Fightingtowin said:
The irony is when Jews had much more control over Hollywood it was considered one of the most patriotic and pro middle American values institutions in our nation. When filmaking became easier in the 60s and 70s independent filmmakers began pushing the boundaries of sex, violence and counter cultural values.
The exact opposite is true - in the 1930s and 1940s, and to a lesser extent in the 1950s, most of the screenwriters were not Jewish, although the movie companies were owned by Jews, some of them old immigrants.
However, in the 1960s and 1970s, virtually all the major screenwriters and producers and many of the directors were Jewish. It was when the second-generation Jews who owned the movie companies hired more and more second and third-generation Jews to actually write the scripts, that the movies began to push the boundaries of sex and violence, and took on an anti-white, pro-minority stance.
I was watching a movie a couple of weeks ago called
Bite the Bullet from 1975. About a quarter of the way through, I thought "this must be written by a Jew" - because the only two people who are decent characters have identified themselves as "half Cherokee" and "having a Mexican grandfather". All the white people, are shallow, selfish, untrustworthy, crazy, and/or unethical. I saw the name "Michael Brooks" as screenwriter and director, so I looked him up and sure enough, he was a Jew from Eastern Europe.
Nowadays in the 21st century, there are far more independent films created by non-Jews than in the 60s, 70s, and 80s. For example, movies like
Gods and Generals, which had virtually no Jewish input, portray white people in a more realistic way, rather than as violent, heartless, shallow and sex-crazed. Sadly, the marketing success of such films is often hurt by the poor reviews they receive from movie critics who are employed by Jewish-owned TV networks, websites and newspapers.
