Biased Scouting Reports of White Players

Extra Point

Extra Point

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 21, 2012
Messages
6,289
The purpose of this thread is to discuss scouting reports of white players, paying special attention to the anti-white racism and negative stereotypes that are often found in these scouting reports.
 
Last edited:
If you look on ESPN.com right now and look at the Doug McDermott scouting report you'll notice the word "but". This is actually much more import than it seems. Not only is he the only one with that word in his sentence, it is also a very effective word to use.
When I was in high school, are debate coach used to make us begin are counter arguments with a sentence that contains the word "but". E.g. "Teaching civics is school is an important tool to teach kids about government, but." Then you would make you counter arguments. This is an important tactics because it acknowledges the importance of something, and yet when you use the word "but" it nullifies everything that is said before the word but.
When I looked at Doug McDermotts scout report it began " great college player, but". Essentially they are trying to nullify his accomplishments.
 
Hawkeye2 said:
If you look on ESPN.com right now and look at the Doug McDermott scouting report you'll notice the word "but". This is actually much more import than it seems. Not only is he the only one with that word in his sentence, it is also a very effective word to use.
When I was in high school, are debate coach used to make us begin are counter arguments with a sentence that contains the word "but". E.g. "Teaching civics is school is an important tool to teach kids about government, but." Then you would make you counter arguments. This is an important tactics because it acknowledges the importance of something, and yet when you use the word "but" it nullifies everything that is said before the word but.
When I looked at Doug McDermotts scout report it began " great college player, but". Essentially they are trying to nullify his accomplishments.
Click to expand...

Excellent insight! We should keep an eye out for this tactic being used.

We should also use the tactic ourselves when appropriate.
 
According to many scouting reports white players don't play as fast as they time.

The anti-whites promote the stereotype that all white players are slow. When a white player runs a fast 40 time they have to explain why they are still slow. So they say they don't play as fast as they time.

Another thing you see in scouting reports is that when whites do well athletically it's "surprising." Scouts are constantly "surprised" by the athleticism of white players.

The reason they're "surprised" is that they operate with the stereotype that all white players are unathletic. So when a white player proves to be athletic, it conflicts with what the racist stereotype they believe and they are "surprised."
 
Last edited:
The anti-white racists like to use words in ways so they diminish the white player.

For example, instead of saying a white player is fast they say he is "sneaky fast." The word sneaky used in conjunction with the word fast is nonsensical. Adding the word sneaky has only one purpose, to diminish the white player. Terms such as "sneaky fast" are used only for white players, never non-whites.

Being sneaky is seen as a negative thing. Being fast is a good thing. The racists combine a negative word with a positive word to make something positive seem negative.

So if a white player is fast and the racists can't deny it, they still make their description of the white player sound negative. He's "sneaky."

The leftists have a policy of never saying anything good about white men and always saying bad things about them. Instead of saying something positive about a white man they always try to twist it into something negative. The use of the word sneaky in conjunction with a positive attribute is an example of this.

I've also seen whites described as having "sneaky athleticism" instead of having good athleticism. This is another example of the same thing.
 
The anti-whites are always coming up with new ways to put down white players.

In this NFL.com scouting report Stanford defensive lineman Henry Anderson is described as having "boring feet." This is meaningless and is only put in the report to put down Anderson.

The cultural Marxists have long advanced the idea that white people are boring as a means of demeaning them. It's a well thought out political tactic.

Here we see an example of that idea being advanced in a football scouting report.
Henry Anderson Draft Profile – NFL.com
 
Boring feet - ha what a joke. Just another idiotic caste term. Anderson is actually one of the best 3-4 des in this draft. He tested out really well athletically at the combine as well with his boring feet.
 
Hawkeye2 said:
Here is a deadspin article that states what we were saying.
http://deadspin.com/which-words-are-used-to-describe-white-and-black-nfl-pr-1573683214
Click to expand...

I typed in "overachiever" into their search function and it's a word almost exclusively used for whites.

The implication inherent in the word is that whites succeeding can only be due to "overachieving" since it couldn't be because they're athletic because the party line is that no whites are athletic.

By "overachieving" whites are magically playing beyond their ability to play, which, of course, makes no sense.
 
Extra Point said:
I typed in "overachiever" into their search function and it's a word almost exclusively used for whites.

The implication inherent in the word is that whites succeeding can only be due to "overachieving" since it couldn't be because they're athletic because the party line is that no whites are athletic.

By "overachieving" whites are magically playing beyond their ability to play, which, of course, makes no sense.
Click to expand...
Similarly, "explosive" is almost an exclusive black term.
 
Lurkers take note. Draft reports are written differently for blacks than whites. The language used for blacks is usually more positive and makes excuses for their weaknesses.

There's a site called Draftwire. Compare their scouting reports for Carson Wentz and Cardale Jones. See how the language used is different for some of the same things.

You can also see how many white men basically act as cheerleaders for blacks but not whites. It's an internalized part of their mental makeup, caused by brainwashing. You see this cheerleading all the time.
 
Most of these "scouts" have to be all reading from the same script. That script over looked Tom Brady, Julian Edelman and Chris Hogan.
 
The mainstream media is always coming up with new ways to denigrate white players. When they're called on one thing they go to another.

