How does ANY of what you just said have anything to do with the Whitest team in the NFL not using their talent to the fullest?
Someone mentioned in the basketball thread about a point system rating teams based on talented players and what level, like giving more points to a team with a few less but of higher caliber etc. I would like to do the same in college football if I have the time, probably next year. Yes its great to have a record of what teams are playing White guys, especially for recruiting purposes which is the stated purpose, but with the caste matchup threads, we consider some losses bad because they have more White guys when the coaches suck, not every White friendly team recruits the best Whites and many have crappy schemes. I mean its ridiculous that teams like Navy and Air Force can be White friendly and remain pretty competitive with ranked teams but Colorado St can play double digit Whites, even a year when they had 17 Whites and can't win that much? Thats coaching for the most part. Scotty McKnight could have put up better numbers with his size and measurables, the White cornerback they had was good, the only person that made him look stupid multiple times was Austin Collie.
I mean i think it hurts the cause if a majority White team in the NFL doesn't use their talent to its fullest, in order for more dwfs to wake up they would not only have to win the Superbowl, but also blow out the competition every week, which they are more than capable of doing. I mean I know that is ridiculous but it is going to take a lot, plus teams are losing respect for the Patriots for not winning the big one lately, even though they have 3 this decade and teams like the Cowboys get respect when they failed to win a playoff game for a while.
The Patriots shouldn't be having a close game with the Bills. Woodhead could run wild on that team, the evidence was there with his one run, which happened to finally be out of a regular running formation, not shotgun up the gut to keep offenses honest.
In 2010 even though Welker wasn't 100 percent and Gronk hadn't reached his peak, the scheme was pretty good, they would run Woodhead out of run formations and pass with him there and run with Lawfirm in passing formations and pass in running formations, now this wasn't always the case but it kept defenses on their toes. Now it seems most runs with Woodhead are in passing formations, and most of the time in running formations its Ridley running, although they are still a threat to pass out of the running formations. I mean not every play that Ridley gets 3 on Woodhead would get more (although there are many that I have seen, especially the 20 yarders, those would be 40 yarders), if they ran Ridley on some draws up the gut after passing with him in shotgun, defenses might not expect it and when Woodhead is in regular formations, run him, because they are probably expecting pass. Its not that hard, just count how many defenders are in the box. So both would benefit in this situation.
With Lloyd, I don't know if Brady is used to a guy like that, he isn't tall but he can go up and get jump balls that are hard to catch, Brady is a precision passer, he is going to put it on the money, or at least try to, if Lloyd isn't getting separation then he isn't going to get many catches. From what I saw in the past, his success came on balls thrown high etc. With Randy Moss this wasn't a problem because he was 6'4, Brady knew he could get it, there isn't that trust factor with Lloyd, and honestly I am not even sure if he can do it anymore, at least consistently, he came on in his late 30's. They run this stuff in practice and obviously its not working with the two like planned, but he is doing better than ochocinco, who looked confused out there. Branch doesn't have much left, he struggled at times to beat crappy corners in single coverage when teams were focusing their best people to Gronk and Welker..
