U.S. conquered Southwest from Indians not Mexicans

[Michael]

A piece entitled " An Upstate New York Reader Adds That Mexicans Want "Reconquista" On Lands They Never Conquered In The First Place (The Seventh Cavalry Had To Do It)"

A further comment: one of the things that I found in reading about the American West, and its settlement by (mostly Anglo-Saxon) whites, is that vast areas of what was part of the Mexican Cession and the Gadsen Purchase, were never truly settled or colonized by the Spanish or Mexico. There were a few forts and missions in New Mexico, but few settlers. As a matter of historical fact, one of the main reasons for both the Cession and, especially, the Gadsden Purchase, was to protect Mexico from cross-border raids by Apache and Comanche Indians. The U.S. had the military ability and political will to do so. The Spanish, and after them, the Mexicans, did not. More importantly, it had the courageous, determined, and occasionally foolhardy people willing to venture into these areas and live there.

What I am getting to is that Mexico never really "owned" these lands (Arizona, New Mexico, parts of Colorado, California, etc.), except in the broadest sense. There is nothing to reconquer. (Of course, we paid about $25,000,000â€"about $640 million in today's moneyâ€"for these. I'm sure the checks were cashed.)

Not that La Raza and the other ignorant proponents of "Reconquista" care about historical truth.

http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_081510.htm

 

[white is right]

This isn't new. Oregon was originally a British territory that was annexed by America because of this reason. Texas was similar. This happened throughout history. All of the Southwest Native American tribes were originally "Mexican". Many Chicanos that look 100 percent Native American ie Micheal Carbajal are descendant of these tribes.

 

[C Darwin]

as i see it, reconquesta is a racial issue, not a national grievance. from what i understand, the mongols give the gringo looking Spaniards a hard time in mexico.

 

[Kaptain]

Whether we call them Indians or Mexicans it doesn't matter. The best arguement to the reconquista retards is pointing out that white people were here first and conquered it last. Mexicans/Indians for a very brief period in history very sparsely populated the land. In between the white civilizations, the Indians built absolutely no permeanent structures, civilization, or advancement in human kind in any way. We are their "Ancient Enemy People."

Know your white racial history. Edited by: Kaptain Poop

 

[Westside]

C Darwin the Spainards are the group that welds real power in Mexico. They did not realize that the cartels would become so ruthless and a major problem affecting their bottom line: tourism money or lack thereof.

 

[Michael]

Whether we call them Indians or Mexicans it doesn't matter. The best arguement to the reconquista retards is pointing out that white people were here first and conquered it last. Mexicans/Indians for a very brief period in history very sparsely populated the land. In between the white civilizations, the Indians built absolutely no permeanent structures, civilization, or advancement in human kind in any way. We are their "Ancient Enemy People."

Know your white racial history.

Kennewick Man http://whiterevolution.com/primers/paleo-american-ethnic-diversity.pdf and other ancient White American skeletons are a major thorn in the side of American Indians, who fear the truth.

Why are some nonwhites so scared of Kennewick man? Because Kennewick man is prime evidence of nonwhite Imperialism in the ancient past! As evidenced by Kennewick man, blonde Mummies in China, the Ainu, paints, other bones, legends and piles of other evidence, Whites likely held almost all the non-tropical Northern lands from Europe to Japan to the Euphrates, Africa North of the Sahara to the Nile and the Coast of the Mediterranean between the Nile and the Euphrates, North American and many of the Pacific Islands. Inland between the Nile and the Euphrates was, probably, already held by the Arabs, but Arabs may have held all the lands between the Nile and the Euphrates at an earlier period.

What it means is that when Whites arrive in North America they came not as invaders but as the rightful owners who came to reclaim what had been stole by nonwhite imperialism thousands of years before. All the lies of the egalitarians about American Indians smashed by the remains of a White man that lived thousands of years ago!

The real Reconquista was when the Whites Spanish, French, English and other Whites reconquered the American conquer from the nonwhite invaders. Also, there were many reports of White "Indians" a strong indication that the White race was never completely divide from American and much speculation that the flare-ups of civilization in the pre-Colombian American might have been triggered when a group of Whites came together and built civilizations.

