I don't think that quote is legitimate though I stand to be corrected. There was a professor of modern history at Oxford who moved to Canada called Goldwin Smith who didn't like Jews. He died in 1910.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n1p16_Smith.html
NFL Week 11
- Thread starter Matra2
- Start date
I don't think that quote is legitimate though I stand to be corrected. There was a professor of modern history at Oxford who moved to Canada called Goldwin Smith who didn't like Jews. He died in 1910.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n1p16_Smith.html
FootballDad
Hall of Famer
Simply because I support white athletes? If you are so naive as to think that affirmative action policies have not been long put into place, along with the well-implanted notion of black athletic superiority, then of course you are a fool. Just to get your mind whirring, why is it that the vast majority of championship HS teams on a state-by-state level across this great land of ours are overwhelmingly white, yet very few of these athletes are ever recruited by D1 universities, and even fewer are even acknowledged by the scouting sites that dictate player ranking?
Highlander
Mentor
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2009
- Messages
- 1,778
You want to know what's really racist? How about athletically gifted White football players on high school football teams that routinely beat teams that have all or majority black players in championship games all across the country but only a very select few of these White athletes on these winning teams get offered a scholarship while almost all of the black athletes on the losing team get one? Nope. No agenda there.
Or how about White running backs that mostly dominate the high school ranks at the highest levels, some with ridiculous statistics and skillsets, but never get a scholarship offer? Rex Burkhead, a four star running back who dominated at the highest levels of Texas high school football, only had three scholarship offers. If he were black, he'd have two dozen offers or so.
The vast majority of White high school football players are cut out at the knee after they graduate from high school, not even getting a chance or opportunity to compete at the next level.
How nice it must be to live in such an artificial reality and bubble where one's success can essentially be ensured at the expense of others.
Decker had no problem getting open. He performed poorly with the limited opportunities given to pass the ball. He had two flat out drops, but once again he got behind the defense - Tebow overthrew him by about a yard.
The media is spinning the lie that Tebow was "horrible" for 55 minutes of the game. The truth is he was pretty accurate when he was given the chance to pass. The Bronco receivers had several drops. For the first 55 minutes Tebow seemed to only pass on third and long -with a couple exceptions. The success percentage in the NFL on 3rd and long (7-12 yards) is 29%. Does anybody think that a passer that only passes on third down should complete 60%? It's totally unreasonable, but so is everything else our TV tell us.
I watched the whole game - Decker IMO dropped two passes he could have caught and Tebow over threw what would have been a sure TD by 2 yards because Decker had burned the two defenders on him by over a full step. The announcers even noted how Decker always seems to be a half step to full step beyond his defender. I'm not sure who was covering him though.
I vowed to watch the whole game and this is the first Tebow game I've seen - including college. I was completely unimpressed by the play calling as for the first 3 quarters Tebow took the ball himself it seemed like maybe three times.
The play of the day seemed to be black up the center for -3 to 3 yards then another black up the center for -3 to 3 yards and I was thinking to myself "I thought the QB sometimes had the option to keep the ball, why are they running up the center when the Jets are stacked with 3 nose tackles in the center to guard against the run?".
Then, when the Jets pinned the Broncos inside their 10 with around 6 minutes left to go I thought to myself "This is going to be disappointing but I stayed up this long so I might as well finish watching it" and wow that was an exciting drive, Tebow was taking the ball and with 10 blockers basically he ran over a number of Jets DBs including one play where it looked like he was going to go out of bounds, cut back inside and ran over Revis who was helped by a safety.
Of the 95 yards, all but 3 of those yards came from Tebow running or passing. And to be honest, that is what I expected all game - Tebow taking the ball more often than once a quarter - I believe he kept the ball on at least 3 rushes that drive.
I picked the Broncos to beat the Jets not because I'm a huge Tebow fan, though I do openly root for him because I'm a bit of a contrarian and it pisses so many people off for whatever reason, but because I honestly thought Denver was strong where the Jets were weak and that the Jets had a very short week.
They keep saying "All you have to do is get up on Denver and force him to throw" but that is easier said than done, the Denver defense has openly said they play hard for Tebow because they feel that if they can keep it close that Tebow will find a way to win - and who can blame them? 4-1 record with him and something like a 4 - 21 record without him? That's pretty ridiculous.
No one argues that Cam Newtons Panthers have more talent outside of QB than the Broncos, yet Tebow is winning where Newton is losing, but apparently winning isn't everything in football....?
