Rebajlo
Mentor
foobar75 said:I still remember last year when Monfils was playing Nadal in the US Open (4th round, I think), and was handily destroyed by the Spaniard. A fan poll question went up the screen, asking "Who would make a better football player?" The results were shown some time later, and in true DWF form, 70% voted for Monfils. To his credit (and to my surprise), John McEnroe said Nadal had the size and build of a safety and tailback, and would make a good football player himself.
The main issue of course is how thoroughly brainwashed white people are in this country, that without hesitation, they picked the black guy for no other reason than because he's black, even though Nadal was handily beating him at the time, and he has shown for years, as an 8-time GS winner, what a world-class athlete he is. But I guess the only thing these mindless drones have been conditioned to look for is skin color.
Putting the sinisteraspects aside, indoctrination is a funnything, isn't it? Today's BBC headline reads "Djokovic beats below-par Monfils to reach US Open semis". The obvious implication is that had the black played to his potential, the result may or, depending on the reader's level of brainwashing, would have been reversed. Interestingly enough, the article reveals that Djokovic holds a 5-0 record against the supposedly "ultra-athletic" Monfils.
The "mindless drones" You referred to have definitely been conditioned to judge sporting ability solely via skin colour - what they are actually seeing with their booze-reddened eyes appears to have no bearing upon their judgement whatsoever.
A black boxer/MMA fightermay be sprawled unconscious in a widening pool of his own blood, his knocked out teeth bobbing about in the claret like croutons, yet the commentators andmedia shall persist intelling all and sundry that the said unconscious black displayed far more "athleticism" than the White geeezer who lamped him out. After all, if onlythe black hadn't lost, he would have won...