One thing I notice is that a lot of wiggers and other haters are calling Wladimir a bum because he lost his belts.
Um... Wait a minute. Isn't he forty years old? Still a young guy, but not for a boxer! The fact that he has been competing at a such high level despite being at an advanced age in a sport that usually states a man's prime is 27-33 or so is quite remarkable. He's forty fighting a guy who is 27.
Wait another minute! These are the same wigger Mike Tyson fanboys who always say Rocky Marciano's win over Joe Walcott shouldn't count because Walcott was 38 and Rocky was 29...
The same fanboys that say Marciano decking Joe Louis shouldn't count because Louis was about 38 and Marcian was 28... Louis at the time certainly wasn't the same Louis of 1937 but he was still a highly capable, champion calibre fighter and was favored to regain the heavyweight belt. Certainly more favored than Marciano. What's more, he outweighed Marciano by 30 pounds and was also the betting favorite. But none of that matters to the haters. All that matters is the age difference. The fact that Marciano kicked the sh*t out of him is always excused because "Louis was an old man."
Yeah. Okay.
So where are the excuses for Wladimir, then?
I notice he makes none for himself.
That's a man.
He makes no excuses because there are none. He's been the best for a long time, ad Fury took the belt from the best.
It's up to Klitschko to see if he can win it all one more time.
That's the game, and he's playing it. Joe Louis played it, so did Joe Walcott.
Bottom line is that wiggers and others can't stand the fact that Wladimir (and his brother) have been so dominant the last decade. Wladimir is about as exciting to watch as Lennox Lewis. In that he is not spectacular but he gets the job done and he wins.
If Wladimir Klitschko were Black he'd be way more accepted and praised by racist Americans.