I'm obviously pulling for a Pats - GB superbowl, but if Tebow could somehow pull of the miracle that would make me pretty happy to pick and poke at all his haters for the entire off season.
I'd also like to point out that his "haters" are still pointing to the Miami win as a worthless win over a worthless team, but then Miami is favored against Buffalo this coming weekend, Buffalo, the "darling" team many people were picking to go to the playoffs not that long ago. So in essence they are saying he beat a team that is now favored over a team many were picking to make the playoffs not too long ago - neat.
GiovaniMarcon
Mentor
Having missed seeing the "original" troll-posts that have since been deleted form this thread, it still makes for interesting reading, looking at the trolls' quoted blurbs from the responses made by established forum members.
It seems that the influx of "new members" that troll this site (whether it's a lot of people, or just a few or even one making multiple accounts) whenever something notable happens involving a White athlete with a caste-crushing performance, is indicative of the panic or insecurity that sets in whenever cherished tropes of the Heeb media are torn down even a little bit.
So, if they're so confident Tebow did, does, and will continue to suck, why do they even care if he did well for a few games?
He will fail later on, right?
But no... They're scared, so they try to convince you it's all a fluke, and so convince themselves.
It seems that the influx of "new members" that troll this site (whether it's a lot of people, or just a few or even one making multiple accounts) whenever something notable happens involving a White athlete with a caste-crushing performance, is indicative of the panic or insecurity that sets in whenever cherished tropes of the Heeb media are torn down even a little bit.
So, if they're so confident Tebow did, does, and will continue to suck, why do they even care if he did well for a few games?
He will fail later on, right?
But no... They're scared, so they try to convince you it's all a fluke, and so convince themselves.
Last edited:
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=7250539
Discussion of the caste system and racial stereotypes on First Take.
Discussion of the caste system and racial stereotypes on First Take.
L
Lew
Guest
I saw that earlier and then later on Around The Horn one of the black panel members, J.A Adande , actually said there was a racial aspect to the Tebow controversy and he called Tebow a "white black qb".
Vanilla_Sky
Mentor
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2011
- Messages
- 808
ESPN announcers admit their racism against whites and nothing happens? This is awful.
Shouldn't this be followed by tearful public apologies, diversity classes, and retiring/firing? Oh wait, their racists against whites? Ha, ha that is funny. Business as usual.
They're not admitting their "racism against Whites," they're playing the game of Nelson being an exception to the rule that Whites are incapable of being dominating wideouts, running backs, and just about any defensive position. They're saying that Jordy Nelson, like Mike Alstott, Jason Sehorn, Peyton Hillis and others, is a freak, not an example of what the NFL would look like if it was even semi-color blind. No talk about the institutionalized discrimination against White football and basketball players beginning at the peewee level but really becoming serious after high school, when it comes to recruiting and fair opportunity. No mention of why Nelson, like seemingly every other successful White player at "taboo" positions, was a walk-on in college. No mention of the incessant negative media stereotyping of White athletes and the absurd lionization of black ones. No mention of the Caste System. This is nothing but the same old same old.
And The Washington Post has gotten into the act by reprinting an almost identical article (from the AP monopoly of Cultural Marxist propaganda masquerading as "news") to the one that caused all the camouflage about Nelson to begin with: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...11/18/gIQA34MRZN_story.html?tid=pm_sports_pop
Wow - two ESPN analysts openly admit to racism and they are still allowed to keep their jobs as commentators on the game.
Skip Bayless would pass on Larry Bird if he were in the draft today - he openly said it - not because of his skill, but because of his race and country of origin.
I'm going to say this about blacks in the NFL (and other sports):
Blacks have virtually no academic drive - as a percentage of teenagers I'm guessing at least 40% are seriously looking for a "career" in pro sports.
Whites are highly academically driven seriously contemplating life after highschool and college and how they are going to support a family - MAYBE 5% are seriously considering a "career" in pro sports.
Couple those stats with the obvious OPEN racism against whites in certain positions and is it any wonder that there are so few whites in "skill" positions in the NFL?
