. Then I went down to the university mailroom and picked up my mail. In it was the July/Aug 2010 <I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Atlantic[/I]. Here's the cover:<O:p></O:p>
201007.jpg
<o:wrapblock></v:><W:WRAP ="topAndBottom" anchorx="page" anchory="page" ns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:word"></W:WRAP></v:shape></o:wrapblock>
Yes, below the title "The End of Men," the subtitle reads "How Women are Taking Control â€" Of Everything," by Hanna Rosin.<O:p></O:p>
The story, by the Jewish Rosin ("I'm Jewish, and I was born in Israel, and my whole family is Israeli"), begins:
Earlier this year, women became the majority of the workforce for the first time in U.S. history. Most managers are now women too. And for every two men who get a college degree this year, three women will do the same. For years, women's progress has been cast as a struggle for equality. But what if equality isn't the end point? What if modern, postindustrial society is simply better suited to women? A report on the unprecedented role reversal now under way â€" and its vast cultural consequences.<O:p></O:p>
<o:wrapblock><W:WRAP ="topAndBottom" anchorx="page" anchory="page" ns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:word"></W:WRAP></v:shape></o:wrapblock>
Rosin.bmp
<BR style="mso-ignore: vglayout" clear=all>
The two-page illustration accompanying it, with its outsized image of the Asian woman in blue, reminded yet again of Kevin MacDonald'sobservation: "The United States is well on the road to being dominated by an Asian technocratic elite and a Jewish business, professional, and media elite." Indeed.
Interspersed throughout the article are snarky pictures showing the petulant beings American men have become due to their loss of status. As one enlarged Rosin quote reads, "Dozens of college women I interviewed assumed that they very well might be the ones working while their husbands stayed home. "Guys,"Â one senior remarked to me, "are the new ball and chain."Â<O:p></O:p>
Contributor Pamela Paul even gets a little room to ask "Are Fathers Necessary?" A paternal contribution may not be as essential as we think."Â<O:p></O:p>
(By the way, last summer The Atlantic published the sizzling anti-male essay <O:p></O:p>
Let's Call the Whole Thing Off <O:p>:</O:p>
THE AUTHOR IS ENDING HER MARRIAGE. ISN'T IT TIME YOU DID THE SAME?
To work, to parent, to housekeep, to be the ones who schedule "date night," only to be reprimanded in the home by male kitchen bitches, and then, in the bedroom, to be ignoredâ€"it's a bum deal.<O:p></O:p>
Male kitchen bitches. Ouch. Then again, any male that so bought into the Alan Alda-inspired demasculinization of the seventies probably deserves a few bad names thrown his way.)<O:p></O:p>
In any case, this summer's issue is a cultural treasure trove of visual evidence that the White race in America is being shown the door. Upon opening the cover â€" which, recall, asserts the End of Men â€" we are greeted with this two-page ad from Shell Oil:<O:p></O:p>
<o:wrapblock><W:WRAP ="topAndBottom" anchorx="page" anchory="page" ns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:word"></W:WRAP></v:shape></o:wrapblock>
emissions_top_banner.jpg
<O:p></O:p>
Turn the page and there's another two-page ad for Altria Group illustrating their support for educational programs aimed at "empowering" students to stay in school and picturing a racially diverse student population. Immediately following this is an ad for Dow Chemical featuring a Black woman stating that she is the "human element" in the "duty to put healthy, abundant food on the world's table."
Back in the days when Blacks had no power in America, we never saw them in ads either. What does it say, then, that we don't see a White man's face until page 8? (It's the Pope and the caption reads: "Is the Catholic Church finished?"Â) <O:p></O:p>
The issue closes on the inside back cover with Shell stepping up to the plate again. Their focus: Japan. (Opposite it, there's a column by the sort of person who functions as a stand-in for a "White male"Â: Jeffrey Goldberg. The implicit message: Don't worry; with writers like Rosin and Goldberg, it's obvious that we Whites still run the show.)<O:p></O:p>
security_b.jpg
<O:p></O:p><BR style="mso-ignore: vglayout" clear=all>
Readers won't be getting a new issue of <I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">The [/I]Atlantic until September, so make this thick one last. And be sure to interact on the Internet with Hanna Rosin, her husband David Plotz and their three children.<O:p></O:p>
As for me, I am no Hanna Rosin fan. Her December 2009 cover story most certainly rubbed me the wrong way. After a year of mind-boggling economic swindles and bailouts that have used up a significant portion of the universe's zeroes, who gets blamed? Christians. Now that's why Jews are so often credited with chutzpah. <O:p></O:p>
<o:wrapblock><W:WRAP ="topAndBottom" anchorx="page" anchory="page" ns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:word"></W:WRAP></v:shape></o:wrapblock><BR style="mso-ignore: vglayout" clear=all>
Crash.bmp
<O:p></O:p>
Recall that Rolling Stone reporter Matt Taibbi wrote in his essay The Great American Bubble Machine that<O:p></O:p>
The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it's everywhere. The world's most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.<O:p></O:p>
I just didn't get the impression he was appealing to a stereotype about Christians. I did an article on the Jewish nature of massive financial swindles over the years in Take the Money and Run. Of course Israeli Rosin was just doing her part in the old Jewish game of blaming the victim. Kevin MacDonald explained this tactic in a recent blog when he observed, "In contemporary human societies, a large part of group competition becomes intellectual warfare over the construction of culture."Â I knew deflecting the blame from Jews was on the Sanhedrin "to do"Â list when I watched the remake of <I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">The Taking of Pelham 123. [/I]<O:p></O:p>
Pelham.bmp

