Muslim kills 50 homosexuals in Florida

[werewolf]

Just googled this. That must be what I saw through that keyhole.

"As a follow-up to the story, Schweiz on Sonntag then interviewed Elmar Mader, a former commander who led the elite force from 2002 to 2008, who seconded the rumors, and went one step further, telling the paper that could not “refute the claim that there is a network of homosexuals” within the Swiss Guard itself..."

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...swiss-guards-accused-of-secret-gay-lobby.html

 

[DixieDestroyer]

Just googled this. That must be what I saw through that keyhole.

"As a follow-up to the story, Schweiz on Sonntag then interviewed Elmar Mader, a former commander who led the elite force from 2002 to 2008, who seconded the rumors, and went one step further, telling the paper that could not “refute the claim that there is a network of homosexuals” within the Swiss Guard itself..."

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...swiss-guards-accused-of-secret-gay-lobby.html

Maybe they should rename those f@990ts the "Gomorrah Guards".

 

[Heretic]

If this wasn't a hoax then America has truly gone insane.

Ha! Wow, Twilight Zone-level bizarreness, on acid. So obvious, blatant and disgusting...pretty gay, too. Glad it's getting utterly flamed now.

Like I mentioned in a previous post, notice how all of these "events" just started to happen right about the time Obama was running for his second term? The Aurora "shooting" happened on July 20th, 2012. Then, the Sandy Hook "event" happened on December 12th, 2012. Since then, it's been one-after-another, seemingly every few weeks or so, I can't even track them all; obviously occurring wayyyy outside the statistical norm...a line graph that is pretty steady throughout the past few decades and then, BOOM, an extreme and extended spike, since Sandy Hook.

Do you know what piece of legislation was passed by the United States House on, or close to, May 22nd, 2012, and then passed later by the Senate and signed into law by Obama? The 2013 NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act). Not only did this act reauthorize the indefinite detention of Americans, it also updated the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 (which was originally written to (only) allow US propaganda on foreign soils) to now also apply to within the United States, and on/to American citizens. Coincidence?

https://www.rt.com/usa/propaganda-us-smith-amendment-903/

 

[Don Wassall]

Ha! Wow, Twilight Zone-level bizarreness, on acid. So obvious, blatant and disgusting...pretty gay, too. Glad it's getting utterly flamed now.

Like I mentioned in a previous post, notice how all of these "events" just started to happen right about the time Obama was running for his second term? The Aurora "shooting" happened on July 20th, 2012. Then, the Sandy Hook "event" happened on December 12th, 2012. Since then, it's been one-after-another, seemingly every few weeks or so, I can't even track them all; obviously occurring wayyyy outside the statistical norm...a line graph that is pretty steady throughout the past few decades and then, BOOM, an extreme and extended spike, since Sandy Hook.

Do you know what piece of legislation was passed by the United States House on, or close to, May 22nd, 2012, and then passed later by the Senate and signed into law by Obama? The 2013 NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act). Not only did this act reauthorize the indefinite detention of Americans, it also updated the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 (which was originally written to (only) allow US propaganda on foreign soils) to now also apply to within the United States, and on/to American citizens. Coincidence?

https://www.rt.com/usa/propaganda-us-smith-amendment-903/

Another interesting quote comes from the Jay Dyer article I posted yesterday in the Dallas shooting thread:

Given the government admission that much of modern history has been manipulated and contrived through false flags and staged events, is it sensible to take the Dallas event at face value? We are constantly reminded in every “terror” event to “never forget” 9/11, but a much more apt recollection would be to never forget the admissions and examples of fake and staged news, as well as individuals who supposedly die in three separate “terror” events being still alive show the lunacy of the fact there is no law or regulation upon the government and private infotainment news agencies barring them from manufacturing events.

The events widely seen as false flags or live drills share the same characteristics: There is a lack of footage of the alleged perp or perps at the scene of the crime, despite the omnipresence of multiple surveillance cameras at virtually all buildings, schools and businesses; and lack of footage of the perp at the scene of the crime shot by the people there or in the vicinity despite the omnipresence of smart phones and people constantly using their phones to film things. There is a lack of ambulances and bodies, and scenes of mass panic. They all seem to feature “crisis actors,” some of whom have been at more than one event, and few if any of whom ever seem to be genuinely in grief (lack of tears and of faces that look like they have been crying non-stop). And the perps have all been killed, except for one of the alleged Boston bombers, who reportedly was unable to speak after being shot up while lying in a boat (and somehow writing a screed on the inside of the boat with his blood).

The Oklahoma City Bombing and then 9/11 seem to have set the stage for the plethora of controversial, alleged mass casualty events in recent years. Even the Dallas event has some curious characteristics -- first there was a cell of snipers then just one, who somehow hit 12 cops, killing 5 of them without being fatally shot himself, then being killed by a robot. As Dyer notes in his article, the Patty Hearst/SLA saga set the stage for the widespread appearance and public acceptance of SWAT teams (replete with a TV show called "SWAT"). 9/11 set the stage for widespread torture (replete with countless TV shows and movies favorably showing suspects being tortured). Is the Dallas incident paving the way for the widespread acceptance of killer robots and drones to be used domestically against not just "terrorists" but also criminals (and eventually dissidents)?

Another thing all mass casualty events share, whether controversial or not, is that following them there is a demand for gun-grabbing. Everything is always moving in the direction of more surveillance, more police state powers, and less freedom and liberty.