Race war in Libya?

[alln2]

http://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/

SBPDL has an interesting take on this. I agree with his analysis.

This is about keeping unrestricted invaders pouring into Europe?

Its about exterminating Europeans, in the long run. Negroes and sand-negroes are biological weapons used against Whites. They breed like rabbits, and in 2 maximum3 generations they will be majority here. After that, look at what happens in South Africa to see the future for White Europeans.

 

[Highlander]

http://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/

SBPDL has an interesting take on this. I agree with his analysis.

This is about keeping unrestricted invaders pouring into Europe?

Some very important excerpts:
<blockquote><div ="firstPar">Comments in diplomatic cables
released by whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks and published by the
daily Le Monde show frustration over France's record in assimilating
minority groups and highlight concerns the problem could be
deepening. </div></blockquote><blockquote><div ="secondPar"> "France not only has a problem with integration or immigration; it also
needs to act to give Muslims a sense of French identity," the U.S.
embassy in Paris said in a secret diplomatic cable to Washington
dated Aug. 17, 2005. </div></blockquote><blockquote><div ="thirdPar">
The comments foreshadowed a wave of violent clashes in December that
year between youths, many of them second-generation immigrants, and
police in the gritty suburban housing projects that ring major French
cities. </div></blockquote><blockquote><div ="fourthPar">
Television footage of burning cars and rioting youths was beamed around
the world, casting a spotlight on tension between the French
government and descendants of immigrant groups, many of whom belonged
to France's 5-million-strong Muslim community.</div></blockquote><blockquote>
"The real problem</font> is the failure </font>of white Christian France</font> to view its
dark-skinned and Muslim compatriots as citizens in their own right,"
the U.S. embassy told Washington in a cable dated Nov. 9, 2005. Craig
Stapleton was U.S. ambassador to France under the administration of
President George W. Bush.

... </blockquote><blockquote> The cables published by Le
Monde date back to mid-2005 and cover the presidencies of both Mr
Bush and Barack Obama, but there is little variation in U.S.
attitudes toward France and its policies on immigrants and
minorities. </blockquote><blockquote> "French institutions appear
insufficiently flexible for a population that is growing more
diverse," said a cable from Jan. 2010. Charles Rivkin is currently
U.S. ambassador to France.
...

Libya has in recent months, however, been more helpful, possibly
because it is working toward a closer relationship with Europe. Its
leader, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi,
has forged informal agreements with Italy to crack down on smugglers
and patrol its own borders to keep those fleeing other African countries
from entering and then heading north from its shores.
...

Libyan leader Moammer Khadafy played the race card Monday, warning Europe that if he falls they will be deluged by hordes of illegal African immigrants.

"There are millions of blacks who could come to the Mediterranean to cross to France and Italy, and Libya plays a role in security in the Mediterranean," he told the France 24 television station.

"Libya may become the Somalia of North Africa, of the Mediterranean," Khadafy's son, Seif, added. "You will see the pirates in Sicily, in Crete, in Lampedusa. You will see millions of illegal immigrants. The terror will be next door."
</blockquote>

 

[foobar75]

These are some very revealing statements and this particular theory about removing Libya as the buffer so Africans and Middle Easterns can flood Europe sounds pretty legit to me.

And for those of you who are students of history, you may already know that Europe has faced many, many threats from Islam and Africa during the past 1000 years or so, and has managed to defeat the enemy each and every time, the last being the Battle of Vienna in 1529. After The Holy League defeated the Ottoman Empire at the doorstep of Vienna, thus began the rise of Europe over the following 300 years while the Ottoman Empire went into a gradual decline in parallel during that same period.

Those brave fore-fathers must be turning in their graves watching what is happening to their emasculated and feminized descendants, who appear helpless against this turd world invasion bent on destroying the White race. I'm afraid that the modern Europeans, a mass of brain-washed, politically correct and "tolerant" people will indeed be run over unless they wake-up and put up a fight before it's too late.
Edited by: foobar75

 

[Westside]

Highlander's post may have alot of truth to it. But all France, Italy and rest of Europe needs to do in curtailing the African illegal immagration is patrol the seas with techonolgy available. Once an illegal african in located on the high seas or within Europe's coast is to intercept and point them back south. If out of fuel, filler up and launch them back to the dark continent. Enough is enough.

