The Vince Young Wonderlic story is indeed curious. It reminds of what happened with Akili Smith's ridiculously low score a few years back. If I recall correctly, Smith scored just slightly higher than Young (maybe an 8 or 9), but then was allowed to retake it and we were told (and expected to believe) that he miraculously increased his score to 39 or something, thereby tying Steve Young's score. Yeah, I'm sure that happened legitimately. Now, Vince Young's score was "incorrectly" graded and he is allowed to retake the test. At least this time, they didn't insult our intelligence by claiming he scored a 39 or something, like they did with Smith. I also watched some of this being discussed on that typical Caste-friendly ESPN show "Around The Horn" today. Shockingly enough, all the lame wanna-be comedians on the show discounted the significance of the Wonderlic test, and were quick to mention how low Dan Marino had scored on the test. I have read some of the sample Wonderlic questions, and you do indeed have to be an idiot not to get a decent score. Anyone who scores a 6 on a simple test like that is, as Don alluded to, probably in the 75-80 IQ range at best. If someone with that kind of thinking ability can play QB effectively in the NFL, I don't want to hear any more propaganda about how "complex" the playbooks are. For years, I have laughed at the notion that these obviously ignorant athletes were diligently studying and memorizing hundreds of complicated plays and formations. If guys with well below average IQs like Vick, McNair, McNabb, Culpepper and now Young are running these offenses and getting anything done at all, then this is all a huge lie, and the playbooks actually a lot simpler.