In the new version, Travolta's character is a New York ethnic Catholic very interested in guilt. He was also a high-rolling Wall Streeter who skimmed millions of dollars until he was caught and sent to prison. Between then and now, he has also gone mostly insane, though he's still canny enough to cook up a scheme to make a killing on stocks when he induces panic in the city with his subway hijacking. Now go back and read James Stewart's excellent account of the savings and loan swindles of the Reagan ‘80s, <B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Den of Thieves[/B]. The thieves were ethnic New Yorkers alright, but they sure weren't Catholic. Sadly, this concerted media effort to blame others will likely work.
Another area in which White displacement advances is in government favoritism shown toward non-Whites. This was highlighted last year during the nominating process of Sonia Sotomayor for a position on the Supreme Court. She had famously ruled against White firemen, but still had no trouble become a Justice. Quoting TOO editor Kevin MacDonald again, the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor "is yet another marker in the march toward the dispossession of Whites in America." (She'll likely soon be joined by another woman â€" this one Jewish â€" when Elena Kagan gets appointed this summer.)<O:p></O:p>
Speaking of women, it was Michelle Malkin who just stood up to defend Whites against government neglect. As she wrote, <O:p></O:p>
This week, Justice Department <U style="text-underline: blue">whistleblower[/u] J. Christian Adams <U style="text-underline: blue">came forward[/u] with damning public testimony about how <U style="text-underline: blue">Obama officials believe[/u] "civil rights law should not be enforced in a race-neutral manner, and should never be enforced against blacks or other national minorities."<O:p></O:p>
I guess we Whites can use all the help we can get, though. Turning again to MacDonald, we have his commentary on the English translation of a chapter from Solzhenitsyn's book 200 Years Together, which is about Russians and Jews. MacDonald has often written about the murderous hostility of Jews toward Russians, millions of whom were murdered. He also draws parallels to the situation for Whites in America today. Reporting on how Jews displaced Gentiles in Russia, he concludes that <O:p></O:p>
This is a speeded up version of what is happening via affirmative action in America and other Western societies now. There is discrimination against higher IQ Whites in favor of lower-IQ groups. Jews, however, continue to be overrepresented in elite academic institutions on the basis of IQ, so they are not suffering a similar level of discrimination.<O:p></O:p>
I've written about this, too. Recall my graph on the student makeup at Harvard:<O:p></O:p>
<O:p>
truth-at-harvard.jpg
</O:p>
To put a human face on such dispossession, let me share a letter from a reader:<O:p></O:p>
Your observation that Jews have constructed walls to protect their fields such as government and academia is correct. They have also erected barriers to defend other fields which they claim to be their own. One of these is medicine. You would be surprised at the number of Jews running selection committeesand medical education departments in hospitals and universities. There they have developed control of who may enter residencies and how residents are evaluated. The acceptance of white males into medical education at this level has sunk to a low. Preferred are Jews, Asians, Mexicans and females.<O:p></O:p>
Another way in which they enforce a leadership role is bythe assignmentof labor in residency programs, where Jewish chief residents assign work so as to favor their own kind and put white males at a disadvantage.Jewish physicians also seem to prefer to run organizations and to control the distribution of funds.<O:p></O:p>
Everything in this article written thus far describes the non-violent dispossession of Whites, but there remains the possibility of the process speeding up through mass slaughter. MacDonald is explicit in comparing the heavily Jewish Bolshevik takeover of Russia to the situation here today: "Again, the analogy is striking. As emphasized repeatedly on TOO, Whites can expect to be increasingly victimized by non-Whites with historical grudges as they sink to minority status and lose political power."Â<O:p></O:p>
I don't need to repeat myself because I've written about the potential for such a bloody future for White Americans before. Instead, I'll try to appeal to readers' visual sensibilities. Below is a chess set made by Italian Jewish glassblower Gianni Toso. In 1969 he created a stunning set called "Jews vs. Catholics."Â<O:p></O:p>
27870014.jpg

