GWTJ said:
.
Without getting too off track here, I want to make one more point. I believe that the United States is the only country that was created from a good idea. I believe in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and the many other documents that were written to help form this country.
This country started out the same as every other country-some people wanted or needed some other people's land and stuff and they took. Not that there is anything wrong with this, its been the game of the world since the Stone Age. I only rue the the fact that White men have become ashamed, rather than justly proud, of being the best in the world at it. That they were sensible enough to attempt to secure some protection for their right to life, liberty, property (newly taken land and however many slaves they may have owned), is laudable. I should point out that such notions of rights of free roughly equal males, such as arms and speech, go all the way back to Celtic and Germanic tribes, probably up to our race's dim beginnings. These things were given a severe setback by Roman imperial notions and the Church's "divine right" concept, however, and America became the best ever exposition of said rights.
GWTJ said:
I also believe that immigration is a necessary part of the continued success of this country.
Why is it nessecary? I see no evidence that mass immigration was ever particularly nessecary once Europeans had formed already formed a reproducing core population in the New World. In fact, Old World immigration may have made the bad aspects of the Industrial Revolution far worse by providing a steady stream of labourers with much lower standards in regard to pay and conditions than natives. But because this immigration was almost entirely White, the immigrants could assimulate easily and it did no long term damage to the country. China and Japan you'll note, however, industrialized at blinding speed with zero immigration.
There is no fundamental difference between the USA/Canada and Mexico/parts South, save that the formula was founded and continues to be populated by a White majority, while the latter are mostly Mestizo. Yes, Hispanic culture approaches White culture in some respects, yes the Hispanic average is so much higher than the black that being around Hispanics is almost a relief, yes many Hispanic individuals are essentially White. But still the Mestizo nations do not come close to the level of civilization and stability achieved in the USA or European countries. If they were able and willing to make Mexico into a copy of the USA, they could have done so by now. Simularly, if the blacks had inclination or ability to change, they would have done so by now. People should quit thinking they can change non-Whites into Whites by "getting the message out", whether it be the conservative values or the evangelical church. Even if differences really are more cultural genetic, they are still inherited at a young age and not readily changeable. I mean, we could being a program of kidnapping black ghetto infants and shipping them off to be raised with Middle American White families, but even if it worked, ain't gonna happen folks.
Since the Asians present an interesting counter-point, I will treat with them last. Asian immigrants are almost always law-abiding and successful. Their high I.Q.s and work ethics make them valuable parts of any community. Never the less, there are fundamental racial incompatabilities that make me object to mass Asian immigration as well. As Steve Sailer points out, traditional predictions about political affinity based on economic status fail with American Asians. They are overwhelmingly Democrats. But this should come as no surprise when you take racial and cultural differences into mind. The things we have so revered in the West-freedom, individuality, independence, innovation-have gotten short shrift in Asian culture since time immemorial. Conformity, harmony, and reverence for tradition are the watchwords. All Asian societies were and are authoritarian by White standards. Whether you call it an Empire or a People's Republic, China is authoritarian. Nessecity may be driving them to primitive capitalism, but you can bet your bottom dollar it won't mean American-style freedoms for the people. We handed Japan an American-style democracy after WWII, but it has rapidly been adapted to suit the Japanese. The police "visit" your home twice a year, up until recently you couldn't even own an obselete edged weapon (now you only have to sign over your first-born and bend over for the government to keep that family katana in your home.), and firearms? Fuggedaboutit. Oh well, the heavily armed populous so difficult to stamp out in European man has never been allowed to exist in Japan or Asian in general.
Clinching the argument, the very few Asians I've met who were interested in Conservatism were so inclined because they believed people needed controlling, particularly in regards to drugs, sex, media obscenity, and that criminals had too many rights. They saw the Republicans as being more authoritarian-minded in certain areas than Democrats, whereas the average White man almost always favors the Republicans for being more Freedom-minded in regards to guns, tax rates, etc. Despite the many cultural contributions Asians bring, I fear what would happen if they ever became a majority of the voters in either a state or the nation as a whole.
Therefore, we don't need more non-White immigration and we don't need to waste any time trying to convince blacks to "straighten up and fly right"