 

[alln2]

Those brave fore-fathers must be turning in their graves watching what is happening to their emasculated and feminized descendants, who appear helpless against this turd world invasion bent on destroying the White race. I'm afraid that the modern Europeans, a mass of brain-washed, politically correct and "tolerant" people will indeed be run over unless they wake-up and put up a fight before it's too late.

Look who's talking.

Lets not forget who made Europe safe for negroes, sand-negroes and gypsies(indians, pakis and other scum). American soldiers in the second world war killed those "evil racists" europeans. They killed and starved them by the millions. American industry armed the asiatic hordes who defeated the german forces in russia, asiatic hordes who raped every german woman after the war.

American soldiers in the second world war = useful idiots for the marxists. And thats the truth.

 

[Thrashen]

All is well with humankind"¦the "Zionist Protective Force"Â￾ (U.S. Army) is once again vaporizing inconsequential, pre-historic, turd-world Muslims. Thus begins yet another in the never-ending generational "wars"Â￾ in which white soldiers are pitted against Jewish enemies in and around the UnHoly Land. Two birds"¦one stone"¦you know the drill.

These sorts of occurrences should indubitably reveal to the "partisan"Â￾ masses that the "two"Â￾ major American political Z.0.G-parties are indeed manipulated by the exact same Ivory Tower Dwellers. No, that would require the employment of free thought and/or free will"¦something that the white American public has been incapable of experiencing for many decades. The contrived clash between "R versus D"Â￾ is as utterly hollow and baseless as "Pepsi versus Coke."Â￾ That is, two hardcore capitalist corporations fighting over absolute control of the resources of the peons.

The national "liberal figurehead,"Â￾ Barry Obongo, just happily bombed a country (likely killing thousands of innocent brown citizens in a matter of hours) with whom the United States has no prior quarrel. Jorge W. (which, of course stands for "Wigger"Â￾) Bush would be so pleased.

The 1973 "War Powers Resolution Law"Â￾ states that there are three instances when the U.S. president can use force against another nation: (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

Of course, none of those things (even remotely) occurred"¦ethnocentric Jewish supremacists aren't subject to laws.

If not for the obligatory white intervention, "brown killing brown"Â￾ would be cause for celebration among pro-white Americans"¦

Toothless savages...

Edited by: Thrashen

 

[Highlander]

I remember Hitlary saying a few weeks ago saying something like "Women must be represented in the new Middle East". Well, it now appears that the radical feminists in Obama's cabinet were the ones pushing for this war:

"So three or four of Obama's advisers, all women, wanted war against Libya.
<blockquote>

We'd like to think that women in power would somehow be
less pro-war, but in the Obama administration at least it appears that
the bellicosity is worst among Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and Samantha
Power. All three are liberal interventionists, and all three seem to
believe that when the United States exercises military force it has some
profound, moral, life-saving character to it.


The press is full of reports about how Clinton, Rice and Power pushed
Obama to war. The New York Times, citing insiders, reports that Obama
shifted to intervention in Libya only under pressure from the trio: "The
change became possible, though, only after Mrs. Clinton joined Samantha
Power, a senior aide at the National Security Council, and Susan Rice,
Mr. Obama's ambassador to the United Nations, who had been pressing the
case for military action, according to senior administration officials
speaking only on condition of anonymity."
</blockquote>http://www.thenation.com/blog/159346/obamas-women-advisers-pushed-war-against-libya

I'm not surprised...the Feminists destroyed Western Civilization, and now they are busy trying to do it the rest of the world...using the lives of White Male soldiers to do it...those that they crap on here at home. Of course, the Mangina-in-Chief buckled under pressure to them.

 

[Highlander]

Highlander's post may have alot of truth to it. But all France, Italy and rest of Europe needs to do in curtailing the African illegal immagration is patrol the seas with techonolgy available. Once an illegal african in located on the high seas or within Europe's coast is to intercept and point them back south. If out of fuel, filler up and launch them back to the dark continent. Enough is enough.

I wish I was as optimistic as you. I heard a few days ago that Tunisians are now flooding into Italy.

