Don Wassall said:
The Bills likely at a few different points went just over a majority for a week or two, given the non-stop moves every team makes during a season, but I'm not sure there's any way to know for sure since there was no Caste Football then and I'm sure the league office wouldn't be forthcoming about it if they even know.
DW and Colonel_Reb, perhaps the only wayyou could get this info would be to get some old copies of Pro Football Weekly back from the 1990's, they used to update depth charts/rosters on a weekly basis. That said, there isn't much point to doing that. I thinkthere's a pretty good chance that the we've found the answer to this question -- the Bills of the early 1990's.
Don Wassall said:
So I guess the bright side is that a White majority hasn't become something totally out of reach; in fact it's very possible given the year-in year-out success of the relatively Whitest teams (Patriots, Colts and Packers) that it might be breeched again in the near future.
I think if the current Packers just had a few backup white defensive tackles (which were common in the 1990's, as "rotation guys") and a extra white safety and tight end, they'd be at 50/50% or above right now. I really believe there is some subtlepressure on Packers exec's Ted Thompson and Mark Murphy (both white, ex-NFL players)to not get to that 50/50 mark (or above), hence the release of guys like Matt Giordano and Spence Havner, who, at the very least, were decent, versatile backups
Don Wassall said:
The clearly shrinking pool of even modestly talented black players (e.g. most NFL "defenses" have become jokes) combined with their endless arrestsand selfish behavior should also be kept in mind. The Caste System has become more difficult to keep in place in football than it is in basketball.
This might be true, but it will take some time. As I noted in a thread I started the other day, practice squads are currently less than 30% white. This doesn't bode well, considering many "Caste friendly" teams only seek white special teams mascots (LB's, DB's,RB's)and 5th receiver/3rd tight end types. These are the sorts of guys that typically put in a year on PSquads and just don't exist right now.
Just as a tangent, what makes the current Patriots so different than even theSuper Bowl Bills, is those Buffalo teamsused to draft a lot of white guys fairly high and would have a lot of quality white starters. The current Patriots have amazinglyturned a lot of low picks/UFA's into starters or superstars -- Brady, Welker, Woodhead, Nikovich, Wright, Koppen, ect. Cleveland is sort of the same way, currently. That's very good -- at least they are giving deserving athletes a fair shake.
whiteathlete33 said:
I was thinking the same thing and the Panthers and Jaguars, Truthteller. I remember watching those teams as a teen and I was surprised how white both of them were. The Jaguars had quite a few white defensive players. I looked at the rosters on pro-football reference but I can't tell whether some of the players are white or black. It's difficult to find pictures of some of these players.
W33, those were some fun teams to watch. They got real good, real quickly. The only way the MSMedia could explain this sudden success by a bunch of "lunch-pail", "overachievers", was because they received one extra pick at the end of round one in 1995and had some extra cap room to start out with. No one mentioned the fact that they were giving deserving players of all races, chances to play more and succeed, while most NFL teams kept recycling the some worthless "projects"....Cleveland came back to the league in 1999 and Jacka$$ GM Dwight Clark decidedthey needed to be more "athletic" right off the bat than Jax and Carolina. That is a franchise that has been around 12 years, and is only now starting to show lasting promise...One more quick point: What's the link between the Bills of the early 1990's, the expansion Panthers and today's Colts? It's Bill Polian, who seems to understand talent.
white is right said:
The 85' Bears started Ron Rivera who at the time might have been regarded as White. He is ethnic Puerto Rican and looks predominately White. These days he would be classified as Hispanic because of publicity reasons. Similar to Tom Fears and Rick Casares.
Rivera seems to be fairly white friendly as a coach. In Chicago, as the DC, he somehow convinced Hatie to start several whitesduring their Super Bowl run-- Urlacher, Hillenmeyer, Dvorcek and Todd Johnson. Since leaving, only Urlacher, who has a mullato son(something Hatie probably loves), has remained as a entrenched starter....As far as the "Hispanic" label. NFL.com used to boast thatthe lilly white, green-eyed Adam Archuletawas part of a "hispanic revolution in the NFL"....Adam's nickname on the Rams (besides Adam Martz), by the way, was"Adam the Greek", as he used to say he was mostly greek (ethnically).
Edited by: Truthteller