2014 World Cup Qualification Tournaments

[ThePhilosopher]

Who cares about the players' looks?

Yup,we are dealing with a whore of a communist here,people.

Who cares about people's looks?
Any third world Aids ridden monkey can wear the shirt of any nation in the world.

I am only concerned about their performance.

Blatant lie.If that was the case,you'd never praise a clown like Sakho.
Also you wouldn't claim that blacks can play football.

Are you a woman or a homosexual?

Are you jew or a goy?

 

[ThePhilosopher]

Is Deschamps a secret Marine Le Pen admirer?

The current crop of "French" blacks are especially bad.Desailly could run,Henry could run fast and Viera could atleast bully people off the ball.

Now,its funny too see Evra 'slipping' every now and then.Benzema need three open shots at goal to score,Pogba cannot control the ball if his life depended on it(not that I have seen a single black who can!).Mandanda is an own goal waiting to happen...even the most bitter black supremacist cannot deny that LLoris is better.

Oh,and Sagna cannot actually run....not without losing his balance.

 

[Xman]

South Africa beat Spain

Blatant lie.If that was the case,you'd never praise a clown like Sakho.
Also you wouldn't claim that blacks can play football.

Mostly black South Africa beat the all-white world champions. If the South Africans did not play football, what did they play? Sakho scored two goals that allowed his team to qualify for the World Cup. What did he do wrong? And please refrain from ad hominem attacks. They're puerile. I prefer facts and well-reasoned opinion. You come off sounding like a whiny twelve year old. Or perhaps you are just dense.

 

[ThePhilosopher]

I prefer facts and well-reasoned opinion.

The gentleman wants "facts" and "well-reasoned opinion".Fine.

But if the facts say so,will you concede that blacks are indeed sub-human?
If I prove it,will you agree that the jews need to exterminated?

I don't think so.You have a fixed opinion,and are here merely "to play the fool".

 

[Porthos]

Mostly black South Africa beat the all-white world champions. If the South Africans did not play football, what did they play?

That was a friendly. Surely you are aware that friendlies are primarily intended as an opportunity to try new players and tactics, while the result is of secondary importance? Let's see what SA can do in the World C.... - oh wait, they did not qualify?
If one follows the sports media it would look like African football is the best thing that happened to the sport since they invented the telstar ball. Every single WC edition there are "pundits" tripping over each other to proclaim an African team to be the "dark horse" of the turnament, an African player to be the new Messi or Ronaldo, a player that is athletic, that is physically superior to these White wimps etc. etc. etc. And then? And everything routinely goes puff... Why do you think there is such a cognitive dissonance between what the media trumpets and reality? Could it be that these sport rags and TV-shows are biassed in a certain direction and contain a fair amount of propaganda?

Sakho scored two goals that allowed his team to qualify for the World Cup.

Sakho did not score 2 goals but 1, the second was an own-goal (not that this deterred him from claiming the goal as his own). He did do well in this game though.

 

[Liverlips]

"Mostly black South Africa beat the all-white world champions." Yes, in a friendly. No African team makes it very far in the World Cup (and none would make it not for regional quotas). By the way, why do you suppose South Africa only starts blacks despite the fact that many South African whites play soccer? Could it be black racism?

 

[frederic38]

Mamadou Sakho did an excellent job in replacing the hot-headed white player Koscielny -- who was responsible for France being in such a deep hole in the first place. In the first leg, he gifted Ukraine a penalty goal with a stupid challenge, then physically assaulted a Ukraine player -- for which he got sent off and suspended. How could Koscielny have done a better job than Sakho even if he had not been suspended? I see Sakho getting the starting nod ahead of Koscielny from now on. Koscielny would have only himself to blame.

koscielny has been the best french player in the first leg against ukraine
his penalty was a consequence of the blatant foul that abidal made a few minutes before in the penalty area
the referee didn't give a penalty for that foul while it was obviously a penalty
but then he gave a penalty for that foul by koscielny (actually he doesn't touch the ukrainian player, there was not really penalty)
it was a compensation

