so real madrid won
on the positive side: real madrid had no non-south american black
a spanish team won, a country that isn't obsessed with black players
and atletico madrid has been one of the very best team in europe, with 2 champions league finals in the last 3 years, while also being perhaps the whitest team in europe over those years
and ofcourse benzema did nothing, useless in the build up and as a striker (he has like what, 4 goals in this CL campaign? with 3 of them being scored against a bad swedish team in a 8-0 one-sided match, that's very bad a a striker in a team that scores so many goals and goes all the way to the final)
negative side: real madrid was obviously a lot less white than atletico madrid (they had mainly brazilian mestizo-type of players as non whites), and you can only feel bad for atletico who have been so unlucky
last final they were going to win it until the very last second when sergio ramos scored the equalising goal
and this year the real madrid goal was ugly, lucky and offside (well taken free kick by kroos though)
overall they deserved a win because in the 2 finals they were better than real madrid yet they have no title at the end of both finals
the best matches in CL are always the semi finals, the final has too much pressure and is decided on only 1 match
also the penalty kicks is the only area of the game where blacks and part-black players are better in my opinion if you have read how i feel about the penalties, so it sucks to have it decide a title so important
also cristiano ronaldo underperformed in the final again but like the last time he had such an impressive CL campaign that he will become a bigger legend no matter what with this title