darthvader
Guru
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2008
- Messages
- 148
Not that this will even save the white race or even force white people to grow a pair but a reminder that the white race is losing hope. Hell maybe all hope is lost on the white race.
White Racial Extinction
by Joseph Bishop
A people that does not reproduce itself, undergoes extinction. Every
white racialist understands this. Yet most white racialists do not have
children or have only one or two. The replacement level for a couple
today is around 2.4. The actual level amongst whites, on average, is
nearer to 1.0, and dropping. Other population groups are usually well
above replacement levels. They are not more fertile than whites, they
simply make better choices.
Obviously, if this trend continues, whites will certainly disappear and
no amount of 'certain future victory' pronouncements by individual
racialists, no amount of optimism or hope, is going to change that.
Nature does not tolerate a vacuum. As a species disappears, other
species fill that space.
With earlier generations of whites, and indeed for most of white history,
men and women looked forward to marriage and to bringing many children
into the world. Individuals in their mid-twenties and beyond but still
not married were unusual. ‘Old maids' - women who remained single -
were particularly pitied. Couples without children experienced a kind of
shame, and deep personal disappointment.
Only a few generations ago the average white family was just as large
as that of any other population group. A white couple having eight,
ten, twelve, or more children, was not at all unusual. This was
especially so with rural families, whites working the land, when every hand
was needed. However, the migration of white families from farms to urban
areas, is only one cause out of many of the birthrate decline, for even
whites living in cities tended to have far larger families than today.
Those were the social mores, the way of living, of whites of most
earlier generations. In spite of war, disease, famine, etc., whites
generally expanded in numbers and spread across the globe. They had
racially healthy attitudes, and in general lived and behaved in racially
positive ways.
Why are whites today in such a radically different situation? A number
of obvious reasons come to mind. Birth control is now completely
legal, readily available, and socially acceptable. The number of abortions
for the past forty years numbers around sixty millions, a large
proportion of which were perfectly healthy white fetuses, usually aborted
as a matter of convenience. Easier and cheaper contraceptive use by
both women and men has become commonplace. 'Night before' and 'morning
after' pills that prevent or destroy conception are now available.
However, the biggest causative agent is the conscious choice made by so
many white women and men to simply not have children, or to have only
one child, or two at the very most. This is partly an economic choice
as many white couples today find it difficult to make ends meet in a
competitive jobs market, wherein all races and both genders are now in
the labor pool - all non-whites often having special privileges and
protections there, thus unfairly tilting employment to them - and due to
the depression of wages thanks to the growing numbers of Third World
non-white populations entering white nations and being willing to work at
decreasing wage levels.
A deeper dimension to this, however, is simple materialism and egotism.
The desire to accumulate a growing mass of 'toys', a bigger house, a
newer car or group of cars, a larger investment portfolio, more savings,
etc. These are typically given greater priority than the founding of
a white family.
Today most whites choose to marry and to have, or not have, children,
at later ages. They often wish to complete more advanced educations
or specialized training, then to accumulate material things, such as a
large house, several late model cars, gadgets, toys. With whites only
founding a family in their late thirties or forties, an entire generation
is effectively lost to our race.
A strong argument could be made that due to these choices and
'lifestyle' changes, perhaps one hundred million whites could have,
and should have, been born in the past half-century, but were not.
The effects on the white birthrate and white survival are catastrophic.
Demographically, the aforesaid 'vacuum' is already well underway and
being filled by blacks, browns, and others not as afflicted with the
egotism and materialism displayed by whites.
The spread of homosexuality further neutralizes healthy and intelligent
whites who should be founding white family units and having many
children. Each person becoming gay or lesbian is another loss to our
race. In general, they tend to remain single and childless their entire
lives, while at the same time promoting their dysgenic ‘lifestyle' to
others.
There are also less obvious causes to the decline in the white
birthrate.
A major cause here is the growth of Jewish feminism. Most of the
moving forces in this evil, i.e. the guiding lights, the theoreticians, the
leaders, the movers and shakers, have been Jewish or of a Jewish
background of some sort. Also many or most of these individuals have
been oriented ideologically along left and Marxist-Leninist lines, i.e.
another closely related Jewish creation.
Feminism has directed itself primarily against whites and has been one
Jewish method or tool, of many, to displace and genocide whites. Thanks
to sympathetic and helpful Jewish influence in mass media, academe,
and government, feminists are now firmly entrenched in virtually all
institutions and positions of influence throughout white societies. The
insidious, misandrist messages they transmit to white women, include
numerous dysgenic choices to be made -
For example, that white women should not marry at all if possible, but
if they do marry, they should only marry late in life, i.e. after they
have completed their formal and advanced educations in order that they
be 'empowered' and 'independent' of their spouses. Marriage itself is
portrayed as a form of slavery for women.
Another message is that white women should consider not having
children, as becoming a mother indicates entrapment into a 'mommy track'
which disempowers women and retards upward career and educational
mobility.
