Should we boycott NFL/NBA/MLB/etc?

[White_Savage]

I've been pondering whether or not Whites would be better off simply refusing to patronize the major caste-system sports, or whether it's even feasible to get them to try.

If we turned all of our attention to sports that Whites not only can play, but can and do dominate, like UFC (one of the most rugged, and most utterly White dominated sports on the planet), hockey, Nascar, etc, would that send a message? Maybe we'd even see changes in the NFL, etc, shortly.

 

[White Shogun]

I've thought about that myself, but only because I get tired of seeing white players screwed over every Sunday.

But for it to have an effect on the actual sporting industry itself, such a boycott would have to be huge, wide-spread and public. If the boycott isn't public, or at least the reason behind it isn't made known to the powers that be, it wouldn't do any good.

Some on this board might say it wouldn't matter, because the masters want it the way it is.

I have read that NASCAR has one of the fastest growing audiences in the world, and maybe its because of the skin tone of its stars? As for hockey, well just when I was getting into it they went on strike -

but we'll see next season. I don't know anything about either one but I'm interested in learning for the aforementioned reason - I want to root for white athletes.

On the other hand, I want to watch the NFL and the NBA because I want to see guys like Steve Nash win the MVP. I want to see European Olympic teams trash the jive-talking, slam dunking, all-about-me USA basketball teams. I want to see guys like Tom Brady come back to win a game with 1:12 left in the game and no time outs. When was the last time you saw Mike Vick or McNabb do that?

So there are reasons to watch and reasons to boycott, but in the long run neither one will probably make a difference. Its going to take players on the field and a lot of noise from the public to get things changed.

 

[Don Wassall]

But for it to have an effect on the actual sporting industry itself, such a boycott would have to be huge, wide-spread and public. If the boycott isn't public, or at least the reason behind it isn't made known to the powers that be, it wouldn't do any good.

That sums it up perfectly. We're way too small in numbers to make a noticeable difference. There's a whole lot of people that have to be educated about the Caste System first.

 

[Bear-Arms]

White_Savage, it would be cool if we had enough people to boycott the league. However, you got a bunch of white anti's who don't care if they watch soley black players.

I do boycott in a way already. I've never bought NBA gear in my entire life. I've always hated basketball and the NBA, it has nothing to with racial make-up of the league. I'd never go see a NBA game. My favorite sport has and always will be hockey. It's a faster game with a lot more contact. I don't know if I need to boycott baseball, but I am so sick of Latin players/coaches. If my team ends up being mostly all Latin than I'll be waving goodbye to the sport. For the most part, I've seen enough of Latin players to know they aren't superior to either white or black athletes. Anyway, I only go to baseball and hockey games. Of course, I like motorsports, and I think it's more entertaining than the highest watched sport NFL. Outside my team, I don't pay much attention to the NFL, never have.

Besides, boycotting you can always tease friends about watching NFL and NBA. I used to do that so people would go watch hockey games with me. It worked.

What about the youth that is more interested in X-treme sports like skateboarding. I see less kids going out for football and baseball because of this.

 

[Bear-Arms]

White_Savage, I am curious if you post your ideas elsewhere. You seem to come up with very interesting threads that you back up quite well.

 

[Uberberserker]

With most of the sports that are the 'worst' there are considerable signs of improvement.

In the NBA there are alot of European players coming into the league and I enjoy watching them. In Baseball (which is one sport I do not watch) it seems pretty clear after the whole Toronto "White Jays" were dismantled that a White team can be successful.

It is important for Whites to watch sports. (and participate as well) It is a part of European Culture going back to 776 B.C.E. when the Ancient Olympics were first recorded to be held.

There are some out there that say because of Intergration Whites shouldn't watch sports, I call these types Robo-racialists because many of them have allowed racialism to permeate their being 24/7. Even The Great One hosted the Olympics himself in Berlin in 1936, and he had no issue with Germans or Whites in general competeing with other Races. Indeed History has shown that the Athletes competed admirably and Germany won the most medals with 89, second place was the US with 56

 

[SteveB]

I think that it already happening. The NBA is declining in popularity, while NASCAR is increasing in popularity. MLB has gotten much whiter in the last few years and their popularity is going up. UFC/Pride fighting, which was a fringe sport 5 years ago, is gaining popularity and may overtake boxing. There are only so many sports fans and all of these sports are competing for the dollars. The fact that the "white" sports are increasing in popularity tells me that many people are turned off by the "black" sports.