 

[Bart]

Ron Paul says stay out of Libya! He is right.

Reasons.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC07ykFMXyM&feature=player_embedded

 

[Rebajlo]

And for those of you who are students of history, you may already know that Europe has faced many, many threats from Islam and Africa during the past 1000 years or so, and has managed to defeat the enemy each and every time, the last being the Battle of Vienna in 1529. After The Holy League defeated the Ottoman Empire at the doorstep of Vienna, thus began the rise of Europe over the following 300 years while the Ottoman Empire went into a gradual decline in parallel during that same period.

I don't wish to be pedantic, but the final great Ottoman assault against Europe, culminating in the Turks' defeat by the forces of the Holy League at theBattle of Vienna,took place in 1683, during the reign of Sultan Mehmed IV.

 

[foobar75]

<div>I don't wish to be pedantic, but the final great Ottoman assault against Europe, culminating in the Turks' defeat by the forces of the Holy League at the Battle of Vienna, took place in 1683, during the reign of Sultan Mehmed IV. 

 </div>

You are absolutely correct sir, and my history clearly needs a bit of refreshing. There were two attempted sieges of Vienna by the Turks, the first as I mentioned in 1529 under Suleiman The Magnificant, which came during the peak of Ottoman power.

The 2nd, as you mention in 1683 came as the Ottoman Empire was already beginning its gradual decline. After their defeat, it also marked the end of any further expansion into Europe by the Turks.

Sadly, the Turks, Africans, and other Middle Easterns don't even have to fight a battle to take over Europe now in the 21st century.

 

[Rebajlo]

You are absolutely correct sir, and my history clearly needs a bit of refreshing. There were two attempted sieges of Vienna by the Turks, the first as I mentioned in 1529 under Suleiman The Magnificant, which came during the peak of Ottoman power.

The 2nd, as you mention in 1683 came as the Ottoman Empire was already beginning its gradual decline. After their defeat, it also marked the end of any further expansion into Europe by the Turks.

Sadly, the Turks, Africans, and other Middle Easterns don't even have to fight a battle to take over Europe now in the 21st century.

foobar75 - Although the Ottoman Empire displayed nascent signs of internal decay during the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent's son, Selim II, the Turks remained a very dangerous and expansionist power, simultaneously conducting armed operations in Europe and against Safavid Persia in the east. For example, they fought three wars with Poland prior to 1683 (including the "Informal War", or "War of Abazy Pasha" of 1633-34).

Without entering into details, the reign of Ahmed I, who acceded in 1603, witnessed an increase in bureaucratic corruption and decentralisation, coupled with a decline in military discipline. Mind You, during the reign of Mehmed IV and bythe time of the campaign of 1683 the Ottoman military and administrative apparatus had been revitalised by the Koprulu grand viziers, but the Battle of Vienna finally put an end to any serious Turkish threat to Europe.

As You said, after centuries of successful hard fighting against massive numerical odds,Whites are now passively allowing Europe to be swamped by Muslims, et cetera. Ironic, isn't it?

Anyway, sorry about taking the discussion off-topic lads...

 

[Michael]

An article entitled "Libyan Liberation Leads To Ethnic Cleansing"

One of the first things the Kosovo Liberation Army did after Bill Clinton bombed Serbia back to the industrial stone age for them in 1999 was ethnically cleanse Serbian-speaking Gypsies, on the grounds that A) They spoke Serbo-Croatian and thus probably sympathized with the Serbs, and B) Hey, they're Gypsies. This Wikipedia account says 90,000 Roma were expelled from Kosovo by the KLA.

David Zucchino reports from the rebel capital of Benghazi for the LA Times that something similar is, unsurprisingly, happening in Libya

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2011/03/24/libyan-liberation-leads-to-ethnic-cleansing/

 

[Jimmy Chitwood]

'Libya war could last 30 years': Armed forces minister's extraordinary admission.

Ministers admitted yesterday that they have no idea how long the military operation against Colonel Gaddafi could take.



Asked for an estimate, Armed Forces Minister Nick Harvey said: 'How long is a piece of string? We don't know how long this is going to go on.