I strongly suspect most Christians are ignorant of the fact that so many Jews still think in these terms. They'll soon learn, however.<O:p></O:p>
Let me leave readers by revisiting the issue of <I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">The Atlantic[/I] I addressed above. The writer I noted, Ta-Nehisi Coates, is an African American male. I found out because he has a three-page article in this summer's issue. There he gives a short biography, noting that as one of seven children, he was less than a scholastic standout. "My roller-coaster ride through the Baltimore-area schools included two suspensions, two expulsions, and an arrest by school police. In 11th grade . . . I was kicked out of the local magnet school."Â Still, he (somehow) made it into college, where he proceeded to do little work and failed to graduate. In an America that gave us Obama, however, that's not always a hindrance. <O:p></O:p>
In 2005 TIME magazine saw fit to hire him as a journalist, and now he has a solid career going. "I had an office 23 floors in the air, in Midtown Manhattan. I used to look down on Sixth Avenue and wonder about the distance between my scholastic and professional lives. How could I utterly fail in practice and then succeed in the game?"Â Gosh, I wonder.<O:p></O:p>
Perhaps it has something to do with the program of removing White men from the newsroom (and fire stations and NASA offices and the Oval Office, etc.) and replacing them with non-Whites who will never threaten those with real power in America today: Jews.<O:p></O:p>
What would it take to make this dispossession process more clear to people? Until they recognize what is happening, there is no hope of confronting it. The loss of the White race would be a true blow to humanity.
Edmund Connelly (email him) is a freelance writer, academic, and expert on the cinema arts. He has previously written for <I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">The Occidental Quarterly.[/I] <O:p></O:p>
<O:p>Permanent Link: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Connelly-White-Decline.html</O:p></O:p>
 

Europe

Mentor
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,642
This is a very depressing but accurate description of America. I see it at my office all the time with the diversity BS. I also see it in my neighborhood. Just today I noticed there are more and more blacks moving in. I have no idea what to do because the elite morons like what is going on.

This was a all white country with a few blacks that we never really had to see. Everywhere I went there were white people, all over the country.Now I feel like a minority and a foreigner.

I was watching CSpan and they had an Irish guy who moved to America and is starting an American Writers Museum. He was asked what things moved him when reading and he said stories of discrimination. This is what the elites think about and that is why we are finished.


