Been reading most of the threads here today...

Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
37
and I see that many of you are very hardcore when it comes to teams with white players playing. I defiantly like to see white guys playing(for me its only the skill positions, which I played, and could care less about lineman, linebackers, etc). But, I don't root or watch games because they have 15 white guys playing... that is ridiculous to me(Im DEFIANTLY NOT racists, let me preface this).

My question is: Do all or most of you only like/watch teams becuase they have a lot of white players(BC, Boise, etc)??:icon_eek: btw, BC is absolutely horrible, would never watch one of their games. I realize the Caste system is in effect big time in college and the NFL, but that still doesn't make me want to root more for one team or another. Also, I have no problem with blacks playing if they are better athletes and will help the team win.

How many on here have played at the 1A level or professional? I ask this because playing 1A ball, for the most part, blacks are for some reason USUALLY; faster, quicker and can jump higher than many white guys(yes, I am white!). The other white players on my team and that I played aganist usually weren't all that athletic, btw.... BUT, BUT there are many whites who are just as fast or sometimes faster(Don Beebe, Mcafferey, Doug donnley(4.3 wr for the Cowboys in early 80s), Seahorn, etc). Also, since there is such a bias that blacks are faster than whites, many whites(who can run 4.5 or better) don't even play sports like football and basketball because the media has royally screwed it for them and the professional teams.

I realize I'm a "newbie" and I'm not trying to stir the pot...just wanted to get some opinions, because I see all these team threads with just the white players represented.
 

Anak

Mentor
Joined
Feb 5, 2010
Messages
771
and I see that many of you are very hardcore when it comes to teams with white players playing. I defiantly like to see white guys playing(for me its only the skill positions, which I played, and could care less about lineman, linebackers, etc). But, I don't root or watch games because they have 15 white guys playing... that is ridiculous to me(Im DEFIANTLY NOT racists, let me preface this).

My question is: Do all or most of you only like/watch teams becuase they have a lot of white players(BC, Boise, etc)??:icon_eek: btw, BC is absolutely horrible, would never watch one of their games. I realize the Caste system is in effect big time in college and the NFL, but that still doesn't make me want to root more for one team or another. Also, I have no problem with blacks playing if they are better athletes and will help the team win.

How many on here have played at the 1A level or professional? I ask this because playing 1A ball, for the most part, blacks are for some reason USUALLY; faster, quicker and can jump higher than many white guys(yes, I am white!). The other white players on my team and that I played aganist usually weren't all that athletic, btw.... BUT, BUT there are many whites who are just as fast or sometimes faster(Don Beebe, Mcafferey, Doug donnley(4.3 wr for the Cowboys in early 80s), Seahorn, etc). Also, since there is such a bias that blacks are faster than whites, many whites(who can run 4.5 or better) don't even play sports like football and basketball because the media has royally screwed it for them and the professional teams.

I realize I'm a "newbie" and I'm not trying to stir the pot...just wanted to get some opinions, because I see all these team threads with just the white players represented.

Firstly, yes. I only root for the White guys. Secondly, I have defiantly taken a disliking to you and your spell check, sir. So I'm out of here, good day to you.
 

Wes Woodhead

Mentor
Joined
Oct 23, 2011
Messages
1,104
formerwhitecornerback, I recommend that you read all, and I mean all the front page articles on this site. GO back to the very first one from like 2005, and just spend time reading them.

I did this before I joined, and started posting on CF. There is so much information that I never woulda known about if not for those articles. Now it will take awhile, but if your serious about waking all the way up to the caste system in sports, and the major role it plays in all other aspects of our lives its well worth it. So many times Id want to join up to ask a question, but then Id read another article and presto, question answered, and in very articulate fashion.
 

Don Wassall

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
31,454
Location
Pennsylvania
formerwhitecornerback, I recommend that you read all, and I mean all the front page articles on this site. GO back to the very first one from like 2005, and just spend time reading them.

I did this before I joined, and started posting on CF. There is so much information that I never woulda known about if not for those articles. Now it will take awhile, but if your serious about waking all the way up to the caste system in sports, and the major role it plays in all other aspects of our lives its well worth it. So many times Id want to join up to ask a question, but then Id read another article and presto, question answered, and in very articulate fashion.


