Yesterday, Cam Newton appeared in front of a controlled group in a "workout" that was clearly designed to raise his draft stock. It was obvious that, unless he collapsed at some point, this brilliant strategy would work.
Trent Dilfer went on a disgustingly gay orgasmic rant afterwards, seemingly calling Newton the greatest afflete of all time. Even his fellow jock sniffers at ESPN chuckled about it and described it as a "slobberfest." Dilfer appears to be working hard to earn the title of most anti-white "journalist." Considering the other jock sniffers at ESPN, that would be some kind of accomplishment.
Today, I caught the odious Mel Kuiper on t.v., and he continued the overt lobbying for Newton, with the chosen mantra that his "stock is rising." In a matter of a few weeks, the media has managed to lift Newton's draft stock to the point where he is a serious candidate to be taken first overall. Btw, they showed a few clips of Newton's "workout." While Dilfer and other gay jock sniffers may think he "looked good in shorts," I thought he appeared stiff and unnatural. On one of the few passes they showed, he threw behind a receiver from about fifteen yards. Yet Dilfer maintained his accuracy was out of this world.
Compare and contrast this royal, positive treatment to what Tim Tebow endured a year ago. In reality, Newton and Tebow should be considered very similiar players. Both were unconventional QBs in college, running a lot, for successful teams. The difference is Tebow was far more successful, for a longer period of time, than Newton. Also, while Tebow was a chaste religious young man without a blemish on his record, Newton has more red flags than almost any QB in NCAA history. Saying he has "character flaws" doesn't quite do justice to Newton's track record of misdeeds.
Not only has Newton's "reverend" father been attempting to extort large sums of money from colleges for his son's services, Newton has shown he can't behave in a civil manner on his own. He was caught cheating on exams at least twice at Florida. He either directly stole another student's laptop, or bought one, depending on which story you choose to believe. And public reports reveal that he had at least 11 moving traffic violations in one year. When you couple that with the eternally smug look on his face, and his cocky manner of speaking, then you have an obviously arrogant and spoiled young man with an already dark history of transgressions.
So....why did the soft spoken choir boy receive such negative treatment before the draft last season, while the very similar in style troubled thug has been given nothing but praise? Why was it considered a huge "reach" by Denver when they took Tebow near the end of the first round, but Newton is now said to be an easy top 5 pick? Exactly what is the difference between the two, that explains this double standard?
To anyone who has followed sports over the past month, there has been a clear campaign to boost Newton's draft stock. It is a concerted effort, and it has already paid dividends. At the same time, once again we see white QBs being diminished, Jake Locker being first and foremost in this regard. How does the consensus #1 overall draft pick last season slide to the point where he may be this year's Jimmy Clausen? Let that be a lesson to any other white player who opts not to enter the NFL draft early. The same Caste hounds who are ensuring Newton will make millions more than he should because of their unearned promotional efforts, are costing Locker millions due to their unrelenting smear campaign against him.
We've seen this happen nearly every year now for well over a decade. The one year wonder black QB (Akili Smith) or even one game wonder (Jamarcus Russell) elevated to the top of the draft for no logical reason, while at least one unfortunate white QB "slides" precipitously on draft day. Brady Quinn. Aaron Rodgers. Jimmy Clausen. The list goes on, but it's always a white guy. Considering that the vast majority of players drafted are black, it's an incredible coincidence that only whites fall into this "sliding" category. Kind of like how white players somehow dominate those "most overrated" and "biggest busts" lists.
I'm really hoping more and more that the greedy owners and deluded players can't work out their differences. It would be poetic justice to see this whole corrupt "sport" suffer a huge blow to its popularity and loss of its profits.
Trent Dilfer went on a disgustingly gay orgasmic rant afterwards, seemingly calling Newton the greatest afflete of all time. Even his fellow jock sniffers at ESPN chuckled about it and described it as a "slobberfest." Dilfer appears to be working hard to earn the title of most anti-white "journalist." Considering the other jock sniffers at ESPN, that would be some kind of accomplishment.
Today, I caught the odious Mel Kuiper on t.v., and he continued the overt lobbying for Newton, with the chosen mantra that his "stock is rising." In a matter of a few weeks, the media has managed to lift Newton's draft stock to the point where he is a serious candidate to be taken first overall. Btw, they showed a few clips of Newton's "workout." While Dilfer and other gay jock sniffers may think he "looked good in shorts," I thought he appeared stiff and unnatural. On one of the few passes they showed, he threw behind a receiver from about fifteen yards. Yet Dilfer maintained his accuracy was out of this world.
Compare and contrast this royal, positive treatment to what Tim Tebow endured a year ago. In reality, Newton and Tebow should be considered very similiar players. Both were unconventional QBs in college, running a lot, for successful teams. The difference is Tebow was far more successful, for a longer period of time, than Newton. Also, while Tebow was a chaste religious young man without a blemish on his record, Newton has more red flags than almost any QB in NCAA history. Saying he has "character flaws" doesn't quite do justice to Newton's track record of misdeeds.
Not only has Newton's "reverend" father been attempting to extort large sums of money from colleges for his son's services, Newton has shown he can't behave in a civil manner on his own. He was caught cheating on exams at least twice at Florida. He either directly stole another student's laptop, or bought one, depending on which story you choose to believe. And public reports reveal that he had at least 11 moving traffic violations in one year. When you couple that with the eternally smug look on his face, and his cocky manner of speaking, then you have an obviously arrogant and spoiled young man with an already dark history of transgressions.
So....why did the soft spoken choir boy receive such negative treatment before the draft last season, while the very similar in style troubled thug has been given nothing but praise? Why was it considered a huge "reach" by Denver when they took Tebow near the end of the first round, but Newton is now said to be an easy top 5 pick? Exactly what is the difference between the two, that explains this double standard?
To anyone who has followed sports over the past month, there has been a clear campaign to boost Newton's draft stock. It is a concerted effort, and it has already paid dividends. At the same time, once again we see white QBs being diminished, Jake Locker being first and foremost in this regard. How does the consensus #1 overall draft pick last season slide to the point where he may be this year's Jimmy Clausen? Let that be a lesson to any other white player who opts not to enter the NFL draft early. The same Caste hounds who are ensuring Newton will make millions more than he should because of their unearned promotional efforts, are costing Locker millions due to their unrelenting smear campaign against him.
We've seen this happen nearly every year now for well over a decade. The one year wonder black QB (Akili Smith) or even one game wonder (Jamarcus Russell) elevated to the top of the draft for no logical reason, while at least one unfortunate white QB "slides" precipitously on draft day. Brady Quinn. Aaron Rodgers. Jimmy Clausen. The list goes on, but it's always a white guy. Considering that the vast majority of players drafted are black, it's an incredible coincidence that only whites fall into this "sliding" category. Kind of like how white players somehow dominate those "most overrated" and "biggest busts" lists.
I'm really hoping more and more that the greedy owners and deluded players can't work out their differences. It would be poetic justice to see this whole corrupt "sport" suffer a huge blow to its popularity and loss of its profits.