Edited by: Europe
 

GiovaniMarcon

Mentor
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
1,231
Location
Westwood, California
I believe that the world shambles on in a semblance of civilization primarily because of two reasons:

1 - There are still enough clear-thinking White men in positions of authority to check, or at least ameliorate the pernicious effects of the incompetence of a gradually uncontrollable number of others -- many of whom are other Whites willfully sabotage their own race (and thus human kind). Additionally, enough members of other races have emulated a responsible, "White" form of behavior and thus arrest the free-fall of society perpetrated by those of all races that believe the best future is a brown one.

and

2 - There is still a base (though it is shrinking), of sedulous Whites (and to a lesser extent, responsible members of other races) who contribute the funds necessary to power the engine of a civilized culture, thus the damaging effects of the effeminate, every-culture-but-white-is-good trumpeting, entitled and lazy are lessened, though these effects will one day very soon become uncontainable.

Self-loathing Whites are usually liberal, somewhat well-off, and are ironically the most racist members of society, willfully surrendering power and authority because they believe members of other races cannot gain positions of power and influence through their own merit.

"Don't compete for that job, Tyrone. Don't get up early in the morning, Carlos. The government will give you that job, and if you don't want a job, you'll get money in the mail anyway. Just vote for me. Or not."

The generous nature of liberal whites is predicated on the naive belief that they will continue to live a safe, clean life in their safe, clean house on that inevitable day when whites don't matter anymore, because the blacks and the browns and the yellows don't need us.

Don't need handouts, don't need our fancy talk, don't need a helping hand, don't need our bullsh**.

Because THEY will be the ones holding all the cards.

But there won't be any white men in authority to blame, no "conservatives" to scream at and protest, because all such men will be gone.

Tyrone will be in power, and the tiny number of White men who used to keep the world safe and maintain standards that our ancestors did for thousands of years will be dead, or dickless.

Congratulations, America. Carry on, and die.

Or change, whatever.
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
That article is enough to make ya puke...or get tore-up drunk...then puke.
smiley55.gif
smiley52.gif
smiley11.gif
smiley42.gif
 

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,975
Location
Arkansas
this is a deadly accurate column, but the question remains: what are we going to do about it?

this question is incredibly difficult to answer, especially considering that virtually all Whites with any power and/or influence are actively fighting for the wrong side.
 

foobar75

Master
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
2,332
The assaults on white men are coming from many fronts, some of which have been underway for decades, and they appear to be having alarmingly high success rates. There are many different topics to discuss, but here are the few I can think of at the top of my head (the original column already touches on some of these).

1. Affirmative action policies in sports and academics have had great success in driving white men out, while increasing the numbers of women and minorities. We all know about the NFL and the NBA, and as it's been mentioned, women have now surpassed men in number of college degrees earned. This imbalance will continue to grow, and I wouldn't be surprised to see most colleges have a similar demographic make-up to the NFL in the not too distant future. Women and minorities will eventually make-up up to 70% of all students, with white men down in the 30% range.

2. Targeted advertising and commercials which make men, mostly white men, look stupid, weak, foolish, and totally incompetent are now the norm. But it doesn't just end there. In addition, these men are reviled by their girlfriends, wives, and other women who find them totally repulsive who then always come to the rescue and clean up the mess. Black men do not suffer from this. They are always portayed as strong, muscular, and athletic. Whenever we see a commercial with a white and black man, it's the black man who's rolling his eyes and joking about the white man who does or says something idiotic. I don't watch much TV anyways, but I simply cannot point to a commercial that portrays white men in a positive light. The beer commercials are worst.

3. White men are taking it on the chin in a big way in the job market. The manufacturing base of this country has been on the decline since the late 70s, but it went into overdrive under Bill Clinton and "Jorge" Bush. Millions of these factory jobs are not coming back. This, of course, has affected all men, not just white.

There are now organizations like ANOW (Apprenticeship and Nontraditional Occupations for Women) whose goal is to get women into high paying, blue-collar union jobs like plumber, electrician, welder, etc. Since the majority of such jobs are held by men, once again they are the ones who'll be displaced. Thanks to the open borders, many constuction jobs have been going to the illegal vermin from Mexico and Central America for years.