 

[GWTJ]

Part of the popularity of football is gambling. It used to be parlays passed out around the office. Now it is fantasy football. Also, IMO, a lot of casual football fans pay very little attention to the color of the player under the helmet. If there were more white RB's and CB's it probably wouldn't create a bigger fan base. I think the NFL will finally start to lose its white fan base when a large percentage of the QB's are black. Maybe then they will bring white players back at all the positions to recapture their fan base.

 

[Bronk]

As I have already posted, I have no interest at all in pro sports. But I do agree with Uber that whites pulling out of sports altogether is not good. But I support the local high school teams, and some college teams.

When I was in the Marines I discovered Rugby and played it through college and into my early 30s. I definately support RFCs, which are non-professional, whenever I can and occausionally travel to some of the Rugby festivals and tourneys in Texas and a few out of state. Rugby is white dominated and would appeal to most of you football fans out there. Take a look at it.

 

[JD074]

I think the NFL will finally start to lose its white fan base when a large percentage of the QB's are black.

And the offensive linemen. Those two positions going black may ultimately undo the NFL. Eventually all sports may become "niche markets."

Maybe then they will bring white players back at all the positions to recapture their fan base.

That'd be great, but I'm not holding my breath.

 

[Uberberserker]

I think the NFL will finally start to lose its white fan base when a large percentage of the QB's are black.

But is that going to happen???

I have read several posts on this board about how this year so far all the starting black QBs are not doing so well this year (McNabb with the Eagles... team is at the bottom of their division, Vick, injured right now and probably is a black clone of Chris Chandelier in the injury department, Fumblepepper (hehe) has thrown alot of INTs so far...)

When you look at the caliber of these current black QBs it is possible that the only way what you are talking about is going to happen is if Affirmative Action comes to the NFL!!

 

[right winger]

When you look at the caliber of these current black QBs it is possible that the only way what you are talking about is going to happen is if Affirmative Action comes to the NFL!!

The Caste System IS a form of affirmative action -- promoting (recruiting, developing, hyping) blacks at the expense of equally or better qualified whites.

 

[GWTJ]

If the day comes when all the QB's are black, it won't matter if they all suck because there will be no white QB's to compare them to. A scary thought but one look at the direction that Div. 1A is going leads me to believe this could happen down the road. The NFL seems desperate to make the Michael Vick's of the world the standard or the norm for the QB position.

This brings me to another question. Are the powers that be in the NFL more interested in flash from the players than talent. I think the promoters of the NFL would rather have one highlight of Vick on ESPN than 10 Manning or Brady highlights. You know, where all they are doing is throwing one TD pass after another without all the fanfare.

 

[JD074]

I agree, Right Winger and GWTJ. If sports were "just a business" and a "meritocracy," we wouldn't be here. Why are all these mediocre black QB's starting in the first place? They don't have to outcompete the white QB's. It is affirmative action, and probably the only reason football has survived thus far is because the QB and OL positions have remained relatively white (and because fans are dumb.) But we're seeing the change at those positions now....

This brings me to another question. Are the powers that be in the NFL more interested in flash from the players than talent.

If they're anything like the powers that be in the NBA, yep! Edited by: JD074

 

[Freethinker]

Jesse Ventura is calling for a boycott of the NFL due to the new TSA style grope-downs that occur entering the stadiums. This all part of Homeland Securities plan and the further destruction of the 4th Amendment. I'll be interested to see if DWFs put up invasion of personal space just so they can cheer on their "negro heroes" or will this put a dent in attendance and subsequently America's "official religion"?

http://www.infowars.com/jesse-ventura-calls-for-nfl-boycott-over-tsa-style-groping/

 

[jaxvid]

Jesse Ventura is calling for a boycott of the NFL due to the new TSA style grope-downs that occur entering the stadiums. This all part of Homeland Securities plan and the further destruction of the 4th Amendment. I'll be interested to see if DWFs put up invasion of personal space just so they can cheer on their "negro heroes" or will this put a dent in attendance and subsequently America's "official religion"?

http://www.infowars.com/jesse-ventura-calls-for-nfl-boycott-over-tsa-style-groping/

You could require that fans strip down and dress up in bunny suits and it wouldn't hurt attendence one iota. Those clowns pay $100 or more a ticket, they gonna care if some guy waves a wand at them?

 

[Run Stuffing LB]

I boycott most sports and don't watch any network television shows. It's for my own personal well-being, not to change the world. Exposure to these jew-molded images simply isn't healthy. Instead of wasting the gift of life on a marxist fantasy world time is freed up for more productive pursuits. I'd encourage everyone to try it and be amazed at how much self-improvement suddenly becomes possible.