Very good suggestion. You seem to be aware of some of what's going on when it comes to affirmative action in sports and media stereotyping, but not all of it. Read more, and with an open mind, and then decide if this site is for you or not. Hopefully it is, but if it isn't no biggie.
 

seattlefan

Guru
Joined
Oct 21, 2011
Messages
288
We do cheer for white players, white athletes and white teams. We do want more white players in the college game and NFL.

BTW, what was your recruiting experience like as a white CB?
 

Extra Point

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
6,289
Personally, I no longer root for any particular team. I'm only interested in how white players do.

formerwhitecornerback, look up Lane Olson on NFL Draft Scout. A look at his measurables show that he's a tremendous athlete. Yet he was never offered a Division 1 scholarship for football while lesser black athletes were.

It's no accident that superior white athletes are passed over for inferior negro athletes. It's all part of a plan to ethnically cleanse white men from any positions of prominence.

The purpose is to raise the status of male negroes and reduce the status of white men.
 

scroat

Guru
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
217
I don't dislike black athletes that deserve to be where they are. Many black NFL and college players deserve to start and are dominant in their respective positions. What I don't like is the clear and obvious bias against white athletes, which I believe this site proves is fact. I also don't like how black athletic supremacy has become an absolute fact in most Americans minds. If affirmative action exists in every other aspect of our "society", why would it not exist in sports?
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
37
well...

I don't have time to read article's that date back to 05. I mentioned that I agree with the bias in sports like basketball and football towards black athletes(FOR SKILL POSITIONS!) I will decide soon wheather to keep posting on this web site. Some of you only will watch a game or follow teams that have mostly white's playing!? amazing!

To answer the question about recruiting...I didn't get heavily recruited because of grades. I suffered from a learning disability and didn't take core classes that were required for 4 year colleges, so I had to go JC. I had setbacks(injuries, depression, etc) in JC, so walked on to play college. But, I defiantly saw a bias(hence why I found this page!). I was always as good of an athlete(usually better) than black players. I competed in dunk contests(could 360 at barely 6"1) and ran in the high 4.4's. But, I was hurt a lot and that also effected my recruitment. When I played there were no rivals/scout, etc... or recruting services, combines, etc..
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
37
extra point...

looked up Lane Olson...he does have a good 40...But, i can see why he wasn't offered by any BCS programs...he is only 5'8. BUT, he should have been offered by at least a MAC school with his speed(Wisconsin had Jim Leonard though, he was 5"8, so if he had other intagibles, he very well could/should have played big time college ball). Playing D-3 is ridiculous if you can run 4.5 or better at any height. I never even considered playing D3, nobody cares. I wanted to play in front of decent crowds, fun enviornments, etc. Like I have said, I agree that white players get overlooked-a lot! I do think its only skill players and maybe linebackers and sometimes D-lineman(SEC). O- Lineman and qbs, no.
 

jaxvid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
7,247
Location
Michigan
Some of you only will watch a game or follow teams that have mostly white's playing!? amazing!

Welcome to the board.

What's your hangup about White guys rooting for White teams? When Notre Dame plays I usually cheer for them because I'm Catholic, if the Italian national soccer team is playing Kenya, I root for the Italians-because I'm Italian, when the Patriots play I root for them because they also have people I identify with like Welker, Gronkowski, Woodhead. What's wrong with that? How many black people are avid fans of BYU? Isn't it normal and natural to identify with people like yourself. What other criteria am I supposed to use when supporting a team? Color of the uniform? Style of play? Geographic locations? Why are those more important they an identification with the people on the team?
 

celticdb15

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
8,469
looked up Lane Olson...he does have a good 40...But, i can see why he wasn't offered by any BCS programs...he is only 5'8. BUT, he should have been offered by at least a MAC school with his speed(Wisconsin had Jim Leonard though, he was 5"8, so if he had other intagibles, he very well could/should have played big time college ball). Playing D-3 is ridiculous if you can run 4.5 or better at any height. I never even considered playing D3, nobody cares. I wanted to play in front of decent crowds, fun enviornments, etc. Like I have said, I agree that white players get overlooked-a lot! I do think its only skill players and maybe linebackers and sometimes D-lineman(SEC). O- Lineman and qbs, no.

Yeah he's 5'8 same height as Bob Sanders.. Also you have to remember Jim Leonhard was lightly recruited by Wisconsin he had to walk on. Thankfully Wisconsin has a fair and storied history of developing walk-ons(Abbrederis,Armstrong,Luke Swan).