 

[frederic38]

Sakho scored two goals that allowed his team to qualify for the World Cup. What did he do wrong?

are we going to judge defenders on how many goals they score?
then anyways sakho is a very bad defender according to that definition, because he is know for scoring as many own goals as goals for his team
for example during his career with PSG he had 7 goals and 4 owngoals
that's ridiculous and i dare you to find another player with similar stats

but if we step away from that nonsense and judge sakho's defensive qualities, what we have is an authentic clown
for example, i have avoided seeing images of that match against ukraine because obviously i am very angry and sad about it , but i was still able to see a glimpse of sakho's talent:

http://youtu.be/RAmM0XZD2oU?t=1h21m50s

just before scoring his 2nd ugly goal, sakho almost gave a goal to ukraine
had the ukrainian striker been a little bit faster, the game would have been over, with 2-1 france would have got to score 2 additional goals to qualify to the world cup

reminds me of thuram in the semi-finals of the 1998 world cup: everybody remember his incredible 2 goals (what makes it even more incredible is that he was very bad at scoring goals, like sakho) but few people remember that he offered a goal to croatia before he scored those goals, putting france in a bad situation in the first place (he was badly placed and kept davor suker onside on croatia's goal)

 

[frederic38]

"Mostly black South Africa beat the all-white world champions." Yes, in a friendly. No African team makes it very far in the World Cup (and none would make it not for regional quotas). By the way, why do you suppose South Africa only starts blacks despite the fact that many South African whites play soccer? Could it be black racism?

yes, this guy has trouble understanding what "friendly match" means, that's not the first time that he makes ridiculous statements about friendly matches
as for the ukraine vs france match, i only saw the first leg, which ukraine dominated and won 2-0, but i couldn't believe how the french players were allowed to play dirty, it's impossible to play when both teams don't play with the same rules
bulgarian legend and former FC barcelona player hristo stoichkov said that the refereeing was unfair to ukraine and that ukraine was robbed by france
in france many people believe that the match was fixed to avoid riots, to give the people something to be proud of, and distract them from all that is going on in france (riots, protests, the president's unpopularity, etc)

 

[ThePhilosopher]

koscielny has been the best french player in the first leg against ukraine
his penalty was a consequence of the blatant foul that abidal made a few minutes before in the penalty area
the referee didn't give a penalty for that foul while it was obviously a penalty
but then he gave a penalty for that foul by koscielny (actually he doesn't touch the ukrainian player, there was not really penalty)
it was a compensation

Great post,Frederic.

Such is the work of the jewish,anti-white media that people like who did not watch the match thought that Koscielny had done something stupid.Thanks for setting the record straight.
What would the soccer sub-forum be without you?

 

[ThePhilosopher]

Let's see what SA can do in the World C.... - oh wait, they did not qualify?

No African team makes it very far in the World Cup (and none would make it not for regional quotas)

The truth about African "football".The World cup would only consist of European,South-American teams if not for said quotas.Its always one of them who wins the world cup anyways.

 

[Parrot]

Mamadou Sakho did an excellent job in replacing the hot-headed white player Koscielny -- who was responsible for France being in such a deep hole in the first place. In the first leg, he gifted Ukraine a penalty goal with a stupid challenge, then physically assaulted a Ukraine player -- for which he got sent off and suspended. How could Koscielny have done a better job than Sakho even if he had not been suspended? I see Sakho getting the starting nod ahead of Koscielny from now on. Koscielny would have only himself to blame.

It's easy to play well against 10 men and all the ref decisions going in your favour.

 

[frederic38]

so this is how the ukrainian player got sent off?

[video=youtube_share;P09cvW3GVpI]http://youtu.be/P09cvW3GVpI[/video]

incredible

 

[Rebajlo]

The "intercontinental playoffs" (Mexico versus New Zealand; Uruguay versus Jordan) spotlighted the glaring inequities of the World Cup qualification process. The entire thing is a travesty which grants nations from minnows-ridden non-European regions multiple bites of the qualification cherry while leaving European nations with minimal margin for error.

