Bart said:
I heard the New England Patriots are way, way under the salary cap. Then why did they get rid of Vinatieri, and their two best receivers? It's going to be very hard for Tom Brady to put points on the board. You'd almost get the impression the league would like to bring him down a few notches so Vick and company wouldn't look so bad in comparison. Too many Brady jerseys out there. I guess I'm just getting too cynical.
If by their two best recievers you mean David Givens and Deon Branch, then I have no problem with what the Patriots have done. Branch and Givens benefitted from a very good Patriots offense and despite being starters at least the last three years neither of them have ever broke the 1,000 yard mark. Both of them wanted to Patriots to "show them the money!". I admire the Patriots for showing them the door instead.
While everyone is gripping about these players being dismissed no one, outside of this website, recognizes the mistreatment of white WRs with similar stats who sign for the league minimum. Kevin Curtis is great example; last year as a non-starter he put up stats similar to the best years Branch and Givens yet he signed for the league minimum and no team showed interest in his talents. There was also no media hysteria over his misuse or Stokelys, or Jurevicuis etc.
As for Vinatieri, that too looks like a good move as Vinateri has been injured thus far this year. Certainly he is an elite kicker and deserves all the credit he gets but I would imagine he is one of the highest paid kickers in the league and if he can be replaced by a young guy that might be just as good then why not?
The reason Tom Brady and the offense may have trouble putting points on the board is that the Pats still have terrible slow undersized recievers and a slow RB.
I hope they use Garrett Mills more in the passing game. I thought he was injured. Anybody know his status?