This year they're saying about fast whites that they play "at one speed." It's the latest put-down and you'll see it in a number of scouting reports for white players.

Apparently white people are incapable of running at anything but one speed.
 
The mainstream media often misreports the drill and test results for white players. This misreporting almost always make the white player look worse.

Here's an example. a site covering the Iowa Hawkeyes reports that linebacker Ben Niemann ran a 4.60 40, had a 4.25 20 yard shuttle and had a 6.84 3 cone at his pro day.

Yet on Draft Scout, a site which reports measurables, Niemann is listed as running a 4.75 40, a 4.43 20 yard shuttle and a 7.01 3 cone at his pro day.

Why the discrepancy? The mainstream media often fudges or outright lies about the measurables of white players. They do this because they have an agenda to promote black athletic superiority and white inferiority. Whites being athletic doesn't fit the narrative they're promoting. They promote this agenda because they're racists.

https://iowa.rivals.com/news/iowa-pro-day-results-2?guccounter=1

http://draftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=1006307&draft
 
Extra Point said:
The mainstream media often misreports the drill and test results for white players. This misreporting almost always make the white player look worse.

Here's an example. a site covering the Iowa Hawkeyes reports that linebacker Ben Niemann ran a 4.60 40, had a 4.25 20 yard shuttle and had a 6.84 3 cone at his pro day.

Yet on Draft Scout, a site which reports measurables, Niemann is listed as running a 4.75 40, a 4.43 20 yard shuttle and a 7.01 3 cone at his pro day.

Why the discrepancy? The mainstream media often fudges or outright lies about the measurables of white players. They do this because they have an agenda to promote black athletic superiority and white inferiority. Whites being athletic doesn't fit the narrative they're promoting. They promote this agenda because they're racists.

https://iowa.rivals.com/news/iowa-pro-day-results-2?guccounter=1

http://draftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=1006307&draft
Click to expand...

The talking heads, scouts, reporters, etc are puppets. They lie as easily as you and I breathe. It's past time for a total overthrow of all involved from the top to the bottom. Treason is what they are guilty of. They should be so charged, a way found to find them guilty, convicted, and where fitting executed. Start at the top and work down to the underlings. And yes, I know that's harsh...
 
I actually heard a talking head say that TJ McConnell doesn't have thenatleticism or speed but he plays extremely hard!!! Funny, my eyes see.the quickest guy on the court every time he is on the court! My kids watch the games and talk about how fast he is....but the same old script comes out of the talking heads...."not necessarily the fastest or athletic...blah blah blah."
 
Good thread!!
 
Matt Miller of Bleacher Report is one of the analysts that shows bias toward white players. When Luke Kuechly came out, one of the greatest linebackers of all time, Miller said he was a 3rd rounder "on a good day." Not surprisingly he portrayed this elite athlete as unathletic. Miller scouts by race in many of his reports.

Ball State's Danny Pinter is an offensive lineman who was taken at the top of the 5th round by the Colts in this year's draft (2020). Colt's GM Chris Ballard said they were trying to trade up to take Pinter when he fell to them. Obviously Ballard and the Colts' scouts had a high opinion of Pinter.

Miller, on the other hand, doesn't. In his 4-25-20 scouting report of Pinter he says that Pinter "could stick around on a practice squad" and "might be two or three years away from carving out a role as a swing interior player." A ridiculous analysis, exaggerated in a bad way.

So who's right? A GM and scouting staff who put together one of the best offensive lines in the NFL? Or an internet scout with a history of bias against white players?


https://bleacherreport.com/articles...0-scouting-report-for-indianapolis-colts-pick
 
Extra Point said:
Matt Miller of Bleacher Report is one of the analysts that shows bias toward white players. When Luke Kuechly came out, one of the greatest linebackers of all time, Miller said he was a 3rd rounder "on a good day." Not surprisingly he portrayed this elite athlete as unathletic. Miller scouts by race in many of his reports.

Ball State's Danny Pinter is an offensive lineman who was taken at the top of the 5th round by the Colts in this year's draft (2020). Colt's GM Chris Ballard said they were trying to trade up to take Pinter when he fell to them. Obviously Ballard and the Colts' scouts had a high opinion of Pinter.

Miller, on the other hand, doesn't. In his 4-25-20 scouting report of Pinter he says that Pinter "could stick around on a practice squad" and "might be two or three years away from carving out a role as a swing interior player." A ridiculous analysis, exaggerated in a bad way.

So who's right? A GM and scouting staff who put together one of the best offensive lines in the NFL? Or an internet scout with a history of bias against white players?


https://bleacherreport.com/articles...0-scouting-report-for-indianapolis-colts-pick
Click to expand...
Good example for the thread.
 
I've been looking at the scouting reports for S Brady Breeze who was drafted late in the 6th round of the 2021 NFL draft. The consensus seems to be that he's too slow to cover anybody in the NFL. Yet he seems to have covered people in college.

One report says he has good range but is too slow to cover anybody. This is contradictory. If you have good range it means you have good on the field speed.

Some white players are slow. Some have average speed. Some have good speed. Yet the anti-white mainstream media says all of them are slow. You can't trust anything they say on the subject. So even if a white player is slow and they say so you can't believe what they say because they lie so much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
American Freedom News
Back
Top