What We Know: A Response to our Detractor

[Deadlift]

Among our detractors, there are those that dare call us ignorant. They would do best to actually look up the definition of the word. We don't ignore the CS, we don't ignore the discrimination facing White athletes, we don't buy into the cultural marxist White Men Can't Jump hogwash.

Our minds our surely open, but not so open that our brains fall out...



1--- Only so many Whites are allowed to play D-1A football; many Whites are unaware of the CS (and black preferential treatment) and become bench-warmers in the ACC, SEC, etc. They aren't allowed to shine and their college football years are wasted.

2--- Only an idiot would deny that there are black players that are way better than other black players. For instance, there are a few schools that recruit mostly blacks, have national recruiting tentacles, make good evaluations of prospective recruits and field solid COLLEGE Football teams. USC and Florida are two such examples. Very important, they aren't only getting blacks from their limited area.

Even if they have a White QB, the overwhelming blackness means it can't be "my" team, thus I can't and don't root for the collective.

But, many teams say F-U to Whitey and recruit blacks, blacks and more blacks, and are perennial failures. Is it possible that every black isn't an athletic freak? Is it also possible that there are a lot more Whites with skillz that the media doesn't want us to know about?... That the White "freak" isn't as rare as they want us to believe.

3--- Taking into consideration the CS being practiced in most places, this scenario might not come to pass.

There is great White talent in Utah, Iowa, etc. But, with limited scholarships and some guys invariably not panning out, you obviously can't build a White powerhouse with local talent alone. They need to make good evaluations and fill their slots with White studs from all around the nation.

Without that precious pipeline that draws White talent in from every corner of the nation, the odds of building a White Powerhouse is slim. White players need to concentrate on going to 3-4 dozen D-1A schools, and avoid most of the rest.

There are only so many of our DL, Safeties, WR, RB, CB that are allowed to play D-1A ball... Sad but true.


Please everybody, add your 2-cents!

Edited by: Deadlift

 

[jared]

We need to be careful to avoid implying that there is a mass conspiracy by the media/coaches/scouts IMO. This is the usual response by detractors that I encounter: "Oh, so all these coaches and scouts are working together to keep the white man down? Ridiculous." It's important to emphasize to people that it is a commonly held perception, a stereotype that white athletes can't compete. Coaches don't refuse to recruit white players as part of a conspiracy, they assume he's not as good as his black counterpart out of hand because they buy into the black athletic myth.

 

[guest301]

Very good point, Jared. That's usually the arguement I make when discussing the Caste system with friends.

 

[Alpha Male]

Mimicry also plays a part, just as it does in the corporate world. College recruiters/coaches aren't going to give a white player a chance to play taboo positions like RB and CB because if they fail, it will look even worse on their part. But if they tow the line, and recruit players of similar racial make-ups of majority teams, then a coach's failure is more permissible. What's psychologically worse in Cultural Marxist America: They have mostly black team and they lose or they have mostly white team and they lose.

 

[TorontoArgos]

Great observations by all. I think the CS is mostly subconscious. For instance, if a coach sees a white and a black player doing the same thing, he might naturally think that the black player has "tons of upside" while the white has "made the most of his limited potential".

That's why we need a few whites to stand out in the NFL. To show how much potential many whites DO have.