White males are portrayed as evil and dangerous, who work to dominate,
humiliate, and exploit women, and who are abusive. Thus white women
are told to consider marrying members of other ‘victim classes‘, i.e.
black or brown men, ANY men other than white men.
A trend is encouraged in which marriage is seen as an opt in / opt out
lifestyle choice. Not as a responsibility, but as one 'choice' amongst
others. And if the choice of marriage is made, easily opting out is
another choice. This is especially so within our present culture in
which ‘no fault' divorce is an almost rubber-stamp process in the courts.
It can even be done online through various websites with a few clicks
of the mouse. Gone are the days when divorce was a shameful act, a
last ditch act, when one had to prove major causes to justify to a judge
that divorce was necessary.
An idea has been inculcated today that women deserve total fulfillment,
total happiness, and that if it is not attained within marriage, then
opting out is the sensible, even the necessary, choice. One's right to
freedom and independence is seen to trump any sense of responsibility
to husband or children. That giving them priority in one's life somehow
inhibits creativity and true happiness is obstructed or repressed.
Much of the above is transmitted to white women through books,
magazines, radio, television, films, through all forms of media and
information, and is conveyed in the classroom, especially so in 'feminist
studies' courses - today often mandated for female students in colleges
and universities. These ideas often become a standard way of thinking
and viewing the world by many women graduates.
The effect of this is obvious and simple: the very individuals who are
the most intelligent and gifted and from whom our race needs progeny,
are the very ones who are the least likely to replicate themselves.
Meanwhile those who are the least intelligent, the least gifted, the lower
end of the 'bell curve' of creative intelligence, are those the most
likely to have the largest families. Thus even within our population
group a downward evolution is occurring. Herrnstein and Murray (authors
of ‘The Bell Curve‘) conservatively estimate a generational drop of
intelligence within ALL population groups as about one or one and one half
points due to these dysgenic trends.
Individuals, and individual racialists should consider their own role
and personal responsibility in these matters. One may dislike the
current direction of whites towards extinction but may themselves be
participants in the process. What sort of example is a racialist setting,
if he or she has never had children? How far does this hypocrisy extend?
Being a racialist is not a hobby or a game. It is a very serious
engagement in society and culture and one which involves personal
responsibility, duty, and the need to set an example to others. Not to
be part of the trends driving our race into oblivion, but to be leading our
fellow whites away from such a course back towards a healthy racial future.
I ask that every individual white, and white racialist, seriously
ponder these issues and closely examine their own lives and choices.
The author can be contacted at:
Revisionist21@aol.com
Copyrighted by Joseph Bishop
All rights reserved.
See reader response to this article here.
back to Other Articles
White Racial Extinction
by Joseph Bishop
A people that does not reproduce itself, undergoes extinction. Every
white racialist understands this. Yet most white racialists do not have
children or have only one or two. The replacement level for a couple
today is around 2.4. The actual level amongst whites, on average, is
nearer to 1.0, and dropping. Other population groups are usually well
above replacement levels. They are not more fertile than whites, they
simply make better choices.
Obviously, if this trend continues, whites will certainly disappear and
no amount of 'certain future victory' pronouncements by individual
racialists, no amount of optimism or hope, is going to change that.
Nature does not tolerate a vacuum. As a species disappears, other
species fill that space.
With earlier generations of whites, and indeed for most of white history,
men and women looked forward to marriage and to bringing many children
into the world. Individuals in their mid-twenties and beyond but still
not married were unusual. ‘Old maids' - women who remained single -
were particularly pitied. Couples without children experienced a kind of
shame, and deep personal disappointment.
Only a few generations ago the average white family was just as large
as that of any other population group. A white couple having eight,
ten, twelve, or more children, was not at all unusual. This was
especially so with rural families, whites working the land, when every hand
was needed. However, the migration of white families from farms to urban
areas, is only one cause out of many of the birthrate decline, for even
whites living in cities tended to have far larger families than today.
Those were the social mores, the way of living, of whites of most
earlier generations. In spite of war, disease, famine, etc., whites
generally expanded in numbers and spread across the globe. They had
racially healthy attitudes, and in general lived and behaved in racially
positive ways.
Why are whites today in such a radically different situation? A number
of obvious reasons come to mind. Birth control is now completely
legal, readily available, and socially acceptable. The number of abortions
for the past forty years numbers around sixty millions, a large
proportion of which were perfectly healthy white fetuses, usually aborted
as a matter of convenience. Easier and cheaper contraceptive use by
both women and men has become commonplace. 'Night before' and 'morning
after' pills that prevent or destroy conception are now available.
However, the biggest causative agent is the conscious choice made by so
many white women and men to simply not have children, or to have only
one child, or two at the very most. This is partly an economic choice
as many white couples today find it difficult to make ends meet in a
competitive jobs market, wherein all races and both genders are now in
the labor pool - all non-whites often having special privileges and
protections there, thus unfairly tilting employment to them - and due to
the depression of wages thanks to the growing numbers of Third World
non-white populations entering white nations and being willing to work at
decreasing wage levels.