I will agree playing D3 ball is pointless for the most part but its not like Olson was playing at some scrub school. He played at UW Whitewater those guys have been to like 6 consecutive D3 national championships. More D1 schools,particularly the MAC need to recruit states like Wisconsin and other "lilly white" states harder. Lol I find it comical how nearly every program has some sort of connection to South Florida. If they would just recruit the players in their own backyard it would pay off in the long run!
 
Last edited:

Liverlips

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
4,197
"Like I have said, I agree that white players get overlooked-a lot! I do think its only skill players and maybe linebackers and sometimes D-lineman(SEC). O- Lineman and qbs, no."

How would you explain the all-black O-lines of many SEC schools (or even the Pittsburgh Steelers)?
 

dwid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
4,254
Location
Louisiana
lol grades held you back, not laughing at your situation because that sucks but your belief that would hold a player back. I have been around a smaller FBS program and even more time at an FCS program, and they all go the extra mile to accommodate players with learning disabilities, I am not going to get into specifics about players and what universities but if you read the Michael Oher story, he had mostly F's, they say that specifically in the book, to get him to Ole MIss they got him enrolled in a bunch of online courses offered by BYU and magically he got a bunch of A's (of course with the help for a tutor that was not paid for by him that stayed with him almost 12 hours a day) and then he was eligible, he couldn't read the playbook, that Cajun guy Ed O had to figure out how to teach him, in high school they set up chairs to represent the x's and o's, in college Ed O found out that he could use ketchup and mustard bottles, now do you think a team would go that far for a white guy?

Back to the point, if they want a black player, they will find a way to get him, yes some have such terrible grades/scores that they go the juco route but in my experience those guys aren't as highly regarded. Those with learning disabilities get lots of extra special help while in college, and they have guys that fake learning disabilities to get the extra help and of course the things that come with it like how they take a test etc. Read the quote by the Florida player who said "we didn't come he to play school, we came here to play football"

As far as watching football, yes I mainly watch ones with lots of Whites on it, because I can identify, I really like players that remind me of how I played or someone in my family played, which is why I am very upset about HIllis being screwed around because of his physical style of play, its not like we don't see majority black teams play, because these majority White teams are usually playing them.

However, i do videos of nfl prospects and I watch games of guys that are highly regarded to get an idea of where the White players rank in comparison, Yes I sometimes overrate some of the White players I make videos of only because they are so underated. I also watch games of teams that have interesting schemes, so I have watched alot of Redskins, they have an awesome scheme, RG3 is extremely overrated though, that scheme would be so much more deadly if he would throw deep, but he has the fewest amount of passes over 15 yards, on play action fakes he dumps it off to the tight end usually. Also, working with a high school team now I have to deal with a lot of black players. I just want to see the best players play, and its obvious that is not happening, especially at the higher levels of football.
 
Last edited:

Jimmy Chitwood

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
8,975
Location
Arkansas
I have been around a smaller FBS program and even more time at an FCS program, and they all go the extra mile to accommodate players with learning disabilities, I am not going to get into specifics about players and what universities but if you read the Michael Oher story, he had mostly F's, they say that specifically in the book, to get him to Ole MIss they got him enrolled in a bunch of online courses offered by BYU and magically he got a bunch of A's (of course with the help for a tutor that was not paid for by him that stayed with him almost 12 hours a day) and then he was eligible, he couldn't read the playbook, that Cajun guy Ed O had to figure out how to teach him, in high school they set up chairs to represent the x's and o's, in college Ed O found out that he could use ketchup and mustard bottles, now do you think a team would go that far for a white guy?

dwid is correct.

i worked in the athletic department for an SEC school after i graduated college, and i also taught at an SEC school while i was working on a Master's degree. in both instances i personally experienced how far athletic programs would go to enable black affletes, both in signing them to scholar(sic)ships and in helping them maintain academic "eligibility."

programs actively recruit affletes who routinely score below a 17 on the ACT admissions exam, yet they "somehow" manage to become eligible to play without ever passing the NCAA-required minimum classes. i know this for a fact, as i witnessed it on numerous occasions (with both basketball and football players) from both inside and outside the athletic department.