Colonel_Reb
Hall of Famer
Last night I heard that neo-con icon Limbaugh had something to say about the Jordy Nelson article yesterday. Looks like he's bringing up the hypocrisy of ESPN. I think Rush might pay attention to the fact that there aren't very many White skill players outside of QB, although he won't discuss the root causes or the consequences. His comment about the polys is pretty ignorant. TEs? Anyway, I thought it would be worth posting here and in the Jordy Nelson thread.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2011/11/18/packers_white_wide_receiver_surprises
RUSH: I have here an interesting story, and it is from CBS News. It's about the National Football League and the Green Bay Packers. "Packers wide receiver Jordy Nelson goes by the nickname White Lightning. With good hands, quick speed, and four touchdowns in the last four games, Nelson has earned the 'lightning' part. But in a recent interview, Nelson reveals that part of his secret is that too many opponents get hung up on the fact that Nelson is, well, white. When asked by the Green Bay Press Gazette if racial bias is a factor in Nelson's on-field success, he replied: 'Honestly, I think it is.' Nelson and his teammates believe that, with so few elite white receivers in the league, opposing players are likely to dismiss Nelson's abilities on the field."
It's kind of like reverse racism here. What they're saying is that Jordy Nelson's able to sneak up on opponents because, as a white guy, he's not supposed to be that fast. He's not supposed to be able to outrun the brothers. "'As receivers, we've talked about it.' Nelson told the Press Gazette. 'I know [cornerbacks coach] Joe Whitt tells me all the time, when all the rookies come in, he gives them the heads up, "Don't let him fool ya." That's fine with me.' Packer teammate Greg Jennings said, 'He uses that to his advantage. It's not because he's the white guy. A lot of it has to do with the fact that guys look at him say, "Okay, yeah, he's the white guy, he can't be that good." Well, he is that good. It's easy for someone to say, "Oh yeah, he's like one of those other white receivers,"' Jennings, who is black, told the newspaper. 'He's not. I'm sorry. He's not. He knows how I feel about it. Maybe I'm a little biased because he is a teammate, but from watching him day one to right now, totally different player.' Quarterback Aaron Rodgers agrees with his receivers.
'When you see Jordy out there, you think, 'Oh well, he's a white wide receiver. He won't be very athletic,' Rodgers said on his weekly ESPNMilwaukee radio show. 'I am not sure why he keeps sneaking up on guys.'"
Hey, Aaron, it's just a damn good thing you didn't mention McNabb in all this. It's a damn good thing none of you people mentioned McNabb in this. "Eventually, opponents are going to have to dismiss the white receiver stereotype - or continue to pay the consequences. Nelson has caught 34 passes for 633 on the season, including seven touchdowns, making him second on the team in receptions and yardage. Nelson's performance brings to mind another prominent white receiver, the current league leader in receptions, New England Patriots' Wes Welker. In an interview with Miami's sports radio station WQAM, Welker admitted, 'I think even my own teammates look at me sometimes and think, "How the hell is this guy doing this?"'"
Reverse racism. The white guy sneaking up on the brothers. (interruption) It's the speed thing, Snerdley. It's not a talent thing. It's not hands, eyes coordination, it's not being able to catch the ball. It's a speed thing. White guys are not supposed to be as fast as the brothers and that's what they're all talking about here. Jordy Nelson sneaking up -- (interruption) Well, no, no, Jimmy "The Greek" didn't -- no. No. It was the exact opposite. Jimmy "The Greek" wasn't talking about this. Jimmy "The Greek" was -- no. No. Jimmy "The Greek" was not talking about white wide receivers. Jimmy "The Greek" did not say they were built. Jimmy "The Greek" said they were bred. That's what got Jimmy "The Greek" -- it's at Duke Zeibert's restaurant, and he said that the slave owners bred them and you could look at their buttocks and thighs and you could see that they were bred that way and that's why they're faster and so forth.
Jennings and Aaron Rodgers are agreeing that there's a stereotype in the league that the white guys aren't as fast and Jordy Nelson is, he's able to sneak up on these guys because the brothers don't think that he's gonna be that fast. (interruption) It's perfectly fine. It doesn't work with the punt. It's a speed thing. This has nothing to do with the quarterbacks. That was a whole different thing. Yeah, CBS published it. Aaron Rodgers said it on ESPN, he agreed with these two guys. (interruption) That's right, ESPN, that's why I'm saying if any of these people had mentioned McNabb -- (interruption) They didn't. What happened was they said it to the Green Bay Press Gazette newspaper. (interruption) I don't know, somebody had the concept. This story just didn't pop up out of nowhere.
