Charles Martel
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2007
- Messages
- 8,484
Yes. I want Klitschko. I think Fury just caught him at the end of his career. Hopefully Wlad can whip himself in shape one more time and come in with a game plan. It will be good for his legacy to go out a winner. I don't know how faded he is, but I am encouraged that during his career, he did much better in second fight situations.
One thing I notice is that a lot of wiggers and other haters are calling Wladimir a bum because he lost his belts.
Um... Wait a minute. Isn't he forty years old? Still a young guy, but not for a boxer! The fact that he has been competing at a such high level despite being at an advanced age in a sport that usually states a man's prime is 27-33 or so is quite remarkable. He's forty fighting a guy who is 27.
Wait another minute! These are the same wigger Mike Tyson fanboys who always say Rocky Marciano's win over Joe Walcott shouldn't count because Walcott was 38 and Rocky was 29...
The same fanboys that say Marciano decking Joe Louis shouldn't count because Louis was about 38 and Marcian was 28... Louis at the time certainly wasn't the same Louis of 1937 but he was still a highly capable, champion calibre fighter and was favored to regain the heavyweight belt. Certainly more favored than Marciano. What's more, he outweighed Marciano by 30 pounds and was also the betting favorite. But none of that matters to the haters. All that matters is the age difference. The fact that Marciano kicked the sh*t out of him is always excused because "Louis was an old man."
Yeah. Okay.
So where are the excuses for Wladimir, then?
I notice he makes none for himself.
That's a man.
He makes no excuses because there are none. He's been the best for a long time, ad Fury took the belt from the best.
It's up to Klitschko to see if he can win it all one more time.
That's the game, and he's playing it. Joe Louis played it, so did Joe Walcott.
Bottom line is that wiggers and others can't stand the fact that Wladimir (and his brother) have been so dominant the last decade. Wladimir is about as exciting to watch as Lennox Lewis. In that he is not spectacular but he gets the job done and he wins.
If Wladimir Klitschko were Black he'd be way more accepted and praised by racist Americans.
Strange interview which was slightly cringe worthy. Stoic-looking, quiet, boring Wlad making excuses that he didn't "let his hands fly" in the first fight, and un-filtered, interrogating, amateur- psychiatrist Tyson pretending he couldn't care less about his belts and basically coming off as a bit nutty. Tysons (first language being English) was more relaxed in expressing his gregarious pubster personality , while Dr. Stiff was his usual robotic self. It came off as awkward and slightly contrived in a "Charlie Rose" type of dark-shadows studio setting.
Fury talks exactly like a Alt.-Right brother, and does it in the public arena where he's paid a price. I respect that.I know some of you like Wladimir here but the interview is, to me, just another example of why I could care a toss if he quits and moves on. Liked Wlad years ago, but knowing more and more about who and what him and his brother are in Ukraine, I won't be missing them at all. Fury's quick witted and fast talking but he's a slick boxer and good family man. The more I know and see of Fury the more I like him; here's to Fury and another UD12.
I think you may be right.I think there is simply too many sporting events going on this summer for this fight to most profitable so they pushed it into late autumn. I doubt Fury has injured his ankle.
I agree.I am sorry but this guy Fury is truly a clown. I know he's white, but I can't stand up for him. He constantly embarrasses himself!
I agree.
Now he's refusing VADA testing, what does that tell us about him?