meanwhile once enrolled, White athletes are held to much more rigorous disciplinary standards AND academic standards than blacks. it is common to have White players suspended (or even kicked off the team in some cases) due to smoking pot or missing mandated study hall sessions (which black athletes almost ALL do but are never punished), while their negro counterparts frequently wouldn't miss a game despite being charged with felonies (almost inevitably the program believes the black player is innocent until proven guilty). also, despite being a small percentage of the overall athletic scholarship number in basketball and football, academic all-conference selections for those sports were almost exclusively made up of Whites. "weird," huh?

and i'm just discussing the academic and discipline (double) standards. i've not even pointed out the glaring double standards when it comes to the physical measurements and on-field production of unrecruited White athletes versus recruited black ones. that has been discussed ad nauseum on the site.

the discrimination against the White athlete is overwhelming at the collegiate level, and demonstrably continues (and perhaps increases) at the professional level.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
37
jaxvid..

hangup to you watching white guy's!? look, I came to this site because I'm a ex- white athlete(Im not the "enemy" here, or some conspiracy theroist) and like to watch white guy's probably just as much as many of you. I just think its a little ridiculous not watching a game or liking a team if there aren't 15 white players on the field(btw, I don't like ND no matter how many white athletes they have..I also do not like USC, Ohio st, Texas to name a few). I, like you, identify with white athlete's with a similar size/speed that I(used to have, I'm a old fart now:))....like I have said, I don't really care if whites play positions other than skill ones(especially DB).

I'm mainly interested in why the NFL and 1A/1AA collleges don't have any white players playing cornerback(but I do understand a few reasons, BUT there still should be a few-like Seahorn, Scott Case, Brian Davis...anyone remember any of these 80s white corners?). Also, and I have stated this too already, I haven't encounterd many white athletes that can compete athletically with many blacks(btw, I'm from Cali-sf east bay, a highly populated area and a lot of athletes). In all my years of pick up b-ball, varsity b-ball, baseball, playing football at a early age(10) I never encounterd a white athlete who had my skill set(****y, maybe, but its the truth). The bottom line is that white athletes who can run/jump are rarer than black athletes. For others who have PLAYED at a high level I would like to hear if you agree with this or not? In college, I played with several white guys(WR's) who could run 4.5 or so. BUT it was all straight line and didn't equate to the game at all(hence why some of these WR's who get free agent contracts get cut quick). Hardly any quickness and they were very easy to cover, especially in cover 0 and cover 1/3 playing bump.

I have found a old thread("There is a simple and obvious reason that there are no white corners in the NFL") that addresses this, and I can see its HOTLEY debated. I agree with the poster; spirtofspook who was started the thread. His reasons for lack of white corners is that they lack the genetics and hip structure. Again I PLAYED the position(and the change of direction and loose hips were my biggest problems when learning corner) and I am white! so, I have no reason to not want white's to play corner! I WANT to see white guys on ESPN, etc.. playing in big time games...But, the change of direction(and I also think quickness/reaactions) is a big reason AND the Caste system comes into play...so its a number of factors..But, not ALL Caste related. This is where I differ from many on here. I believe I'm a decent judge.

I'm not even addressing the grades/LD issues. Totally irrelevent(shouldn't have brought this up, my bad). Post is about current athletes playing.
 

Extra Point

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
6,289
I'm mainly interested in why the NFL and 1A/1AA collleges don't have any white players playing cornerback

The reason the NFL and 1A and 1AA colleges don't have any white players playing cornerback is anti-white racism. Whites are discriminated against and denied opportunities because of their race.
 

dwid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
4,254
Location
Louisiana
hangup to you watching white guy's!? look, I came to this site because I'm a ex- white athlete(Im not the "enemy" here, or some conspiracy theroist) and like to watch white guy's probably just as much as many of you. I just think its a little ridiculous not watching a game or liking a team if there aren't 15 white players on the field(btw, I don't like ND no matter how many white athletes they have..I also do not like USC, Ohio st, Texas to name a few). I, like you, identify with white athlete's with a similar size/speed that I(used to have, I'm a old fart now:))....like I have said, I don't really care if whites play positions other than skill ones(especially DB).