White-collar jobs such as those in the Hi-tech and IT aren't much better, as millions of them have been and continue to get shipped to India, China, and now even South America. There was a recent annoucement about Microsoft opening an R&D facility on the East Coast, whose entire leadership team is made up of women. White men who have invented everything from the micro-processor to the personal computer and all else in between are being phased out here, too.

So, where do the white men have a majority? Two places I can think of are elected offices (federal and state level) as well as DWFs. These people, of course, are enemy #1 who are essentially contributing to their own demise and preparing the stage for their eventual extinction.

It's too bad that the people who know the game and who've figured it all out (such as most members of this forum) do not have the say or power to change course. It seems the best we can do is to educate as many people as we can (here as well as amongst friends and family) and hope that all the imbalances eventually reach critical mass and this whole corrupt system collapses under its own weight.
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
That article sure is depressing but it has to be put in perspective. The population chart is % of world population. Who gives a sh*t if the hell holes of africa contiinue to increase in their overpopulated insanity? Is the black population increasing in white homelands? Yes but not nearly to that extent. They just closed 40 schools in Detroit, must NOT be a lot of black kids being bred there.

The numbers on women graduating from college more then men? So what. They get useless degrees that will only prepare them for future jobs as waitresses. Men still get nearly all of the Engineering and science degrees and that won't change much because it can't.

The article also had a graph on the student population of Harvard. Harvard!! Better NO whites go to that brain indoctrination center and others like it. I'll worry when MIT has the same data.

'Male kitchen bitches'?? Where's that at, Manhatten? San Francisco? LA? Big deal. I have just spent a week with relatives in 'flyover country' and I can assure you that woman are still wives, girls are still looking for a guy, and men still get stuff done. The article concentrates too much on published articles in mainstream magazines like Time. Who publishes and writes those articles? Dykes and ****s. And they write the crap they want to hear and try to create the fantasy world they want to live in. Screw em. White Americans are still breeding (more then any white group in the world) and living as decent people should.

The number one problem facing white america is the divorce rate. Many kids grow up wanting to get married and have a family but after they do the pressures of married life panic them and then they divorce and move in with Mom and Pop and split time with the kids. I predict that ends when the next generation of Mom and Pop don't have the resources to take back Junior and kid.

Yeah the future looks grim. But it looks grim for everybody. Seriously, who is going to fare better in rough times? Low IQ ghetto dwellers? hedonistic high rise city dwellers? No practical skill jews? Or whites with strong family ties in moderately populated areas living among people of good moral sense?
 

Deadlift

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
5,240
Location
North Carolina
"'Male kitchen bitches'?? Where's that at, Manhatten? San Francisco? LA? Big deal. I have just spent a week with relatives in 'flyover country' and I can assure you that woman are still wives, girls are still looking for a guy, and men still get stuff done. The article concentrates too much on published articles in mainstream magazines like Time. Who publishes and writes those articles? Dykes and ****s. And they write the crap they want to hear and try to create the fantasy world they want to live in. Screw em. White Americans are still breeding (more then any white group in the world) and living as decent people should."


Deadly accuracy, jaxvid!

I have driven into "the country" at least 6 times in the last 2 months, and it's amazing how White folks have kept their rolling green fields in simply IMMACULATE condition. Whenever I go there, I will always see some White mom's with 4 or 5 uber-fair children. These women usually have motherly hips (a good thing IMO), but they aren't "fat" - like how the media portrays country folks. I always tell these ladies that they have beautiful kids! Does anyone else compliment beautiful White ladies and their children?
 

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,975
Location
Arkansas
jaxvid said:
Men still get nearly all of the Engineering and science degrees and that won't change much because it can't.

