I see we have some users here finally. A technical problem causedCaste Footballto go offlineFriday and it had to be "repropagated," which is a gradual process. Hopefully everyone will be able to access the site again over the next day or so.
Ground Fighter said:Either that, or big brother shut this site down and was issuing bench warrants for all of us. lol.
white tornado said:Im not joking I bet the C.I.A. and mossod have files on all of us, and I bet one day they will shut down this site and never let it come back.
Bart said:white tornado said:Im not joking I bet the C.I.A. and mossod have files on all of us, and I bet one day they will shut down this site and never let it come back.
I wouldn't doubt it in the least. The internet has become my main source of information.
white tornado said:Im not joking I bet the C.I.A. and mossod have files on all of us, and I bet one day they will shut down this site and never let it come back.
Don Wassall said:This site is "controversial" but only because its point of view is unique. It's still a long way from being a so-called "hate" site.
Bart said:The Prof. from Harvard (Ignatiev)? who advocates the extermination of the white race will never be in jeopardy.
Rise said:Maybe we need a contingency plan in place if this ever happens. Where should we all post if this site ever does get shut down? I would presume if this board ever gets shut down so would the ANU board.
voice said:This board won't be shutdown. This is a pure free speech right. We aren't advocating any violence or even discrimination toward any other group, just fair treatment for our group. If anything, the caste system's days are numbered!!
The only threat someone could possibly have is by posting real name and working for a PC company and impacting career/job.
For Christsakes, we only want whites not be discrimanated against. They don't call in the feds for that.
British National Party, August 23, 2006
In the last few weeks the entire nature of the laws that regulate the internet have fundamentally changed. Though the Police have long had the power to prosecute people for their actions on the Internet they have in the past been unwilling to do so. This policy began to change last year when individuals were prosecuted and jailed for posting information on a website that was considered to be part of a campaign of racial harassment.
Since then two individuals have been charged with crimes related specifically to posting illegal information on the internet. Mr. Simon Sheppard has been charged with ten counts of "Incitement to Racial Hatred" and Mr. Luke O'Farrell with two counts even though the website of Mr. Sheppard is hosted in the United States. This means that those individuals who post information on forums, bulletin boards and websites hosted in the US, can now be prosecuted for incitement to racial hatred, incitement to violence and glorification of terrorism in the United Kingdom.
The time limit on the nature of what is considered as 'terror' is not specified, so includes those who glorify the 1916 Easter Uprising , the Bolshevik Revolution, the Nazi era and Islamist violence worldwide.
British Law Against Glorifying Terrorism Has Not Silenced Calls To Kill For Islam
Souad Mekhennet and Dexter Filkins, New York Times, August 21, 2006
Londonâ€â€From his home on the northwest edge of this city, Muhamad al-Massari runs a Web site that celebrates the violent death of British and American soldiers. It is visited by tens of thousands of people every day, he said.
Mr. Massari maintains the Arabic-language site, tajdeed.org.uk, in the face of a strict new law aimed at curtailing violent speech and publishing. Just last week, the Council of Holy Warriors, a group affiliated with Al Qaeda, posted a declaration on the site praising a suicide bombing in Iraq that killed or wounded 55 people.
"If you kill our civilians, we kill your civilians," Mr. Massari declared during an interview.
Mr. Massari's Web site, and his public remarks, appear to violate of the Antiterrorism Act of 2006, which makes it a crime to glorify or encourage political violence. Inciting violence has long been illegal here but the new rules, drawn up after the London subway and bus bombings in July 2005, are intended to be much tougher.
The law's underlying assumption is that speeches and publications by Britain's more extreme Islamists may play a role in leading disgruntled young men toward violence. In addition to banning speech that encourages terrorism, the new law also criminalizes reckless speech that may have the same effect.
Ground Fighter said:I told you I was serious about the whole 'big brother' thing, and now I got everyone thinking about what could really be going on behind closed doors.