I'm mainly interested in why the NFL and 1A/1AA collleges don't have any white players playing cornerback(but I do understand a few reasons, BUT there still should be a few-like Seahorn, Scott Case, Brian Davis...anyone remember any of these 80s white corners?). Also, and I have stated this too already, I haven't encounterd many white athletes that can compete athletically with many blacks(btw, I'm from Cali-sf east bay, a highly populated area and a lot of athletes). In all my years of pick up b-ball, varsity b-ball, baseball, playing football at a early age(10) I never encounterd a white athlete who had my skill set(****y, maybe, but its the truth). The bottom line is that white athletes who can run/jump are rarer than black athletes. For others who have PLAYED at a high level I would like to hear if you agree with this or not? In college, I played with several white guys(WR's) who could run 4.5 or so. BUT it was all straight line and didn't equate to the game at all(hence why some of these WR's who get free agent contracts get cut quick). Hardly any quickness and they were very easy to cover, especially in cover 0 and cover 1/3 playing bump.

I have found a old thread("There is a simple and obvious reason that there are no white corners in the NFL") that addresses this, and I can see its HOTLEY debated. I agree with the poster; spirtofspook who was started the thread. His reasons for lack of white corners is that they lack the genetics and hip structure. Again I PLAYED the position(and the change of direction and loose hips were my biggest problems when learning corner) and I am white! so, I have no reason to not want white's to play corner! I WANT to see white guys on ESPN, etc.. playing in big time games...But, the change of direction(and I also think quickness/reaactions) is a big reason AND the Caste system comes into play...so its a number of factors..But, not ALL Caste related. This is where I differ from many on here. I believe I'm a decent judge.
umm, usually all of these White guys set records or close to records for shuttle and 3 cone drill times which is all about change of direction, you should look up the thread about how agility beats out straight line speed. If you look at the combine and pro days Whites excel and do better than their black counterparts. It is all about how many White guys may run a .05 or .10 slower than some of the top black players but lost little speed when changing direction. The current record for 3 cone drill barely got a shot and is hanging on the Texans roster by a thread, a White guy that ran a 4.6 but was very quick and you could see how great he could change direction in college, Jeff Maehl. Eric Peterman was also very quick, made defenders miss easily in space and was out of the league before he really had a shot. Kevin Kasper, another White receiver who is quick holds the 20 yard shuttle record. He bounced around 5 different teams recording 24 catches, and had some nice returns.

As far as loose hips and backpedaling, read this article on how Alabama corners play, and how they are taught to play.

http://smartfootball.com/defense/why-nick-saban-doesnt-teach-backpedaling

current Cincinnati Bengals cornerback Dre Kirkpatrick caused something of a stir when he told the media that he “never backpedaled at Alabama.” Apparently, this is something Bengals coaches value, as Kirkpatrick had to learn to backpedal. Some fairly questioned whether this was hyperbole — How do you not teach defensive backs to backpedal? — but, although he does teach backpedaling, Saban very specifically focuses on other techniques.
As Saban tells it, he used to teach backpedaling until he was with the Cleveland Browns with Bill Belichick. The ownership signed the legendary Everson Walls, who, much to the dismay of the young defensive backs coach, Saban, ran about a 4.8 forty yard dash and simply could not, under any circumstances, backpedal. He was awkward, couldn’t accelerate, and there were other guys on the roster much better at backpedaling.


Walls also, however, was being paid significantly more than his coach, and it was clear from the ownership that Walls would be starting. He also, it must be said, was still a great player, and just happens to still rank 10th on the all time list of most interceptions in NFL history. So Saban began teaching his now famous “shuffle” technique, rather than the traditional backpedal.

so a black player with 4.8 speed, awkward and can't backpedal put up great numbers, a White guy like that wouldn't have even gotten a chance.

I don't know what White guys you were around but your comment about it all being all straight line speed sounds like a typical dwf comment. When Jordy Nelson came out that was what every wanna be draft guru said, "yeah he has great straight line speed but it takes him like a minute to change directions, he would be good on special teams as a gunner not worthy of pick until the 4th round or later" His straight line speed is great, its in the 4.4 range and he ran 10.6 when he was younger, the same time as Devin Hester. When he came into the league they put him in as a return man, now how can a returner make big plays if they "take a minute to change direction", he had some very nice returns, I remember a 70 yarder, not sure if it was preseason or regular season but he has quickness.
Also, the White players I work with, ,most of the fast ones are quick as well. Some may look a little different than black players when changing direction but its all the same as long as its quick. From my experience blacks are usually quick but many lack good balance and fall and trip much easier when changing direction. I just read a report about top athletes in sports like football which talked about how balance is more important than overall speed.