 

[Carolina Speed]

If the day comes when all the QB's are black, it won't matter if they all suck because there will be no white QB's to compare them to. A scary thought but one look at the direction that Div. 1A is going leads me to believe this could happen down the road. The NFL seems desperate to make the Michael Vick's of the world the standard or the norm for the QB position.

This brings me to another question. Are the powers that be in the NFL more interested in flash from the players than talent. I think the promoters of the NFL would rather have one highlight of Vick on ESPN than 10 Manning or Brady highlights. You know, where all they are doing is throwing one TD pass after another without all the fanfare.

Good point GWTJ, that's the problem now with DB's in the NFL. Most of them are terrible and 90% are black, but theirs not many whites to compare them to. Most DB's in the NFL can't tackle, can't cover and many times drop balls that they should be able to intercept, but if they're all black, and they all suck, there's no great white DB's to compare them to, so they can't be exposed. The best hope right now would be Eric Weddle, but we need more to step up!

Fans need to wake up, before boycotting can be effective and most DWF's are still asleep and don't get it!

I have a friend who has asked me many times to attend a local FCS powerhouse game with him, but I don't go, because they field 90% black players. This week they are playing a white friendly FCS team and I hope I can attend, to pull for them.

This local FCS powerhouse told one white player who led the state in tackles and ran a 4.49, 40, and made all state in the largest high school division, that he would have to walk-on. Although he is now a starter and happy for him, I will be pulling for the opponent!

 

[jaxvid]

Wow a White Savage thread! That brings back memories. I'm guessing he decided that yes, ignoring the major caste system sports was the way to go because he disappeared from here. Hopefully his support of MMA, NASCAR, and the NHL is changing things because we could really use that support at CF.

I've done boycotts for a while. But unless you get some great personal benefit out of it like Run Stuffing LB it gets to be pointless. I got into this discussion in another forum with someone, they were saying "how can you claim to be a supporter of white people and their causes when you spend your spare time following ignorant negroes playing childrens games."

"You should be out there devoting that energy to causes that will further the White race, not rewarding the jews and blacks"

Okay, I'm all for that, I'll go right out and spend all my time campaigning for a guy that represents what I believe. Uh-huh. And who is that? Or I can spend my time working with a group that supports white causes. OK, who is that?

Let's face it people, we are perfectly unrepresented in the mainstream. There is not one single office holder that I know of who feels even remotely like I do about racial and thus social issues. Not one single f'in one. There is a freakin' socialist in the US House of Representives. But not a single pro-White one. There are representatives in every branch of govt that cover the whole political spectrum from those who actively HATE White people, to those who only somewhat hate White people. That's the range of choices.

The best you could possibly get is someone who is as neutral as possible on the subject but is avowedly NOT pro-white and that would be one guy-Ron Paul. And okay for his mild sort of opposition to the sh*thole that is the modern usa I DO support him, vote for him and have given money to his campaigns. And he has a snowballs chance in hell of changing anything-not that he would do any changing that I would like, but at least he would possibly try to slow the rate of decline. But he is all alone even in that.

And what about an organization I could lend a hand to? Who? the Klan or nazi's? Seriously, Ron Paul will be president of the world before those guys accomplish anything. The Tea Party? Basically the same as Ron Paul. Well meaning people, trying to stop the rate of decay, but as avowedly NOT pro-white as the ACLU. And I give them some lukewarm support, go to an occasional meeting, give some money. And while I will remain positive of what they can do I still think they will end up as another arm of the establishment Republican party.

There is really nothing out there. Maybe someday. Call me then. Until then I might as well bitch about what is going on in sports. At least its something.

 

[Thrashen]

Wow a White Savage thread! That brings back memories. I'm guessing he decided that yes, ignoring the major caste system sports was the way to go because he disappeared from here. Hopefully his support of MMA, NASCAR, and the NHL is changing things because we could really use that support at CF.

I've done boycotts for a while. But unless you get some great personal benefit out of it like Run Stuffing LB it gets to be pointless. I got into this discussion in another forum with someone, they were saying "how can you claim to be a supporter of white people and their causes when you spend your spare time following ignorant negroes playing childrens games."

"You should be out there devoting that energy to causes that will further the White race, not rewarding the jews and blacks"

Okay, I'm all for that, I'll go right out and spend all my time campaigning for a guy that represents what I believe. Uh-huh. And who is that? Or I can spend my time working with a group that supports white causes. OK, who is that?

