As I've lacked spare time this week I hadn't commented on Brock Lesnar's "performance" - in the immediate aftermath of the "fight" I was so ferociously pissed off that I was literally unable to make more than a brief one-line post before I had to get up and leave the room to calm down, before turning the computer off in disgust and stalking away anew. As the "fight" took place on the afternoon of the 31st Australian time it pretty much ruined New Year's Eve for me.
"That's a rather drastic reaction!" I hear You say, especially as some of You may remember that I hold a low opinion of Brock Lesnar as a fighter and thus never really expected him to deliver the goods. But, despite all of that I naturally hoped that Lesnar would always comprehensively take apart any non-White he ever came up against.
So why was I overcome with knuckle-whitening, boat-contorting, kick-the-furniture-and-the-cat fury? Because nothing - and I mean nothing - enrages amd embarrasses me more than seeing a White man lose to a non-White in any form of combat sport. Such defeats do more than every other facet of propaganda combined to perpetuate the core myth of black physical superiority which is at the centre of the "popular" marginalisation and degradation of the White male.
Every time a White audience sees a large White male being beaten by a proverbial "big black guy" it reinforces the meticulously constructed stereotype of the Negro's innate physical superiority - and that prick Lesnar has lost two very high-profile fights against non-White opposition in frankly embarrassing style. His beating at the hands of Cain Velasquez underscored his woeful limitations, while his last "effort" against Overeem lay firmly in the realm of farce.
Some of You may think that I'm being too harsh on Lesnar, but the fact remains that he collected a truckload of money for participating in these humiliations while in return he provided truly priceless ammunition for those who hate the White race. I doubt that he threw the Overeem fight, but with his pro-wrestling background an "I'll simply take the money and minimise the damage" approach wouldn't surprise me one bit.
A final point, which I've made before: just because somebody may be a "great athlete" doesn't automatically mean that they are a great fighter. As Hawkeye2 and others stated, Lesnar lacks a fighter's instinct and brain (or any brain, for that matter...). A bloke's speed over 100 metres, standing vertical jump, ability to throw or catch a football, slalom between witches' hats, or perform forward rolls has absolutely nothing to do with his fighting ability.
Lesnar might be some sort of "athlete" , but he sure as hell isn't a fighter. Look at the evidence. Despite plenty of highly expensive training the fellow's punches and standup defence are plainly rubbush and he is unable to throw out anything even remotely resembling a simulacrum of a decent kick. His takedown "attempt" (to use a generous euphemism) against Overeem was bloody laughable.
If it wasn't for his size and associated power (helped along by a not-so-healthy sackful of steroids in his "wrasslin'" days) coupled with his ex-pro wrestler "celebrity status" the geezer would be an MMA non-entity. Then again, in terms of technical ability, Lesnar always was a non-entity...