Look at the CONCACAF zone. After various titans like Montserrat, Bermuda, Guyana, and Guatemala did battle in the first and second stages, "heavyweights" Mexico were parachuted into the third round. The beaners progressed to the fourth round (groan...) by winning all six of their matches against Costa Rica, El Salvador and Guyana. At this point, everything was running to script. Of course, it goes without saying that each of those weak-as-piss opponents would be nothing more than slapstick whipping boys if they played in Europe...

The final, "elite" (s******...) CONCACAF fourth round comprised six nations. Here's the punch line: only two of those six would actually be eliminated at its conclusion! Now, that's arse-puckering, bollock-shrinking pressure for you.

Mexico heroically finished this ultra-challenging stage in fourth place behind the United States, Costa Rica and Honduras, recording a poxy two wins, five draws, and three losses from their ten matches. Their goal difference was a disgraceful -2 (all of this in a group featuring the "hermetically sealed" defences of Panama, Jamaica, Honduras, Costa Rica, and the United States).

So what was the penalty for winning a mere two matches out of ten and "amassing" a paltry 11 points from a possible 30, combined with that stunning goal difference of -2? Why, what else but entry into a two-legged "intercontinental" playoff against puny New Zealand, "winners" of the weakest zone of them all - that insignificant backwater called Oceania.

New Zealand's path to the preposterous gift of an "intercontinental playoff" was laughably easy. Their so-called "competition" consisted of several godforsaken archipelagos populated by grinning coconut-heads of various turd-like hues plus the cannibal-and-HIV hellhole of Papua New Guinea. Such bone-though-the-nose morons need foreign coaching to tie their bootlaces, let alone comprehend the rules of the game. Here is a measure of the "strength" of the Oceania Football Federation: New Zealand won all six of their third round matches...yet Mexico effortlessly took them apart 9-3 on aggregate in the playoff.

The South American group likewise rewards teams for failure. Uruguay finished fifth out of nine teams, winning seven, drawing four and losing five of their sixteen matches, conceding 25 goals in the process. That "condemned" them to an "intercontinental playoff" against the "fifth best team in Asia", namely Jordan. Doesn't that sound like an imposing challenge? Sedatives and nappies all round...

To attain the highly prestigious label of "fifth best team in Asia" the Jordanians tangled with soccer superpowers such as Nepal, Iraq, China, Singapore and Oman before finishing third behind Japan and Australia in Group B of the Fourth Round. Incidentally, I'm ashamed to say that Jordan beat Australia 2-1 in Amman (although the Socceroos won the return match in Melbourne 4-0), which shows just how pitiful our national team is. Jordan lost four of their eight matches in the said Group B and ended up with a humiliating -9 goal difference - which, of course, was enough to qualify for a playoff against Uzbekistan, who'd claimed third place in Group A. That particular football "showcase" finished 2-2 on aggregate, with Jordan progressing via a penalty shootout. The "climactic" intercontinental playoff was quickly decided in the first leg in Jordan, which Uruguay won 5-0! Talk about free rides. Mind You, Uruguay didn't exactly cover themselves in glory when the return leg in Montevideo finished 0-0...

Meanwhile, over in Europe Denmark were runners up in Group B, losing only twice in ten games - yet this wasn't enough to secure a playoff berth. The Danes' Group B opponents included Italy, the Czech Republic, and Bulgaria - all of whom would put the likes of Jordan, New Zealand, Honduras, and Costa Rica through the mincer. It's safe to say that the European nations which were eliminated in the UEFA playoffs (with the possible exception of Iceland) would definitely despatch the aforementioned four non-European teams with no problem at all.

