NFL Europe

Realgeorge

Mentor
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
675
NFL Europe was the White-friendly alternative to the NFL. Where will the White players of NFL Europe go to now?

The end of the league has that stinky feel to it. The Rothschildefeller types who owned NFLE franchises probably hoped that they could sell Diversity to the Europeans via NFLE, and it didn't happen that way
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,583
Location
Pennsylvania
jared said:
WR Aaron Hosack was signed by the Saints to a two year deal. Hopefully he can stick on the roster.


Hosack is tremendously talented. The total package other than "blinding speed" plus he's 6' 5". Yet another white receiver who would be an established starterand probablyan All Pro except for the Caste System.


Maybe Sean Peyton will give Hosack a chance after what he did to the white law firm of Hass, Lyman and (Chris) Horn last season, especially with Joe Horn moving on. I'd love to see Drew Brees throwing to not only new TE Eric Johnson but Hosack too. Edited by: Don Wassall
 

Kiwi

Newbie
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
91
Location
Outside North America
I think the problem with NFL gaining popularity internationally is the complexity of the game. Looking from a non-americans point of view, the game is very complicated and hard to understand for the casual observer. There are a huge amount of laws and technical terms to understand which makes it really hard to get interested in the game because most of the time you have no idea of whats going on.

Whenever I've watched a game with anyone new to the sport, generally they are baffled by what is going on - they don't understand what a 'down' or an 'incomplete' is, why people appear to be tackling each other nowhere near where the ball is, why players start doing stupid dances after they make a tackle, and most importantly why after every play there's a break and after every turnover there's a bloody ad break!

For me personally, I only took an interest in the sport because I bought madden 05 a couple of years ago and I reckon it took me about a year to get a good understanding of the intricacies and nuances of the NFL. In saying that, having never played Football at an organised level and only ever watched about 10 full games my technical understanding is still pretty weak. Because of this I don't think the NFL will ever catch on internationally because to the uninitiated, it just takes too long to understand and is too boring to watch.
 

chris371

Mentor
Joined
Dec 1, 2006
Messages
716
NFL europe should have halved the play clock. all those breaks are what turn europeans away. I find myself extremely frustrated with all the ad breaks in the NFL. its only watchable if you have something to do in the breaks, like a girl for instance
smiley2.gif

Or food...
 

devans

Mentor
Joined
Jul 7, 2005
Messages
729
Location
Outside North America
You must be a fast worker with the females Chris! I can manage a small sandwich in an ad break, but that's about it.
 

ToughJ.Riggins

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
5,063
Location
Ontario Canada
Kiwi said:
I think the problem with NFL gaining popularity internationally is the complexity of the game. Looking from a non-americans point of view, the game is very complicated and hard to understand for the casual observer. There are a huge amount of laws and technical terms to understand which makes it really hard to get interested in the game because most of the time you have no idea of whats going on.

Whenever I've watched a game with anyone new to the sport, generally they are baffled by what is going on - they don't understand what a 'down' or an 'incomplete' is, why people appear to be tackling each other nowhere near where the ball is, why players start doing stupid dances after they make a tackle, and most importantly why after every play there's a break and after every turnover there's a bloody ad break!

For me personally, I only took an interest in the sport because I bought madden 05 a couple of years ago and I reckon it took me about a year to get a good understanding of the intricacies and nuances of the NFL. In saying that, having never played Football at an organised level and only ever watched about 10 full games my technical understanding is still pretty weak. Because of this I don't think the NFL will ever catch on internationally because to the uninitiated, it just takes too long to understand and is too boring to watch.

Kind of like Australian Rules Football to the non Australian. I looked it up on wikepedia, a very long article with lists of the complex rules to the sport. I lost interest in the article about a third of the way through
 

Kiwi

Newbie
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
91
Location
Outside North America
Yeah thats true - although it might have something to do with Aussie Rules being the worst sport ever invented
smiley4.gif
.

I think another good comparison is with cricket. Outside of the commonwealth, no-one cares or has any interest in cricket (if they've even heard of it) because people see it as an extremely "British" sport and as such is loaded with stereotypes and misconceptions about the game. I think American Football suffers from this as well because it is so "American", and is full of the same misconceptions and stereotypes.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Messages
197
ToughJ.Riggins said:
I'd love to see Europe start their own American football league. Unfortunately I don't see it happening with how popular basketball, soccer and Rugby are over there. Rugby is their version of an NFL like sport. There just isn't enough time for Europeans to devote time to American football.

I could just see if Europe started playing American football; European countries faring well against us in the Olympics with their white RBs for their teams posting 4 or 5 yards a carry against our "superior" defenses. Europe could really help debunk the myth of whites not having any tools to be NFL caliber running backs. I laugh at the notion that Europe's most athletic Rugby players couldn't be dominant NFL tailbacks. In fact I think Rugby players are tougher. They have less pads and less breaks in play!

theres a guy called johnny wilkinson who plays for england (im English BTW) and he would make a great RB (in fact hed make a great linebacker too dude can hit scratch that any posistion you want him in he could do it and do it great)
 

Angelcynn

Guru
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
430
Location
Outside North America
I think Wilkinson would more likely be a kicker or a quaterback in the NFL, becuase of his build. I think if you were looking at English rugby players to be RB you'd go for guys like Mike Tindall, Lewis Moody, Jamie Noon, Joe Worsley and maybe Mark Cueto.
 

Kiwi

Newbie
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
91
Location
Outside North America
Don't you think Tindall, Worsley and Moody might be just a little slow to play HB? Tindall's pretty ancient these days and I think Worsley and Moody would be better suited to playing LB.

Heres a few guys from around the rugby world I would consider at RB:

Brian O'Driscoll - Ireland
Cedric Heymens - France
Florian Fritz - France
Jacque Fourie - South Africa
Adam Ashley-Cooper - Australia
Luke McAlister - New Zealand
Shane Williams - Wales




Edited by: Kiwi
 

backrow

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Messages
7,401
Location
Spain
yeah Williams would make a great halfback. as far as Joe Worsley and Lewis Moody they would make good DE/LB or TEs.
 
Top