Let's face it people, we are perfectly unrepresented in the mainstream. There is not one single office holder that I know of who feels even remotely like I do about racial and thus social issues. Not one single f'in one. There is a freakin' socialist in the US House of Representives. But not a single pro-White one. There are representatives in every branch of govt that cover the whole political spectrum from those who actively HATE White people, to those who only somewhat hate White people. That's the range of choices.

The best you could possibly get is someone who is as neutral as possible on the subject but is avowedly NOT pro-white and that would be one guy-Ron Paul. And okay for his mild sort of opposition to the sh*thole that is the modern usa I DO support him, vote for him and have given money to his campaigns. And he has a snowballs chance in hell of changing anything-not that he would do any changing that I would like, but at least he would possibly try to slow the rate of decline. But he is all alone even in that.

And what about an organization I could lend a hand to? Who? the Klan or nazi's? Seriously, Ron Paul will be president of the world before those guys accomplish anything. The Tea Party? Basically the same as Ron Paul. Well meaning people, trying to stop the rate of decay, but as avowedly NOT pro-white as the ACLU. And I give them some lukewarm support, go to an occasional meeting, give some money. And while I will remain positive of what they can do I still think they will end up as another arm of the establishment Republican party.

There is really nothing out there. Maybe someday. Call me then. Until then I might as well bitch about what is going on in sports. At least its something.

Thank you for another great post. I particularly enjoyed the bolded sections. Of course, I feel the same way…like a lone wolf.

Although Ron Paul provides somewhat of an “alternative,” his values aren’t nearly strong enough when contrasted against my own. It’s not even close, really. Instead of labeling a politician as either “liberal,” “moderate,” or “conservative,” they should be categorized as either “pro-white,” “race-neutral,” or “anti-white.”

As you mentioned, 0.0% would fall under “pro-white,” 99.999% would fall under “anti-white,” and 0.001% (Dr. Paul) would fall under “race-neutral.”

No mainstream organization currenty in existance deserves my time, my energy, my respect, my attention, my membership, my money, etc.

 

[jaxvid]

No mainstream organization currenty in existance deserves my time, my energy, my respect, my attention, my membership, my money, etc.

What is most unbelievable about this is that there must be thousands probably hundreds of thousands perhaps millions? who feel this way. How can such a large group of relatively intelligent people with a decent level of finances be so unrepresented? Is there any example in history of how such a large bloc of voters with our resources in a society that allows basically free communication can have 0% political representation? It really is quite mind boggling. I know white-aware people are not a HUGE bloc of voters, but from what I see on the internet I know it isn't zero percent of the population. This is an unserved demographic and I have to think that someday someone is going to cash in on that.

 

[Freethinker]

Thrashen and jaxvid, I agree with you guys a great deal but I don't think we need "pro-White" politicians. We just need "race neutral" ones who will repeal AA policies, end welfare, end political correctness, etc. With a level playing field again, the White race will once again excel and prove itself as the dominate race. We've done it all throughout history and the Jews and PTB know it, hence their policies against us.

 

[Don Wassall]

What is most unbelievable about this is that there must be thousands probably hundreds of thousands perhaps millions? who feel this way. How can such a large group of relatively intelligent people with a decent level of finances be so unrepresented? Is there any example in history of how such a large bloc of voters with our resources in a society that allows basically free communication can have 0% political representation? It really is quite mind boggling. I know white-aware people are not a HUGE bloc of voters, but from what I see on the internet I know it isn't zero percent of the population. This is an unserved demographic and I have to think that someday someone is going to cash in on that.

When you consider that the entire system is built to prevent such a pro-White organization or political party from gaining traction it's not that suprising. And if an organization were to get large anyway, then there are the time-honored methods of infiltration, entrapment, civil and criminal lawsuits, etc.

The old ways don't work anymore, which is why I get so ticked off seeing people who should know better still falling for the "liberal vs. conservative" "Republican vs. Democrat" game after all these years of non-stop betrayal and subversion by both wings of the one-party monopoly.

It really goes back to the dinosaur media vs. the alternative media thread. What we're doing is building virtual communities across vast distances that have instant communication and that effectively spread important information. Thinking people are rejecting the system as individuals and finding alternatives. Our salvation, as individuals and possibly as a country, is to secede from the rotten system, which can only function when there's a sufficient number of people like us -- hard-working, productive, intelligent -- to suck the blood from. Anyway, the process of collapse is already underway because the system is way too top-heavy with parasites at both the top and bottom and not enough in the middle as the White population is getting older and poorer. Rejecting and not feeding a doomed system in as many ways as possible is the only wise choice at this point.