guest301 said:
JD,Whatever you think the agenda of our goverment is and whoever you think is pulling the strings is beside the point. Iran with nuclear weapons is a scary thought and they will most certainly use them on America, Israel and the West. So if Bush takes them out with a surgical strike before he leaves office, so be it. If he doesn't, the Israeli's will. I certainly don't want to see troops on the ground in Iran but if we can do it without any type of invasion(except for special forces) then I would be for it. I admit it's a scary scenario and oil prices would go up dramatically but it may have to be done.The UN, Russia and China are only making things worse with their enabling and excuse making for Iran. It's just my opinion and I know it's not shared by all here.
How ridiculous. Our own CIA says that Iran is not and has not had nuclear weapons program and even if they started one today it would take over a decade to develop. I personally think they should. It's the duty of their government to protect their people. Israel will attack them whether they have one or not as you can quite plainly see right now - Iran has none and Israel is on the verge of attacking them.
It's funny how "scary" questioning the holocaust is to some people. While Iran threatens the establishments view of history, Israel is making real threats to use nuclear weapons. Israel doesn't belong to any IAEA or any other non-proliferation agreement or overseeing authority as every other nuclear country in the world does including Iran. Israel, not Iran already has nukes pointed on every major city in Europe and who knows where else. How scary is that? We could give Iran a nuke, only it would be useless as they have no way of delivering it anyway. How "scary" is that? I think your confused.