The Biggest Racist

Who is the most openly raceist person in sports reporting?

  • Stephen A. Smith

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jason Whitlock

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bryant Gumble

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Charles Barkley

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

C Darwin

Mentor
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
1,181
Location
New York
Let the debate begin!Edited by: C Darwin
 

psychosid

Newbie
Joined
Apr 23, 2005
Messages
92
Location
United States
actually steven a. is on my good side, he said that the nba mvp is steve nash hands down...gotta give him some respect for that
 

Jofreidr_1488

Newbie
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
70
Bryant Gumbel is easily the most racist.

One thing that is very interesting about this is that I have heard he is a mulatto (half black/ half White). This type tends to be the most racist of all and many have theorized that this is because they are angry they are not all the way White. (Barrack Obama is another good example of this) These types often try to live like Whites as well and as is well known Gumbel has a White wife as he attempts to Whiten his angry light brown life.

Whitlock is not particluarly racist, he just writes outrageous/ sensationalist things to try and get more attention for his writings.

Smith and Barkley aren't particularly racist either, my guess is that behind closed doors they are like the average black.
 

Weltner

Guru
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
224
Location
United States
As much as I hate Gumbel,I had to vote for Barkley.He's said and done too many things as well; his conning a White woman into believing he really "love yuu,bay-buh", and marrying his jungle carcass(And producing two or three mutants),assaults at two clubs/bars of Whites the media claims were "harrassing" him,the SI cover of him in chains,with his typically ignorant claims of racism and slavery,his horribly written "books",to name a few....
smiley7.gif
 

C Darwin

Mentor
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
1,181
Location
New York
Listen, I am very upset about two things. The first is that I
spelled racist wrong twice with my survey. The second is that
the consensus coming back is that Smith, Whitlock, and Barkley
are not in Gumbel's league when it comes to promoting black
supremacy.

Smith went crazy when no black head coaches were hired in
the off-season by anyone in the NFL (before Art Shell). This guy
beats the entitlement drum louder than anybody.

Whitlock will not break his stance that Barry Bonds and the
situation he is in, is because of racism. Playing the race card
like this is pathetic. But what drives me bananas is that he will
never face the consequences of his slander.

Barkley can bite me! He rationalizes his stance on affirmative
action by believing that "whites have nepotism".

These men are ALL black supremacists.
These men are all bad people.
Will they ever be held accountable?
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2005
Messages
388
Location
North Carolina
Great question. Although I have never heard of Jason Whitlock, the other choices are all worthy of the title.

For my part, I voted for Charles Barkley. I think he deserves the title of "Most Openly Black Racist" as a lifetime achievement award for his many years of thick-skulled, flubber-lipped, barely-intelligible hate-Whitey schtick, which has (of course) made him a media darling.

Barkley practically invented the pissed-off black multi-millionaire persona that has become the norm in today's Jewnited States of African-America.
 

Spooge

Guru
Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Messages
450
Location
Montana
I vote Arnold (Gov of Mexicalifornia) for not standing up and saying/doing anything of substance about the INVASION of dirt people from the south.
 
Joined
Apr 22, 2005
Messages
1,057
You're upset because of the poll results? Can't you only vote for one?
Settle down.
 

C Darwin

Mentor
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
1,181
Location
New York
Listen, when I watch these four candidates work I see two
distinct categories. The first is the sympathizer, Gumbel. I don't
feel he is as politically aggressive as the other three. I would
say that Smith, Whittlock, and Barkley have a very specific
political agenda and use their media time to make
advancments. They bully and oppress different points of view
by using anecdotes to keep the perception of "white
supremacy" alive. And as long as there is a perception of white
supremacy, blacks get a free pass to guilt people into believing
affirmative action policies are a good idea. This unchecked
strategy bothers me to no end.

To me, it's shocking to see Gumbel with such a commanding
lead. I have felt much better since my last posting. Thank You.
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2005
Messages
388
Location
North Carolina
I'm shocked by the results, too.

I'm pretty sure flubber-lipped Charles Barkley is the only one of the named choices that is on record as saying "That's why I hate White people," even as his race-traitor pig of a wife and his mongrel spawn looked on.
 

Kaptain

Master
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
3,346
Location
Minnesota
Stephen A. Smith actually somewhat defended the Duke Lacrosse team yesterday by ripping on Jesse Jackson for being a publicity hound and interjecting needless racial politics into this case. I have rarely seen anybody with the guts to rip on Jesse Jackson like that - it was refreshing.
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2005
Messages
388
Location
North Carolina
80? Slur Charles would be lucky to clock in around room temperature, if you ask me. You're absolutely right, JD -- among many other things, Barkley is a complete moron. Literally.
 

JoeV

Guru
Joined
Jun 29, 2005
Messages
432
Location
Ohio
Some people I just find fascinating, and Charles Barkley is one of them. I know if a white guy spoke like he did about blacks, he would be a media pariah, but I find Barkley entertaining nonetheless. Its refreshing to see people speak there mind whether its for or against my viewpoint. I am so sick of water down, politically correct opinions. You cannot have an entertaining debate or argument when people are concerned about offending someone. Now I would pay to see some of you guys debate Charles Barkley, that would be funny as hell!
 

C Darwin

Mentor
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
1,181
Location
New York
JoeV,

I have concluded that Barkley in fact does not debate, only
editorializes on stereotypes or draws conclusions from
assumptions. Barkley NEVER puts himself in a situation where
his views can be challenged.

One day you might find him on a panel with some white morons
who seek his "expertise" on matters of race. After Barkley spits
out some rope-a-dope opinions filled with racial unity and guilt,
the panel usually has nothing more to say than Thank You. On
another day he might be speaking to a black man on black
matters. In this forum he sticks to the same rope-a-dope,
Malcolm X strategy, but changes his messages to black unity
and blacks are still oppressed. Again, his opinions will stand
without any counter.

As far as his entertainment value, watching Barkley speak is
like watching a NHL shootout with one team and no goalies.

It is true that Barkley speaks his mind, this is because the caste
system allows him to do so. He has his time, how do I get my
time?

Peace!
 

pt.guard

Newbie
Joined
Mar 28, 2006
Messages
61
Barkley may be smarter than you think.......this "speaks his mind" image that he projects has enabled him to make a very nice living after his basketball career ended.....

I, too find him amusing and think that he says a lot of things just for the shock value.......but I would rather have someone speak his mind even if I do not agree with what he says.....

But, yes I do agree that if the roles were reversed and he were white he would never get away with it.....
 

bwc_708

Newbie
Joined
Oct 31, 2005
Messages
16
I, too find him amusing and think that he says a lot of things just for the shock value.......but I would rather have someone speak his mind even if I do not agree with what he says.....



Well g#@dammit, I wish someone I agreed with COULD speak his f@#%ing mind. Wouldn't it be great if there was a celebrity white racist who was considered "amusing"?
 
Top