Tomorrows election in Massachusetts

Bear Backer

Mentor
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
658
Location
Illinois
jaxvid said:
Brown wins in Mass. Epic win for the R's, although I have no doubt they will screw it up. Cuts off the filibuster vote down, probably kills most of Obama's agenda. Look for gridlock for a while. Which is fine. Finally Teddy K was able to do something good! Die at the right time.

I agree. While I am normally not a person to speak ill of the dead, that old piece of garbage was the biggest traitor in American history and probably did more harm to this country than any other single person ever did. Benedict Arnold has absolutely nothing on Kennedy.

If this massive health care swindle can be defeated as a result, it is truly a very good thing. Even if the Republicans are as close to being as bad as the democrats. This health care swindle and the coming planned amnesty combined would have surely destroyed this country beyond all hope of repair.
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
Westside said:
While Uncle Teddy is sodimized by "Old Scratch" on a daily basis in Hell, the news of his seat going to a republican(hopefully a principled one)has to add to his eternal discomfort. I am loving it.
smiley36.gif
Congrats to "Great Scott!"

smiley36.gif
LMAO! Yessir, ol' Teddy "Kommiedy" is down their gettin' punked by fiery demon schlunks (along with Michael Jackson)!
smiley2.gif
smiley15.gif


Seriously, I would have rather the Marxist DNC not retained that seat...even though the RNC is controlled by the same ma$ters.
 

referendum

Mentor
Joined
Nov 13, 2005
Messages
1,687
I'm glad Brown won, and props to Sen Webb of Virginia (an anti-war, anti-Amnesty Democrat btw) for insisting that Brown be seated before the Senate votes again on any health care measure if it goes back to the Senate.
Concerning the differences between the parties I agree that very often they are two sides of the same coin. However, take the immigration issue for instance. In 1995 180 House members voted to lower overall legal immigration into the US. Of the 180 members a grand total of 2 were Democrats from outside of the South. Of those in favor of less immigration, about 160 were Republicans, about 20 were Southern Democrats. Thats a clear example of a difference. Another was the Senate votes on amnesty in the last few years, where a clear majority of Republicans have been against, and a clear majority of Dems have been in favor.
 

guest301

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
4,246
Location
Ohio
And so the second American revolution begins(tea party) ironically in the same place it started, Massachusetts! If we can win in MA, we can win anywhere. The good news about Brown is he is only serving out the last two years of Kennedy's term and if he sucks we can run somebody against him in the primary.
 

guest301

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
4,246
Location
Ohio
white is right said:
I always thought that this seat was part of the Kennedy trust....
smiley36.gif
smiley2.gif
smiley32.gif


Maybe the late Mary Joe Kopechne is somewhere smiling about the loss of the Kennedy seat. I hope so.
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
guest301 said:
And so the second American revolution begins(tea party) ironically in the same place it started, Massachusetts! If we can win in MA, we can win anywhere. The good news about Brown is he is only serving out the last two years of Kennedy's term and if he sucks we can run somebody against him in the primary.

301, you mean the third American revolution, right? The second one was in 1861-1865, but regrettably failed.

I'm more than a little hesitant to lump this Brown fellow in with "we." I consider him no different than any of the other all talk, no walk GOP shills from the "94 Conservative takeover" until he proves to me otherwise. Maybe his presence will stop Socialized Health Care in 2010, but I'm not about to praise him or any other neo-con globalist jewish puppets unless and until they have a clearly visible paradigm shift. They deserve at least as much criticism as the Dems until they change their sick ways.
 

guest301

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
4,246
Location
Ohio
Third american revolution? I will give you that one, Reb. I have never bought into the jewish puppet stuff but you know that already about me. The "we" thing is about the tea party and 9-12 project group I participate in and my local group helped with the Brown phone bank and is partly responsible for beating Coakley and hopefully stopping the health care bill in it's tracks. I have misgivings about Brown as well, he's not pro-life, not overly fiscally conservative and he's a career politician who's won ten out of ten elections but he's the best candidate you could possibly hope to get in Massachusetts.
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
Thanks for clearing up the "we" thing. It is a good movement, I just wish people would come out and say it is a White movement, as 99%+ of it is. Too much towing the PC line for me. Its a decent start, but so much more has to be done. Like many efforts going today, it doesn't embody every aspect I would want in a movement but it is a positive and should help wake others up and get the attention of the power hungry money grubbers who are, in the final analysis, elected by we the people.
 

Bear Backer

Mentor
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
658
Location
Illinois
guest301 said:
white is right said:
I always thought that this seat was part of the Kennedy trust....
smiley36.gif
smiley2.gif
smiley32.gif


Maybe the late Mary Joe Kopechne is somewhere smiling about the loss of the Kennedy seat. I hope so.