A deeper dimension to this, however, is simple materialism and egotism.
The desire to accumulate a growing mass of 'toys', a bigger house, a
newer car or group of cars, a larger investment portfolio, more savings,
etc. These are typically given greater priority than the founding of
a white family.
Today most whites choose to marry and to have, or not have, children,
at later ages. They often wish to complete more advanced educations
or specialized training, then to accumulate material things, such as a
large house, several late model cars, gadgets, toys. With whites only
founding a family in their late thirties or forties, an entire generation
is effectively lost to our race.
A strong argument could be made that due to these choices and
'lifestyle' changes, perhaps one hundred million whites could have,
and should have, been born in the past half-century, but were not.
The effects on the white birthrate and white survival are catastrophic.
Demographically, the aforesaid 'vacuum' is already well underway and
being filled by blacks, browns, and others not as afflicted with the
egotism and materialism displayed by whites.
The spread of homosexuality further neutralizes healthy and intelligent
whites who should be founding white family units and having many
children. Each person becoming gay or lesbian is another loss to our
race. In general, they tend to remain single and childless their entire
lives, while at the same time promoting their dysgenic ‘lifestyle' to
others.
There are also less obvious causes to the decline in the white
birthrate.
A major cause here is the growth of Jewish feminism. Most of the
moving forces in this evil, i.e. the guiding lights, the theoreticians, the
leaders, the movers and shakers, have been Jewish or of a Jewish
background of some sort. Also many or most of these individuals have
been oriented ideologically along left and Marxist-Leninist lines, i.e.
another closely related Jewish creation.
Feminism has directed itself primarily against whites and has been one
Jewish method or tool, of many, to displace and genocide whites. Thanks
to sympathetic and helpful Jewish influence in mass media, academe,
and government, feminists are now firmly entrenched in virtually all
institutions and positions of influence throughout white societies. The
insidious, misandrist messages they transmit to white women, include
numerous dysgenic choices to be made -
For example, that white women should not marry at all if possible, but
if they do marry, they should only marry late in life, i.e. after they
have completed their formal and advanced educations in order that they
be 'empowered' and 'independent' of their spouses. Marriage itself is
portrayed as a form of slavery for women.
Another message is that white women should consider not having
children, as becoming a mother indicates entrapment into a 'mommy track'
which disempowers women and retards upward career and educational
mobility.
White males are portrayed as evil and dangerous, who work to dominate,
humiliate, and exploit women, and who are abusive. Thus white women
are told to consider marrying members of other ‘victim classes‘, i.e.
black or brown men, ANY men other than white men.
A trend is encouraged in which marriage is seen as an opt in / opt out
lifestyle choice. Not as a responsibility, but as one 'choice' amongst
others. And if the choice of marriage is made, easily opting out is
another choice. This is especially so within our present culture in
which ‘no fault' divorce is an almost rubber-stamp process in the courts.
It can even be done online through various websites with a few clicks
of the mouse. Gone are the days when divorce was a shameful act, a
last ditch act, when one had to prove major causes to justify to a judge
that divorce was necessary.
An idea has been inculcated today that women deserve total fulfillment,
total happiness, and that if it is not attained within marriage, then
opting out is the sensible, even the necessary, choice. One's right to
freedom and independence is seen to trump any sense of responsibility
to husband or children. That giving them priority in one's life somehow
inhibits creativity and true happiness is obstructed or repressed.
Much of the above is transmitted to white women through books,
magazines, radio, television, films, through all forms of media and
information, and is conveyed in the classroom, especially so in 'feminist
studies' courses - today often mandated for female students in colleges
and universities. These ideas often become a standard way of thinking
and viewing the world by many women graduates.
The effect of this is obvious and simple: the very individuals who are
the most intelligent and gifted and from whom our race needs progeny,
are the very ones who are the least likely to replicate themselves.
Meanwhile those who are the least intelligent, the least gifted, the lower
end of the 'bell curve' of creative intelligence, are those the most
likely to have the largest families. Thus even within our population
group a downward evolution is occurring. Herrnstein and Murray (authors
of ‘The Bell Curve‘) conservatively estimate a generational drop of
intelligence within ALL population groups as about one or one and one half
points due to these dysgenic trends.
Individuals, and individual racialists should consider their own role
and personal responsibility in these matters. One may dislike the
current direction of whites towards extinction but may themselves be
participants in the process. What sort of example is a racialist setting,
if he or she has never had children? How far does this hypocrisy extend?
Being a racialist is not a hobby or a game. It is a very serious
engagement in society and culture and one which involves personal
responsibility, duty, and the need to set an example to others. Not to
be part of the trends driving our race into oblivion, but to be leading our
fellow whites away from such a course back towards a healthy racial future.
I ask that every individual white, and white racialist, seriously
ponder these issues and closely examine their own lives and choices.
The author can be contacted at:
Revisionist21@aol.com
Copyrighted by Joseph Bishop
All rights reserved.
See reader response to this article here.
back to Other Articles