'We don't know if this is going to result in a stalemate. We don't know if his capabilities are going to be degraded quickly. Ask me again in a week.'
...

And as Tory MPs expressed fears that the war could last for 30 years, Foreign Secretary William Hague added to fears of an expensive and open-ended commitment, saying that it was impossible to put a deadline on British involvement.



Mr Hague said: 'It's too early to speculate. It depends what happens one way or another.



'I don't think you can put a deadline or a time objective to that.

oh, by the way, according to Prez Obongo's administration, 'It's not a war, it is kinetic military action. uh ... WTF?!?

In the last few days, everyone from military officers to the President himself have been asked the question - What is the fighting in Libya if it is not a war?


In a press briefing on board Air Force One on Wednesday, deputy national security adviser for strategic communications Ben Rhodes called it 'kinetic military action'.

both links provide more info and pictures of this totally illegal, totally pointless loss of White American lives.

 

[Thrashen]

Almost all of the "Obama Bombing Libya"Â￾ articles I've read are entirely centered on the potential of his decision to "weaken his chances"Â￾ of re-election in 2012.

Loss of life, especially those of white American and European soldiers, is secondary (or tertiary, or not considered whatsoever) to the mind-numbing, meaningless, single-party, Monopoly-style American oligarchy.

"Obama the Warmonger"Â￾ is a comically paradoxical (yet predictable) character to contrast "Mr. Hope,"Â￾ "Mr. Change"Â￾ and "Mr. Yes We Can."Â￾Edited by: Thrashen

 

[alln2]

"Obama the Warmonger"Â￾ is a comically paradoxical (yet predictable) character to contrast "Mr. Hope,"Â￾ "Mr. Change"Â￾ and "Mr. Yes We Can."Â￾

The negro teleprompter also has a Nobel Prize for ............................. Peace.

 

[Highlander]

"Obama the Warmonger"Â￾ is a comically paradoxical (yet predictable) character to contrast "Mr. Hope,"Â￾ "Mr. Change"Â￾ and "Mr. Yes We Can."Â￾

The negro teleprompter also has a Nobel Prize for ............................. Peace.

Yes, and the elites responsible for this "prize" now have egg on their face and have been discredited...all because they decided to give a prize to someone simply because he was the "first black President of the United States". Obviously, in their minds, that equals "peace". Such simplistic thinking for such a supposedly intellectual group of people. It looks like their Cultural Marxism backfired on them this time.

 

[Jimmy Chitwood]

Defense Secretary: Libya did not pose threat to U.S., was not "vital national interest" to intervene.

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said that Libya did not pose a threat to the United States before the U.S. began its military campaign against the North African country.


On "This Week,"Â￾ ABC News' Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper asked Gates, "Do you think Libya posed an actual or imminent threat to the United States?"Â￾


"No, no,"Â￾ Gates said in a joint appearance with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. "It was not -- it was not a vital national interest to the United States ... "

meanwhile, the Obongo administration says Libyan operation could last for months. if they're admitting this, then the truth is probably closer to what we're hearing from Britain: the 30 years' (not a real) war.

simultaneously the two-sides of the Coke-Pepsi government are "feuding" over semantics. OBAMA: 'WE'RE SUCCEEDING IN OUR MISSION'... vs. Boehner: Obama needs to 'provide clarity' on military objective...


you'll please notice that both "representatives of the American people" ignore the fact that the whole f-ing thing is un-Constitutional, illegal, against the will of (if i recall the latest polls correctly) 93% of the US citizenry, and completely pointless on top of all that. yep, that is some real, legitimate opposition right therebetween the "change" candidate and the "conservative. *puke*

oh, and lest we forget, "our" allies in NATO are considering anincrease in the air strikes against Libya.this is, of course, simply a move to create some plausible deniability in order for Washington to wash its hands of the mess. or, as the article states, "hand off responsibility for air strikes."wow. just wow.

 

[DixieDestroyer]

More foreign entanglements, serving the Globalist Elite & their Z0G allies. The PTB puppets continue to carry forth the NWO agenda.

 

[Michael]

An article entitled "Libyan Involvement To Trigger Third-World Invasion of U.S. As Well As Europe?"