Somebody had to think of the premise and then go ask these guys about it, and then they agreed. (interruption) Well, yeah, the Pacific islander guys, you don't find too many of them wide receivers. At best you'll find them as tight ends on the offensive side of the ball. No, you're not gonna get the same kind of comparison. (interruption) Well, these Hispanics, that's a whole different thing as well. None of that was part of the story. The story was based on the premise that you've got this white receiver who's excelling, doing really great, and he's sneaking up on people because the brothers don't think he's that fast, and it's a story about how amused everybody is that he's able to sneak up on these guys.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2011/11/18/packers_white_wide_receiver_surprises
RUSH: I have here an interesting story, and it is from CBS News. It's about the National Football League and the Green Bay Packers. "Packers wide receiver Jordy Nelson goes by the nickname White Lightning. With good hands, quick speed, and four touchdowns in the last four games, Nelson has earned the 'lightning' part. But in a recent interview, Nelson reveals that part of his secret is that too many opponents get hung up on the fact that Nelson is, well, white. When asked by the Green Bay Press Gazette if racial bias is a factor in Nelson's on-field success, he replied: 'Honestly, I think it is.' Nelson and his teammates believe that, with so few elite white receivers in the league, opposing players are likely to dismiss Nelson's abilities on the field."
It's kind of like reverse racism here. What they're saying is that Jordy Nelson's able to sneak up on opponents because, as a white guy, he's not supposed to be that fast. He's not supposed to be able to outrun the brothers. "'As receivers, we've talked about it.' Nelson told the Press Gazette. 'I know [cornerbacks coach] Joe Whitt tells me all the time, when all the rookies come in, he gives them the heads up, "Don't let him fool ya." That's fine with me.' Packer teammate Greg Jennings said, 'He uses that to his advantage. It's not because he's the white guy. A lot of it has to do with the fact that guys look at him say, "Okay, yeah, he's the white guy, he can't be that good." Well, he is that good. It's easy for someone to say, "Oh yeah, he's like one of those other white receivers,"' Jennings, who is black, told the newspaper. 'He's not. I'm sorry. He's not. He knows how I feel about it. Maybe I'm a little biased because he is a teammate, but from watching him day one to right now, totally different player.' Quarterback Aaron Rodgers agrees with his receivers.
'When you see Jordy out there, you think, 'Oh well, he's a white wide receiver. He won't be very athletic,' Rodgers said on his weekly ESPNMilwaukee radio show. 'I am not sure why he keeps sneaking up on guys.'"
Hey, Aaron, it's just a damn good thing you didn't mention McNabb in all this. It's a damn good thing none of you people mentioned McNabb in this. "Eventually, opponents are going to have to dismiss the white receiver stereotype - or continue to pay the consequences. Nelson has caught 34 passes for 633 on the season, including seven touchdowns, making him second on the team in receptions and yardage. Nelson's performance brings to mind another prominent white receiver, the current league leader in receptions, New England Patriots' Wes Welker. In an interview with Miami's sports radio station WQAM, Welker admitted, 'I think even my own teammates look at me sometimes and think, "How the hell is this guy doing this?"'"
Reverse racism. The white guy sneaking up on the brothers. (interruption) It's the speed thing, Snerdley. It's not a talent thing. It's not hands, eyes coordination, it's not being able to catch the ball. It's a speed thing. White guys are not supposed to be as fast as the brothers and that's what they're all talking about here. Jordy Nelson sneaking up -- (interruption) Well, no, no, Jimmy "The Greek" didn't -- no. No. It was the exact opposite. Jimmy "The Greek" wasn't talking about this. Jimmy "The Greek" was -- no. No. Jimmy "The Greek" was not talking about white wide receivers. Jimmy "The Greek" did not say they were built. Jimmy "The Greek" said they were bred. That's what got Jimmy "The Greek" -- it's at Duke Zeibert's restaurant, and he said that the slave owners bred them and you could look at their buttocks and thighs and you could see that they were bred that way and that's why they're faster and so forth.
Jennings and Aaron Rodgers are agreeing that there's a stereotype in the league that the white guys aren't as fast and Jordy Nelson is, he's able to sneak up on these guys because the brothers don't think that he's gonna be that fast. (interruption) It's perfectly fine. It doesn't work with the punt. It's a speed thing. This has nothing to do with the quarterbacks. That was a whole different thing. Yeah, CBS published it. Aaron Rodgers said it on ESPN, he agreed with these two guys. (interruption) That's right, ESPN, that's why I'm saying if any of these people had mentioned McNabb -- (interruption) They didn't. What happened was they said it to the Green Bay Press Gazette newspaper. (interruption) I don't know, somebody had the concept. This story just didn't pop up out of nowhere.