Then we have the African zone which yields a whopping five automatic places in the World Cup. From a purely sporting perspective (cough), such a scenario is bemusing as African teams are routinely knocked out in the first round of the finals tournaments. In fact, their record is dreadfully embarrassing because in each World Cup from 1986 onwards only one African team has made it past the first round:

1986 - Morocco (second round)

1990 - Cameroon (quarter finals)

1994 - Nigeria (second round)

1998 - Nigeria (second round)

2002 - Senegal (quarter finals)

2006 - Ghana (second round)

2010 - Ghana (quarter finals)

In case anyone is wondering, no African team managed to dig its way out of the first round prior to 1986.

On this evidence, how the hell does the African federation deserve five automatic spots in the finals? Based on their consistently dismal showings, African nations should only have three automatic places in a 32-team format, with two extra berths potentially up for grabs (but practically remaining unattainable) via playoffs against European opposition.

Yet in the lead up to each World Cup we are constantly subjected to excited predictions about the apparent "African challenge", being told in no uncertain terms that "Africa is the future"...

 

[frederic38]

finally, a new rebajlo post :amen:

the best proof of soccer being turned into a circus and no longer being a sport is that asian and african countries are offered more places in the world cup every year while they are arguably getting worse

and to take the example of the 2010 world cup, ghana made it to the quarter finals, but all the other teams were pathetic, while the world cup was played in africa for the first time, and south africa was the first country not to make it out of the group phase while organising the world cup, if i am not mistaken

 

[ThePhilosopher]

Yes,Rebaljo,we are ruled by jews and your post proves it.

Then we have the African zone which yields a whopping five automatic places in the World Cup. From a purely sporting perspective (cough), such a scenario is bemusing as African teams are routinely knocked out in the first round of the finals tournaments.

The Dark continent's contenders downgrade the quality of the tournament by their mere presence.
With them comes cheating,thuggery and hoof-ball.And stench too.

In case anyone is wondering, no African team managed to dig its way out of the first round prior to 1986.

In a saner world,that would have justified their permanent exclusion from a contest meant for humans.Hate beaners much as you want,they're human,at the very least.

Yet in the lead up to each World Cup we are constantly subjected to excited predictions about the apparent "African challenge", being told in no uncertain terms that "Africa is the future"...

Jews and their minions at work.

 

[Matra2]

Michel Platini has also called for a 40 team World Cup.:dork: Why? Because he agrees with $epp Blatter that African and Asian teams need to be better represented. Platini says there should be two more for Africa, Asia, and America (he didn't specify North or South but probably one from each) and one extra from Europe. That only adds up to 39 so I don't know where the last would come from. Oceania? There are already too many teams but greed, and perhaps political correctness, dictates bigger and bigger tournaments.

 

[ThePhilosopher]

How Jews work against whites.

That only adds up to 39 so I don't know where the last would come from.

The other spot will probably go to Africa too.

This is how the international jew works in removing whites from any,all aspects of our lives.Be it politics,sports,music or anything else.It begins with screaming for the rights of minorities,shoving them up our collective nose till they form a significant proportion of workers in the lower rungs of said field.

Then,such are the "qualities" of said minorities that the standards of said field fall so sharp that it will be acceptable for the "minority" to take over from the now "dispossessed majority".And takeover they will to come to dominate the field.

Take the example of libraries,they used to be visited almost exclusively by whites in some black-majority colleges too.Knowledge was actually pursued in libraries.
But the jew couldn't stand for it,hell no!An all white avenue?Right in the middle of their multicultural Synagogues?
"OY VEY!" they yelled collectively to bring about the significant change in the traditional library structure by forcing them to incorporate computers alongside books.

The end result is this:

A 20-year-old Racine man who's accused of engaging in lewd behavior in a library has been banned from "all the libraries on the face of the earth." Tyree S. Carter is charged with misdemeanor counts of lewd behavior and disorderly conduct. He's due in court next month for a pre-trial conference.


A Journal Times of Racine report says Carter is accused of openly masturbating in the Racine Public Library last week. A witness told investigators Carter was out in the open, not trying to conceal his act.
The criminal complaint says he apologized to responding police officers.

Original article.


And this:

Original article.