 

[White Shogun]

The Mexicans who are in the Raza movements consider themselves descendants of the Native Americans rather than the Spaniards, despite the fact that 99% of them all have Spanish surnames.

 

[Michael]

The Mexicans who are in the Raza movements consider themselves descendants of the Native Americans rather than the Spaniards, despite the fact that 99% of them all have Spanish surnames.

I remember one time I was watching some program on TV where a "Mexican" was yacking about taking over the Southwest U.S. and he looked very much like a Greek I knew. That "Mexican" was so Southern European that it was ridicules him trying to speak for Mestizos who according to the CIA Fact book https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mx.html are 60% of Mexico's population with American Indians being 29%, and Whites 9% and by what I have heard from other sources about 1% black but Mexico doesn't want that known.

The whole "Hispanic" label appears to be a way that egalitarian Spaniards can claim to be nonwhites so they can forum a "nonwhite" elite in "Aztlan" to rule over a mass of nonwhite "Hispanic" serfs and slaves who likely try to head to the nearest White land that take care of them when the Welfare is cut off.

 

[Charles Martel]

[video=youtube;faNge-o0V-k]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=faNge-o0V-k&list=UUkXYznmArMELRxH_36uM1lQ[/video]

 

[Charles Martel]

[video=youtube;fl9HMSTHeTg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=fl9HMSTHeTg[/video]

 

[Average American]

There used to be a group of Reconquista bigots that would hang out around Sunset & Vine in Hollywood. They had their sloppy home-made signs, and stacks of brochures they would bother passersby with. I don't begrudge their freedom of speech, but they always conveniently omitted certain facts about the Mexican War.

The lands America 'stole' from Mexico, were actually purchased following the war. The US also assumed over 3 million dollars in debts that the Mexican gov't owed US citizens. And more importantly, in my mind, is the Mexicans living in the lands America gained.. didn't seem to care Mexico lost them. At the time, they were routinely bothered by Indian raiders. Mexico City wasn't helping them, so ultimately they felt they might be better protected by their new American government.

 

[werewolf]

They drew the indian so he looks like a n'r.

Mexico never owned or ruled the southwest. Some pope gave them a piece of paper saying, "Yo, it's all yours!", that's all. Yes, the southwest was indian country, and the Mexicans never conquered the indians, but the Americans did. That is the way of the world, people move in from one part of the world and conquer another. That's how the indians themselves came here from various parts of the world - including from Europe!!! In the southwest itself, the Apaches and their Navajo relatives were recent invaders - and pillagers - of the country of the ancient Pueblo people who were there long before, such as the Hopi, who are now completely surrounded by Navajo.

 

[Leonardfan]

http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/25/obama-americans-have-no-right-to-favor-americans/

According to Obama only "Native Americans" have the right to object to any type of immigration reform. This is right out of the leftist script they have been pushing the past 50 years. Honestly, there is no such thing as native Americans as they migrated over the land bridge from Asia. Whites coming over to colonize and build this country is Social Darwinism at it's finest. The best, most intelligent, most courageous, most daring and enterprising race won. If the "native americans" had advanced themselves they would not have lost the battle for the American continent.

One of the funniest things I notice about all these moronic cultural marxists is that they love to talk about Darwinism and evolution when attacking and disparaging Christianity and God yet they never mention Social Darwinism when they want to know why the world is the way it is. They would rather complain and make up arbitrary things like "social justice" to explain why the other races are so far behind and less advanced. They have no logic when they try to argue and cannot think for themselves or answer questions to why they apply one of their asinine beliefs to one thing but when bringing up that argument to them about something else they get all butt hurt and cannot explain themselves.

 

[Freethinker]

One of the funniest things I notice about all these moronic cultural marxists is that they love to talk about Darwinism and evolution when attacking and disparaging Christianity and God yet they never mention Social Darwinism when they want to know why the world is the way it is. They would rather complain and make up arbitrary things like "social justice" to explain why the other races are so far behind and less advanced. They have no logic when they try to argue and cannot think for themselves or answer questions to why they apply one of their asinine beliefs to one thing but when bringing up that argument to them about something else they get all butt hurt and cannot explain themselves.

Great point. I've thought about that inconsistency too.