Obama Admin OKs Taxpayer Funded Abortion

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
The traitorous tyranny continues...

Obama Administration Approves First Direct Taxpayer Funding of Abortion

Wednesday, July 14, 2010
By Susan Jones, Senior Editor


President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden react to cheers as they arrive in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, March 23, 2010, for the signing ceremony for the health care bill. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
(CNSNews.com) - If you want proof that President Obama's Executive Order on taxpayer-funded abortion was a sham, look no further than Pennsylvania, says House Republican Leader John Boehner (Ohio).

Boehner and other Republicans point to reports that the Health and Human Services Department is giving Pennsylvania $160 million to set up a new high-risk insurance pool that will cover any abortion that is legal in the state.

"The fact that the high-risk pool insurance program in Pennsylvania will use federal taxpayer dollars to fund abortions is unconscionable," Boehner said in a statement on Tuesday.

"Just last month at the White House, I asked President Obama to provide the American people with a progress report on the implementation of his Executive Order, which purports to ban taxpayer-funding of abortions. Unfortunately, the President provided no information, and the American people are still waiting for answers."

President Obama pledged that under his health care plan "no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions, and federal conscience laws will remain in place."Â￾

In a May 13 letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Boehner asked if her department has provided guidance to the states on how to implement the president's Executive Order on abortion funding. Boehner also asked Sebelius if the new federal high-risk pools would exclude abortion coverage.

He says his questions remain unanswered.

"Millions of Americans care deeply about this aspect of the new law and its implementation, and no progress report is complete without detailed information about it,"Â￾ Boehner wrote to Sebelius.

The conservative Family Research Council says the $160 million in taxpayer funds for Pennsylvania is the first known instance of direct federal funding of abortions through the new high-risk insurance pools.

The abortion funding for pool participants validates the arguments pro-life groups made throughout the health care debate â€" that taxpayer dollars will fund abortions, said Tom McClusky, senior vice president of the Family Research Council's political action arm.

"For our efforts to remove the bill's abortion funding, we were called 'deceivers' by President Obama and 'liars' by his allies. Now we know who the true deceivers and liars really are,' McClusky said.

"This action by the Obama Administration also exposes the worthlessness of President Obama's Executive Order that supposedly would prevent federal funding of abortion, but which both sides, including Planned Parenthood, agreed was unenforceable.

"While the American people deserve an apology from President Obama for his deception, we should only be satisfied when this Pennsylvania abortion funding is rescinded and the health care law repealed.

McClusky noted that the new health care law also includes $12.5 billion for community health centers, and $6 billion for co-ops, both of which can fund abortions. And some people will use tax credits to help them pay for plans that cover abortion.

Even before it's fully implemented, the Democrats' health care plan "is already being exposed as a high-taxing, poorly thought-out, and taxpayer-funding-of-abortion monstrosity,"Â￾ McClusky said.

Republican leader Boehner says House Republicans would codify the Hyde amendment, thus prohibiting all authorized and appropriated federal funds from being used to pay for abortion. Under the Republican plan, any health plan that includes abortion coverage would not receive federal funds.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/69384
 

Westside

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
7,703
Location
So Cal
Over the past 18 months or so, America and even its most drunk of DWFs are see this Marxist as Lair in Chief. Fortuneately, his adminstration is imploding before our eyes. Just hope we as conservative Americans can undo the damage cuased by this man and his enablers and right the ship.
 

Paleocon

Guru
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
330
Location
On the far Right
Obama has made himself an accessory to murder by financing the killing of the unborn. He ought to be tried and punished accordingly. That is really the least intemperate thing I could manage to write regarding that contemptible liar.
 

Observer

Mentor
Joined
May 10, 2008
Messages
523
Paleocon said:
Obama has made himself an accessory to murder by financing the killing of the unborn.  He ought to be tried and punished accordingly.  That is really the least intemperate thing I could manage to write regarding that contemptible liar. 
Yes.
 

Riddlewire

Master
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
2,567
Westside said:
Over the past 18 months or so, America and even its most drunk of DWFs are see this Marxist as Lair in Chief. Fortuneately, his adminstration is imploding before our eyes. Just hope we as conservative Americans can undo the damage cuased by this man and his enablers and right the ship.

It doesn't matter if Americans hate him. They're not smart enough to realize that they need to take votes away from his agenda by voting against the Democrats this year.
The truth is nothing will ever be able to undo some of Obama's treasonous policies. It would require more than a supermajority of conservative Republicans in both houses of congress (if the GOP ever got to 60, the liberals among them would side with the Dems) and a conservative President. That will never happen. It didn't even happen in 2008 for the Democrats. The Dems stole at least one senate seat (Franken) and probably several other races as well.
American voters don't think nationally when voting for congress. They think they're voting for someone to represent their state. But Senators and Representatives act in the interests of their party, not their constituents. And, until strict federalism returns to America, it will always be that way.
 

whiteCB

Master
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Messages
2,282
I am 100% Pro Choice all the way but I cannot support the use of tax payer dollars to fund a woman's DECISION. That's all it is is funding somebody's decision to go through with something that they honestly do not have to do. Have people use their OWN MONEY for their own decisions in life. It's just another example of the welfare state gone wild.
 

Thrashen

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,706
Location
Pennsylvania
I'm strongly opposed to white abortions, and strongly in favor of non-white abortions.

It's difficult to fathom how many wonderful, intelligent, beautiful white men and white women we've forsaken through the odious act of white abortion. Non-white babies are adopted, cherished, and fully integrated into white societies (with the myriad of "special treatment"Â￾ allotted to the "special people"Â￾).
 

guest301

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
4,246
Location
Ohio
I'm against ALL abortions and none of my taxes should go to paying for any of them and ditto to paleocons sentiments above about Obama.
 

Freethinker

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 3, 2008
Messages
7,419
Location
Suffolk County, NY
whiteCB said:
I am 100% Pro Choice all the way but I cannot support the use of tax payer dollars to fund a woman's DECISION. That's all it is is funding somebody's decision to go through with something that they honestly do not have to do. Have people use their OWN MONEY for their own decisions in life. It's just another example of the welfare state gone wild.
I have to agree with this post.

Thrashen and others. After a quick search I found these interesting but not surprising stats:

In 2005 out of women aged 15 to 44, white women aborted at a rate of 13.6% (662,00 abortions out of a population of 48,678,000). Black women were at a rate of 49.3% (452,000 abortions out of 9,177,000).

Imagine all those additional black bastard children and orphans that white tax payers, in some way or another, would have to support. Just some food for thought.
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
If you guys don't want the Fed Gov paying for abortions with your tax money---stop giving it to them. It's that simple!
 

Paleocon

Guru
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
330
Location
On the far Right
jaxvid said:
If you guys don't want the Fed Gov paying for abortions with your tax money---stop giving it to them. It's that simple!



I suppose we could right after we end Federal withholding or repeal the 16th Amendment. As it stands now the only way to avoid paying taxes is to be unemployed or work off the books. Federal withholding eliminates the possibility of a tax protest.
 

DixieDestroyer

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
9,464
Location
Dixieland
Paleocon, the income tax is un-Constitutional from the word go. The IRS is the collection agency for the (private) Fed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_protester_arguments

No_IRS


Edited by: DixieDestroyer
 
Top