If there is any justice in an afterlife, Teddy is continually drowning in an automobile filling with booze instead of water while a vision of Mary Joe continually asks him why did you leave me to die Ted, for all of this? As all the corrupt dealings of his life and betrayals of his country flash before his eyes.
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,246
Location
Michigan
Bear Backer said:
If there is any justice in an afterlife, Teddy is continually drowning in an automobile filling with booze instead of water while a vision of Mary Joe continually asks him why did you leave me to die Ted, for all of this? As all the corrupt dealings of his life and betrayals of his country flash before his eyes.

That's funny you should post that. I was thinking of posting something similar when I posted about Teddy finally doing something right by dying at the right time. The MSM really underestimates how much people hated that guy.

I'm surprised Brown won because I always felt that Kennedy won his seat not because people voted for him but because Boston/Mass politics is so crooked that they just rigged the elections. I have a lot of family in Mass. and travel there occasionally and it seemed everyone disliked him. If crooked elections is not the case for his 50 years abusing the citizens of this country then his continual reelection must have been due to the spoils system and the goodies he could deliver as a high power politician. Perhaps they didn't think Coakley could deliver the goods.

I'm sure Brown will turn out to suck, they all do eventually. Notice that he is one of the few recent big winners that is a regular white male in the prime of his life. Perhaps Mass. wanted a return to the good ol days when white men ran things and ran them right (mostly). Note how almost all of the main political figures today are not typical white males. Obama-black, Pelosi-female, Frank-homo, McCain-decrepit old guy, the list goes on.
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
If Mr Scott Brown Senator-Elect does these three things I will consider him a Senator who will suck less:

1. Oppose Deathcare

2. Oppose Ammesty

3. Oppose any form of Cap and Trade
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
I can only imagine how many Turd Kennedy-types (D & R & I) are festering within the american government. Teddy, the Father Piggie, just happened to have the biggest mouth...which vomited neverending cultural marxism, along with yesterday's booze.

Everything about him was so hypocritical and ironic. He wanted to steal from the rich, but he came from a family of politically-connected millionares. He shreeked for feminism, but he beat coutless women, was accused of rape, and left a young woman to die in an upside down car filling with water. The list goes on and on, and applies to hundreds of other politicians.
 

Solomon Kane

Mentor
Joined
Jul 3, 2006
Messages
783
<DIV =q>
I'm glad he won---if only to slow down obamaism--but before we celebrate too much, take a look at this interview with "The Jewish Advocate". Here he pretty much reveals himself as a down the line Zionist.


The Senate race

By Kenneth H. Kaplan Special to the Advocate


Nearing the end of a brief Senate campaign focused almost exclusively on domestic issues, State Sen. Scott Brown, the Republican candidate, sought to sharply distinguish himself from his Democratic opponent in the areas of security and Mideast policies. Brown called Attorney General Martha Coakley wrong on both Iran and Afghanistan and portrayed himself as a longtime friend of Israel who would be one of its leading advocates in Washington.


Brown, a lieutenant colonel in the National Guard who cited more than once his "training in the issues of war and peace,'' said Coakley is "out of touch on military issues." He said she is making a mistake by extending constitutional rights to terror suspects "at taxpayers' expense," insisting that they instead be treated as enemy combatants.


Brown spoke last weekend by phone from his home in Wrentham in advance of the Jan. 19 special election. At times both laid back and feisty in the half-hour interview, he wondered aloud whether young American Jews fully understand Israel's security needs. He criticized President Obama for pressing Israel to freeze all settlement activity, but praised his plan to send more troops to Afghanistan. On the campaign itself, he said, "If I could have the Jewish community come out, a bloc [Coakley] thinks she's getting, I'll win this thing by 5 to 8 percent."


The following are excerpts from the interview:


Q: Israel enjoyed extremely close ties with the United States under the Bush administration. Critics say despite that, no real progress was made toward achieving peace, leading them to conclude that the US should put more pressure on Israel. Do you subscribe to that view?


I understand it, but I don't agree with it. ... President Bush was one of the most pro-Israel presidents in our lifetime, and first of all, it takes two or three entities to get down to the bargaining table and come up with peace. But when you have groups who will not adhere to the treaties of yesteryear and want to have a whole new set of treaties, one of the first things you need to do is have these entities recognize the agreements and honor them, and obviously recognize the right for Israel to actually survive.


Q: Speaking of existing agreements, Israel previously agreed to stop building more settlements. The Obama administration pressed Israel to halt any more settlement activity. Are settlements an obstacle to achieving a two-state solution?


Well certainly, but Israel also has the right to live in its lands without having another country dictate terms before you get to the bargaining table. Whether it's close settlements or not build, you can't be giving away cards before you get to the bargaining table. ... I find it offensive that [Obama is] setting the terms before even sitting down at the table. ... I think that Israel had done more than enough in terms of extending the olive branch to get people to the bargaining table.