Further commentary by Alex Linder:

The basic problem here is court decisions applauded by illiberal cultists have made it difficult to impossible for 'public' instituations to enforce traditional behavioral standards. You know, minimal things like not masturbating, not stinking the place out, not using the chairs as your hotel, not showering in the library bathroom sink.

Forcing libraries to accept bums like regular patrons is part of the jewish plan to create general looseness. See? You can't do what you want. You must do what we want - everywhere. This is very deliberate humiliation inflicted on whites by hate-filled jews, to be redundant. Driven by the same mentality that pushes forced mongrelization. Whatever is clean - make it dirty. Whatever is wholesome - pervert it. Whatever is nutritious - process it into junk.

And people think I'm crazy for advocating extermination. Why do we owe this people anything? They **** up our libraries, our government, our media, our families. They deny us opportunities. They deny us the chance to enjoy institutions we created. They deny us freedom our founders died to obtain. They mock us endlessly. Who needs them? Why shouldn't we just kill them off and live happily ever after. Because the jebus cult says it's immoral? Why does anyone care what christians think? They are numerous, true, but they are cowards. Christianity is what allowed the jews to take over the west because it refused to acknowledge they are a hostile group and treat them the only way that works if you to want to stop them - and that is simply to kill them off.

Here.

 

[Europe]

"they yelled collectively to bring about the significant change in the traditional library structure by forcing them to incorporate computers alongside books.'

DVD's and CD's also bring in the riffraff. They should have a separate building or at least keep the areas totally separate with different entrances so the people who want to browse the books don't have to be exposed to this.

There aren't too many blacks in my area, but they do pop up in the computer section at the library.

 

[Europe]

Michel Platini has also called for a 40 team World Cup.:dork: Why? Because he agrees with $epp Blatter that African and Asian teams need to be better represented. Platini says there should be two more for Africa, Asia, and America (he didn't specify North or South but probably one from each) and one extra from Europe. That only adds up to 39 so I don't know where the last would come from. Oceania? There are already too many teams but greed, and perhaps political correctness, dictates bigger and bigger tournaments.

I wouldn't mind adding teams if they added at least 6 Euro teams out of the 8.
6 out of the 10 South American teams are already in it this year. 60% is way too high. They have 10 teams playoff for 6 spots.

There were too few teams in the past. In '74 16 teams made the final which included Zaire and Haiti, but not England, Soviet Union or Spain. England was the 3rd best team of the 70's according to the ELO rankings, Soviet Union 7th and Spain 10th.

 

[Rebajlo]

finally, a new rebajlo post :amen:

Yes, I hadn't posted for just over two months. During that time I was sick for a while, my uncle passed away and I was quite occupied with several other pressing matters. But in all honesty, the primary reason I've been "absent" for so long has been my almost terminal disillusionment with football - which, as You may perhaps recall, I noted in my final contribution prior to embarking upon a "posting vacation"...

Speaking of almost terminal disillusionment, the 2014 World Cup finals shall feature the smallest proportion of Whites ever. Firstly, look at the "European" teams which have qualified. England, France, Portugal, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Croatia, and Greece shall all -to varying degrees - have a Negro or other non-White presence on the field or bench. Due to the Muslim factor, I don't even count Bosnia and Herzegovina as a White team and Switzerland's Albanian / Muslim contingent makes them just as bad. Spain may or may not have the likes of Thiago Alcantara, Jesus Navas or David Silva in their squad while the Russians invariably field an "Asiatic" type or two like Alan Dzagoev (Ossetian) or Aleksandr Samedov (Azerbaijani).

The United States' squad is guaranteed to be packed with blacks while Australia also "boasts" a non-White component. The half-Samoan Tim Cahill remains the Socceroos' main striker, Rhys Williams (Middlesbrough) is half-Indian and I wouldn't be surprised if the 35-year old New Zealand-New Guinea hybrid Archie Thompson (Melbourne Victory) makes the final cut. Yet another non-White in the mix is the quarter-Japanese Jason Davidson (Heracles Almelo), who has started the last two friendlies (he also came on straight after half-time in that humiliating 6-0 pasting at the hands of "France").

