Search results

Rocks aren't alive and don't pass on DNA, so no.

Please do. Now what kind of "experts" are they, Sitchin and the guy from ancient aliens quality experts or the bona fide experts? Here's an example, Zahi Hawass is a veritable expert on Egyptology, a guy that looked at pictures and read news stories and then made a website or youtube video about...

Honestly it looks like she ate Walt. She must have felt a little queasy after and still resents him for it.

It's just PBS, man. Basically just proving that the Bible doesn't have archaeological proof like you claimed. Any find that corroborates with a Bible claim is nebulous at best, and most of the findings prove that the Bible is just BS if you want to take it literally.

As soon as the scores were read as a split decision I knew that that Ortiz kid lost because he looks full white.

Likewise, you need to stop reading the Christian websites that make up their own facts as well because none of that is true. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ancient/archeology-hebrew-bible.html

How is it ridiculous? There is no proof outside of the Bible that Moses existed, no where in Egyptian records or otherwise. And the Bible is about as accurate and truthful as the Iliad, so not very.

Did he? I'm not an adherent to ancient Greek mythology, so I'm not sure why you're asking me about Homer. As far as that goes though, there is speculation and debate on whether Homer ever existed and whether or not there were multiple authors for his epics. Yes, he was writing about...

The compilation of all the Biblical writings into one tome happened a few centuries before the putative birth of Christ, I don't agree that they are harmonious they are contradictory and open to wildly different interpretation, Moses is a mythological figure, and the ten commandments that he...

Oh, wow. That's a new one. How do you twist agnosticism into being a religion?

That is Old Testament, and just "do as I say not as I do" laws. The USA has laws, but the federal government isn't exactly on the up and up themselves, are they? By the way the Old Testament was compiled only a few hundred years before Christ. Maybe you should research the history of it...

That is weird listing Austin Collie a player over 6 feet tall as a "smurf," it's almost like he doesn't know what he's talking about and is just regurgitating common invective that has been hurled at the Patriots receiving corps + rb/wr the last few years when they had Wes Welker and Danny...

Jesus wasn't necessarily a liar, the people that constructed the religion about him are liars.

Who are the white starters for the Seahawks, all offensive line + a tight end? I can't see the difference between that and Peyton Manning, Wes Welker and Eric Decker. I suppose you're right, I guess I'd root for the Broncos in that case.

A more apt comparison would be Dirk Nowitzki and the Mavs vs the repugnant LeBron James and the Miami Heat. You didn't have a rooting interest in that match up?

The fact that the Broncos start two white receivers, and feature the greatest field general in NFL history against a black quarterback counts for nothing. Pete and Repeat were in a boat, Pete fell off, who's left?

Patriots are the better overall AFC representative but I'm pulling for Manning. Even if the Patriots run all over the Broncos and the Broncos defense gives up 60 points they'll say Manning choked again if he doesn't get this Super Bowl.

Because it's more multivariate than just points or yards allowed, you have to factor in things like strength of schedule. You can name the people that think Manning ever had a great defense as a Colt on one hand and they're all in the looney bin. The Patriots defense from 2000 up until about...

Give Manning the super bowl winning Patriots defenses and he wins them too, so pointing out that Brady has the rings so should be rated higher is a fallacious argument. Brady has led his team to zero super bowl wins since becoming an elite QB.

When he faced 3 elite defenses; Bears, Ravens and Patriots. Colts D was mediocre but faced bad offenses except for the Patriots when they gave up 34 points.

Since the offense became the focal point of the Patriots team Brady has about as much playoff success as Manning. He has 3 rings from when the Pats D was top 3, and they only won by 3 points in each of them, and got fortunate with officiating to get there in the first one.

His 2007 defense was elite, one of the top 3 in the league. Only the defense in his last super bowl appearance sucked, and they lost. He has no super bowl wins without an elite defense.

Do you need to look at misleading statistics to form an opinion?

Brady's defense for his 3 super bowl victories and 2007 super bowl appearance were elite. Manning NEVER had an elite defense.