Q: Israel's security barrier in the West Bank and its incursion into the Gaza Strip both achieved their aims, measured by the reduction in suicide bombings inside Israel and rocket fire from Gaza. Yet both have been condemned as violating Palestinians' rights. Are Israel's methods excessive?


A: Well, when it comes to your survival, I don't know, what's excessive? When you have people lobbing missiles into your bedrooms, you need to establish security measures to protect your kids, your families. ... And don't forget. when you have Hamas lobbing missiles from hospitals and schools, you're at an unfair disadvantage. Israel and the United States, we follow the Geneva Conventions and the protocols and the laws of war.


Q: The United States was fortunate to have been spared in the attempted attack aboard a Detroit-bound plane. How should the US tighten air security? Is there anything that should or should not be borrowed from Israel's methods, which, while effective, have been criticized for involving profiling?


A: Let me just backtrack and add another wrinkle to that. I do not believe that these people should be treated as ordinary criminals. They should be treated as enemy combatants. We're in a war. Clearly there was a tie to Al Qaeda. [The Detroit suspect] should never have been lawyered up at taxpayer expense. He should immediately be treated as an enemy combatant and transferred down to Gitmo or some other facility, and interrogated under the laws of the United States and the Geneva Convention and all the laws of war, first of all. So there's a mistake that Martha Coakley is making by providing constitutional rights to enemy combatants and opening up a whole new level of rights that they're not entitled to at taxpayer expense. ... I would rather spend more time keeping our people safe and then maybe infringing on our liberties a little bit at a time when in fact there are some very serious threats upon us.


Q: How concerned are you that Iran is close to acquiring a nuclear weapon? Do you believe economic sanctions can halt the Iranian program? If not, should other measures be considered, or should the world, and Israel, find a way to coexist with a nuclear Iran?


That's scary. Well, first of all there's a couple of things happening. Ahmadinejad ... Martha Coakley wants to have one-on-one negotiations with him. She would go there. That's ridiculous. You don't want to legitimize his regime and give it a propaganda tool. She'd be the only one who wants to do that. Not even President Obama wants to do that. Low-level negotiations are great, but they're obviously playing the cat and mouse game. ...


They're at 28 percent unemployment. Their cash reserves are almost gone. So if there is any type of economic threat right now, that can work ... it would shut their industry down cold. ...


Everyone knows that Israel has the right to protect itself. The option to attack Iran is always there. You don't even need to mention it.


Q: Martha Coakley recently voiced opposition to Obama's plan to send more troops to Afghanistan. What do you think should be the American commitment?


First of all, she's wrong. It shows how out of touch she is with military issues. ... By having the amount of troops we have there now, they're spread so thin that they're vulnerable. So ... I do support the president. Especially his 180 on this very issue. He took the time to figure out what the problem was. I commend him for that, publicly. ... He's looking to provide the tools and resources to our men and women to finish the job. And the job is very clear. It's to make sure the Taliban and Al Qaeda do not reestablish bases, reestablish control.
 

Bear Backer

Mentor
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
658
Location
Illinois
I agree with you Solomon Kane. I don't think he is much better, maybe only in the sense that he seems to be against the disastrous Obama-SCARE or how I like to refer to it as "instant wealth redistribution" or "hurry up and die old white devil care", maybe also too will be a weapon against shamnesty. Beyond that though, he seems to be just another crooked Neo-Con Israeli firster. I read a comment somewhere about how hopefully he would help kill Obama care and then hurry up and kick the bucket so that maybe someone better could be voted in during the 2010 midterms. I don't remember if it was when I was browsing through Stormfront or Amren or maybe it was even here at Castefooball, but it is was pretty much right on target. He is a far cry from someone who is a real patriot. My biggest hope is that the mood against more of these imperialistic Zionist first, big money corporation second, American interest last wars has reached a point where it is just not going to be a feasible solution. Where going against the overwhelming will of the American people will translate to instant forfeiture of a congressional seat come re-election.
 

Colonel_Reb

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
13,987
Location
The Deep South
With as much evidence as there is to show how many "conservatives" are Zionist lapdogs, it makes me wonder how any thinking person can believe Israel doesn't have a huge influence on U.S. policies. With that kind of proof, I think most "doubters" are really just in denial.
 

Charlie

Guru
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
354
Coakley is vile. She prosecuted the nanny baby shaking case. The mixed race couple (white/south Asian) and the Asian mother-in-law were the most likely suspects yet they were never considered. Instead a young and naive white British girl was persecuted. No evidence. No confession. No motive. But what the heck! Try her anyway.

Obama's response to Brown's win was to attack the banks (against the advice of Geitner and Sumners). How stupid. In a fractional reserve banking system only willing lenders can prevent a deflationary implosion. So what if banks make money? That's the system we have.

Is this Obama's socialist moment or his Götterdämmerung moment? Perhaps he realizes he's a one term President and therefore he's going to destroy it all out of spite. POS.
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
Top