Somebody had to think of the premise and then go ask these guys about it, and then they agreed. (interruption) Well, yeah, the Pacific islander guys, you don't find too many of them wide receivers. At best you'll find them as tight ends on the offensive side of the ball. No, you're not gonna get the same kind of comparison. (interruption) Well, these Hispanics, that's a whole different thing as well. None of that was part of the story. The story was based on the premise that you've got this white receiver who's excelling, doing really great, and he's sneaking up on people because the brothers don't think he's that fast, and it's a story about how amused everybody is that he's able to sneak up on these guys.
Just wanted to point something out - racism is judging or treating someone differently because of their race.
There is no such thing as reverse racism because by definition you would have to use their race as a criteria for how you were going to treat them.
If you think a black person cannot be a good manager because you think black people are generally lazy and stupid - that is racism.
If you think a white person cannot be a good wide receiver because you think white people are generally slow and unathletic - that is racism.
It isn't some magical "reverse racism" which doesn't even make sense. It would imply that you judge white people by stereotypes applied to blacks, in which case Jordy Nelson would be treated normally at the WR spot.
There is no such thing as reverse racism because by definition you would have to use their race as a criteria for how you were going to treat them.
If you think a black person cannot be a good manager because you think black people are generally lazy and stupid - that is racism.
If you think a white person cannot be a good wide receiver because you think white people are generally slow and unathletic - that is racism.
It isn't some magical "reverse racism" which doesn't even make sense. It would imply that you judge white people by stereotypes applied to blacks, in which case Jordy Nelson would be treated normally at the WR spot.
I agree with your definition that racism is racism.
But people use the term 'reverse racism', because the words 'racism' and 'racist' are used almost exclusively in popular culture in reference to whites; as if non-whites cannot be racists, and racism doesn't exist among non-whites.
Of course, that is not true, but this is how popular culture and the media have come to use, and therefore, define these words.
But people use the term 'reverse racism', because the words 'racism' and 'racist' are used almost exclusively in popular culture in reference to whites; as if non-whites cannot be racists, and racism doesn't exist among non-whites.
Of course, that is not true, but this is how popular culture and the media have come to use, and therefore, define these words.
Highlander
Mentor
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2009
- Messages
- 1,778
Limbaugh barely scratches the surface and doesn't have enough knowledge of the underlying issues. Poly's being TE's (wtf?). What games are he watching?
Also, remember, Limbaugh was the guy that used the NBA and basketball, in general, to support his position against Affirmative Action by saying (paraphrasing): "That would be the same thing as having the NBA filled with a bunch of White players because they are underrepresented there. Do you want that?"
And "reverse racism" is Cult Marx lingo because they want everyone to know that everyday "racism" must always refer to Whites only.
Also, remember, Limbaugh was the guy that used the NBA and basketball, in general, to support his position against Affirmative Action by saying (paraphrasing): "That would be the same thing as having the NBA filled with a bunch of White players because they are underrepresented there. Do you want that?"
And "reverse racism" is Cult Marx lingo because they want everyone to know that everyday "racism" must always refer to Whites only.
GiovaniMarcon
Mentor
The dilemma of miseducating the populace about racism and spurious "reverse-racism" is exacerbated in the way a lot of cloying, self-serving Whites will play the politically-correct card, and pander to the idea that Whites alone are racist — or, even more false — that only Whites possess the power to seriously impede the progress of other races through racism.
As in, "it only matters when Whites are racist, because Whites have all the power through their centuries of racism, where as if a 'few' coloreds are racist, it doesn't matter at all because they have no such power..."
It really is an almost psychedelic scenario, the way any reasonably intelligent White person will know something is terribly wrong in the way Whites are depicted vis-a-vis the concept of racism, and yet wink-wink, nod-nod along with the pat script that only Whites are generally racist, where as in freakish circumstances where Whites themselves suffer discrimination, such prejudice is given the special title of "reverse-racism".
As opposed to regular racism, of which only Whites are the perpetrators.
The old comparison still holds true:
Have a Black person or Hispanic person walk through town wearing a "Black Pride" or "Brown Pride" shirt, and a few eyebrows may be raised (if even that), but have a White guy with a shaved head wearing an "Aryan Pride" shirt, and well now it's newsworthy...