The article also had a graph on the student population of Harvard. Harvard!! Better NO whites go to that brain indoctrination center and others like it. I'll worry when MIT has the same data.

funny you mention this, jaxvid. i stumbled across the below video just today. check out the professor and the demographics of his class. as an aside, the topic is pretty damn important, too, especially considering the numbers being thrown out by "our" government in a seeming ever-constant stream.

[tube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY[/tube]
 

Alpha Male

Mentor
Joined
May 22, 2005
Messages
775
Location
California
I wasENRAGED by the read but...


jaxvid thank you for putting some light on the darkness of the article.I neeed that as felt thatiabout to lose it.Perspective is needed and hopelessness is not. We need to fight!

My experience points to another problem when Idisucss with the every man the dominance of Jewish ownership and business in LA:

Thisconversation with anwhite automechanic took place yesterday:

"Jews, they have all the money in the world."

"Oh yeah?" I said.

"They are Gods Chosen People."

"What about Communism?" I challenged.

"It's not about Communism."

The Christian obsession with Israel and it's people is another obstacle to talking openly about Jewish influence. SO not only do they have the victimhood card but they also have the God card as well. This is complete psych-intellectual warefare that has seized this country's collective conscious.

Thanks to Castefootball and all the other pro European American sites for helping to break the spell.





Edited by: Alpha Male
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
AM, it's not the "Christian" obsession with (modern) Israel, but the "Christian" Zionists/"Judeo-Christians". There's plenty of non-Zionist Christians (such as Col.Reb & myself). The current Israel is NOT that of the Old Testament, but one's that's been co-opt'd with/by the Elite (see Rothschild's funding of the Knesset building & Supreme Court of Israel building). Just a point of clarification.
smiley1.gif
 

The Hock

Master
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
3,886
Location
Northern California
jaxvid said:
Yeah the future looks grim. But it looks grim for everybody. Seriously, who is going to fare better in rough times? Low IQ ghetto dwellers? hedonistic high rise city dwellers? No practical skill jews? Or whites with strong family ties in moderately populated areas living among people of good moral sense?

Right on Jaxvid. This and the rest of your post put all this doom and gloom stuff into its proper perspective.
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
jaxvid said:
That article sure is depressing but it has to be put in perspective. The population chart is % of world population. Who gives a sh*t if the hell holes of africa contiinue to increase in their overpopulated insanity? Is the black population increasing in white homelands? Yes but not nearly to that extent. They just closed 40 schools in Detroit, must NOT be a lot of black kids being bred there.

The numbers on women graduating from college more then men? So what. They get useless degrees that will only prepare them for future jobs as waitresses. Men still get nearly all of the Engineering and science degrees and that won't change much because it can't.

The article also had a graph on the student population of Harvard. Harvard!! Better NO whites go to that brain indoctrination center and others like it. I'll worry when MIT has the same data.

'Male kitchen bitches'?? Where's that at, Manhatten? San Francisco? LA? Big deal. I have just spent a week with relatives in 'flyover country' and I can assure you that woman are still wives, girls are still looking for a guy, and men still get stuff done. The article concentrates too much on published articles in mainstream magazines like Time. Who publishes and writes those articles? Dykes and ****s. And they write the crap they want to hear and try to create the fantasy world they want to live in. Screw em. White Americans are still breeding (more then any white group in the world) and living as decent people should.

The number one problem facing white america is the divorce rate. Many kids grow up wanting to get married and have a family but after they do the pressures of married life panic them and then they divorce and move in with Mom and Pop and split time with the kids. I predict that ends when the next generation of Mom and Pop don't have the resources to take back Junior and kid.

Yeah the future looks grim. But it looks grim for everybody. Seriously, who is going to fare better in rough times? Low IQ ghetto dwellers? hedonistic high rise city dwellers? No practical skill jews? Or whites with strong family ties in moderately populated areas living among people of good moral sense?



Jax, great post.

African woman certainly have the highest overall birth rates on planet earth. Some northwest African countries have fertility rates in excess of 7-8 children per woman.

But so what? It's just more puppies added to the dog-eat-dog reality of an eternally impoverished, hell-on-earth continent.