I wouldn't mind adding teams if they added at least 6 Euro teams out of the 8.

Europe -

I don't believe that the number of finalists should be expanded beyond 32. A 40 team World Cup would mean eight groups of five teams, which obviously translates to far too many first round matches. The qualification process simply requires a few tweaks which would make everything a lot better. How about the following "solutions"?

(A) Asia and Oceania should form a single qualification zone (3 automatic spots plus 2 intercontinental playoff berths). The Oceania section would be played as a preliminary tournament with the winner (i.e. New Zealand) dropped into the Third Round of the Asian qualifiers. This Third Round would comprise two-legged knockout matches like the current first and second stages and would therefore leave ten teams to contest a Fourth Round. This fourth phase would involve a single group format identical to that of the South American zone. The top three would automatically qualify for the finals while the fourth and fifth placed teams would enter "intercontinental playoffs" against European teams.

(B) The, er, "powerhouse" African zone could likewise have 3 automatic spots plus 2 intercontinental playoff berths. If the First, Second, and Third Rounds consisted of two-legged knockout matches ten nations would remain in contention in a fourth phase. Again, the Fourth Round would involve a single group format identical to that of the South American zone. The top three would automatically qualify for the finals while the fourth and fifth placed teams would enter "intercontinental playoffs" against European teams.

(C) The CONMEBOL (5 automatic spots plus 1 intercontinental playoff berth) and CONCACAF (3 automatic spots plus 1 intercontinental playoff berth) qualification tournaments would be unchanged, with one exception, namely - the sixth placed South American nation would always play off against the fourth best CONCACAF nation for a place in the World Cup. Unfortunately, such a setup would still reward South American teams for failure, as five or six out of the ten CONMEBOL nations would be guaranteed qualification...

(D) Europe would have 12 automatic spots plus 4 intercontinental playoff berths. This equates to three more places at the finals than the current thirteen.

Having eight groups of equal size is the key to a staightforward and fair (or at least fairer...) European qualification process. That way, the group winners would qualify automatically and all eight runners up would enter a two-legged playoff. The four winners would seal qualification with the four losers participating in intercontinental playoffs against teams from Asia and Africa.

Unfortunately, simple numbers pose a problem as UEFA has way too many members, which include hopelessly uncompetitive microstates such as Andorra and San Marino. A staggering 53 teams took part in the 2014 qualifiers - and in their boundless wisdom UEFA have recently granted full membership to Gibraltar, thus raising the total pool of competitors to 54.

Let me take the opportunity to once again state that Israel should not be permitted to play in Europe. Unfortunately, barring any "radical" political developments, we all know the Yids will never leave voluntarily...

Now, here are a few wishful thoughts...

I believe that Kazakhstan should rejoin the Asian Football Confederation, which they left in 2002. For that matter, I am of the opinion that Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Georgia should also compete in Asia. Such a geographically-based realignment would reduce the number of UEFA members to 50. Naturally, I'd also like to see Turkey switch to the AFC, but such an action is impossible to justify on the grounds of geography as four Turkish provinces lie either fully or partially on the European side of the Bosphorus. Of course, if I had my way, Turkey would be booted out of both UEFA and those four "European" provinces...

If the above steps were implemented, the four bottom-ranked UEFA nations could play a preliminary tournament to reduce the number of first round entrants to the 48 which would facilitate an "even" eight groups of six teams. Such a preliminary round could take the form of a mini league, with the top two progressing to the actual First Round. I'm sure that as a brief alternative to the usual one-sided hidings they are forced to endure, these tiny nations' fans would really enjoy the chance to see their teams play six competitive matches against "beatable" opposition...

 

[Matra2]

I am of the opinion that Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Georgia should also compete in Asia.

The Azeri capital of Baku is east of Riyadh. Maybe jet lag contributed to Northern Ireland not qualifying.:icon_wink:

 

[ThePhilosopher]

ITS MADDENING!!!!!!

http://www.football365.com/news/215...-hails-England-trio-Sterling-Zaha-and-Johnson

"Sterling's now back in the Liverpool team and his form seems to be going up and up and up.

