Maple Leaf said:Jaxvid, your point about keeping the league to 30% because it is a controllable number rings true. It has now become the norm and not challenged very much. But I dispute the original reason for that 30%. I think the NFL wanted a 70% black majority primarily to employ disorderly rabble that would not unite and work cohesively. A large group of intelligent, aggressive, media savy and organized whites became a pain in the ass to the owners. White players had to be kept in check. The '70s and early '80s were a tumultous time for labour relations in the NFL. The changes to the league's racial makeup became status quo and became the culture. Cultural Marxism has become a dominant shaping force in North America, and justifies what the owners have done, and gives the owners a reason to hide behind. But what evidence do we have to show that the owners took it upon themselves to be politcally correct and create some kind of psywar against whites by blackening the league? Are there letters of direction anywhere that came out of the head office or boardrooms? Are there taped or written minutes of meetings that prove the owners planned to deracinate whites by making them feel inferior because they could not play football? While those may be the affects they do not seem to hold up as the original reasons to keep whites out of the NFL.
There's not going to be a paper trail on the Caste System any more than there is going to be a paper trail for your contention that the league decided to become 70% black as a way to control uppity white players.
The "psywar" is part of a general psywar being waged against whites. That was the thrust of my argument -- that the Caste System is acohesive part of a larger picture and that only by understanding the larger picture can one understand the Caste System.
If society's social planners really wanted to influence white culture, why use football? Why not use Hollywood?
You are kidding, right? Hollywood IS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN THE MAIN WEAPON USED TO INFLUENCE CULTURE.
And for that matter, the NFL is part of Hollywood and the general media/government/information complex. Sports, entertainment and even patriotism are all wrapped up together in the way the NFL is presented by the media.
If the goal of the social planning by the cultural marxists is to ruin white culture through sports then why is it that the NFL and NBA are the only black majority professional sports? And recently the NBA has been trying to do an image makeover and is trying to bring whites back into the game. All other professional team sports and almost all other professional individual sports have white majorities. So these cultural marxists -wherever they are- have a lot of "splaning" to do.
Quite simple -- football and basketball are the two sports blacks play far more than any others and are the two they're best at. That should be self-explanatory. The powers that be would love it if the NHL or the PGA Tour or the tennis world was 70% black butthatbe as impossible as expecting the Geico cave man to beat Billie Jean King in that tennis commercial.
I still think when it comes down to it the league's owners are following the 30% rule because for the moment it is a good business plan. Their workforce is majority zombie. They fill their stadiums for 16 weeks a year with the other zombies. The zombie customers buy anything and pay anything with the NFL logo on it. The TV networks pay the owners billions for the rights to broadcast to zombies. Sunday Night Zombie is the most watched sports program on televison. The NFL is the richest sports business on the planet. Valuations go up every year win or lose. The Washington Redskins are valued at over a billion and they love losing. Oh how they just love losing -on the field! For the moment it seems the sky is the limit for all of the NFL franchises even though interest in football is slowly waning. So why should the owners make any changes to a good thing for them? The owners already have the white customer so they do not need to go out to try and sell to them.
Blacks are even more materialistic than whites. As has been documented in other threads, NBA players make the most money of any pro athletes, on and off the court. Sports labor unions are run by sharp lawyers; it doesn't matter what the demographic composition of the union is when it comes to pro leagues. Over the past decade each of the four major sports leagues in the U.S. have reached labor peace by allotting a fixed percentage of their revenue to player salaries, generally around 60 percent or so. Labor negotiations now are mere quibbling over details and perks. The NFL has a business plan that was very successful long before the Caste System went into effect. The NFL could deliberately be all-white and be just as profitable as it is now or more so because its business model isn't predicated on how many whites or blacks it employs.
Edited by: Don Wassall