A great majority of African babies are born HIV positive. 9 out of 10 deaths (worldwide) as a result of AIDS infections are people of African decent"¦across the continent, about 12% of the population is HIV positive (with the southern portion of Africa being the absolute worst, averaging around 20-30%). Much of the same can be said for India, the nation with the second largest population.

In contrast, Amish women (of Swiss-German decent) in America also average 7-8 children per woman"¦and those children are healthy, hard-working, well nourished, disease free, and quite likely to produce families of their own in later years.

Amish people are said to have much higher birth rates than what is actually reported. Some experts believe that Amish women have the highest birth rates, per woman, on planet earth.

White women (mostly of English, German, and Scandinavian decent) in the state of Utah (which is over 95% white) have the highest birth rates and population growth in the United States.
 

Michael

Mentor
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
870
An piece entitled "A Reader Questions Tim Wise's Arithmetic"

Tim Wise [email him], the self hating white man who predicted that, in 40 years or fewer, "half the country will be black or brown", has number problems. In my parish young white people are having a passel of kids: I venture to say this is true amongst conservative Roman Catholics and Protestants as well. Meanwhile the Libs are aborting themselves and encouraging, with success, the blacks and the Latinos to do likewise. With those numbers, the Left has to keep importing to stay afloat.

http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_010111.htm

Since most people have figure out that the government lies, why should the government be believe when it comes to the census? I know some believe that the government hides the number of nonwhites so that Whites won't get to alarmed but that is very unlikely, because that would cut down on set asides and Affirmative action quotas and the nonwhites would riot if they did. Also, how gleeful the egalitarians are at the prospects of Whites becoming less than 50% of the population, why would they not overestimate, the number of nonwhite and underestimate the number of Whites.

I started to question the population numbers years ago when I was looking at population estimate and then I noticed that the estimate for blacks (don't know if the estimate were government or private) would shot up high but they be far higher than the census would say they were.Every time the census comes out nonwhites scream that they were undercounted and call for higher estimate of their numbers. The government very likely gives extra effort into finding nonwhites even likely overcounts them, and gives less effort especially in rural White areas.

When an Eastern European country was falling apart if one took all the estimate of percentage of the population all the different ethic groups claim in a region the population would have been way over 100%. Demographic statistics even when wrong increase the share of the pie that minorities get, more Affirmative action jobs, money, even at time representation, so their is a strong motive to overestimate favored groups and underestimate non-favored groups."Hispanic" is a term use to create a power block of many different races but which races benefit, sure a few rich White "Hispanics" get set asides and their children into "elite" schools, but common White "Hispanics" as was pointed out at a site that was advocating to count White "Hispanics" as White, pointed out that White "Hispanics" were often call in for an interview and pushed aside, the site that seem to try to be political correct, blamed it on being classified as "Hispanic", but most likely, they won't be called in if they were rejected for being "Hispanic" but were being called in for a "Hispanic" quota job and as soon as the, most likely, nonwhite hiring office see that they are White, they reject them for being White.

How many nonwhite in this country--too many but likely fewer than the "elite" claim and probably more Whites. People have for years overestimate the numbers of blacks in this country due to TV, and do not forget that demographic information can be used for propaganda to demoralize one side with falling numbers andexcite the other with ever increasing numbers rather the numbers are real or not.
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
Having worked with demographics for several years, I know the official numbers given for minority groups is low, nationally under-estimated by at least a couple of percentage points for blacks and maybe more than that for mestizos. I do not think, however, that there is enough difference in the numbers to drastically alter when Whites might sink below 50% of the U.S. population. Of course, things can happen to change those numbers, such as Whites having more children, (and hopefully they are) and push that year back indefinitely. It would be great if we stopped illegal immigration and changed legal immigration too, but I don't see this happening any time soon.
 