Along with most of the European MSM, the Daily Mail does not pretend these arrivals are refugees as traditionally understood. The many film clips on internet invariably show the boats are almost exclusively carrying young men: very few women, almost no children or elderly. This is a plain Camp Of The Saints-style economically-motivated invasion. And of course the Italian Government is foolishly encouraging it by transferring the arrivals to the mainland.

The Italians are wise to fear more arrivals. Colonel Gadaffi, who for the last couple of years had been bribed to restrain the flow, has directly threatened to send Europe more Blacks. (Apparently they are not appreciated in North Africa.)

Given President Obama's predilections and the ambitions of the Refugee Industry, America has reason to fear the U.S. involvement in Libya will be used as an excuse for more Third World imports.

Already Refugee Resettlement Watch has detected Canadian Treason Lobby activity. And National Public Radio has started the drum roll: Italians Rescue Africans Fleeing ‘Boiling' Libya by Sylvia Poggoli NPR March 29, 2011 (Note European features of migrant photographed and emphasis on Libyan maltreatment, helpfully bolstering refugee status claims.)

Another Muslim war and accelerated immigration from non-traditional sources â€" whose agenda is this?

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2011/03/30/libyan-involvement-to-trigger-third-world-invasion-of-us-as-well-as-europe/

 

[Westside]

BO still continues the Bush policies of drone attacks, Terrorist prisons in Cuba, 1000s of "Kill Team" photos, over $4.00 gasoline, troops activily killing and being killed in Afganastan and Iraq and now his little war in Libya. Back in 2007 BO condemned Bush for doing exactly what the US forces are doing in Libya. The worthless press is now where to be found.

Something earth shattering is going to have to happened to hurt BO and libs, dems and repubs who go along to get along bullcrap.

 

[DixieDestroyer]

BO still continues the Bush policies of drone attacks, Terrorist prisons in Cuba, 1000s of "Kill Team" photos, over $4.00 gasoline, troops activily killing and being killed in Afganastan and Iraq and now his little war in Libya. Back in 2007 BO condemned Bush for doing exactly what the US forces are doing in Libya. The worthless press is now where to be found.

Something earth shattering is going to have to happened to hurt BO and libs, dems and repubs who go along to get along bullcrap.

Further proof of the bogus "left vs. right" ruse pitched by the puppet "leadership" of the (Globalist controlled) DNC & GOP. Alotta the legit liberals are now seeing that their supposed "savior" is nothing more that a corporatist shill for the PTB (as was his "opposite"...Jorge Boosh").

 

[white is right]

No kill shot today, but Ghadafi's compound was overrun today....http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-14630702

 

[Michael]

An article entitled "Did foreign military forces take Tripoli?"

The US media is calling the rebel take over of Tripoli a “major victoryâ€￾ for Obama’s foreign policy. However numerous sources say special forces from France and Britain lead the fight on the ground. US and NATO forces conducted a mass bombing campaign from the air.

UK Guardian reports British SAS active with Libyan rebels.

NATO brought professional Jihadis from their eastern strongholds in Bengazi to fight in Tripoli as well. These fighters include members of hardcore Islamic militant groups including Al-Quada.

The next catastrophe could be a massive Civil War between Libyans rival tribes, followed by a “humanitarianâ€￾ occupation.

http://cofcc.org/2011/08/did-foreign-military-forces-take-tripoli/

 

[Michael]

An article entitled "CNN: Foreign troops leading fight in Libya."

CNN reports on the presence of foreign ground troops days after the “conspiracyâ€￾ websites already broke the story.

While American planes drop millions of dollars worth of bombs a day, special forces from Britain, France, Quatar, and Jordan are leading “rebelâ€￾ forces on the ground. It is now very apparent that “anti-warâ€￾ leaders Obama and Hillary want a full scale military invasion and occupation.

Fighting on the the side of NATO is an assortment of rival tribal groups who live in the region with the oil fields, hardline Islamic militants (including actual Al-Qaeda members and foreigners who fought US troops in Iraq), professional gangsters, and ex-Qaddafi officials (some of whom were under investigation for embezzling millions from oil revenues right before hostilities broke out.)

http://cofcc.org/2011/08/cnn-foreign-troops-leading-fight-in-libya/