As in, "it only matters when Whites are racist, because Whites have all the power through their centuries of racism, where as if a 'few' coloreds are racist, it doesn't matter at all because they have no such power..."
It really is an almost psychedelic scenario, the way any reasonably intelligent White person will know something is terribly wrong in the way Whites are depicted vis-a-vis the concept of racism, and yet wink-wink, nod-nod along with the pat script that only Whites are generally racist, where as in freakish circumstances where Whites themselves suffer discrimination, such prejudice is given the special title of "reverse-racism".
As opposed to regular racism, of which only Whites are the perpetrators.
The old comparison still holds true:
Have a Black person or Hispanic person walk through town wearing a "Black Pride" or "Brown Pride" shirt, and a few eyebrows may be raised (if even that), but have a White guy with a shaved head wearing an "Aryan Pride" shirt, and well now it's newsworthy...
FootballDad
Hall of Famer
In the context, Limbaugh was disparaging Poly speed by saying that they can do no better than TE. Which is still interesting, since "his" team features everyone's favorite Polynesian dingleberry, Troy Palomalu.
That said, I don't really think that Rush has the slightest clue about the caste system and the systematic weeding out of white talent. Sure, he can see obvious affirmative action like with McDrab, but considering that "his team" is the odious Steelers with the head Cult Marxist devotee as owner, Dan Rooney, he sees nothing wrong with black athletic "dominance". Limbaugh probably just has trouble with the labels, but is completely clueless about the insidious agenda behind the CS.
Colonel_Reb
Hall of Famer
I think Lameblah can't let go of what ESPN did to him for the McDrab statement. I think his only point in bringing it up was to point out some hypocrisy on their part. At least that is my take on it.
foobar75
Master
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
- Messages
- 2,332
When I read the transcript, I just see a bunch of incoherent ramblings. There's nothing of value in there as far as the caste system and McNabb's name is being thrown around randomly, so I agree with Colonel that this is El Rushbaugh grinding his ax with ESPN more than anything else. It's unfortunate because there was some potential there to really open the dialog on racial stereotypes against Whites in sports, but he knows who butters his bread and will never cross that line.
That's exactly what it's about. The chief cheerleader for the Black Steelers and main MSM pimp for Herman Cain and amerikas number 1 zionist booster is in no way shape or form going to go against the caste system. He's just taking some shots at the guys that skewered him for his innocent comments about McDrabb. He had nothing to say that wouldn't have "crossed the line" or conflicted with his public personna so the transcript was one giant episone of cognitive dissonance.
"Oh yeah, he's like one of those other white receivers,"' Jennings, who is black, told the newspaper. 'He's not. I'm sorry. He's not."
The real truth is that Jordy Nelson IS like "those other white receivers." Eye popping numbers and measurables out high school only to go unrecruited and having to walk-on to a college program. Then rinse and repeat the high school story to college. Finally, the NFL gives him a chance to be a fifth stringer until his undeniable talent finds its way to be allowed on the field, but never is considered a number one receiver despite his production. Followed by the pundits endless mental gymnastics to try to explain how someone with so little talent can be so good. ie - he's in a great system that anybody could excel in, the defense is always preoccupied with blacky so he's always open, opponents underestimate him because he's white, he runs great routes, hard worker, great communication with the qb (best friends) etc. Never, Never are white receivers physically and athletically dominant. There's always some illogical logical explanation for all their success. Exactly like every single white receiver ever.
The real truth is that Jordy Nelson IS like "those other white receivers." Eye popping numbers and measurables out high school only to go unrecruited and having to walk-on to a college program. Then rinse and repeat the high school story to college. Finally, the NFL gives him a chance to be a fifth stringer until his undeniable talent finds its way to be allowed on the field, but never is considered a number one receiver despite his production. Followed by the pundits endless mental gymnastics to try to explain how someone with so little talent can be so good. ie - he's in a great system that anybody could excel in, the defense is always preoccupied with blacky so he's always open, opponents underestimate him because he's white, he runs great routes, hard worker, great communication with the qb (best friends) etc. Never, Never are white receivers physically and athletically dominant. There's always some illogical logical explanation for all their success. Exactly like every single white receiver ever.
whiteathlete33
Hall of Famer
What a great compliment from the black receiver. "He's not like every other black quarterback. He's not! I'm sorry, he's not." Once we hear these words all will be even.