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
1,016
Colonel_Reb said:
Having worked with demographics for several years, I know the official numbers given for minority groups is low, nationally under-estimated by at least a couple of percentage points for blacks and maybe more than that for mestizos. I do not think, however, that there is enough difference in the numbers to drastically alter when Whites might sink below 50% of the U.S. population. Of course, things can happen to change those numbers, such as Whites having more children, (and hopefully they are) and push that year back indefinitely. It would be great if we stopped illegal immigration and changed legal immigration too, but I don't see this happening any time soon. 

Col. Reb we need to remember the exponential function that the professor was talking about. If we increase the number of racially aware whites, or just members here at Caste Football by 7% a year, it's only about 0.002% a day but in ten years it doubles. And keeps doubling every ten years on top of that, and so forth.

That's simply using a steady rate of growth. If the growth rate increases, so do the doubling time periods. Caste Football has already crossed the MSM mention threshold. If the growth keeps happening, then it will be unavoidable that other outlets, traditional and otherwise, will be forced to discuss Caste Football and the growth taking place here.

Also remember that technology is our friend in terms of bringing up the stories and issues that are otherwise being ignored. One doesn't have to be in LA or New York to influence the paradigm anymore. People from Kansas, Nebraska, and Idaho can do it through new social media.

Somewhere along the way there is a tipping point for the white people of the world. Either they are reduced so great that things just fall apart and you start all over again, or like I believe we have developed technology that allows us to communicate messages and influence others to oppose anti-white and self defeating policies. There's a lot we can do to turn the boat around. I think we're teetering on the verge of the MSM becoming irrelevant. I think at some point public education and traditional liberal arts education will become defunct as well. These are things that are used to prop up the liberal, anti-white self defeating policies.
 

Stocksy

Newbie
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
2
Location
England
USA is not alone with many of the problems stated in this article in Britain and the rest of Europe we have some very similar problems not so much with blacks because we don't have many over here but with Islamic Immigrants they are all rushing into any European country they can find then once they arrive they don't get jobs complain how crap our country is because we don't have sharia law, make our women look like ninjas or praise their stupid god they just to destroy everything our country was built on and want to make it like the 3rd world country they likely came from.

But I am glad to see that we are finally doing something about it because now everyone is seeing that these people keep on flooding into our country and with their high birth rates they are going to be the majority in my country by 2050. We have people protesting every month in their thousands all over England in something called the English Defence League protesting against Islam we have anti immigrant parties winning lots of local elections in Britain and in other European countries coming close to winning the general elections.

We need to do something before its too late.


Edited by: Stocksy
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
Electric Slide, I hear what you are saying about the exponential function and I agree with you about Caste Football, the decline of the old, anti-white media, and people waking up to the anti-white agenda that exists across the cultural spectrum. My point is that it is one thing for a man to "know the score" but it is something else entirely for him to put that knowledge into practice in multiple areas of his life (and the life of his family) including having more than 1-2 children. We are talking about a huge paradigm shift from the way most men and women think AND ACT today. The general selfishness and self-centeredness of many young Whites coupled with oft-used birth control and abortion doesn't bode well for increased White fertility rates. While the White fertility rate in the U.S. has increased since 1980, it is still below the rate of replacement. If a large enough White sub-population starts having more children, then we'll see the rate increase to a level above replacement. More Whites waking up to the reality that surrounds them will surely help some Whites be willing to have more children, but it remains to be seen whether that number will be high enough to keep us over 50% of the U.S. population.
 

WHITE NOISE

Mentor
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
791
Location
Pacific NW
"I have driven into "the country" at least 6 times in the last 2 months, and it's amazing how White folks have kept their rolling green fields in simply IMMACULATE condition. Whenever I go there, I will always see some White mom's with 4 or 5 uber-fair children. These women usually have motherly hips (a good thing IMO), but they aren't "fat" - like how the media portrays country folks. I always tell these ladies that they have beautiful kids! Does anyone else compliment beautiful White ladies and their children?"

Good post Deadlift. I have not only complimented a beautiful White lady, we had five beautiful boys together. Our 19 year marriage and support for family is stronger than ever!
 
Top