"If you can do it at the top of the table with Liverpool, then you can do it in an England shirt as well.
"Zaha is back in the frame again because he's playing football at Cardiff.

"Adam Johnson is another. These guys have got it all to play for but, at the end of the day, I'll have to make a choice. I can't take all of them."
England's next match is a friendly against Denmark in early March, with Hodgson naming his squad on February 27.

This is absolutely absurd!

To be fair to Sterling,he has atleast been playing regularly in a team which still has an outside shot at the title...so irrespective of his contribution(which is fairly little,I can assure you),talk of 'Sterling 4 Englunder' isn't THAT stupid.

Now,to Zaha.
This black has started zero matches for Manchester United in the PL this year.Only one start in the Capital one cup,and that's that.

Now after joining Cardiff on loan,he comes on a sub and provides an assist.
I doubt he has even 90 minutes in the PL in his whole career.
And now its 'ZAHA FOR ENGLAND!'

What has he done?
Even his first cap for England was a joke.Rarely do 19 year old Championship players with 8 goals get to play for England.

But ofcourse,Zaha has superior African DNA and thus being selected despite achieving fuc* all is his prerogative,handed down by the jew.

And finally to Adam Johnson,who is almost an after-thought in that article.
But he's the one who deserves the most praise of the three.

Player of the month for January:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...England-player-perfectly-timed-World-Cup.html

If it was intended as a wake-up for the 26-year-old it seems to have done the trick. In January, he has now scored six goals, and his total of eight make him Sunderland’s top scorer.His resurgence helped Sunderland out of the bottom three for the first time since August this week. And if they are going to stay there, it will be with Johnson leading the way, not without him.

The catalyst appears to have been the realisation that a place on the flight to Brazil could still be within his grasp if he could hit the heights of his form at Manchester City three years ago.
With Theo Walcott ruled out, his Arsenal team-mate Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain making slow progress from his own injury, and Aaron Lennon and Ashley Young struggling for form, Johnson worked out that his name could still make it on the FA’s itinerary. He has certainly not hidden his desire to make the finals.

 

[Europe]

http://www.football365.com/news/215...-hails-England-trio-Sterling-Zaha-and-Johnson




This is absolutely absurd!

To be fair to Sterling,he has atleast been playing regularly in a team which still has an outside shot at the title...so irrespective of his contribution(which is fairly little,I can assure you),talk of 'Sterling 4 Englunder' isn't THAT stupid.

Now,to Zaha.
This black has started zero matches for Manchester United in the PL this year.Only one start in the Capital one cup,and that's that.

Now after joining Cardiff on loan,he comes on a sub and provides an assist.
I doubt he has even 90 minutes in the PL in his whole career.
And now its 'ZAHA FOR ENGLAND!'

What has he done?
Even his first cap for England was a joke.Rarely do 19 year old Championship players with 8 goals get to play for England.

But ofcourse,Zaha has superior African DNA and thus being selected despite achieving fuc* all is his prerogative,handed down by the jew.

And finally to Adam Johnson,who is almost an after-thought in that article.
But he's the one who deserves the most praise of the three.

Player of the month for January:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...England-player-perfectly-timed-World-Cup.html

I was thinking of an all white England team.


Flanagan Cahill Terry Baines

Gerrard Carrick

Lallana Wilshere Johnson

Rooney

That's a good team.

Maybe Britten for Carrick.

There's also Henderson.

 

[ThePhilosopher]

I was thinking of an all white England team.


Flanagan Cahill Terry Baines

Gerrard Carrick

Lallana Wilshere Johnson

Rooney

That's a good team.

Maybe Britten for Carrick.

There's also Henderson.

Excellent post.

Regarding the team,I'd drop Carrick to the bench,put Wilshere alongside Gerrard and play Lallana in 'the hole'.

The right winger would be Milner who,despite everyone's claims,is very good.