Yes you played the position and you struggled with change of direction, but you are just one person. When I was helping out with a local FCS program I saw black cornerbacks that started struggling with White guys on the scout team that just came out of high school, yet the White guys never got a change to start as the years went by. There was one guy in particular that I brought up to the coach and he laughed and asked if he was related to me or something and why would he start that guy and then said what you wanna suit up to now and play" (and of course I was no longer in playing shape) It didn't make any sense because there was a great White safety starting, who had similar measurables, if he could start at safety and be one of the defenses best players, why couldn't another White kid play receiver? The coach called the safety a once in a lifetime player at that kind of program. Maybe he thought the guy had some type of nonwhite blood in him, he had a look similar to Channing Tatum but a little tanner and talked like a black person, bascially a wigger. He looked a little darker from a distance for some reason and he kept his head really short and had it lined up on the forehead like black people do, but I saw his high school picture and he had the long hair of a White person. That hairline might have confused some people, looking up his picture now, he didn't have like the typical "roman nose" more rounder, but it looks similar to mine and I am mostly Irish/French (like 1/16th Spanish). He might have had a small amount of Native American in him but probably minimal, a lot of people from the area he came from had indian in them, some very light skin blacks, or "creoles" which used to be a word for Whites but With 20/20 vision the guy looked White close up, White facial features etc, everything except his hair, like I said it was very short and hard to tell what it would look like grown and the forehead straight line that black people do (they did that to me once and I was pissed) out and in the Louisiana sun of course he tanned. Maybe the coach didn't have 20/20 vision.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
37
differnet views....

I hope you all don't ban me because I'm a ittle opinionated about the topic of lack of white corners. BUT, i believe I have some decent points because I played the position. I agree the media and a lot of coaches have a bias towards blacks, and its not fair! It defiantly cost me in my playing years. Also, this testing 3-cone, shuttle, etc...doesn't prove anything. Just like 40s, verticle jump, etc...If you cant make plays during practice or games all the athletic ability doesn't matter. Can you make plays or not!? The Hip issue is a real one, which unless you have played the position, I'm not going to dispute anymore.. Also, I have lived all over the country...blacks sometimes are gifted more athletically. I played junior high b-ball in Lousisville KY. We had a guy(black) on our team who was 5"3 and could dunk. He used to laugh at me when we raced(I believe he could run a legit 4.2). And I could beat or come close to beating most black in races! an amazing athlete and still the best I have ever encountered(and back in my 20s I could do about 7 or 8 types of dunks, so I wasn't some slouch). These guys like Welker or Seahorn(who is a genetic freak) and other's are in a very, very small minority. They are more gifted than most blacks and whites. We all agree that there is a Caste system in effect, ESPECIALLY at positions like cornerback. It needs to stop. I want to watch a game and see a white guy playing corner, dammit!:biggrin:
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
37
dwid..

thanks for the reply.... I appreciate the info on bama. I follow them and enjoy watching Vinni Sunseri. I also read smart football. Haven't seen the Article about the bama DB technique.
 

dwid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
4,254
Location
Louisiana
What does it matter if we played the position or not? I briefly played there on the freshman team but I liked safety better and the coach switched me, I still had to change direction quickly and had to play man sometimes, on varsity we had enough players so most guys didn't play both ways. I didn't find it a problem to change direction, the only thing I know is not being able to move like you want because of pain (have a bad back, had a bad car accident that messed it up more than it was before). My wife makes fun of me because sometimes I joke around and dance in the house jokingly and says I dance like a girl because she is stiffer and can't do the moves that I'm almost hesitant to put that because its embarrassing and private. I don't understand how some people are stiff and struggle to move certain ways. Personally I think its stretching at a young age. I know the USC coach stressed staying loose and stretching, he said any guy can bulk up but they will be like a refridgerator, stiff. The coach I had before high school stressed stretching and we had to stretch a lot, I attribute my ability to change direction to that because after that I kept stretching like he taught while I bulked up in high school.

I coach and see these kids all the time on the field, and the players I mentioned, I saw it on film, they have the change of direction ability and it matches up with what they timed. Jeff Maehl could cut in the blink of an eye and Eric Peterman as well. Kevin Kasper as well. So you want to tell me that despite being able to change direction well on the field and timing well means nothing?

