G
Guest
Guest
Huh? I'm a troll because I appreciate intelligent dialogue?
Actually, his early 90's "retirement" was due to a torn achilles tendon. He came back and competed through '98, including dropping a 10.07 in '96. Andre Cason was a freak ever since high school. He clocked a 10.08 his senior year. He topped out 4 years later with a 9.92. That's only 16/100ths of a second improvement over 4 years. That doesn't strike me an anything other than natural progression.
As far as his muscularity, that's an empty argument. Have you ever been to a gym? Do you honestly believe every single guy in there with a muscular physique is juicing? If a Joe Blow off the street is ripped, why would you find it peculiar that a world-class athlete, who's paid to train everyday, would have a competitive physique as well?
Coming into the 2006 indoor season, Craig Pickering was a 6.83 60m stringbean. One year later, he was a ripped, sinewy, veiny 6.55 behemoth. That's amazing progress in one year, no? Now he's having trouble staying healthy. He's much more muscular than Gay, Powell, Gatlin, Montgomery, Lewis, et al ever were. Do you find that suspect as well? My guess would be no, you don't. Sorry, but you didn't even come close to PROVING anything about Cason.
Lolol, yea, he married Marion Jones 10 years after he dropped his 9.87. Guilty! LOLOL! Sorry, but that doesn't even come close to PROVING anything.
No, anyone with an agenda can ASSUME. Crawford's on the other side of 30, and has been battling iunjuries. Of all the guys you mentioned, he's the only one who even comes close to suspicion.
While you swung and missed at all of the others, I'll give you a foul tip for this one. Even though you didn't prove a thing, I'm feeling generous.
Also, Heredia claims Mo Greene STARTED using with him after injuries in 2003 (sorta like the Andy Pettite defense) to hold onto his multi-million adidas contract. If this even happened, which I'll even give Heredia the benefit of the doubt and say it did, it was 6 YEARS AFTER he went sub-9.90 in the 100m, and 5 YEARS AFTER he went sub-6.40 in the 60m.
Wrong is wrong, though, so I'll give you Greene in the twilight of his career. I'd still like to hear what he says under oath. He might pull a Clemens.
Sufficient for what? Wasting my time? You PROVED about as much as I expected you to.. nothing. If you think you did, you unfortunately don't know the meaning of the word.Edited by: Maximus
Okay let me go over these names and state who most likely doped here and I will state why. Cason was a doper he shattered his femur and subsequently retired in the early 90's and he also had unusual muscularity.
Actually, his early 90's "retirement" was due to a torn achilles tendon. He came back and competed through '98, including dropping a 10.07 in '96. Andre Cason was a freak ever since high school. He clocked a 10.08 his senior year. He topped out 4 years later with a 9.92. That's only 16/100ths of a second improvement over 4 years. That doesn't strike me an anything other than natural progression.
As far as his muscularity, that's an empty argument. Have you ever been to a gym? Do you honestly believe every single guy in there with a muscular physique is juicing? If a Joe Blow off the street is ripped, why would you find it peculiar that a world-class athlete, who's paid to train everyday, would have a competitive physique as well?
Coming into the 2006 indoor season, Craig Pickering was a 6.83 60m stringbean. One year later, he was a ripped, sinewy, veiny 6.55 behemoth. That's amazing progress in one year, no? Now he's having trouble staying healthy. He's much more muscular than Gay, Powell, Gatlin, Montgomery, Lewis, et al ever were. Do you find that suspect as well? My guess would be no, you don't. Sorry, but you didn't even come close to PROVING anything about Cason.
He broke down because unlike most elite 100m runners, he ran full indoor seasons as well as outdoor, from '92 on, and never gave his body a chance to rest. He had 59 sub-6.60 60m's, and 36 sub-10.10 100m's. His times were consistent, from 10.14 in 1989, to 10.11 in 2001. He lived in the 10.0x's for over a decade, and breached 10 only a handful of times, exhibiting nothing out of the ordinary. Sorry, but you didn't even come close to PROVING anything about Surin.Bruny Surin never failed a steroid test but he grew late in his career and suddenly could dip under 10 seconds with ease in 99' and by 2000 was breaking down like a race horse that was overworked.
Thompson always looked clean to me, but he is married to the biggest female fraud since Flo Juice.
Lolol, yea, he married Marion Jones 10 years after he dropped his 9.87. Guilty! LOLOL! Sorry, but that doesn't even come close to PROVING anything.
Yea, and we all know every internet rumor is true.. especially ones in which sprinters using their own names scour the net in search of illegal PED's that would destroy their lives and livelihood if caught. You can't be serious. Your internet rumor doesn't come close to PROVING a thing.There was a a rumour all over the internet that Fasuba was asking about roid cycles on bodybuilding boards and registered with his nickname.
Then it's Crawford who's training partner was dirty and Crawford had a obviously too muscular physique. Also he has mysteriously slowed down since his coach has been popped. He blamed it on bunions, anybody with a brain could put 2 and 2 together and figure out why.
No, anyone with an agenda can ASSUME. Crawford's on the other side of 30, and has been battling iunjuries. Of all the guys you mentioned, he's the only one who even comes close to suspicion.
While you swung and missed at all of the others, I'll give you a foul tip for this one. Even though you didn't prove a thing, I'm feeling generous.
Several personal bests were set last weekend which is indicative of suspect timing. Jamaican sprinters are tested by the same international governing body that every other country is tested by. You've, as usual, proved nothing.Bolt is dirty he popped a 9.76' in May? He also was never a hundred meter sprinter and he trains in country with lax drug testing standards.
I haven't heard ANYTHING about Leonard Scott. I doubt there's any connection between the two whatsoever. I would ask you to prove it, but I won't bother because I know you can't. I seriously think you pulled his name out of the air because he's a bodybuilder.Both Leonard Scott and Greene are going to be exposed as drug cheats in this trial coming up.
Also, Heredia claims Mo Greene STARTED using with him after injuries in 2003 (sorta like the Andy Pettite defense) to hold onto his multi-million adidas contract. If this even happened, which I'll even give Heredia the benefit of the doubt and say it did, it was 6 YEARS AFTER he went sub-9.90 in the 100m, and 5 YEARS AFTER he went sub-6.40 in the 60m.
Wrong is wrong, though, so I'll give you Greene in the twilight of his career. I'd still like to hear what he says under oath. He might pull a Clemens.
Yea, sure he did. And I bet Bailey used to throw in a couple scoops of ice cream, and make steroid smoothies too. Come on, you can do better than that.I have talked a club level sprinter and we talked about Bailey and we both laughed that he was juicing for the same reasons as Surin and he told me story that in his training camp he had fridge in his rented house(in Texas) that had syringes sitting in them.
I could go on but this is sufficient for the passionate troll.......
Sufficient for what? Wasting my time? You PROVED about as much as I expected you to.. nothing. If you think you did, you unfortunately don't know the meaning of the word.Edited by: Maximus