An article entitled "Continuing Vote Fraud in New Hampshire"
http://www.whitecivilrights.com/?p=6526
Shortly after the 2008 New Hampshire primary an alert citizen noticed that screen captures, he had made, of early vote totals that had been broadcast on the local news, suggested that someone had swapped the vote totals from Ron Paul and John McCain. That video can be seen here. Even more damning evidence of vote fraud surfaced a little bit later: People in several small towns where Ron Paul had been given zero votes stepped forward to say that they had voted for Paul. In one case an entire family voted for Paul, but he still got an official zero vote count for that town.
There is no doubt that vote fraud took place in 2008. The only difference this year is that Ron Paul was allowed to receive more votes to try to make the election seem more legitimate. The wholesale massive vote theft of 2008 was a little too obvious to try again.
The 2012 vote thievery appeared to accelerate as the New Hampshire primary election progressed. When 25 percent of the vote was in, Ron Paul had closed the gap on Romney to 10 percent. Was that a real result with no vote thievery? Could Romney and Paul have been tied? A mere 10 percent lead for Romney would have been an embarrassingly weak finish so the puppeteers running the Republican party had the Diebold programmers create some more votes for Romney so that he would finish with a 16 point “lead†over Ron Paul. They also made sure that the vote totals for Gingrich and Santorum dropped below 10 percent.
http://www.whitecivilrights.com/?p=6526