As far as being a corner, teaching technique is key, if a guy is a little stiff technique is key, a guy with looser hips can play a little sloppy and make up for it but it doesn't matter
 
Last edited:

Wes Woodhead

Mentor
Joined
Oct 23, 2011
Messages
1,104
These guys like Welker or Seahorn(who is a genetic freak) and other's are in a very, very small minority.

This is simply just not true. There are tons of lightning quick white guys who could play any skill position on any level.
 

dwid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
4,254
Location
Louisiana
This is simply just not true. There are tons of lightning quick white guys who could play any skill position on any level.

Yes, Welker was replaced at Texas Tech by Danny Amendola, who was just as quick. He is on a team that doesn't utilize his talents to the fullest, he did have a ton of all purpose yards as a returnman. Bradford is starting to better and he was lighting it up this year before the freak injury.

Then Amendola was replaced at Tech by Eric Morris, also very quick, he had less straight line speed than the other two, but great burst and could make people miss. Went to Canada for a while, seen as another Weston Dressler (another White guy who is very quick and would be a beast in the NFL, instead he is doing great in the CFL).

Thats just 3 guys from one school. I hope Leach continues recruiting those quick White receivers. Even the media will agree these guys are quick but they write them off, Skip Bayless said "guys like Welker and Shipley (another quick wide receiver) are just quick little zone busters that dart around making people miss but don't have the ability to go vertical like Jordy Nelson", they were talking about White receivers and the lack of them. Apparently being a quick slot receiver and gaining yards on what are basically extended handoffs and getting yards after the catch means nothing, unless your Percy Harvin of course. In their eyes Jordy Nelson was the only talented "true wideout" that was White and "one of a kind, rare" etc.

Marc Mariani is another quick guy who I believe made the pro bowl as a return man. He broke his leg though, he will be back.

At the lower levels there are tons of these guys. They have guys like Justin Beaver who had the elite straight line speed to go with the quickness who never got a shot. Woodhead did and is barely used except for up the gut, can't really cut there unless the blocking is good enough to get to the second level, which rarely happens. He was used more in space his first year and displayed his quickness, you can see it on his catches as well. Nate Kmic was another quick guy, his top end speed was not "elite" but good enough for the NFL, probably 4.5 or 4.6, Brian Westbrook ran a 4.56 and was pretty damn good.

I am going to stop here because the list could go on and on, tons of quick guys at least running 4.6's, plenty in the 4.5 range. we might have slightly less in the sub 4.5 range but I don't think its that big of a difference with the amount of Whites in the country compared to blacks, plus rarely does anyone run a legit 4.3, if they do its like 4.38 or 4.39, I am talking about electronic times, I don't know any who ran a 4.2 except Chris Johnson who holds the combine record at 4.24. Hand times are usually bogus and you can only compare the times with guys who were timed by the same person at the same event with the same conditions like the surface they run on, wind etc. The difference between a 4.4 and a 4.5 over 40 yards is like a stride, within reach, I forget the exact measurement, its not enough and it doesn't account for on the field speed with pads, or stamina, can a 4.3 guy run a 4.3 for 4 quarters?
 
Last edited:

seattlefan

Guru
Joined
Oct 21, 2011
Messages
288
Jason Sehorn was not a genetic freak. He was just the only white player to really get a shot at the position in the last 20 years.
 

dwid

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
4,254
Location
Louisiana
Jason Sehorn was not a genetic freak. He was just the only white player to really get a shot at the position in the last 20 years.

he was rare in the sense of his size and speed 6'2 over 210 4.3 speed combined with the fact that not many 6'2 guys can play corner, White or black, usually 6 foot or under, probably the only reason he got a shot, Whites have to be elite to start at skill positions, Im assuming they would have to be elite like top 3 to get a spot at corner at this point. We currently have a safety in the NFL with similar size that would be a great corner in the NFL, Chris Conte, who is 6'2. However he was moved to safety. The poster was asking for d1 corners, Conte was one of the last ones I was aware of. Brandon Hardin is another, also drafted by the Bears and moved to safety at 6'3. Weddle, Prosinski, Gioradano would all excel at corner as well as the two mentioned, none of them are really big but seem bigger than the average corner (many have exagerated measurables, like Jason David was listed at 5'8 but had to be 5'6) many who are like 170 pounds , Prosisnki being the biggest at 6'1 but that doesn't matter, they would be great cornerbacks.
 
Last edited:
Top